Advertisement

by Blouman Empire » Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:14 pm
Californian Mod Haters wrote:What do you have against Obama?

by Grave_n_idle » Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:15 pm
Mimic wrote:
Of course not. The criminal impinged on the freedom of others by committing a crime, so the justice is administered to him -- as a warning to others of what they will suffer if they try to deny others their freedom.
After all, that's all crime is, in the end -- people trying to take away the freedom and rights of other people. That's why all gun control laws, for instance, are inherently criminal.

by Fubared States » Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:16 pm
Blouman Empire wrote:Californian Mod Haters wrote:What do you have against Obama?
He borrowed $100 off me and has never paid it back that's why I hate him personally.
Now as to why people hate Obama's policies which will lead many to say I hate Obama (doesn't mean it is personal) that is a different kettle of fish

by Mimic » Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:18 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:Mimic wrote:
Of course not. The criminal impinged on the freedom of others by committing a crime, so the justice is administered to him -- as a warning to others of what they will suffer if they try to deny others their freedom.
After all, that's all crime is, in the end -- people trying to take away the freedom and rights of other people. That's why all gun control laws, for instance, are inherently criminal.
You said that freedom and justice are synonymous. You said one can't exist without the other.
So - imprisoning someone (and thus, limiting their freedom) is inherently unjust.
Or you were just peddling hollow rhetoric that sounds convincing until you actually examine it. That's the other option.

by Fubared States » Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:19 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:Mimic wrote:
Of course not. The criminal impinged on the freedom of others by committing a crime, so the justice is administered to him -- as a warning to others of what they will suffer if they try to deny others their freedom.
After all, that's all crime is, in the end -- people trying to take away the freedom and rights of other people. That's why all gun control laws, for instance, are inherently criminal.
You said that freedom and justice are synonymous. You said one can't exist without the other.
So - imprisoning someone (and thus, limiting their freedom) is inherently unjust.
Or you were just peddling hollow rhetoric that sounds convincing until you actually examine it. That's the other option.

by Daemonicai » Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:22 pm

by Grave_n_idle » Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:30 pm
Mimic wrote:Not really. Since they limited the freedom of others, it's entirely just to limit theirs.

by Blouman Empire » Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Fubared States wrote:Blouman Empire wrote:Californian Mod Haters wrote:What do you have against Obama?
He borrowed $100 off me and has never paid it back that's why I hate him personally.
Now as to why people hate Obama's policies which will lead many to say I hate Obama (doesn't mean it is personal) that is a different kettle of fish
You're not assuming that I ate the fish raw are you?

by Great Arya » Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:36 pm

by The Southron Nation » Sun Nov 08, 2009 7:51 pm
Israslovakahzerbajan wrote:To put it simply in the Confederate States I'd be a second class citizen...enough reason for me to spy on them if it was still around.

by Bavin » Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:10 pm
Mimic wrote:
Of course not. The criminal impinged on the freedom of others by committing a crime, so the justice is administered to him -- as a warning to others of what they will suffer if they try to deny others their freedom.
After all, that's all crime is, in the end -- people trying to take away the freedom and rights of other people. That's why all gun control laws, for instance, are inherently criminal.

by Dyakovo » Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:14 pm
The Southron Nation wrote:if anyone should feel entitled to some pathetic sense of racial equality, its mulattos like myself. you know, the folks who really are blacker than the president.

by The awesomeness 1 » Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:17 pm

by The Southron Nation » Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:17 pm
Dyakovo wrote:The Southron Nation wrote:if anyone should feel entitled to some pathetic sense of racial equality, its mulattos like myself. you know, the folks who really are blacker than the president.
If you have a black father and a white mother, how exactly are you "blacker" than Obama, who also has a black father and a white mother?

by The Southron Nation » Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:18 pm
Great Arya wrote:I don't have anything against Obama personally, because I see the destruction of America as a great opportunity to build something better from its ruins.

by Bavin » Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:19 pm
The Southron Nation wrote:Dyakovo wrote:The Southron Nation wrote:if anyone should feel entitled to some pathetic sense of racial equality, its mulattos like myself. you know, the folks who really are blacker than the president.
If you have a black father and a white mother, how exactly are you "blacker" than Obama, who also has a black father and a white mother?
his father was kenyan. mine was american. makes me blacker.

by RightLeaningChristians » Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:20 pm

by The awesomeness 1 » Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:20 pm
The awesomeness 1 wrote:the white house is supposed to be white, no offense to other people

by Bavin » Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:21 pm
RightLeaningChristians wrote:Mulattos are worse than Black Folks. Your what happens when people step over boundries.

by CIB EMPIRE » Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:24 pm


by The Southron Nation » Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:25 pm
Bavin wrote:The Southron Nation wrote:Dyakovo wrote:The Southron Nation wrote:if anyone should feel entitled to some pathetic sense of racial equality, its mulattos like myself. you know, the folks who really are blacker than the president.
If you have a black father and a white mother, how exactly are you "blacker" than Obama, who also has a black father and a white mother?
his father was kenyan. mine was american. makes me blacker.
Wouldn't being from Africa make him blacker!?

by The Southron Nation » Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:25 pm

by New Kereptica » Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:29 pm
Blouman Empire wrote:Natural is not nature.
KiloMikeAlpha wrote:Umm hmm.... mind if I siggy that as a reminder to those who think that it is cool to shove their bat-shit crazy atheist beliefs on those of us who actually have a clue?
Teccor wrote:You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.
Bluth Corporation wrote:No. A free market literally has zero bubbles.
JJ Place wrote:I have a few more pressing matters to attend to right now; I'll be back later this evening to continue my one-man against the world struggle.
Mercator Terra wrote: Mental illness is a myth.

by Dyakovo » Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:30 pm
The Southron Nation wrote:Dyakovo wrote:The Southron Nation wrote:if anyone should feel entitled to some pathetic sense of racial equality, its mulattos like myself. you know, the folks who really are blacker than the president.
If you have a black father and a white mother, how exactly are you "blacker" than Obama, who also has a black father and a white mother?
his father was kenyan. mine was american. makes me blacker.
That might come as a surprise to them...Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, Hartzut, Ifreann, Isomedia, Kashimura, Neo-American States, New Ciencia, Port Caverton, PouchiLand, Stellar Colonies, The Huskar Social Union, The Rio Grande River Basin, Uiiop, Umbratellus, Vassenor
Advertisement