Advertisement

by Mkuki » Mon Apr 22, 2013 3:42 pm
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.

by Mike the Progressive » Mon Apr 22, 2013 3:43 pm
Mkuki wrote:Has austerity ever worked?

by Eoghania » Mon Apr 22, 2013 3:44 pm
Forsakia wrote:Eoghania wrote:"From fiscal year 1900 to fiscal year 2011" - doesn't state inclusive or exclusive. Reading your source, as noted in the corner of the graph, the values for 2010 onwards are all, explicitly, predicted. Presumably on the grounds that the government would follow current best economic theory. They haven't.
The continuance of the graph past the notch 2010 would seem suggestive to me. Admittedly I clicked through to the briefing when I should've posted the other charts (that were total spending rather than by GDP).
Equally they aren't adjusted for inflation (which I'll dig up if I have the time, and would love for someone else to post). With inflation running at the ~3% range you'd end up with a graph flattened out or a small downward move. But not massive cuts by any means.


by Forsakia » Mon Apr 22, 2013 3:47 pm
Eoghania wrote:Forsakia wrote:
The continuance of the graph past the notch 2010 would seem suggestive to me. Admittedly I clicked through to the briefing when I should've posted the other charts (that were total spending rather than by GDP).
Equally they aren't adjusted for inflation (which I'll dig up if I have the time, and would love for someone else to post). With inflation running at the ~3% range you'd end up with a graph flattened out or a small downward move. But not massive cuts by any means.
It's right there on the site, under your charts. "Central spending after 2010 is planned. Local spending after 2010 is “guesstimated.”"

by Marcurix » Mon Apr 22, 2013 3:53 pm

by Eoghania » Mon Apr 22, 2013 3:58 pm
Forsakia wrote:Eoghania wrote:
It's right there on the site, under your charts. "Central spending after 2010 is planned. Local spending after 2010 is “guesstimated.”"
Fair enough, I should've gone with the other charts, less haste more speed and all that.
Still be delighted if someone dug up a chart showing significant austerity.

by The Whispers » Mon Apr 22, 2013 4:11 pm
Mkuki wrote:Has austerity ever worked?

by The Serbian Empire » Mon Apr 22, 2013 4:14 pm
Mike the Progressive wrote:Of course, austerity isn't working. It would be one thing if you were just cutting spending, but increasing taxes too? Talk about what not to do...

by Mike the Progressive » Mon Apr 22, 2013 4:22 pm
The Serbian Empire wrote:Mike the Progressive wrote:Of course, austerity isn't working. It would be one thing if you were just cutting spending, but increasing taxes too? Talk about what not to do...
Merely one or the other would make it weak. Combine the two and there is no question the economy at best is stagnant and at worst is in decline. If one cuts spending, taxes should either stay the same or decrease to increase economic growth.

by Mkuki » Mon Apr 22, 2013 4:26 pm
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.

by Nadkor » Mon Apr 22, 2013 4:27 pm

by The UK in Exile » Mon Apr 22, 2013 4:29 pm
Priory Academy USSR wrote:If you've been following British news recently, or, well, any time over the past few years, you'd have noticed that the British economy is in fairly deep trouble right now. Ever since the recession, it's been struggling to recover and even now it's still floundering around, still struggling to avoid further recession even today.
Many people are attributing this to the harsh austerity measures put in place by the Coalition.
This in itself isn't really news; austerity has been failing since day one. What I want to ask is, why are the Conservatives still pushing through with it?
Nearly 3 years on, and there still seems to be no sign of recovery. The deficit reduction plan isn't working, and neither, it seems, are any other government economic policies. They have me stumped.
NSG? Why is the government going ahead with its failing plan?

by Forsakia » Tue Apr 23, 2013 6:50 am
Mike the Progressive wrote:The Serbian Empire wrote:Merely one or the other would make it weak. Combine the two and there is no question the economy at best is stagnant and at worst is in decline. If one cuts spending, taxes should either stay the same or decrease to increase economic growth.
Absolutely. I think too many people look at spending as the solution/problem to a depression/recession. While that is important, without private consumption means little and cannot be sustained. It's little wonder that when you cut public spending and increase taxes, you damn your economy twice.

by St George » Tue Apr 23, 2013 6:57 am
Forsakia wrote:Alongside that even the Labour party acknowledged the need for cuts.
Bombadil wrote:To be quite honest, on any subject, around 25% of any population are batshit insane.

by Forsakia » Tue Apr 23, 2013 7:01 am
St George wrote:Forsakia wrote:Alongside that even the Labour party acknowledged the need for cuts.
This line is trotted out by the Tories so much it's ridiculous.
There is literally no-one saying we shouldn't cut. No one. Targeted, well thought out cuts, which are fair to all, is what people want and what the economy needs. Instead we're getting massive cuts that disproportionately effect the poorest in society, alongside a despicable campaign of vilifying anyone on any kind of benefit.

by St George » Tue Apr 23, 2013 7:01 am
Forsakia wrote:What is this harsh austerity?
Bombadil wrote:To be quite honest, on any subject, around 25% of any population are batshit insane.

by Baiynistan » Tue Apr 23, 2013 7:06 am

by Olivaero » Tue Apr 23, 2013 7:09 am

by The Archregimancy » Tue Apr 23, 2013 7:12 am
Farnhamia wrote:Because they don't want to become Greece. It is a well know fact of economics - one might almost say a Law - that when your debt exceeds 90% of your GDP everyone begins speaking Greek and eating spanakopita and drinking retsina and shouting "Hopa!" Really, you can look this up. How silly would people from Manchester and Birmingham and Burton-on-Trent look shouting "Hopa!"?

by Czechanada » Tue Apr 23, 2013 7:22 am
The Archregimancy wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Because they don't want to become Greece. It is a well know fact of economics - one might almost say a Law - that when your debt exceeds 90% of your GDP everyone begins speaking Greek and eating spanakopita and drinking retsina and shouting "Hopa!" Really, you can look this up. How silly would people from Manchester and Birmingham and Burton-on-Trent look shouting "Hopa!"?
Quite right.
Keep up this nonsense, and some British passport holders might even become Orthodox.
*Hastily writes down in religious conspiracy notebook: "Orthodox Conspiracy now relies on economic subversion."* 
by Ostroeuropa » Tue Apr 23, 2013 8:19 am

by Czechanada » Tue Apr 23, 2013 8:22 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:The country is run by a class of etonian dipshits and other colleges that decided to emulate their culture who have never run a country properly but think they are entitled to do so.
Fuck them all.
Just look at how prestigious our method of teaching people to run countries is, why, theres barely a country in the world we havn't run into the fucking ground!
If a candidate is from eton, it's an IMMEDIATE disqualification in my book.
Teaching people the same wrong ideas for centuries but making them look awfully posh doing it.
Couldn't run an empire, can't run a country, won't stop running for election.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cyber Duotona, Dimetrodon Empire, Dumb Ideologies, Elejamie, Floofybit, Grinning Dragon, Hiram Land, Hrofguard, Ifreann, Kernen, Majestic-12 [Bot], Old Tyrannia, The Astral Mandate, The Selkie, Wawa Cat Republic
Advertisement