As animals tend to have a better sense of smell and/or better eyesight than humans do, I assume that they can also distinguish between male and female. Therefore, this line of reasoning of yours does not meet the need of your argument. It is not a prima facie argument.
Slovenya wrote:RainBear wrote:Slovenya, what part of nature? Nature has demonstrated a great degree of adaptability in sexual matters and homosexual acts have been documented in various species.
Seriously, you cannot argue against homosexuality by saying it is unnatural when it happens in nature and you cannot argue against homosexuality by considering it to be animalistic when you have already argued that it does not happen in nature. The two arguments cancel each other out!
no they dont because one is the way nature intends things, and another is the guidance and knowledge people have of what is right and wrong. We know killing is bad for so and so reason, we know stealing is bad for so and so reason. Yes animals do have homosexual sex but they cant reason that nature distinguished male from female.