NATION

PASSWORD

Former Racists

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Yankee Empire
Senator
 
Posts: 4186
Founded: Aug 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yankee Empire » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:43 am

Person012345 wrote:
Agritum wrote:So everyone who dislikes the symbol of an oppressive and xenophobic regime and of its relative ideology who fucked over plenty of countries is a Liberal.

Classy, very classy.

By implication there are also 0 liberals in countries where the swastika is an accepted and even important religious symbol.

Oh don't be an airhead, you know im talking about Europe.
Economic Left/Right: -6.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.05


Pro: U.S.,Diplomatic Militarism, Imperialism, Patriotism/Civic Nationalism, Cosmopolitanism, Stoicism, Authoritarianism, Classical Liberalism, Unionism, Centralization (usually), Federalism, Corporatism.
Anti:Tribalism, Seccessionism(usually),Decentralization,Pure Capitalism/State controlled economics, Misanthropy,Cruelty, Cowardice, Pacifism,Hedonism, Corporitocracy.
Vice-Chairman of the National-Imperialist-FreedomParty
"My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right."-Carl Schurz

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:43 am

The fucking swastika isn't banned in europe, god. It's banned in like, germany and 3 eastern european countries (Poland, Lithuania and Hungary). How does that make it "banned in europe". Germany isn't the entirity of Europe.

User avatar
Agritum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22161
Founded: May 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Agritum » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:45 am

Person012345 wrote:The fucking swastika isn't banned in europe, god. It's banned in like, germany and 3 eastern european countries (Poland, Lithuania and Hungary). How does that make it "banned in europe". Germany isn't the entirity of Europe.

Surprisingly, it isn't banned in Italy or France, too.

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:48 am

Agritum wrote:The Allies. Who were also composed by heavily rightist Britain and France. Your point?

Don't be silly, we all know that europe is full of pansy hippy socialist liberal nazis who want to take everyone's guns and free speech.

User avatar
Agritum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22161
Founded: May 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Agritum » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:51 am

Yankee Empire wrote:
Agritum wrote:The Allies. Who were also composed by heavily rightist Britain and France. Your point?


You are aware much of the "Rightists" were either Collaborators or Sympathisers who never called for the Swastika to be banned.

It's the Left that were so scared shitless by it that they banned it, thats why i said "Liberals" as in the Left or "Liberal Democracies" etc.

This is accurate. I don't know what your trying to prove.

Sure, De Gaulle and Churchill surely felt sorry for the Nazis.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:52 am

Agritum wrote:Sure, De Gaulle and Churchill surely felt sorry for the Nazis.


Especially De Gaulle, the damned leftist. *nods*
Last edited by Samuraikoku on Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:53 am

Agritum wrote:
Yankee Empire wrote:
You are aware much of the "Rightists" were either Collaborators or Sympathisers who never called for the Swastika to be banned.

It's the Left that were so scared shitless by it that they banned it, thats why i said "Liberals" as in the Left or "Liberal Democracies" etc.

This is accurate. I don't know what your trying to prove.

Sure, De Gaulle and Churchill surely felt sorry for the Nazis.

And he called me an airhead. :palm:

User avatar
Jetan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13216
Founded: Mar 07, 2011
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Jetan » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:57 am

Agritum wrote:
Jetan wrote:All Swastikas aren't related to the Nazis.

Did I say something to the contrary of it, in my precedent posts?

You turned a comment about all of the swastikas into one only about the Nazi swastika.
Second Finn, after Imm
........Геть Росію.........
Україна вільна і єдина
From the moment I understood the weakness of my flesh, it disgusted me.
Beholder's Lair - a hobby blog
31 years old, patriotic Finnish guy interested in history. Hobbies include miniatures, all kinds of games, books, anime and manga.
Always open to TGs. Pro/Against

Ceterum autem censeo Putinem esse delendum

User avatar
Agritum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22161
Founded: May 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Agritum » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:59 am

Jetan wrote:
Agritum wrote:Did I say something to the contrary of it, in my precedent posts?

You turned a comment about all of the swastikas into one only about the Nazi swastika.

Nope. I replied to a comment that said that "Liberals" were somehow guilty of ruining the swastika's reputation.
Last edited by Agritum on Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:59 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Tue Apr 23, 2013 5:00 am

It might also be worth noting that the failure of the proposed Europe-wide ban (proposed... maybe a few times, by germany and opposed strongly by the british who I believe were being led by labour at the time) was partially caused by, drum roll please... That ebil liberal plot of religious tolerance.

User avatar
Tel
Diplomat
 
Posts: 818
Founded: Nov 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Tel » Tue Apr 23, 2013 5:03 am

Banning the swastika only brings it more attention, ironically. It's not an inherently evil symbol. Much like blaming the knife in your hand when you stab someone with it.
Last edited by Tel on Tue Apr 23, 2013 5:07 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Yankee Empire
Senator
 
Posts: 4186
Founded: Aug 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yankee Empire » Tue Apr 23, 2013 5:09 am

Person012345 wrote:
Agritum wrote:Sure, De Gaulle and Churchill surely felt sorry for the Nazis.

And he called me an airhead. :palm:

I couldn't of possibly been Talking about Mosley or Petain? :o
Last edited by Yankee Empire on Tue Apr 23, 2013 5:09 am, edited 2 times in total.
Economic Left/Right: -6.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.05


Pro: U.S.,Diplomatic Militarism, Imperialism, Patriotism/Civic Nationalism, Cosmopolitanism, Stoicism, Authoritarianism, Classical Liberalism, Unionism, Centralization (usually), Federalism, Corporatism.
Anti:Tribalism, Seccessionism(usually),Decentralization,Pure Capitalism/State controlled economics, Misanthropy,Cruelty, Cowardice, Pacifism,Hedonism, Corporitocracy.
Vice-Chairman of the National-Imperialist-FreedomParty
"My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right."-Carl Schurz

User avatar
Yankee Empire
Senator
 
Posts: 4186
Founded: Aug 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yankee Empire » Tue Apr 23, 2013 5:10 am

Agritum wrote:
Jetan wrote:You turned a comment about all of the swastikas into one only about the Nazi swastika.

Nope. I replied to a comment that said that "Liberals" were somehow guilty of ruining the swastika's reputation.

No i said they were responsible for it's banning.
Economic Left/Right: -6.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.05


Pro: U.S.,Diplomatic Militarism, Imperialism, Patriotism/Civic Nationalism, Cosmopolitanism, Stoicism, Authoritarianism, Classical Liberalism, Unionism, Centralization (usually), Federalism, Corporatism.
Anti:Tribalism, Seccessionism(usually),Decentralization,Pure Capitalism/State controlled economics, Misanthropy,Cruelty, Cowardice, Pacifism,Hedonism, Corporitocracy.
Vice-Chairman of the National-Imperialist-FreedomParty
"My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right."-Carl Schurz

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Tue Apr 23, 2013 5:13 am

Yankee Empire wrote:I couldn't of possibly been Talking about Mosley or Petain? :o


Because Petain, obviously, banned Swastikas.

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Tue Apr 23, 2013 5:41 am

Samuraikoku wrote:
Yankee Empire wrote:I couldn't of possibly been Talking about Mosley or Petain? :o


Because Petain, obviously, banned Swastikas.

European governments are autocracies where random defecting generals have complete authority to ban symbols from use after being defeated in a war.

Yankee, what your saying is either totally non sequitur (totally disconnected point after disconnected point), or fucking insane.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Tue Apr 23, 2013 5:46 am

Person012345 wrote:
Samuraikoku wrote:
Because Petain, obviously, banned Swastikas.

European governments are autocracies where random defecting generals have complete authority to ban symbols from use after being defeated in a war.

Yankee, what your saying is either totally non sequitur (totally disconnected point after disconnected point), or fucking insane.


Por qué no los dos?

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Tue Apr 23, 2013 5:55 am

Samuraikoku wrote:
Person012345 wrote:European governments are autocracies where random defecting generals have complete authority to ban symbols from use after being defeated in a war.

Yankee, what your saying is either totally non sequitur (totally disconnected point after disconnected point), or fucking insane.


Por qué no los dos?

Yankee refers to the other dude. I was agreeing with you. I also have no idea what you just said.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Tue Apr 23, 2013 6:02 am

Person012345 wrote:Yankee refers to the other dude. I was agreeing with you. I also have no idea what you just said.


"Why not both?" in Spanish. Basically, why is that either non-sequitur or fucking insane? Why does one exclude the other? :p

User avatar
Quintium
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5881
Founded: May 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Quintium » Tue Apr 23, 2013 6:02 am

Person012345 wrote:The fucking swastika isn't banned in europe, god. It's banned in like, germany and 3 eastern european countries (Poland, Lithuania and Hungary). How does that make it "banned in europe". Germany isn't the entirity of Europe.


It seems you've forgotten about the Netherlands. If I remember correctly, displaying a swastika in public is illegal here, and the police will chase you down for it. Also illegal is giving a far-right salute, and saying our country can't take any more immigrants in without collapsing completely, and saying we should put our own citizens first. In fact, people have been convicted over those things several times.
I'm a melancholic, bipedal, 1/128th Native Batavian polyhistor. My preferred pronouns are "his majesty"/"his majesty".

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Tue Apr 23, 2013 6:03 am

Samuraikoku wrote:
Person012345 wrote:Yankee refers to the other dude. I was agreeing with you. I also have no idea what you just said.


"Why not both?" in Spanish. Basically, why is that either non-sequitur or fucking insane? Why does one exclude the other? :p

Ah, well now I just feel silly. But yes, that is definitely a possibility.

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Tue Apr 23, 2013 6:05 am

Quintium wrote:
Person012345 wrote:The fucking swastika isn't banned in europe, god. It's banned in like, germany and 3 eastern european countries (Poland, Lithuania and Hungary). How does that make it "banned in europe". Germany isn't the entirity of Europe.


It seems you've forgotten about the Netherlands. If I remember correctly, displaying a swastika in public is illegal here, and the police will chase you down for it. Also illegal is giving a far-right salute, and saying our country can't take any more immigrants in without collapsing completely, and saying we should put our own citizens first. In fact, people have been convicted over those things several times.

I can find nothing supporting that claim. Care to provide a source?

User avatar
Occeania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 831
Founded: Feb 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Occeania » Tue Apr 23, 2013 6:22 am

I was never racist but I still disliked a lot of lower class African Americans/Hispanics. I mean both races have a higher unemployment rate thus tend to be on welfare more often (something I highly dislike.) infact I hate whities on welfare, But if a African Ameircan or Hispanic was hard working and got a job you know or at least was not on welfare and not some gang banger then yeah, I could get along just fine with them.
Zimmerman is INNOCENT

User avatar
Quintium
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5881
Founded: May 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Quintium » Tue Apr 23, 2013 6:24 am

Person012345 wrote:I can find nothing supporting that claim. Care to provide a source?


They fall under laws against inciting discrimination, inciting hatred and calling for violence. I'll give you one simple example: Article 137d, Wetboek van Strafrecht. It's illegal to incite hatred in spoken word, written word or image.

The government has also signed a treaty which forbids all war propaganda and propaganda based on heritage, race or religion that is meant to incite discrimination, hostility or violence. That's the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, article 20, for reference.

If you want a practical example of how those are used, try to look for Hans Janmaat, a former member of Dutch parliament who was convicted several times for saying such things as "we need to put our own citizens first."
I'm a melancholic, bipedal, 1/128th Native Batavian polyhistor. My preferred pronouns are "his majesty"/"his majesty".

User avatar
Dejanic
Senator
 
Posts: 4677
Founded: Nov 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Dejanic » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:48 am

When I was very young and new to politics (Around the age of 13), I was a quasi-fascistic British nationalist (even though I am ethnically Croatian and most British nationalists would have me deported if they had their way).

However I'm about as far from those views as you can get nowadays, I'm now a Marxist-Socialist, and as a result, a believer in open borders, and my fiance is a black woman.
Post-Post Leftist | Anarcho-Blairite | Pol Pot Sympathiser

Jesus was a Socialist | Satan is a Capitalist

Dumb Ideologies wrote:Generic committed leftist with the opinion that anyone even slightly to the right of him is Hitler.

Master Shake wrote:multicultural loving imbecile.

Quintium wrote:Have you even been alive at all, toddler anarcho-collectivist?

User avatar
Volnotova
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8214
Founded: Nov 08, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Volnotova » Tue Apr 23, 2013 11:00 am

I am not a racist, in fact, I am part of a familly that has been on the recieving end of racism (and anti-semitism).

Being that I and others within my familly have been at the recieving end of it I have zero tolerance for that kind of behaviour (and no problem calling people out for it in public).
A very exclusive and exceptional ice crystal.

A surrealistic alien entity stretched thin across the many membranes of the multiverse.
The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace wrote:You are the most lawful neutral person I have ever witnessed.


Polruan wrote:It's like Humphrey Applebee wrote a chapter of the Talmud in here.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Achan, Albaaa, Australian rePublic, Cappedore, Democratic Poopland, Dimetrodon Empire, Nantoraka, Neo-American States, The Joeanian Republic, The marxist plains, The Two Jerseys, Valentian Elysium

Advertisement

Remove ads