Your View of Homosexuality?

[Rocopurr]

1. Nobody is immune to judging. Nobody's opinion is immune to judging.
2. Hitler's actions were illegal, hence they were legally and not just morally wrong in our society.

Not to mention harmful to society, as mass murder tends to have a negative impact on... Well, almost everything.

Still a better post than most of yours.

Is this were Kelso comes in and screams "BURRRRN!"?

He already did; you just missed him.

[Agymnum]

Hate the sin, not the sinner.

I hate Homosexuality, not the Homosexuals.

I hate black rights, not black people.

[Umbra Ac Silentium]

My view?
It's fun.
Unf unf unf

Said every person ever that did not want to say that they were gay but wanted to make it painfully obvious.

Good sir I say
Nay
All the merry day
I'll shout how I am gay.

Said every person ever that did not want to say that they were gay but wanted to make it painfully obvious.

The only good direction is up the butt.

Unf unf unf. :3

:3 see you've got the right idea

[The U S S R]

Actually, for this year's Academic Decathlon state speech, I did an in depth study of genetics and how it affects each individual; however, I am too lazy to post it tonight (have not slept in a while), so I will post my speech tomorrow. Sound good?

I'm not really interested in your speech I'd like to see your data, if you've conclusively discovered the "gay gene" I'm sure you've been published in at least one journal I have access to so you can just tell me the name of the study.

Conclusively, there is no "gay gene."

This article, however, is a good read.
http://www.popsci.com/category/tags/-gay-gene

[Wisconsin9]

Your reasoning is subjective/nonsecular and objectively wrong/subjective/irrelevant.

Subjective...possibly. Non-secular? Definitely.

The rest are your opinions, and you are entitled to them in the same way I am to mine.

No, I mean it is objectively wrong that homosexuality is a genetic defect, it is objectively wrong that homosexuality is unnatural, and it is and pointless that they can't reproduce without assistance.

[Occupied Deutschland]

I hate black rights, not black people.

Well, it's not so much the RIGHTS. I just wish they didn't have to be around me practicing them. I mean, if they just had their own separate places, I'd be perfectly happy with them having all their rights and everything!

[Soldati Senza Confini]

I hate black rights, not black people.

I hate asexuality, not asexuals.

(NOTE: JK!!! I accept you the way you are, joke aside )

[Cosara]

I hate black rights, not black people.

Black Rights are not a sin

*Stamps with the invalid stamp*

[Agymnum]

Subjective...possibly. Non-secular? Definitely.

The rest are your opinions, and you are entitled to them in the same way I am to mine.

No, I mean it is objectively wrong that homosexuality is a genetic defect, it is objectively wrong that homosexuality is unnatural, and it is both objectively wrong and pointless that they can't reproduce without assistance.

If it was a genetic defect, it wouldn't be so common. Genetic defects which spread enough to become fairly permanent in a population are called traits.

Also, homosexuality is perfectly natural. Plenty of animals participate in it. Saying it's unnatural is objectively wrong.

[Wisconsin9]

No, I mean it is objectively wrong that homosexuality is a genetic defect, it is objectively wrong that homosexuality is unnatural, and it is both objectively wrong and pointless that they can't reproduce without assistance.

If it was a genetic defect, it wouldn't be so common. Genetic defects which spread enough to become fairly permanent in a population are called traits.

Also, homosexuality is perfectly natural. Plenty of animals participate in it. Saying it's unnatural is objectively wrong.

I know, that's what I was saying.

[Agymnum]

I hate black rights, not black people.

Black Rights are not a sin

*Stamps with the invalid stamp*

Sins are subjective. They are irrelevant to a free and secular society.

*Stamps with the ignorance stamp*

[The U S S R]

I hate black rights, not black people.

Black Rights are not a sin

*Stamps with the invalid stamp*

Nor is being gay.


From what I have read, gay sex is a sin, not BEING gay.

*stamps with INVALID stamp*

[Cosara]

No, I mean it is objectively wrong that homosexuality is a genetic defect, it is objectively wrong that homosexuality is unnatural, and it is both objectively wrong and pointless that they can't reproduce without assistance.

If it was a genetic defect, it wouldn't be so common. Genetic defects which spread enough to become fairly permanent in a population are called traits.

Also, homosexuality is perfectly natural. Plenty of animals participate in it. Saying it's unnatural is objectively wrong.

Homosexuality is common? Isn't it like...what? Five percent of the population?

[Soldati Senza Confini]

Black Rights are not a sin

*Stamps with the invalid stamp*

Sins are subjective. They are irrelevant to a free and secular society.

*Stamps with the ignorance stamp*

Why must everything "free" must also be "secular"?

Then again, it's little surprise given what some of my fellow Christians have said why you must think that.

[Condunum]

Not to mention harmful to society, as mass murder tends to have a negative impact on... Well, almost everything.


Is this were Kelso comes in and screams "BURRRRN!"?

He already did; you just missed him.

That fucker owes me money. Brb, kicking hippy ass.

[CIS Shadowfeed]

Hate the sin, not the sinner.

I hate Homosexuality, not the Homosexuals.

http://lavistachurchofchrist.org/LVSerm ... TheSin.htm
It is difficult to separate sin from the sinner, instead of being hung up on hating, try loving the person.

[Des-Bal]

Why must everything "free" must also be "secular"?

Because the only way to strike balance between all religions is to favor none of them.

[The U S S R]

If it was a genetic defect, it wouldn't be so common. Genetic defects which spread enough to become fairly permanent in a population are called traits.

Also, homosexuality is perfectly natural. Plenty of animals participate in it. Saying it's unnatural is objectively wrong.

Homosexuality is common? Isn't it like...what? Five percent of the population?

Ten. Do you know how many people that is?

You do the math.

[Agymnum]

Sins are subjective. They are irrelevant to a free and secular society.

*Stamps with the ignorance stamp*

Why must everything "free" must also be "secular"?

Religion is inherently oppressive when applied to the masses. Religion may exist in a secular and free society, but it is marginalized to houses of worship and not involved in public policymaking so as not to infringe upon the freedoms of and from religion.

[Valcouria]

No, I mean it is objectively wrong that homosexuality is a genetic defect, it is objectively wrong that homosexuality is unnatural, and it is both objectively wrong and pointless that they can't reproduce without assistance.

If it was a genetic defect, it wouldn't be so common. Genetic defects which spread enough to become fairly permanent in a population are called traits.

Also, homosexuality is perfectly natural. Plenty of animals participate in it. Saying it's unnatural is objectively wrong.

The only point that comes from the fact that some animals do it is that it is a defect that is present not only in the human mind. And of course it's unnatural; as I said, without science, they could not reproduce naturally with each other ( I should point out that I do not support the methods of artificial [or, as I like to call it, unnatural] insemination).

[Umbra Ac Silentium]

If it was a genetic defect, it wouldn't be so common. Genetic defects which spread enough to become fairly permanent in a population are called traits.

Also, homosexuality is perfectly natural. Plenty of animals participate in it. Saying it's unnatural is objectively wrong.

Homosexuality is common?
Homosexuality is common? Isn't it like...what? Five percent of the population?

Even if only one percent of the global population is queer, that's about 70 million people.

[The U S S R]

Why must everything "free" must also be "secular"?

Because the only way to strike balance between all religions is to favor none of them.

Exactly.

[Wisconsin9]

If it was a genetic defect, it wouldn't be so common. Genetic defects which spread enough to become fairly permanent in a population are called traits.

Also, homosexuality is perfectly natural. Plenty of animals participate in it. Saying it's unnatural is objectively wrong.

Homosexuality is common? Isn't it like...what? Five percent of the population?

10%, I believe. As opposed to, oh, let's say Down syndrome, at one in about 700.

[Agymnum]

If it was a genetic defect, it wouldn't be so common. Genetic defects which spread enough to become fairly permanent in a population are called traits.

Also, homosexuality is perfectly natural. Plenty of animals participate in it. Saying it's unnatural is objectively wrong.

The only point that comes from the fact that some animals do it is that it is a defect that is present not only in the human mind. And of course it's unnatural; as I said, without science, they could not reproduce naturally with each other ( I should point out that I do not support the methods of artificial [or, as I like to call it, unnatural] insemination).

If homosexuals cannot reproduce, how can they keep occurring in nature?

Heterosexual organisms produce homosexual children. Homosexuality is a trait, not a defect.

[Rocopurr]

He already did; you just missed him.

That fucker owes me money. Brb, kicking hippy ass.

Have fun.

And defend our fabulous world from the homophobes while you're at it!