Benuty wrote:
Where have you been for... the past 5 years?
Places. Many of them were the internet.
Advertisement
by Ethel mermania » Thu Apr 25, 2013 5:31 am
Daemyrs wrote:I saw a "there is nothing in the bible against homosexuality" comment.
If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination." (Leviticus 20:13).
"You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination. Nor shall you mate with any animal, to defile yourself with it. Nor shall any woman stand before an animal to mate with it. It is perversion. ‘Do not defile yourselves with any of these things; for by all these the nations are defiled, which I am casting out before you." (Leviticus 18:22-24).
"For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due." (Romans 1:26-27).
Are Leviticus and Romans not counted as parts of the Bible?
by Des-Bal » Thu Apr 25, 2013 5:32 am
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
Yuo so oarsum bra! Here...have a PBR!
by Ethel mermania » Thu Apr 25, 2013 5:43 am
Des-Bal wrote:Private schools should have the right to hire and fire based on whatever criteria they choose.
by Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Thu Apr 25, 2013 5:44 am
Des-Bal wrote:Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
Yuo so oarsum bra! Here...have a PBR!
Yeah I'm such a good old boy with my southern ways, vaguely concealed racism, and black skin. Yeah that third part there was the important one. I support freedom, I know people often say that when they want to cover racist, homophobic, or generally discriminatory positions but that is not what's happening here. If you have a problem with the schools hiring and firing policies boycott the school, protest, send letters to their donation offering type people. I don't remember what they're called and when I google "what do you call someone who donates" I just get philanthropist.
Do not have the government step in and force their hand.
by Des-Bal » Thu Apr 25, 2013 5:45 am
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
Yeah...that's pretty naive. What if your philanthropist is a racist shithead?
Anyway I can see the entire civil rights movement just passed you by.
by Benuty » Thu Apr 25, 2013 5:46 am
by Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Thu Apr 25, 2013 5:48 am
Des-Bal wrote:Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
Yeah...that's pretty naive. What if your philanthropist is a racist shithead?
Anyway I can see the entire civil rights movement just passed you by.
Then you can reasonably expect them to do racist, shitheaded things?
It didn't pass me by I saw it, informed it that while I agreed with it's spirit I disagreed with it's practices, and bid it a fond farewell.
by Des-Bal » Thu Apr 25, 2013 5:50 am
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:Ok...so you are happy with a system that would engender violence towards others just because they are different. Make no mistake...because ultimately that is what racism is.
by Ethel mermania » Thu Apr 25, 2013 5:50 am
by Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Thu Apr 25, 2013 5:51 am
Des-Bal wrote:Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:Ok...so you are happy with a system that would engender violence towards others just because they are different. Make no mistake...because ultimately that is what racism is.
No I would object to it, I would do everything in my power as a private citizen to bring that system down. I would not, under any circumstances seek out the government.
by Ethel mermania » Thu Apr 25, 2013 6:01 am
by Immoren » Thu Apr 25, 2013 6:17 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Gauthier » Thu Apr 25, 2013 6:23 am
Cosara wrote:Camicon wrote:It isn't cheap, nor is it pathetic.
Look at it this way. The RCC spends years shielding pedophile priests, and by proxy preventing their victims from receiving either help or justice. Then, they turn around and fire a teacher who has worked for them, teaching children, for the last nineteen years. Not because she was a lesbian, and not because she hid that she was a lesbian (because she did not), but because that information became slightly more public than the RCD Columbus was comfortable with.
Church actively represses information about pedo-priests, still protects them when it becomes public.
Same church flips shit and fires a hard-working teacher, when what should be an inconsequential and irrelevant piece of information reaches the ears of a single parent.
How many times do I have to say this. It was Pope Benedict (maybe under preceding popes, but it was notorious under Benedict) who protected them and moved them around. Pope Francis is trying to get the Pedophile child molesters arrested or stripped of their title.
by Etartsacia » Thu Apr 25, 2013 6:26 am
by Gauthier » Thu Apr 25, 2013 6:27 am
Daemyrs wrote:I saw a "there is nothing in the bible against homosexuality" comment.
If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination." (Leviticus 20:13).
"You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination. Nor shall you mate with any animal, to defile yourself with it. Nor shall any woman stand before an animal to mate with it. It is perversion. ‘Do not defile yourselves with any of these things; for by all these the nations are defiled, which I am casting out before you." (Leviticus 18:22-24).
"For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due." (Romans 1:26-27).
Are Leviticus and Romans not counted as parts of the Bible?
by Des-Bal » Thu Apr 25, 2013 6:29 am
Etartsacia wrote:This is what happens when you give power to a patriarchical religion such as Catholicism. Something must be done about this.
by Etartsacia » Thu Apr 25, 2013 6:30 am
Des-Bal wrote:Etartsacia wrote:This is what happens when you give power to a patriarchical religion such as Catholicism. Something must be done about this.
Before anyone responds 100% of Etartsacia's short post history is posts about feminism/the patriarchy and potentially offensive. I am levying no accusations.
by Benuty » Thu Apr 25, 2013 6:33 am
by Immoren » Thu Apr 25, 2013 6:36 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
Users browsing this forum: Jasumaa, Northern Socialist Council Republics
