Advertisement

by RightLeaningChristians » Sat Nov 07, 2009 1:58 am

by Senestrum » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:03 am
Elgadika wrote:I seem to remember reading somewhere (in the newspaper I think) that the Higgs boson that they're trying to find is so "horrific in nature" that it's discovery in the future is causing problems in the past so as to prevent its discovery. I can't find that anywhere, though.
Elgadika wrote:
Tbh I don't have any "doomsday theories/hypotheses" about the LHC. I just don't think it'll ever work as intended.

by Elgadika » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:06 am
Senestrum wrote:Elgadika wrote:I seem to remember reading somewhere (in the newspaper I think) that the Higgs boson that they're trying to find is so "horrific in nature" that it's discovery in the future is causing problems in the past so as to prevent its discovery. I can't find that anywhere, though.
Yeah... I saw that, and there's absolutely nothing in the science involved to support that. The guys who said that are pretty much getting laughed at by anybody who knows anything about it.Elgadika wrote:
Tbh I don't have any "doomsday theories/hypotheses" about the LHC. I just don't think it'll ever work as intended.
There's no reason it wouldn't. When they had the problems back in the fall of '08 they were already running, they just weren't at full power and they weren't actually colliding anything. There's really no fundamental reason it can't work; it's just a bigger, more powerful version of the myriad other supercolliders out there.

by Orinon » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:06 am

by The Republic of Lanos » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:08 am
Elgadika wrote:Senestrum wrote:Elgadika wrote:I seem to remember reading somewhere (in the newspaper I think) that the Higgs boson that they're trying to find is so "horrific in nature" that it's discovery in the future is causing problems in the past so as to prevent its discovery. I can't find that anywhere, though.
Yeah... I saw that, and there's absolutely nothing in the science involved to support that. The guys who said that are pretty much getting laughed at by anybody who knows anything about it.Elgadika wrote:
Tbh I don't have any "doomsday theories/hypotheses" about the LHC. I just don't think it'll ever work as intended.
There's no reason it wouldn't. When they had the problems back in the fall of '08 they were already running, they just weren't at full power and they weren't actually colliding anything. There's really no fundamental reason it can't work; it's just a bigger, more powerful version of the myriad other supercolliders out there.
Meh, let them do what they feel like. If it works, it works.

by Elgadika » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:08 am
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Elgadika wrote:Senestrum wrote:Elgadika wrote:I seem to remember reading somewhere (in the newspaper I think) that the Higgs boson that they're trying to find is so "horrific in nature" that it's discovery in the future is causing problems in the past so as to prevent its discovery. I can't find that anywhere, though.
Yeah... I saw that, and there's absolutely nothing in the science involved to support that. The guys who said that are pretty much getting laughed at by anybody who knows anything about it.Elgadika wrote:
Tbh I don't have any "doomsday theories/hypotheses" about the LHC. I just don't think it'll ever work as intended.
There's no reason it wouldn't. When they had the problems back in the fall of '08 they were already running, they just weren't at full power and they weren't actually colliding anything. There's really no fundamental reason it can't work; it's just a bigger, more powerful version of the myriad other supercolliders out there.
Meh, let them do what they feel like. If it works, it works.
you mean:
If it works, we're fucked?

by Senestrum » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:10 am

by Orinon » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:12 am

by Senestrum » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:15 am


by RightLeaningChristians » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:17 am
Senestrum wrote:If you're going to troll, at least use cool image macros:
only that should be november '09 lol

by Orinon » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:17 am

by Post-Unity Terra » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:21 am
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Elgadika wrote:Senestrum wrote:Elgadika wrote:I seem to remember reading somewhere (in the newspaper I think) that the Higgs boson that they're trying to find is so "horrific in nature" that it's discovery in the future is causing problems in the past so as to prevent its discovery. I can't find that anywhere, though.
Yeah... I saw that, and there's absolutely nothing in the science involved to support that. The guys who said that are pretty much getting laughed at by anybody who knows anything about it.Elgadika wrote:
Tbh I don't have any "doomsday theories/hypotheses" about the LHC. I just don't think it'll ever work as intended.
There's no reason it wouldn't. When they had the problems back in the fall of '08 they were already running, they just weren't at full power and they weren't actually colliding anything. There's really no fundamental reason it can't work; it's just a bigger, more powerful version of the myriad other supercolliders out there.
Meh, let them do what they feel like. If it works, it works.
you mean:
If it works, we're fucked?

by Christmahanikwanzikah » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:22 am
Elgadika wrote:Maurepas wrote:Elgadika wrote:Everything that has gone wrong with the LHC:Wikipedia wrote:On 25 October 2005, a technician was killed in the LHC tunnel when a crane load was accidentally dropped.
On 27 March 2007 a cryogenic magnet support broke during a pressure test involving one of the LHC's inner triplet (focusing quadrupole) magnet assemblies, provided by Fermilab and KEK. No one was injured. Fermilab director Pier Oddone stated "In this case we are dumbfounded that we missed some very simple balance of forces". This fault had been present in the original design, and remained during four engineering reviews over the following years. Analysis revealed that its design, made as thin as possible for better insulation, was not strong enough to withstand the forces generated during pressure testing. Details are available in a statement from Fermilab, with which CERN is in agreement. Repairing the broken magnet and reinforcing the eight identical assemblies used by LHC delayed the startup date, then planned for November 2007.
Problems occurred on 19 September 2008 during powering tests of the main dipole circuit, when an electrical fault in the bus between magnets caused a rupture and a leak of six tonnes of liquid helium. The operation was delayed for several months. It is currently believed that a faulty electrical connection between two magnets caused an arc, which compromised the liquid-helium containment. Once the cooling layer was broken, the helium flooded the surrounding vacuum layer with sufficient force to break 10-ton magnets from their mountings. The explosion also contaminated the proton tubes with soot.
Two vacuum leaks were identified in July 2009, and the start of operations was further postponed to mid-November, 2009.
In November 2009, a bird was suspected of causing an electrical short to the LHC by dropping a baguette onto an unprotected electrical installation. Because the LHC was not activated, the short did no serious damage.
Fun.
They said itd be the end of the world, its just taking a little longer than expected, increments,
So next, small pockets of the world will disappear? Or is that after a few more steps?
Maybe an actual bird will find its way into it.

by Senestrum » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:22 am
Post-Unity Terra wrote:If it works, science happens. I'm sure you've heard dozens of times by now that if the LHC was capable of creating black holes, cosmic rays striking the atmosphere would have created a black hole already.

by Cubic kms » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:25 am
Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:Elgadika wrote:Maurepas wrote:Elgadika wrote:Everything that has gone wrong with the LHC:Wikipedia wrote:On 25 October 2005, a technician was killed in the LHC tunnel when a crane load was accidentally dropped.
On 27 March 2007 a cryogenic magnet support broke during a pressure test involving one of the LHC's inner triplet (focusing quadrupole) magnet assemblies, provided by Fermilab and KEK. No one was injured. Fermilab director Pier Oddone stated "In this case we are dumbfounded that we missed some very simple balance of forces". This fault had been present in the original design, and remained during four engineering reviews over the following years. Analysis revealed that its design, made as thin as possible for better insulation, was not strong enough to withstand the forces generated during pressure testing. Details are available in a statement from Fermilab, with which CERN is in agreement. Repairing the broken magnet and reinforcing the eight identical assemblies used by LHC delayed the startup date, then planned for November 2007.
Problems occurred on 19 September 2008 during powering tests of the main dipole circuit, when an electrical fault in the bus between magnets caused a rupture and a leak of six tonnes of liquid helium. The operation was delayed for several months. It is currently believed that a faulty electrical connection between two magnets caused an arc, which compromised the liquid-helium containment. Once the cooling layer was broken, the helium flooded the surrounding vacuum layer with sufficient force to break 10-ton magnets from their mountings. The explosion also contaminated the proton tubes with soot.
Two vacuum leaks were identified in July 2009, and the start of operations was further postponed to mid-November, 2009.
In November 2009, a bird was suspected of causing an electrical short to the LHC by dropping a baguette onto an unprotected electrical installation. Because the LHC was not activated, the short did no serious damage.
Fun.
They said itd be the end of the world, its just taking a little longer than expected, increments,
So next, small pockets of the world will disappear? Or is that after a few more steps?
Maybe an actual bird will find its way into it.
Well, the first computers had bugs crawling through them, hence the term "debugging..." Maybe future particle accelerators will have to undergo "bebirding" and "desammiching" before takeoff...


by Christmahanikwanzikah » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:25 am

by Senestrum » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:35 am

by Fartsniffage » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:35 am
Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:Seriously, though, I can't *not* trust Hawking when it comes to physics.

by Elgadika » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:36 am
Senestrum wrote:Here is a great big 22 page PDF explaining in extreme detail why there is no reason to think the LHC will fucking kill you dead.
Some of you will no doubt find it a bit too high-brow.

by Cubic kms » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:48 am
Senestrum wrote:Here is a great big 22 page PDF explaining in extreme detail why there is no reason to think the LHC will fucking kill you dead.
Some of you will no doubt find it a bit too high-brow.

by Elgadika » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:50 am
Cubic kms wrote:Senestrum wrote:Here is a great big 22 page PDF explaining in extreme detail why there is no reason to think the LHC will fucking kill you dead.
Some of you will no doubt find it a bit too high-brow.
Yeah so the only downside is that no new particles may be discovered? Hope they find the Higgs boson particle which hypothetically could lead to anti-gravity
Either way, i want this to lead to a Particle Beam Weapon in the form of a satellite orbiting Earth.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Angeloid Astraea, Attempted Socialism, Elejamie, Fartsniffage, Ifreann, James_xenoland, Lativs, Ostroeuropa, Point Blob, Reich of the New World Order, Sorcery, Stratonesia, Transitional Global Authority, Trivalve
Advertisement