NATION

PASSWORD

Smoking In Public

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Should we ban smoking in public places?

I'll smoke wherever I damn please!
60
14%
No smoking inside public places, restaurants etc. but everywhere else is fine-stop moaning
135
31%
Yes, ban smoking in all public places-only allow it on private property, I'm sick of this cigarette smoke
133
31%
Smokers, I shall have my revenge upon thee! Ban smoking entirely! Prohibition!
56
13%
I couldn't care less/Neutral
21
5%
Other
11
3%
Something witty about David Hasselhoff etc.
15
3%
 
Total votes : 431

User avatar
Occupied Deutschland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18796
Founded: Oct 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Occupied Deutschland » Tue Apr 16, 2013 10:32 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:...
I sound like a damn libertarian now, thank you very much.

Hey, some ideologies promise cookies, some promise the upholding of the 'social good' and moral values, us libertarians?

Cigarettes and moral depravity to your heart's content. :p Eventually anyone any fun sounds like one of us.
Last edited by Occupied Deutschland on Tue Apr 16, 2013 10:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'm General Patton.
Even those who are gone are with us as we go on.

Been busy lately--not around much.

User avatar
Umbra Ac Silentium
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11724
Founded: Aug 03, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Umbra Ac Silentium » Tue Apr 16, 2013 10:33 pm

Welstonia wrote:
Umbra Ac Silentium wrote:I try that but it travels everywhere. ;~; I usually stand thirty or more feet away from everywhere else but the only place the smoke doesn't go is the far back in the field which is even worse than smoke. :V

You know, granted I smoke, but smoke doesn't permeate areas like that. If you stand a while away and up wind you will be fine. If not, just deal with it, don't ruin it for everyone else cause you can't suck it up for a couple minutes each day. Your not going to get cancer or the like from that.

Oh I don't ruin it for anyone else.
I'm pretty much the definition of sucking it up, with a little bit of bitching about it online. ;v
Don't support bans or complain and yell at smokers.
If I could just wear my gas mask around in public it'd be all good. :V
It could just be the area, I dunno though. The smoke really gets around for whatever reason.

Economic Left/Right: -0.63 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.97
Other Compass
The Holy Therns wrote:Your thought pattern is so bizarre I can't even be offended anymore.

User avatar
Pillea
Diplomat
 
Posts: 672
Founded: Oct 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Pillea » Tue Apr 16, 2013 10:34 pm

Umbra Ac Silentium wrote:
Welstonia wrote:You know, granted I smoke, but smoke doesn't permeate areas like that. If you stand a while away and up wind you will be fine. If not, just deal with it, don't ruin it for everyone else cause you can't suck it up for a couple minutes each day. Your not going to get cancer or the like from that.

Oh I don't ruin it for anyone else.
I'm pretty much the definition of sucking it up, with a little bit of bitching about it online. ;v
Don't support bans or complain and yell at smokers.
If I could just wear my gas mask around in public it'd be all good. :V
It could just be the area, I dunno though. The smoke really gets around for whatever reason.


I can sympathize if it means anything. I'm a tobacco snob, so most cigarette smoke is vile to me, and there are some places it does seem to defy physics and just linger.
Trans*, polyamorous, atheist, vegan, pro-choice, pro-animal rights, pro-science, anti-rape culture, lesbian, feminist, far left wing

User avatar
Umbra Ac Silentium
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11724
Founded: Aug 03, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Umbra Ac Silentium » Tue Apr 16, 2013 10:35 pm

Pillea wrote:
Umbra Ac Silentium wrote:Oh I don't ruin it for anyone else.
I'm pretty much the definition of sucking it up, with a little bit of bitching about it online. ;v
Don't support bans or complain and yell at smokers.
If I could just wear my gas mask around in public it'd be all good. :V
It could just be the area, I dunno though. The smoke really gets around for whatever reason.


I can sympathize if it means anything. I'm a tobacco snob, so most cigarette smoke is vile to me, and there are some places it does seem to defy physics and just linger.

It's completely open, so it doesn't make sense to me. :V Shouldn't the open air and no buildings within a hundred yards or so make it disperse quickly? But no. ._. At the bus stop it's like a small vortex just surrounds the area.

Economic Left/Right: -0.63 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.97
Other Compass
The Holy Therns wrote:Your thought pattern is so bizarre I can't even be offended anymore.

User avatar
Ironrite
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 388
Founded: Mar 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ironrite » Tue Apr 16, 2013 10:39 pm

Eh, ban it, it's horrible for your health and for those around you. A great alternative people have found are e-cigs :)
[signature]

South Ironrite Puppet (Far-Right lol) - South_Ironrite

Proud Member of the Liberal-Democrats in the NSG Senate. Ambassador to the National Centrist Party

Tekania wrote:
OMGeverynameistaken wrote:Because some people are under the impression that you have to read him his rights AS YOU ARREST HIM NO MATTER WHAT, even if he's bleeding out from a bullet hole in his neck and was subsequently sedated for a few days.

"Do you understand your rights as I have explained them to you?"

"(bubbling noises)"


Two gurgles for yes, one for no.
Social Democratic Cosmopolitan
Economic Left/Right: -2.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.18
http://www.nstracker.net/?nation=Ironrite

User avatar
Pillea
Diplomat
 
Posts: 672
Founded: Oct 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Pillea » Tue Apr 16, 2013 10:40 pm

Ironrite wrote:Eh, ban it, it's horrible for your health and for those around you. A great alternative people have found are e-cigs :)


That'd be a mighty nasty blow to the economy. What with the massively large tobacco farming industry.
Trans*, polyamorous, atheist, vegan, pro-choice, pro-animal rights, pro-science, anti-rape culture, lesbian, feminist, far left wing

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Tue Apr 16, 2013 10:49 pm

Vitaphone Racing wrote:
Pillea wrote:
When I have to pay 6.57$ for a pack of smokes, because of crazy taxes that are partially put into place to discourage smoking, I'm gonna smoke outside. Why? I don't like the smell of stale smoke, and I like the outside breeze. Also cause I smoke to deal with rampant anxiety issues, sure Xanax is cheaper but this way I can have something as an emergency tool.
Why else? Because I'm legally allowed to smoke outside, and I damn well will if I want.

I don't give a rats arse what you pay for smokes. There is no expressed legal right to smoke wherever you please therefore being allowed to legally smoke anywhere outside could change at any given minute.


It could.

And the U.S. government could order the fifth fleet to bomb Seoul.

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Tue Apr 16, 2013 10:51 pm

Occupied Deutschland wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:...
I sound like a damn libertarian now, thank you very much.

Hey, some ideologies promise cookies, some promise the upholding of the 'social good' and moral values, us libertarians?

Cigarettes and moral depravity to your heart's content. :p Eventually anyone any fun sounds like one of us.


Heh.

Well I've been moderating as I've aged.

User avatar
Vitaphone Racing
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10123
Founded: Aug 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Vitaphone Racing » Tue Apr 16, 2013 10:55 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Vitaphone Racing wrote:You don't have a legal right to smoke so what you feel about your personal liberties doesn't matter the least bit. Likewise it's not up to you to determine whether or not everybody else should "fucking deal with it" when it comes to inhaling unwanted fumes. We already regulated tough exhaust restrictions on cars which you happily point to in defence, why should smokers be immune to further regulation?


Which is why we no longer smoke indoors.

People have scent allergies that can require them to be hospitalized. How dare we allow people to wear strong perfumes, outdoors!

Your 'right' to not have a breath of secondhand smoke is not worth the restriction in personal liberty, especially considering the additional taxation smokers already face.

I sound like a damn libertarian now, thank you very much.

You don't get to decide what is a worthwhile restriction of "personal liberty", society does. All of this is sort of irrelevant to my question of why smokers should be immune from any further regulations about where they can smoke. Already complying to some regulations is a really poor excuse.

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Vitaphone Racing wrote:I don't give a rats arse what you pay for smokes. There is no expressed legal right to smoke wherever you please therefore being allowed to legally smoke anywhere outside could change at any given minute.


It could.

And the U.S. government could order the fifth fleet to bomb Seoul.

Were you just itching to make a humorous response then? I didn't think the likelihood of an occurrence had anything to do with my point of smoking outside not being protected from changes to the law.
Parhe on my Asian-ness.
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.

ayy lmao

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Tue Apr 16, 2013 10:58 pm

...Perhaps I've misunderstood you then. Are you merely arguing that it's possible? Or that it's desirable?

Because one is accurate.

Besides, "society" doesn't seem to think that a ban on smoking in public places is a good use of time or money. Hence, of course, the reason I can smoke on the sidewalk.

User avatar
Occupied Deutschland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18796
Founded: Oct 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Occupied Deutschland » Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:02 pm

Vitaphone Racing wrote:You don't get to decide what is a worthwhile restriction of "personal liberty", society does. All of this is sort of irrelevant to my question of why smokers should be immune from any further regulations about where they can smoke. Already complying to some regulations is a really poor excuse.

Smokers contribute more to society than nonsmokers, at great risk to themselves for that matter. I don't expect any thanks, but don't try to limit how much I serve my country because my greater level of patriotism and bigger heart make you uncomfortable. If you cared about people as much as I do you'd smoke too.

To be more serious, the only reason to ban smoking in any public places is for some people to swing around their massive morality penis and loudly declare how much more bigger their morality penis is than smokers morality penis.
...
I guess that wasn't much more serious was it?
I'm General Patton.
Even those who are gone are with us as we go on.

Been busy lately--not around much.

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:03 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:...Perhaps I've misunderstood you then. Are you merely arguing that it's possible? Or that it's desirable?

Because one is accurate.

Besides, "society" doesn't seem to think that a ban on smoking in public places is a good use of time or money. Hence, of course, the reason I can smoke on the sidewalk.

I don't see how anyone could view it as possible, at least in this day and age.
password scrambled

User avatar
Vitaphone Racing
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10123
Founded: Aug 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Vitaphone Racing » Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:03 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:...Perhaps I've misunderstood you then. Are you merely arguing that it's possible? Or that it's desirable?

Because one is accurate.

Besides, "society" doesn't seem to think that a ban on smoking in public places is a good use of time or money. Hence, of course, the reason I can smoke on the sidewalk.

I am arguing that a ban on public smoking would indeed be possible although I don't desire such a law. That aside, I still think current "anti-smoking" laws should go further than what they already do.
Parhe on my Asian-ness.
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.

ayy lmao

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:04 pm

Occupied Deutschland wrote:
Vitaphone Racing wrote:You don't get to decide what is a worthwhile restriction of "personal liberty", society does. All of this is sort of irrelevant to my question of why smokers should be immune from any further regulations about where they can smoke. Already complying to some regulations is a really poor excuse.

Smokers contribute more to society than nonsmokers, at great risk to themselves for that matter. I don't expect any thanks, but don't try to limit how much I serve my country because my greater level of patriotism and bigger heart make you uncomfortable. If you cared about people as much as I do you'd smoke too.

To be more serious, the only reason to ban smoking in any public places is for some people to swing around their massive morality penis and loudly declare how much more bigger their morality penis is than smokers morality penis.
...
I guess that wasn't much more serious was it?

This is the best thing I have read in a smoking thread ever.
password scrambled

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:04 pm

Occupied Deutschland wrote:
Vitaphone Racing wrote:You don't get to decide what is a worthwhile restriction of "personal liberty", society does. All of this is sort of irrelevant to my question of why smokers should be immune from any further regulations about where they can smoke. Already complying to some regulations is a really poor excuse.

Smokers contribute more to society than nonsmokers, at great risk to themselves for that matter. I don't expect any thanks, but don't try to limit how much I serve my country because my greater level of patriotism and bigger heart make you uncomfortable. If you cared about people as much as I do you'd smoke too.

To be more serious, the only reason to ban smoking in any public places is for some people to swing around their massive morality penis and loudly declare how much more bigger their morality penis is than smokers morality penis.
...
I guess that wasn't much more serious was it?


I approve of this post.

User avatar
Umbra Ac Silentium
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11724
Founded: Aug 03, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Umbra Ac Silentium » Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:05 pm

Occupied Deutschland wrote:
Vitaphone Racing wrote:You don't get to decide what is a worthwhile restriction of "personal liberty", society does. All of this is sort of irrelevant to my question of why smokers should be immune from any further regulations about where they can smoke. Already complying to some regulations is a really poor excuse.

Smokers contribute more to society than nonsmokers, at great risk to themselves for that matter. I don't expect any thanks, but don't try to limit how much I serve my country because my greater level of patriotism and bigger heart make you uncomfortable. If you cared about people as much as I do you'd smoke too.

To be more serious, the only reason to ban smoking in any public places is for some people to swing around their massive morality penis and loudly declare how much more bigger their morality penis is than smokers morality penis.
...
I guess that wasn't much more serious was it?

So it's morality penis versus very phallic object in mouth users.
Dammit Freud.

Economic Left/Right: -0.63 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.97
Other Compass
The Holy Therns wrote:Your thought pattern is so bizarre I can't even be offended anymore.

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:05 pm

Condunum wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:...Perhaps I've misunderstood you then. Are you merely arguing that it's possible? Or that it's desirable?

Because one is accurate.

Besides, "society" doesn't seem to think that a ban on smoking in public places is a good use of time or money. Hence, of course, the reason I can smoke on the sidewalk.

I don't see how anyone could view it as possible, at least in this day and age.


Well, possible within the sense that it's entirely possible that the NWO is real and we're all secretly implanted with Jewish control chips.

User avatar
Ironrite
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 388
Founded: Mar 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ironrite » Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:05 pm

Pillea wrote:
Ironrite wrote:Eh, ban it, it's horrible for your health and for those around you. A great alternative people have found are e-cigs :)


That'd be a mighty nasty blow to the economy. What with the massively large tobacco farming industry.


The possibilities, I do cede to ou though, as know realize some flaws in my logic :p
[signature]

South Ironrite Puppet (Far-Right lol) - South_Ironrite

Proud Member of the Liberal-Democrats in the NSG Senate. Ambassador to the National Centrist Party

Tekania wrote:
OMGeverynameistaken wrote:Because some people are under the impression that you have to read him his rights AS YOU ARREST HIM NO MATTER WHAT, even if he's bleeding out from a bullet hole in his neck and was subsequently sedated for a few days.

"Do you understand your rights as I have explained them to you?"

"(bubbling noises)"


Two gurgles for yes, one for no.
Social Democratic Cosmopolitan
Economic Left/Right: -2.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.18
http://www.nstracker.net/?nation=Ironrite

User avatar
Welstonia (Ancient)
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 53
Founded: Apr 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Welstonia (Ancient) » Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:05 pm

Umbra Ac Silentium wrote:
Welstonia wrote:You know, granted I smoke, but smoke doesn't permeate areas like that. If you stand a while away and up wind you will be fine. If not, just deal with it, don't ruin it for everyone else cause you can't suck it up for a couple minutes each day. Your not going to get cancer or the like from that.

Oh I don't ruin it for anyone else.
I'm pretty much the definition of sucking it up, with a little bit of bitching about it online. ;v
Don't support bans or complain and yell at smokers.
If I could just wear my gas mask around in public it'd be all good. :V
It could just be the area, I dunno though. The smoke really gets around for whatever reason.

If your just bitching online than I guess you are, I assumed you were supporting outdoor bans. The problem is, most of the hardline anti smoking people are highly inconsiderate, and over react to outdoor smoke, like the fake coughing when they are up wind and across the street.
Political Compass: Economic -9.7 Social -9.3. I identify with many ideologies, because every person has their own interpretation of each term. You could call me a democrat (as in supports democracy, not the democratic party) a socialist, libertarian, leftest, communist idealist, green, progressive, or liberal, and not be wrong depending on how you mean it. I am also a gay male and an atheist.

User avatar
Pillea
Diplomat
 
Posts: 672
Founded: Oct 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Pillea » Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:06 pm

Occupied Deutschland wrote:
Vitaphone Racing wrote:You don't get to decide what is a worthwhile restriction of "personal liberty", society does. All of this is sort of irrelevant to my question of why smokers should be immune from any further regulations about where they can smoke. Already complying to some regulations is a really poor excuse.

Smokers contribute more to society than nonsmokers, at great risk to themselves for that matter. I don't expect any thanks, but don't try to limit how much I serve my country because my greater level of patriotism and bigger heart make you uncomfortable. If you cared about people as much as I do you'd smoke too.

To be more serious, the only reason to ban smoking in any public places is for some people to swing around their massive morality penis and loudly declare how much more bigger their morality penis is than smokers morality penis.
...
I guess that wasn't much more serious was it?


I've never felt more patriotic in my whole life.
Trans*, polyamorous, atheist, vegan, pro-choice, pro-animal rights, pro-science, anti-rape culture, lesbian, feminist, far left wing

User avatar
Umbra Ac Silentium
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11724
Founded: Aug 03, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Umbra Ac Silentium » Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:07 pm

Welstonia wrote:
Umbra Ac Silentium wrote:Oh I don't ruin it for anyone else.
I'm pretty much the definition of sucking it up, with a little bit of bitching about it online. ;v
Don't support bans or complain and yell at smokers.
If I could just wear my gas mask around in public it'd be all good. :V
It could just be the area, I dunno though. The smoke really gets around for whatever reason.

If your just bitching online than I guess you are, I assumed you were supporting outdoor bans. The problem is, most of the hardline anti smoking people are highly inconsiderate, and over react to outdoor smoke, like the fake coughing when they are up wind and across the street.

Nah, I wouldn't support a ban on it. :v I'd just appreciate it if people kept their smoke away from me. If not oh well. :V
Mm, smoking does make me cough, but I don't over-exaggerate it. My lungs suck. Allergies, asthma, and I've had a nagging cough for about half a year now. :v

Economic Left/Right: -0.63 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.97
Other Compass
The Holy Therns wrote:Your thought pattern is so bizarre I can't even be offended anymore.

User avatar
Costa Alegria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6454
Founded: Aug 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Alegria » Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:38 pm

Vitaphone Racing wrote:And you're also a lot further away from it.


No you're not.

And exhaust gas from cars is either emitted extremely low or extremely high to minimize the chance of someone breathing it in.


Bullshit. You breathe in more fumes from motor vehicles than you do from ninja smokers.

Already complying to some regulations is a really poor excuse.


And your entire argument of "ban smoking because it annoys me" is apparently the single best argument put forward in the history of internet debates?

And roads, unlike many pedestrian footpaths, are not covered to trap exhausts.


Right, because every pedestrian footpath is covered.
I AM THE RHYMENOCEROUS!
Member of the [under new management] in the NSG Senate

If You Lot Really Must Know...
Pro: Legalisation of Marijuana, LGBT rights, freedom of speech, freedom of press, democracy yadda yadda.
Con: Nationalism, authoritariansim, totalitarianism, omnipotent controlling religious beliefs, general stupidity.
Meh: Everything else that I can't be fucked giving an opinion about.

User avatar
Costa Alegria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6454
Founded: Aug 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Alegria » Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:40 pm

Vitaphone Racing wrote:I don't give a rats arse what you pay for smokes. There is no expressed legal right to smoke wherever you please therefore being allowed to legally smoke anywhere outside could change at any given minute.


Same thing goes for driving. You don't have a legal right to use a motor vehicle and pollute the atmosphere as you do so.
I AM THE RHYMENOCEROUS!
Member of the [under new management] in the NSG Senate

If You Lot Really Must Know...
Pro: Legalisation of Marijuana, LGBT rights, freedom of speech, freedom of press, democracy yadda yadda.
Con: Nationalism, authoritariansim, totalitarianism, omnipotent controlling religious beliefs, general stupidity.
Meh: Everything else that I can't be fucked giving an opinion about.

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:41 pm

Costa Alegria wrote:
Vitaphone Racing wrote:And you're also a lot further away from it.


No you're not.

And exhaust gas from cars is either emitted extremely low or extremely high to minimize the chance of someone breathing it in.


Bullshit. You breathe in more fumes from motor vehicles than you do from ninja smokers.

Already complying to some regulations is a really poor excuse.


And your entire argument of "ban smoking because it annoys me" is apparently the single best argument put forward in the history of internet debates?

And roads, unlike many pedestrian footpaths, are not covered to trap exhausts.


Right, because every pedestrian footpath is covered.

Hell, most pedestrian footpaths are completely open.
password scrambled

User avatar
Welstonia (Ancient)
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 53
Founded: Apr 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Welstonia (Ancient) » Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:43 pm

Umbra Ac Silentium wrote:
Welstonia wrote:If your just bitching online than I guess you are, I assumed you were supporting outdoor bans. The problem is, most of the hardline anti smoking people are highly inconsiderate, and over react to outdoor smoke, like the fake coughing when they are up wind and across the street.

Nah, I wouldn't support a ban on it. :v I'd just appreciate it if people kept their smoke away from me. If not oh well. :V
Mm, smoking does make me cough, but I don't over-exaggerate it. My lungs suck. Allergies, asthma, and I've had a nagging cough for about half a year now. :v

Usually if you ask really politely people smokers will move or atempt to avoid blowing in your face, at least here, I don't know where you are from. But yeah, sorry if I came across as an ass.
Political Compass: Economic -9.7 Social -9.3. I identify with many ideologies, because every person has their own interpretation of each term. You could call me a democrat (as in supports democracy, not the democratic party) a socialist, libertarian, leftest, communist idealist, green, progressive, or liberal, and not be wrong depending on how you mean it. I am also a gay male and an atheist.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aerlanica, Ameriganastan, Bienenhalde, Cannot think of a name, Cetaros, Chodeburg, Des-Bal, Dtn, Duvniask, Eurocom, Grinning Dragon, Juansonia, Necroghastia, Nilokeras, Novaya Equestria, Pizza Friday Forever91, Rary, Techocracy101010, The Jamesian Republic, TheKeyToJoy, Tlaceceyaya, Umeria, United Bongo States of the New America, Valrifall, Vassenor, Washington Resistance Army, Xind

Advertisement

Remove ads