Advertisement
by AiliailiA » Thu Apr 18, 2013 5:54 am
Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.
by Greed and Death » Thu Apr 18, 2013 6:43 am
by Lyassa and Nairoa » Thu Apr 18, 2013 6:45 am
Divair wrote:Can all parties involved give consent? If yes, who cares. If no, then keep it illegal.
There. That was easy.
by Arglorand » Thu Apr 18, 2013 6:48 am
by Lyassa and Nairoa » Thu Apr 18, 2013 6:52 am
by Blekksprutia » Thu Apr 18, 2013 6:53 am
by Arglorand » Thu Apr 18, 2013 6:54 am
by Hackleberry Islands » Thu Apr 18, 2013 6:54 am
by Valcouria » Thu Apr 18, 2013 6:56 am
Blekksprutia wrote:Two siblings having a child would very likely result in the child having malformities and/or defects. I'm not even going to go into what Human/Bonobo intercourse would bring...mostly because I don't think it's good form to talk about the results of bestiality on NSG. Homosexual intercourse, except for various religious reasons, won't cause any defects in a child for obvious reasons.
There is no direct harm by homosexuality. By bestiality and incest, there is.
by AiliailiA » Thu Apr 18, 2013 6:57 am
greed and death wrote:Justice Scalia is that you ?
Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.
by Arglorand » Thu Apr 18, 2013 6:57 am
Valcouria wrote:Blekksprutia wrote:Two siblings having a child would very likely result in the child having malformities and/or defects. I'm not even going to go into what Human/Bonobo intercourse would bring...mostly because I don't think it's good form to talk about the results of bestiality on NSG. Homosexual intercourse, except for various religious reasons, won't cause any defects in a child for obvious reasons.
There is no direct harm by homosexuality. By bestiality and incest, there is.
Homosexuality cannot result in a child...bodily functions won't allow it.
by Farnhamia » Thu Apr 18, 2013 6:57 am
by Blekksprutia » Thu Apr 18, 2013 6:59 am
by Cosara » Thu Apr 18, 2013 7:00 am
by Farnhamia » Thu Apr 18, 2013 7:02 am
Cosara wrote:In about 10 years, when the Supreme Court takes up the cases of Bestiality, Sibling Marriage and Parent Child marriages, I am sure there will be more people on this forum protecting the traditional definition (If the Supreme Court rules DOMA and Prop. 8 unconstitutional, it will be this: Between two unrelated adult humans)
by Lyassa and Nairoa » Thu Apr 18, 2013 7:03 am
Valcouria wrote:Blekksprutia wrote:Two siblings having a child would very likely result in the child having malformities and/or defects. I'm not even going to go into what Human/Bonobo intercourse would bring...mostly because I don't think it's good form to talk about the results of bestiality on NSG. Homosexual intercourse, except for various religious reasons, won't cause any defects in a child for obvious reasons.
There is no direct harm by homosexuality. By bestiality and incest, there is.
Homosexuality cannot result in a child...bodily functions won't allow it.
by Arglorand » Thu Apr 18, 2013 7:03 am
Cosara wrote:In about 10 years, when the Supreme Court takes up the cases of Bestiality, Sibling Marriage and Parent Child marriages, I am sure there will be more people on this forum protecting the traditional definition (If the Supreme Court rules DOMA and Prop. 8 unconstitutional, it will be this: Between two unrelated adult humans)
by Farnhamia » Thu Apr 18, 2013 7:07 am
Eaglleia wrote:Siblings, parents, If that is their wish, I suppose so. Animals cannot give consent, however.
by Valcouria » Thu Apr 18, 2013 7:08 am
Farnhamia wrote:Cosara wrote:In about 10 years, when the Supreme Court takes up the cases of Bestiality, Sibling Marriage and Parent Child marriages, I am sure there will be more people on this forum protecting the traditional definition (If the Supreme Court rules DOMA and Prop. 8 unconstitutional, it will be this: Between two unrelated adult humans)
Bestiality, as has been explained to you more than once, is not possible as animals cannot give informed consent. Minor children cannot, either.
by Regnum Dominae » Thu Apr 18, 2013 7:09 am
by Farnhamia » Thu Apr 18, 2013 7:11 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bermia, Cerula, Dreadton, Ethel mermania, HISPIDA, Lycom, Niolia, Siluvia, Thelottine, Uiiop
Advertisement