God created the world in 7 days? or Big Bang?

by **Jessjohnesik** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:06 am

Individuality-ness wrote:
Jessjohnesik wrote:Yes, he was PWND.

It sounds so juvenile, really. "Pwned"? Really?

He said it. I just forgot to put "" over it.

by **Of the Free Socialist Territories** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:07 am

Individuality-ness wrote:
Jessjohnesik wrote:Yes, he was PWND.

It sounds so juvenile, really. "Pwned"? Really?

It sounds more like some form of Trotskyist organisation to me.

by **Edward Richtofen** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:08 am

Biased poll, the Big Bang did not create the world, it's effect on the section of universe known as our solar system created the world we know as Earth.
And by World i assume you mean universe, in that case both statements are legit options but i would have clarified.

by **Transhuman Proteus** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:08 am

Alimprad wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:
Scientific Evidence that God Created Life

http://www.creationism.org/heinze/SciEvidGodLife.htm

http://godandscience.org/youngearth/longdays.html

http://www.keyway.ca/htm2002/sevncrea.htm

PWND!

Self PWND! Since you know, the sources are about as scientific as the ramblings of a homeless guy warning you about aliens ending the world.

by **Churchilland** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:08 am

Technically the Big Bang didn't create the world, it created the Universe... But what started the Big Bang? I hope they answer that question soon, no one really has an explanation, religion or science!

by **Farnhamia** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:08 am

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:It sounds so juvenile, really. "Pwned"? Really?

It sounds more like some form of Trotskyist organisation to me.

Or a bunch of Welshmen, they love words with odd W's in them.

by **Great Nepal** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:09 am

Czechanada wrote:
Alimprad wrote:PWND!

I honestly think that people who cite these sources think that they are credible just because they have .org as a domain name.

Source: http://www.czechanadahasabsoluteinfallibility.gov

Maybe we should start domain which sells them stone to repel tiger, on domain "repealtiger.org"... we could be rich.

by **Of the Free Socialist Territories** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:10 am

Farnhamia wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
It sounds more like some form of Trotskyist organisation to me.

Or a bunch of Welshmen, they love words with odd W's in them.

PWND

noun (puh-win-nidd)

1. A small village in the far north of Caerphilly, equidistant to Merthyr Tydfil and Tredegar, noted for the exceptionally fine wool of its many sheep.

I'm allowed to do that, I have a great deal of Welsh ancestry.

by **Czechanada** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:11 am

Churchilland wrote:Technically the Big Bang didn't create the world, it created the Universe... But what started the Big Bang? I hope they answer that question soon, no one really has an explanation, religion or science!

I'll be willing to wager sixpence that it will be science who answers the question.

Religion has a nasty habit of sticking to the same point for a long time.

by **Ksclve** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:11 am

6 days. not 7.

by **Individuality-ness** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:11 am

Jessjohnesik wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:It sounds so juvenile, really. "Pwned"? Really?

He said it. I just forgot to put "" over it.

Good point.

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:It sounds so juvenile, really. "Pwned"? Really?

It sounds more like some form of Trotskyist organisation to me.

Made up of rabid twelve year olds?

Edward Richtofen wrote:Biased poll, the Big Bang did not create the world, it's effect on the section of universe known as our solar system created the world we know as Earth.
And by World i assume you mean universe, in that case both statements are legit options but i would have clarified.

One of them has scientific evidence. The other is a myth. The choice is obvious.

Transhuman Proteus wrote:
Alimprad wrote:PWND!

Self PWND! Since you know, the sources are about as scientific as the ramblings of a homeless guy warning you about aliens ending the world.

Nah, even homeless dudes have some shred of signify under their threadbare clothes.

by **Jehuddah** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:11 am

I tend to believe the Big Bang, but I'm not gnostic about that.
I mean, science doesn't explain anything, if it is a theory and not a fact.
For example, light, particle, or wave? Theory of relativity, or quantum mechanics? Second law of thermodynamics or the theory of evolution?

And you have to remember that Stephen Hawking himself, one of the developers of the Big Bang theory, has said he might be wrong.

by **Jessjohnesik** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:12 am

Churchilland wrote:Technically the Big Bang didn't create the world, it created the Universe... But what started the Big Bang? I hope they answer that question soon, no one really has an explanation, religion or science!

The difference is:
Science: Can provide some answers that, although lead to even more questions, give us knowledge and are answers.

Theistic Religion: Gives fake answers and brainwashes everyone.

Non-theistic religion: Does nothing really, besides pherhaps helping achieve inner peace.

by **Individuality-ness** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:12 am

Churchilland wrote:Technically the Big Bang didn't create the world, it created the Universe... But what started the Big Bang? I hope they answer that question soon, no one really has an explanation, religion or science!

Uh, we do have a scientific explanation? That a total vacuum is the most unstable of states?

by **Of the Free Socialist Territories** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:13 am

Individuality-ness wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:It sounds more like some form of Trotskyist organisation to me.

Made up of rabid twelve year olds?

Leave the SWP out of this.

by **Of the Free Socialist Territories** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:13 am

Jehuddah wrote:Second law of thermodynamics or the theory of evolution?

From where does that "contradiction" arise?

by **Individuality-ness** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:13 am

Jehuddah wrote:I tend to believe the Big Bang, but I'm not gnostic about that.
I mean, science doesn't explain anything, if it is a theory and not a fact.
For example, light, particle, or wave? Theory of relativity, or quantum mechanics? Second law of thermodynamics or the theory of evolution?

And you have to remember that Stephen Hawking himself, one of the developers of the Big Bang theory, has said he might be wrong.

Theory in science means something completely different than theory in the common slang.

by **Farnhamia** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:14 am

Czechanada wrote:
Churchilland wrote:Technically the Big Bang didn't create the world, it created the Universe... But what started the Big Bang? I hope they answer that question soon, no one really has an explanation, religion or science!

I'll be willing to wager sixpence that it will be science who answers the question.

Religion has a nasty habit of sticking to the same point for a long time.

And on the 7th pence he rested ...

I know the singular is not "pence"

by **Czechanada** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:14 am

Jehuddah wrote:I tend to believe the Big Bang, but I'm not gnostic about that.
I mean, science doesn't explain anything, if it is a theory and not a fact.
For example, light, particle, or wave? Theory of relativity, or quantum mechanics? Second law of thermodynamics or the theory of evolution?

And you have to remember that Stephen Hawking himself, one of the developers of the Big Bang theory, has said he might be wrong.

You're misunderstanding the usage of Theory in this instance.

Theory in science is a set of developed explanations for why a phenomenon happens.

Furthermore, the very basis of the scientific method is that it is always willing to be wrong.

by **Jehuddah** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:14 am

Jessjohnesik wrote:
Churchilland wrote:Technically the Big Bang didn't create the world, it created the Universe... But what started the Big Bang? I hope they answer that question soon, no one really has an explanation, religion or science!

The difference is:
Science: Can provide some answers that, although lead to even more questions, give us knowledge and are answers.

Theistic Religion: Gives fake answers and brainwashes everyone.

Non-theistic religion: Does nothing really, besides pherhaps helping achieve inner peace.

Ummmm... Did you PROVE that the Bible is fake? No? Exactly.

You probably didn't even read it, nor understand it if you talk like that.

by **Jessjohnesik** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:14 am

Jehuddah wrote:I tend to believe the Big Bang, but I'm not gnostic about that.
I mean, science doesn't explain anything, if it is a theory and not a fact.
For example, light, particle, or wave? Theory of relativity, or quantum mechanics? Second law of thermodynamics or the theory of evolution?

And you have to remember that Stephen Hawking himself, one of the developers of the Big Bang theory, has said he might be wrong.

Do you know the definition of scientific theory?
No?
Thought so:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory

by **Ifreann** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:15 am

Jehuddah wrote:I tend to believe the Big Bang, but I'm not gnostic about that.
I mean, science doesn't explain anything, if it is a theory and not a fact.

Gods above and below, learn what a scientific theory is.

...Second law of thermodynamics or the theory of evolution?

Woah woah woah, hold up there, Skippy. The fuck makes you think there's any conflict between these two things?

And you have to remember that Stephen Hawking himself, one of the developers of the Big Bang theory, has said he might be wrong.

Because he's a scientist, not a priest.

by **Individuality-ness** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:16 am

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:Made up of rabid twelve year olds?

Leave the SWP out of this.

Okay. Rabid ten year olds on XBox thinking that screaming profanities and saying that their opponents were "raped" is mature, grown up behavior that makes them gods or something.

by **Farnhamia** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:16 am

Jehuddah wrote:
Jessjohnesik wrote:The difference is:
Science: Can provide some answers that, although lead to even more questions, give us knowledge and are answers.

Theistic Religion: Gives fake answers and brainwashes everyone.

Non-theistic religion: Does nothing really, besides pherhaps helping achieve inner peace.

Ummmm... Did you PROVE that the Bible is fake? No? Exactly.

You probably didn't even read it, nor understand it if you talk like that.

Fake? There are some verifiable items in the Bible, the ones that refer to events corroborated by other sources such as Assyrian and Egyptian monuments. The creation story in Genesis is not one of these items.

by **Jessjohnesik** » Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:17 am

Jehuddah wrote:
Jessjohnesik wrote:The difference is:
Science: Can provide some answers that, although lead to even more questions, give us knowledge and are answers.

Theistic Religion: Gives fake answers and brainwashes everyone.

Non-theistic religion: Does nothing really, besides pherhaps helping achieve inner peace.

Ummmm... Did you PROVE that the Bible is fake? No? Exactly.

You probably didn't even read it, nor understand it if you talk like that.

It is a BOOK. Which has NO EVIDENCE. A BOOK written by some UNEDUCATED, overly-religious NUTS. Which doesn't make any sense.
Now you tell me, how fake is it?

God created the world in 7 days? or Big Bang?

7 days or Big Bang?

Who is online