NATION

PASSWORD

Michigan considers $10 minimum wage

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Good or bad?

Good
234
51%
Meh
87
19%
Bad
135
30%
 
Total votes : 456

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Wed Apr 17, 2013 2:56 pm

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Khadgar wrote:So if unemployment is forced upward by higher minimum wages, shouldn't there be a strong correlation between minimum wage and unemployment?

These numbers are available.

http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/lab ... chart.aspx
http://www.bls.gov/web/laus/laumstrk.htm


Regardless the principle is that minimum wage is an attack on freedom. Even if it doesn't equal higher unemployment it is wrong based on principle alone.

The minimum wage promotes freedom.
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Wed Apr 17, 2013 2:57 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:
The law says I am not allowed to take a job unless it pays above minimum wage. The law is the middleman in job offers.

Where?
Freiheit Reich wrote:Perhaps a company is willing to hire me for $5 an hour but not willing to hire me for $7 an hour (or whatever the minimum wage is).

And?


OK, I should have said 'the employer is forbidden from offering me a job which pays less than minimum wage.' I won't know about the potential job I lost because it was never even offered. The law was still a middleman between me and the job, I just didn't know it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_wage_law

Minimum wage law is the body of law which prohibits employers from hiring employees or workers for less than a given hourly, daily or monthly minimum wage. More than 90% of all countries have some kind of minimum wage legislation.[1]
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:00 pm

Sibirsky wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:*cough*Bullshit*cough*
(Image)

Misleading chart is misleading.

Measuring the rate of growth of spending is something, certainly. All that really says, is that Obama has only increased spending modestly, after it was already sky high, from the Bush years.

This certainly qualifies Obama as a big spender.

Perhaps, but Bush increased spending more, which means he was worse. Obama's rate of spending increase is half that of Clinton's.
Last edited by Geilinor on Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:00 pm

Frisivisia wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:
Regardless the principle is that minimum wage is an attack on freedom. Even if it doesn't equal higher unemployment it is wrong based on principle alone.

The minimum wage promotes freedom.


How? It prevents me from working for a wage I believe to be fair. It also restricts companies from hiring people for a wage they believe is fair. Freedom is letting the market determine wages.
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Imperiatom
Minister
 
Posts: 2416
Founded: Mar 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperiatom » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:01 pm

Frisivisia wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:
Regardless the principle is that minimum wage is an attack on freedom. Even if it doesn't equal higher unemployment it is wrong based on principle alone.

The minimum wage promotes freedom.


Yes because last time a checked the definition of freedom and democracy did not include the word minimum wage.

That's what Churchill did, he fought the second world war over the right to a minimum wage.

User avatar
Imperiatom
Minister
 
Posts: 2416
Founded: Mar 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperiatom » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:02 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:Misleading chart is misleading.

Measuring the rate of growth of spending is something, certainly. All that really says, is that Obama has only increased spending modestly, after it was already sky high, from the Bush years.

This certainly qualifies Obama as a big spender.

Perhaps, but Bush increased spending more, which means he was worse. Obama's rate of spending increase is half that of Clinton's.


He is still increasing it. That man is the worlds biggest spender.

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:03 pm

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Norstal wrote:I've been to Singapore. You're right that no bums live there. Because only rich people live there. So a minimum wage would be absurd since everyone is making money overseas except for migrant workers.


There are poor people everywhere. The point was that the USA has a minimum but a bigger homeless problem, a higher unemployment rate, and a higher crime rate. If minimum wage is so great than the USA should have lower rates of all of these things.

Homeless people never begged for money from me in Singapore but they have done this in the USA. This even happened in smaller cities.

Well, I mean, yeah, cause you don't beg money from the elite, who they presume everyone who live there to be. You don't go to Warren Buffet's house and ask him "please sir, give me some money."

The real minimum wage is $0 per hour. Liberals would rather have somebody make $0 an hour instead of $5 per hour. Liberals tell people, 'I'm sorry, I can't let you take that job because it only pays $5 per hour even though you want it, you better keep looking until you can get one aying $7, $8, $10 (whatever minimum wage is) per hour.' Liberals are middlemen in the negotiation between employer and potential employee.

And all you right-wingers do is masturbate until the economy improves am I right?
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
The Whispers
Minister
 
Posts: 2323
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Whispers » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:04 pm

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Frisivisia wrote:The minimum wage promotes freedom.


How? It prevents me from working for a wage I believe to be fair.

Are you old enough to have to pay for anything real, or is this "I'll take $3 an hour if it means I can play CoD without asking my stupid dad for money" type talk?

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:05 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:Misleading chart is misleading.

Measuring the rate of growth of spending is something, certainly. All that really says, is that Obama has only increased spending modestly, after it was already sky high, from the Bush years.

This certainly qualifies Obama as a big spender.

Perhaps, but Bush increased spending more, which means he was worse. Obama's rate of spending increase is half that of Clinton's.



Person 1: I raped 5 dogs
Person 2: I raped 10 dogs (100% increase in dogs raped)
Person 3: I raped 12 dogs (20% increase in dogs raped)

Does this mean person 3 is the better than person 2 because he only raped 20% more dogs?

We can use this same case with drinking whiskey, using heroin, etc. Total usage is more important that increase.

To be fair though we should adjust all total dollars to the same (etc. use 2012 dollars for all TOTAL spending, don't use marginal spending increases as a guide).
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:05 pm

Imperiatom wrote:
Frisivisia wrote:The minimum wage promotes freedom.


Yes because last time a checked the definition of freedom and democracy did not include the word minimum wage.

That's what Churchill did, he fought the second world war over the right to a minimum wage.

Minimum wage makes wage slavery more difficult, and coupled with other regulations, impossible. Ending wage slavery increases freedom.
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
Imperiatom
Minister
 
Posts: 2416
Founded: Mar 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperiatom » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:06 pm

Norstal wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:
There are poor people everywhere. The point was that the USA has a minimum but a bigger homeless problem, a higher unemployment rate, and a higher crime rate. If minimum wage is so great than the USA should have lower rates of all of these things.

Homeless people never begged for money from me in Singapore but they have done this in the USA. This even happened in smaller cities.

Well, I mean, yeah, cause you don't beg money from the elite, who they presume everyone who live there to be. You don't go to Warren Buffet's house and ask him "please sir, give me some money."

The real minimum wage is $0 per hour. Liberals would rather have somebody make $0 an hour instead of $5 per hour. Liberals tell people, 'I'm sorry, I can't let you take that job because it only pays $5 per hour even though you want it, you better keep looking until you can get one aying $7, $8, $10 (whatever minimum wage is) per hour.' Liberals are middlemen in the negotiation between employer and potential employee.

And all you right-wingers do is masturbate until the economy improves am I right?


No we pay for prostitutes to do it for us. Nothing like the division of labour :p .

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:06 pm

Freiheit Reich wrote:OK, I should have said 'the employer is forbidden from offering me a job which pays less than minimum wage.' I won't know about the potential job I lost because it was never even offered. The law was still a middleman between me and the job, I just didn't know it.

And this is bad why...? It's like whining about all of the puppies you COULD have adopted.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:08 pm

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Frisivisia wrote:The minimum wage promotes freedom.


How? It prevents me from working for a wage I believe to be fair. It also restricts companies from hiring people for a wage they believe is fair. Freedom is letting the market determine wages.

The state is part of the market.

I don't understand this stupidity. If all governments were to collapse overnight and anarchy ensues, I could still form a roving bandit that does what the government does and no one could even tell the difference.

If they didn't want a minimum wage, perhaps they should've had higher wages that makes everyone happy. Otherwise, well, I'll stick with my band of bandits.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Yes Im Biop
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14942
Founded: Feb 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yes Im Biop » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:08 pm

That 3 dollar extra will just be added to whatever they produce meaning that they make 3 dollars more, and cost inflates to match it.
Scaile, Proud, Dangerous
Ambassador
Posts: 1653
Founded: Jul 01, 2011
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...

Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.

Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
Yes, I Am infact Biop.


Rest in Peace Riley. Biopan Embassy Non Military Realism Thread
Seeya 1K Cat's Miss ya man. Well, That Esclated Quickly

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:08 pm

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Perhaps, but Bush increased spending more, which means he was worse. Obama's rate of spending increase is half that of Clinton's.



Person 1: I raped 5 dogs
Person 2: I raped 10 dogs (100% increase in dogs raped)
Person 3: I raped 12 dogs (20% increase in dogs raped)

Does this mean person 3 is the better than person 2 because he only raped 20% more dogs?

We can use this same case with drinking whiskey, using heroin, etc. Total usage is more important that increase.

To be fair though we should adjust all total dollars to the same (etc. use 2012 dollars for all TOTAL spending, don't use marginal spending increases as a guide).

That analogy is neither flattering nor accurate.
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
Imperiatom
Minister
 
Posts: 2416
Founded: Mar 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperiatom » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:09 pm

Frisivisia wrote:
Imperiatom wrote:
Yes because last time a checked the definition of freedom and democracy did not include the word minimum wage.

That's what Churchill did, he fought the second world war over the right to a minimum wage.

Minimum wage makes wage slavery more difficult, and coupled with other regulations, impossible. Ending wage slavery increases freedom.


Fuck off(my expression of exasperation) . That is the most ridiculous thing i have heard today. A minimum wage nether aids and abets wage slavery and nether does it determine if wage slavery is deemed impermissible(i mean stop it occurring). Even in my job i am a slave to my wage, when does this carte Blanche end?
Last edited by Imperiatom on Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:13 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Benomia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14615
Founded: Oct 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Benomia » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:10 pm

The Whispers wrote:Seems reasonable.
Remembering games, and daisy chains, and laughs...Got to keep the loonies on the path.
The Archangel Conglomerate wrote:You've obviously never seen the Benomian M16A3s.
Carathon wrote:*Logs in with the name of Troll Alliance and writes a short app with poor grammar and logic.*Somehow genuinely surprised when denied*
Ragnarum wrote:Ragnarum transforms into a giant godzilla like creature, then walks into the sunset while emotional music plays and Morgan Freeman narrates.
Kouralia wrote:Everyone hates us: we're MMW. We're like the poster children of Realismfggtry.
Sauritican wrote:We've all been spending too much time with Ben
(-9.8, -10.0)
Map of Benomia
NS's Resident Floydian
Left 4 Dead RP
Want me to explain life to you?

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:10 pm

Frisivisia wrote:
Imperiatom wrote:
Yes because last time a checked the definition of freedom and democracy did not include the word minimum wage.

That's what Churchill did, he fought the second world war over the right to a minimum wage.

Minimum wage makes wage slavery more difficult, and coupled with other regulations, impossible. Ending wage slavery increases freedom.


Slavery is wrong. If I choose to work for $0 an hour it is not slavery. If I choose to work for $2 an hour, this is not slavery.

Slavery is forced work. FORCED is different than choice.

Singapore does not legalize slavery and they don't have minimum wage laws.
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Imperiatom
Minister
 
Posts: 2416
Founded: Mar 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperiatom » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:12 pm

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Perhaps, but Bush increased spending more, which means he was worse. Obama's rate of spending increase is half that of Clinton's.



Person 1: I raped 5 dogs
Person 2: I raped 10 dogs (100% increase in dogs raped)
Person 3: I raped 12 dogs (20% increase in dogs raped)

Does this mean person 3 is the better than person 2 because he only raped 20% more dogs?

We can use this same case with drinking whiskey, using heroin, etc. Total usage is more important that increase.

To be fair though we should adjust all total dollars to the same (etc. use 2012 dollars for all TOTAL spending, don't use marginal spending increases as a guide).


Well said they might understand the argument now.

User avatar
The Whispers
Minister
 
Posts: 2323
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Whispers » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:12 pm

Yes Im Biop wrote:That 3 dollar extra will just be added to whatever they produce meaning that they make 3 dollars more, and cost inflates to match it.

This is making an assumption that a) everything people from Michigan buy is made by people in Michigan who are all working at the minimum wage in the first place, b) that consumers will put up with that increase, c) that no improvements in industrial capability are made, d) that raw material/transport etc. costs also rise at the same rate and that e) those in charge of setting prices put things up the amount that you think they will.

Plus probably some more things that I didn't even think of.

That is a lot of assumptions to make.

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:12 pm

The Whispers wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:
How? It prevents me from working for a wage I believe to be fair.

Are you old enough to have to pay for anything real, or is this "I'll take $3 an hour if it means I can play CoD without asking my stupid dad for money" type talk?


People in Singapore pay their bills without minimum wage laws. They manage to live quite well.
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
The Whispers
Minister
 
Posts: 2323
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Whispers » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:13 pm

Freiheit Reich wrote:
The Whispers wrote:Are you old enough to have to pay for anything real, or is this "I'll take $3 an hour if it means I can play CoD without asking my stupid dad for money" type talk?


People in Singapore pay their bills without minimum wage laws. They manage to live quite well.

Depends on the people, and you should probably answer my question.

User avatar
Imperiatom
Minister
 
Posts: 2416
Founded: Mar 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperiatom » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:14 pm

The Whispers wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:
People in Singapore pay their bills without minimum wage laws. They manage to live quite well.

Depends on the people, and you should probably answer my question.


Its all about ARMA.

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:15 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:OK, I should have said 'the employer is forbidden from offering me a job which pays less than minimum wage.' I won't know about the potential job I lost because it was never even offered. The law was still a middleman between me and the job, I just didn't know it.

And this is bad why...? It's like whining about all of the puppies you COULD have adopted.


I need a job and I was 'cockblocked' from it by some do-gooder minimum wage supporter. I am still unemployed because I lost the job opportunity. $0 an hour is less than $5 an hour. Nobody HAS to give me a minimum wage job, they can just say 'Forget it, I don't need an extra employee after all.'
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:17 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:If you ask me, raising wages on such a large scale would prove to be harmful.
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Continental Free States, Eahland, EuroStralia, Luminerra, Necroghastia, Perchan, Senkaku

Advertisement

Remove ads