NATION

PASSWORD

Gay marriages....now what about siblings parents or animals?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202543
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:34 am

Anachronous Rex wrote:
Llamalandia wrote:
See I imagine that had it been me I wouldn't have been fine and quite frankly as a child that scared the hell out of me and the irony is even at the time I knew there was a 0% chance of my parents ever splitting up nor is there one now, but nevertheless i felt as if there did exist this world ending catastrophe known as divorce. I feel at the very least that when children are involved they should have some say in approving any disillusion of marriage/later remarriage.

You know what is much more traumatizing to children then a divorce?

Living with two people who don't like each other.

No, seriously. I've seen this at play a hundred times. Walked into homes where you could cut the tension with a knife, endured the snide backhanded comments, and passive-aggression; random explosive outbursts.

That shit will fuck you up.


Testify!

The best gift a parent can give their children is loving their spouse (mother or father). If that love is no longer there, part ways. It will be better for everyone, even the children, to see their parents happy in the long run.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:35 am

Individuality-ness wrote:
Person012345 wrote:It depends on what exactly is promised. As already mentioned marriages have all sorts of vows, although I'll assume this guy thinks that all marriages are a pledge-to-the-death. Most contracts such as phone contracts have specific get-out clauses (if you wish to end this contract you will XYZ), whereas his idea of marriage vows probably don't.

Although I'm not sure on the legality of a contract that would give you no way out. Of course, the actual laws are what he's proposing would be changed here.

A large amount of people in their wedding vows omit the "till death do us part". Many couples have a prenuptial. And it's often presumed now that if the contract doesn't work, the option of a divorce exists.

Indeed. I'm not saying Llama is living in the general vicinity of reality of course.

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:36 am

Llamalandia wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:What exactly is it about divorce that makes it the most terrible of all possible outcomes, in your mind?

Because I have you down as honestly advocating the near total destruction of marriage, just to prevent divorce... something which, frankly, isn't that bad.


I'm not entirely sure but as a child I always figured if my parents tried to divorce I would totally flip out either run way from home or something. Also I believe now that it weakens the institution of marriage for those who do it in what I believe is the historically correct way (i.e. staying married until death).


Actually, maintaining a bad marriage could be a thousand times more traumatizing than ending it badly.

Indeed, if a marriage is somehow poor, it should be ended quickly and painlessly, for the sake of the children.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202543
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:36 am

Anachronous Rex wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Point. The pox usually took care of that. Or child birth or war.

I didn't know we had a time traveling poster.

Speaking of which, you should really consider killing off the cephalopods now. That, or treating them very nicely.


Why? Are they our new overlords? I didn't get the memo text.

Fucking AT&T. >:(
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Llamalandia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: Dec 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Llamalandia » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:36 am

Anachronous Rex wrote:
Llamalandia wrote:
See I imagine that had it been me I wouldn't have been fine and quite frankly as a child that scared the hell out of me and the irony is even at the time I knew there was a 0% chance of my parents ever splitting up nor is there one now, but nevertheless i felt as if there did exist this world ending catastrophe known as divorce. I feel at the very least that when children are involved they should have some say in approving any disillusion of marriage/later remarriage.

You know what is much more traumatizing to children then a divorce?

Living with two people who don't like each other.

No, seriously. I've seen this at play a hundred times. Walked into homes where you could cut the tension with a knife, endured the snide backhanded comments, and passive-aggression; random explosive outbursts.

That shit will fuck you up.


I don't know in my family passive - aggression seems to be the only form of communication at times and I feel like we do alright. Now were there to be actually abuse woman hits man man hits woman that kind of thing I do believe will mess kids up, but no relationship is ever perfect and parents at times yell at children quite dramatically and thats no worse I believe than what you are terming random explosive outbursts. :)

User avatar
The Planet of Orran
Attaché
 
Posts: 91
Founded: Apr 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Planet of Orran » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:36 am

OP... Please, please tell me this is satire on your part.
For those curious, I'm just Orangi.

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:36 am

Although he'd no doubt argue that no true marriage would omit the "till death us do part" bit.

User avatar
Llamalandia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: Dec 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Llamalandia » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:37 am

Person012345 wrote:Although he'd no doubt argue that no true marriage would omit the "till death us do part" bit.


Exactly correct. but i'm pretty sure someone in the audience would object to a marriage vow which said to love and honor and cherish for ...eh 'bout 20-30 years or so then dump each other for someone 20 years younger ;)
Last edited by Llamalandia on Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:39 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:38 am

Person012345 wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:A large amount of people in their wedding vows omit the "till death do us part". Many couples have a prenuptial. And it's often presumed now that if the contract doesn't work, the option of a divorce exists.

Indeed. I'm not saying Llama is living in the general vicinity of reality of course.

True. Although I have to say, even in the Old Testament, there's a clause allowing for divorce. And there are stories of couples making up stories or lying to the authorities in order to get a divorce legally where no-fault divorces are illegal -- the legal complications in obtaining a divorce in such a case was even documented in Anna Karenina, to name one example.
Last edited by Individuality-ness on Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Anachronous Rex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Anachronous Rex » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:38 am

Llamalandia wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:You know what is much more traumatizing to children then a divorce?

Living with two people who don't like each other.

No, seriously. I've seen this at play a hundred times. Walked into homes where you could cut the tension with a knife, endured the snide backhanded comments, and passive-aggression; random explosive outbursts.

That shit will fuck you up.


I don't know in my family passive - aggression seems to be the only form of communication at times and I feel like we do alright. Now were there to be actually abuse woman hits man man hits woman that kind of thing I do believe will mess kids up, but no relationship is ever perfect and parents at times yell at children quite dramatically and thats no worse I believe than what you are terming random explosive outbursts. :)

How old are you? Oh, and please do tell the truth, because lying to make yourself seem older will have the opposite of the desired effect.
Last edited by Anachronous Rex on Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
My humor is like church wine: dry and tasteless.
If you are not sure if I am being serious, assume that I am not.

Summer is coming...

User avatar
Pillea
Diplomat
 
Posts: 672
Founded: Oct 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Pillea » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:39 am

Person012345 wrote:Although he'd no doubt argue that no true marriage would omit the "till death us do part" bit.


Which of course is sometimes a result of these marriages that should end in divorce but don't. The death is just ya know, caused by the other spouse.
Trans*, polyamorous, atheist, vegan, pro-choice, pro-animal rights, pro-science, anti-rape culture, lesbian, feminist, far left wing

User avatar
The Planet of Orran
Attaché
 
Posts: 91
Founded: Apr 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Planet of Orran » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:40 am

The Rich Port wrote:
Llamalandia wrote:
I'm not entirely sure but as a child I always figured if my parents tried to divorce I would totally flip out either run way from home or something. Also I believe now that it weakens the institution of marriage for those who do it in what I believe is the historically correct way (i.e. staying married until death).


Actually, maintaining a bad marriage could be a thousand times more traumatizing than ending it badly.

Indeed, if a marriage is somehow poor, it should be ended quickly and painlessly, for the sake of the children.


I can vouch for this. My parents hated each other, and my only escape was twiddling the thumbs on my console's controller.

Now I'm left without any true semblance of family in my life, and having/starting one is my number one aspiration.
For those curious, I'm just Orangi.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202543
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:40 am

Llamalandia wrote:
Person012345 wrote:Although he'd no doubt argue that no true marriage would omit the "till death us do part" bit.


Exactly correct. but i'm pretty sure someone in the audience would object to a marriage vow which said to love and honor and cherish for ...eh 'bout 20-30 years or so then dump each other for someone 20 years younger ;)


Are you secretly Donald Trump?
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Llamalandia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: Dec 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Llamalandia » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:40 am

Anachronous Rex wrote:
Llamalandia wrote:
I don't know in my family passive - aggression seems to be the only form of communication at times and I feel like we do alright. Now were there to be actually abuse woman hits man man hits woman that kind of thing I do believe will mess kids up, but no relationship is ever perfect and parents at times yell at children quite dramatically and thats no worse I believe than what you are terming random explosive outbursts. :)

How old are you? Oh, and please do tell the truth, because lying to make yourself seem older will have the opposite of the desired effect.


I'm in my twenties (won't be more specific on the net) but don't see how that's especially relevant.

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:40 am

Llamalandia wrote:
Person012345 wrote:Although he'd no doubt argue that no true marriage would omit the "till death us do part" bit.


Exactly correct. but i'm pretty sure someone in the audience would object to a marriage vow which said to love and honor and cherish for ...eh 'bout 20-30 years or so then dump each other for someone 20 years younger ;)

Well no, if they both agreed to that then what business is it of mine?

User avatar
AiliailiA
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27722
Founded: Jul 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby AiliailiA » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:41 am

Individuality-ness wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Mind you, in the old days, people died.

Till death do us part was much easier when dysentery was a serious threat.

And death in childbirth. Nowadays, much longer life expectancy thanks to the miracles of modern medicine.


Death in childbirth is most exquisitely relevant.

But aren't we granting a premise unnecessarily, that "until death" is the age old way? This may be true, but given who's plugging it could also be based on nothing more than the wording of a slightly old-fashioned but not age-old wedding vow. "'Til death do us part". My guess is that hasn't been a constant over time or among different places.
My name is voiced AIL-EE-AIL-EE-AH. My time zone: UTC.

Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.
Ethel mermania wrote:
Ifreann wrote:
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
: eugenics :
What are the colons meant to convey here?
In my experience Colons usually convey shit

NSG junkie. Getting good shit for free, why would I give it up?

User avatar
Anachronous Rex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Anachronous Rex » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:42 am

Llamalandia wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:How old are you? Oh, and please do tell the truth, because lying to make yourself seem older will have the opposite of the desired effect.


I'm in my twenties (won't be more specific on the net) but don't see how that's especially relevant.

Because we could track you down if we knew the year you were born?

Well, I was going to say wait until you've lived a little... but you don't do yourself any favors with that answer. Wait until you've lived a little more, I guess.
My humor is like church wine: dry and tasteless.
If you are not sure if I am being serious, assume that I am not.

Summer is coming...

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:43 am

Llamalandia wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:You know what is much more traumatizing to children then a divorce?

Living with two people who don't like each other.

No, seriously. I've seen this at play a hundred times. Walked into homes where you could cut the tension with a knife, endured the snide backhanded comments, and passive-aggression; random explosive outbursts.

That shit will fuck you up.

I don't know in my family passive - aggression seems to be the only form of communication at times and I feel like we do alright. Now were there to be actually abuse woman hits man man hits woman that kind of thing I do believe will mess kids up, but no relationship is ever perfect and parents at times yell at children quite dramatically and thats no worse I believe than what you are terming random explosive outbursts. :)

Have you ever been in the same room when your parents are fighting one another? It's horrible.

My parents should probably get a divorce, since they're often fighting over money and how to spend it and over how to best raise my brother and my father's credit card usage and stuff. They won't though, because of legal complications (mother's a permanent resident and father's a citizen, and if they got divorced my mother's residency might be at stake) and because my father's old and can't really live on his own with the amount of money he makes -- he's near retirement age now.
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Llamalandia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: Dec 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Llamalandia » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:43 am

Person012345 wrote:
Llamalandia wrote:
Exactly correct. but i'm pretty sure someone in the audience would object to a marriage vow which said to love and honor and cherish for ...eh 'bout 20-30 years or so then dump each other for someone 20 years younger ;)

Well no, if they both agreed to that then what business is it of mine?


Then why is marriage the business of anyone but the two people getting married and why is there a need for a state marriage license and why does the priest or officiating officer ask if for people to "speak now or forever hold your peace." and why is there any need for any witnesses to the marriage. clearly marriage is meant to be subject to the will of the society to some extent (just keep the govt far away before they start dictating who can and can't marry).

User avatar
Grainne Ni Malley
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7564
Founded: Oct 17, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Grainne Ni Malley » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:44 am

Llamalandia wrote:No I said no to abusive marriages which you may have missed if you haven't my posts from like 10 pages ago. I believe parents shouldn't fight or at the very least never fight in front of children and should work out any marital problems quickly and on their own (or with outside counseling) and not let it affect children. If you can't do this I don't believe you are emotionally mature enough to be raising children (not that lack of maturity stops many people in the USA from having kids anyway.) The childs interests should come first and I believe in non-abuse type situations the childs interests are always best served with the original two parent nuclear model.


Okay, I did miss that. I don't have a large enough attention span to go digging back that far. :blush:

The circumstances you mention are, once again, ideal. However, as you also stated, this doesn't always happen. As a people we must address reality as opposed to idyllic situations unfortunately. People are more likely to fall "in love" when they are young and also tend to be quite fertile in their youth, so often maturity, or a lack thereof, has a very small part to play if any at all in marriage and bringing children into the scenario.

Also, I'm pretty sure that kids everywhere across the world get knocked up, or end up entering into marriage at young ages. To say this is a problem distinct to the USA is at best naive, at worst prejudiced.
*insert boring personal information, political slant, witty quotes, and some fancy text color here*

Гроня Ни Маллий - In fond memory of Dyakovo. I will always remember you. Thank you for the laughs.

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:45 am

Llamalandia wrote:
Person012345 wrote:Well no, if they both agreed to that then what business is it of mine?


Then why is marriage the business of anyone but the two people getting married and why is there a need for a state marriage license and why does the priest or officiating officer ask if for people to "speak now or forever hold your peace." and why is there any need for any witnesses to the marriage. clearly marriage is meant to be subject to the will of the society to some extent (just keep the govt far away before they start dictating who can and can't marry).

I don't believe I ever advocated government involvement in marriage. And if you don't, then who is going to tell people they can't get divorced?

User avatar
Pillea
Diplomat
 
Posts: 672
Founded: Oct 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Pillea » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:45 am

Llamalandia wrote:
Person012345 wrote:Well no, if they both agreed to that then what business is it of mine?


Then why is marriage the business of anyone but the two people getting married and why is there a need for a state marriage license and why does the priest or officiating officer ask if for people to "speak now or forever hold your peace." and why is there any need for any witnesses to the marriage. clearly marriage is meant to be subject to the will of the society to some extent (just keep the govt far away before they start dictating who can and can't marry).


The government does that already. They say Steve and Mary can get hitched, without asking questions. But Steve and Mark wanna get hitched.... now there's this whole hullabaloo.
Trans*, polyamorous, atheist, vegan, pro-choice, pro-animal rights, pro-science, anti-rape culture, lesbian, feminist, far left wing

User avatar
Llamalandia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: Dec 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Llamalandia » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:45 am

Individuality-ness wrote:
Llamalandia wrote:I don't know in my family passive - aggression seems to be the only form of communication at times and I feel like we do alright. Now were there to be actually abuse woman hits man man hits woman that kind of thing I do believe will mess kids up, but no relationship is ever perfect and parents at times yell at children quite dramatically and thats no worse I believe than what you are terming random explosive outbursts. :)

Have you ever been in the same room when your parents are fighting one another? It's horrible.

My parents should probably get a divorce, since they're often fighting over money and how to spend it and over how to best raise my brother and my father's credit card usage and stuff. They won't though, because of legal complications (mother's a permanent resident and father's a citizen, and if they got divorced my mother's residency might be at stake) and because my father's old and can't really live on his own with the amount of money he makes -- he's near retirement age now.


Yes I have and I have always found my parents fights even the most serious ones to be rather comical (i literally remember lolling at some of them) because I knew they would always make up and reconcile any differences and I don't in fact believe that irreconcilable difference are real I believe there are only people too lazy to make their relationships work. :)

User avatar
Anachronous Rex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Anachronous Rex » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:45 am

Ailiailia wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:And death in childbirth. Nowadays, much longer life expectancy thanks to the miracles of modern medicine.


Death in childbirth is most exquisitely relevant.

But aren't we granting a premise unnecessarily, that "until death" is the age old way? This may be true, but given who's plugging it could also be based on nothing more than the wording of a slightly old-fashioned but not age-old wedding vow. "'Til death do us part". My guess is that hasn't been a constant over time or among different places.

In fact, I know a culture that exists today where the vow is, "stay together until all the children are raised, and don't be jealous of each other's lovers."

Well, not so much a vow, actually, as something which is shouted at you by your new parents-in-law.
My humor is like church wine: dry and tasteless.
If you are not sure if I am being serious, assume that I am not.

Summer is coming...

User avatar
Llamalandia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: Dec 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Llamalandia » Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:46 am

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Llamalandia wrote:
Exactly correct. but i'm pretty sure someone in the audience would object to a marriage vow which said to love and honor and cherish for ...eh 'bout 20-30 years or so then dump each other for someone 20 years younger ;)


Are you secretly Donald Trump?


No I still have mah hair thank you very very much. :lol:

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Aldygast, Ankoz, El Lazaro, Enormous Gentiles, Galloism, Grinning Dragon, Ima, ImperialRussia, Kenowa, Ostroeuropa, Picairn, Primitive Communism, Reloviskistan, Soviet Haaregrad, Stellar Colonies, Tarsonis, Techocracy101010, The Black Forrest, The Sherpa Empire, The Two Jerseys, Xmara

Advertisement

Remove ads