NATION

PASSWORD

Feminists sabotage yet another talk on men's equality

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57902
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:13 pm

Ora Amaris wrote:
New England and The Maritimes wrote:This argument is starting to bother me.

So I will join in and get even more bothered.

It is misogyny because it is not about "hating men" it is about "hating men who act like women." That's the whole fucking point. If you "act LIKE A WOMAN" you are discriminated against, not if you "are a man."

THIS x1000
You put it perfectly, Maritimes.

Ostroeuropa wrote:I disagree that women are more disadvantaged in western society than men. I think men are probably more disadvantaged now.
Women have a safety net and won't fall below it. Men are expected to either be rich, conform to gender stereotypes, or suffer.
I fully accept my personal bias may be coloring the issue given that I give more of a shit about violence than capital.

If you believe that men are getting fucked over, then you'd be right, because not every man can conform to the perfect alpha male standard. And I agree that women don't look at this in feminism enough, much in the same way that the second wave didn't look at women of colour or transwomen. So, while feminists do think these issues warrant attention, they pay more attention to issues that directly affect women, such as the rape culture and pay gap.

THIS is why feminism (imo) needs to have a male perspective in order to carry forward, because the issues that men face in society when it comes to issues relating to gender come directly from the fact that men can't conform to the perfect alpha male standard.

While you definitely should be upset that you were discriminated in your domestic abuse case, instead of shunning feminism you should be the one to go up to them and say "This is why you need me."


The focus on women is inherent to feminism and feminist theory. It won't stop, so the only alternative is a gender egalitarian or gender abolitionist movement.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Sailsia
Senator
 
Posts: 4475
Founded: Mar 05, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sailsia » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:13 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Sailsia wrote:You are aware that one can be against rape, and believe that the concept of rape culture as interpreted by feminism just isn't the right way to reduce the number of rapes that occur, right? See, you've subscribed to this "if you aren't with us, you're against us" mentality and it's completely removed your ability to see the debate from the other person's point of view.


If you are not against rape culture, or at the very least the concept of rape culture, you are actually for the legitimization of rape.

Stop. Just stop now.
RIP RON PAUL
Author of the U.S. Constitution
July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:14 pm

Sailsia wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
If you are not against rape culture, or at the very least the concept of rape culture, you are actually for the legitimization of rape.

Stop. Just stop now.


When faced against you and your ilk? Never.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57902
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:14 pm

Freelanderness wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
How can rhetoric be violent?
And lemme point out that the number of times someone has called me a faggot or a retard is far, far more than the number of times they did so and then proceeded to attack me. To say one "Leads" to the other is a stupid as saying speech leads to it.

Better question is how can you call yourself an egalitarian and then fire off slurs against other people for their identity?


I've been called a faggot because i'm a bisexual.
I've been called a retard because i suffer from mental health issues.
(depression).
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
United Dependencies
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13659
Founded: Oct 22, 2007
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby United Dependencies » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:14 pm

Sailsia wrote:Stop. Just stop now.

Stop what? and why?
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.

Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.

This is Nationstates we're here to help

Are you a native or resident of North Carolina?

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:14 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Freelanderness wrote:Better question is how can you call yourself an egalitarian and then fire off slurs against other people for their identity?


I've been called a faggot because i'm a bisexual.
I've been called a retard because i suffer from mental health issues.
(depression).


Which in no way excuses your victimization of others along those lines.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57902
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:15 pm

Condunum wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
It's fairly typical of feminists to come out in favor of censorship these days. Gail dines would be proud.

How did you get censorship out of this.


The context of her attack there is that i'm not in favor of punishing people for saying things like "Tranny" or for being offensive. Since i'm not in favor of punishing people for words they speak, I apparently support suicide etc.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57902
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:15 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
I've been called a faggot because i'm a bisexual.
I've been called a retard because i suffer from mental health issues.
(depression).


Which in no way excuses your victimization of others along those lines.


Where did I do that?
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ora Amaris
Diplomat
 
Posts: 650
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ora Amaris » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:16 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Ora Amaris wrote:THIS x1000
You put it perfectly, Maritimes.


If you believe that men are getting fucked over, then you'd be right, because not every man can conform to the perfect alpha male standard. And I agree that women don't look at this in feminism enough, much in the same way that the second wave didn't look at women of colour or transwomen. So, while feminists do think these issues warrant attention, they pay more attention to issues that directly affect women, such as the rape culture and pay gap.

THIS is why feminism (imo) needs to have a male perspective in order to carry forward, because the issues that men face in society when it comes to issues relating to gender come directly from the fact that men can't conform to the perfect alpha male standard.

While you definitely should be upset that you were discriminated in your domestic abuse case, instead of shunning feminism you should be the one to go up to them and say "This is why you need me."


The focus on women is inherent to feminism and feminist theory. It won't stop, so the only alternative is a gender egalitarian or gender abolitionist movement.

Because women are the ones who got fucked over the most in society. The only reason why men do too is because they're perceived as being womanlike. This is the reason why MtF transpeople face much more discrimination than FtM transpeople.
Let beauty and creativity reign throughout the universe,
Preserve the sublime equilibrium of nature,
Find enlightenment through the doors of perception,
An it harm none, do what thou wilt,
Respect yourself, respect all life, celebrate oneness with the universe.
Economic Left/Right: -7.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.49
Factbook Entry

User avatar
The New Sea Territory
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16992
Founded: Dec 13, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Sea Territory » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:17 pm

I personally have two testicles and don't find the need to have them removed by the Feminine Führer and his band of merry Feminazis, thank you. Equal legal rights, sure. Feminine supremacy, not so much.
| Ⓐ | Anarchist Communist | Heideggerian Marxist | Vegetarian | Bisexual | Stirnerite | Slavic/Germanic Pagan | ᛟ |
Solntsa Roshcha --- Postmodern Poyltheist
"Christianity had brutally planted the poisoned blade in the healthy, quivering flesh of all humanity; it had goaded a cold wave
of darkness with mystically brutal fury to dim the serene and festive exultation of the dionysian spirit of our pagan ancestors."
-Renzo Novatore, Verso il Nulla Creatore

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:17 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Condunum wrote:How did you get censorship out of this.


The context of her attack there is that i'm not in favor of punishing people for saying things like "Tranny" or for being offensive. Since i'm not in favor of punishing people for words they speak, I apparently support suicide etc.


I'm in favour of using your free speech to pressure other people into not being bigots and not encouraging violence.

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:17 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Which in no way excuses your victimization of others along those lines.


Where did I do that?


The part where you said it's your fault for being offended?

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57902
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:17 pm

Ora Amaris wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
The focus on women is inherent to feminism and feminist theory. It won't stop, so the only alternative is a gender egalitarian or gender abolitionist movement.

Because women are the ones who got fucked over the most in society. The only reason why men do too is because they're perceived as being womanlike. This is the reason why MtF transpeople face much more discrimination than FtM transpeople.


Despite my dislike of feminism i've regularly stated it was a necessary movement.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:17 pm

The New Sea Territory wrote:I personally have two testicles and don't find the need to have them removed by the Feminine Führer and his band of merry Feminazis, thank you. Equal legal rights, sure. Feminine supremacy, not so much.


Not all feminists are female supremacists :p
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
The New Sea Territory
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16992
Founded: Dec 13, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Sea Territory » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:18 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Ora Amaris wrote:THIS x1000
You put it perfectly, Maritimes.


If you believe that men are getting fucked over, then you'd be right, because not every man can conform to the perfect alpha male standard. And I agree that women don't look at this in feminism enough, much in the same way that the second wave didn't look at women of colour or transwomen. So, while feminists do think these issues warrant attention, they pay more attention to issues that directly affect women, such as the rape culture and pay gap.

THIS is why feminism (imo) needs to have a male perspective in order to carry forward, because the issues that men face in society when it comes to issues relating to gender come directly from the fact that men can't conform to the perfect alpha male standard.

While you definitely should be upset that you were discriminated in your domestic abuse case, instead of shunning feminism you should be the one to go up to them and say "This is why you need me."


The focus on women is inherent to feminism and feminist theory. It won't stop, so the only alternative is a gender egalitarian or gender abolitionist movement.


Or you could be like me and not give two shits. that would work. Let people hold opinions, but keep them out of legality.
| Ⓐ | Anarchist Communist | Heideggerian Marxist | Vegetarian | Bisexual | Stirnerite | Slavic/Germanic Pagan | ᛟ |
Solntsa Roshcha --- Postmodern Poyltheist
"Christianity had brutally planted the poisoned blade in the healthy, quivering flesh of all humanity; it had goaded a cold wave
of darkness with mystically brutal fury to dim the serene and festive exultation of the dionysian spirit of our pagan ancestors."
-Renzo Novatore, Verso il Nulla Creatore

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:18 pm

The New Sea Territory wrote:I personally have two testicles and don't find the need to have them removed by the Feminine Führer and his band of merry Feminazis, thank you. Equal legal rights, sure. Feminine supremacy, not so much.


Thank gawd no one has done that.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57902
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:18 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Where did I do that?


The part where you said it's your fault for being offended?


Yep. Because it is. It's their fault if they are offended too. That isn't victimization, it's stating the obvious.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:18 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
The part where you said it's your fault for being offended?


Yep. Because it is. It's their fault if they are offended too. That isn't victimization, it's stating the obvious.


And victim blaming.

User avatar
The Joseon Dynasty
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6015
Founded: Jan 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Joseon Dynasty » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:19 pm

The New Sea Territory wrote:I personally have two testicles and don't find the need to have them removed by the Feminine Führer and his band of merry Feminazis, thank you. Equal legal rights, sure. Feminine supremacy, not so much.


The Feminine Führer is a bloke? Even Feminism is the Patriarchy!
  • No, I'm not Korean. I'm British and as white as the Queen's buttocks.
  • Bio: I'm a PhD student in Statistics. Interested in all sorts of things. Currently getting into statistical signal processing for brain imaging. Currently co-authoring a paper on labour market dynamics, hopefully branching off into a test of the Markov property for labour market transition rates.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57902
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:19 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Yep. Because it is. It's their fault if they are offended too. That isn't victimization, it's stating the obvious.


And victim blaming.


How so?
If someone calls you ugly you can either decide to ignore them, or decide you give such a massive shit about their opinion that you've become devestated by it.
It's your fault if you do the latter. It really is just as simple as deciding not to give a fuck. Trust me. I've done it. There is no excuse for bawwing about being offended.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ora Amaris
Diplomat
 
Posts: 650
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ora Amaris » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:20 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Ora Amaris wrote:Because women are the ones who got fucked over the most in society. The only reason why men do too is because they're perceived as being womanlike. This is the reason why MtF transpeople face much more discrimination than FtM transpeople.


Despite my dislike of feminism i've regularly stated it was a necessary movement.

And now, the only thing that feminism is lacking are those men who dare to want to not be an uber-masculine body builder fucknut.
Let beauty and creativity reign throughout the universe,
Preserve the sublime equilibrium of nature,
Find enlightenment through the doors of perception,
An it harm none, do what thou wilt,
Respect yourself, respect all life, celebrate oneness with the universe.
Economic Left/Right: -7.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.49
Factbook Entry

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:21 pm

The Joseon Dynasty wrote:
The New Sea Territory wrote:I personally have two testicles and don't find the need to have them removed by the Feminine Führer and his band of merry Feminazis, thank you. Equal legal rights, sure. Feminine supremacy, not so much.


The Feminine Führer is a bloke? Even Feminism is the Patriarchy!


LOL! Dude, this was awesome :lol2:
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57902
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:21 pm

Ora Amaris wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Despite my dislike of feminism i've regularly stated it was a necessary movement.

And now, the only thing that feminism is lacking are those men who dare to want to not be an uber-masculine body builder fucknut.


The core of feminist theory prevents it from properly addressing mens issues so long as there is even a small issue effecting women.
Hence my current hatred for feminists.

"Why won't you shut up about MRA'S? ohmygod, feminism is going to deal with domestic abuse and all that."
"GIVE US OUR FUCKING MONEY! MONEY MONEY MONEY! MONEY IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN RAPE AND ABUSE! MONEY!"
"Oh my god, stop whining about domestic violence, we'll get around to it!"
"WE'RE PAID 3 CENTS LESS EVERY DOLLAR! GIVE US OUR MONEY! IT'S THE BIGGEST FUCKING DEAL GUYS!"
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:22 pm

Ora Amaris wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Despite my dislike of feminism i've regularly stated it was a necessary movement.

And now, the only thing that feminism is lacking are those men who dare to want to not be an uber-masculine body builder fucknut.


You already got me in the shadows, so that makes this whole thing a full circle :lol2:
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Ora Amaris
Diplomat
 
Posts: 650
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ora Amaris » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:22 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
And victim blaming.


How so?
If someone calls you ugly you can either decide to ignore them, or decide you give such a massive shit about their opinion that you've become devestated by it.
It's your fault if you do the latter. It really is just as simple as deciding not to give a fuck. Trust me. I've done it. There is no excuse for bawwing about being offended.

I can't agree with you here. Bullying is a real thing; that girl in Halifax killed herself because of it. Not everyone has the luxury of being thick-skinned. Maybe we should encourage basic human fucking decency instead of encouraging people to ignore it?
Let beauty and creativity reign throughout the universe,
Preserve the sublime equilibrium of nature,
Find enlightenment through the doors of perception,
An it harm none, do what thou wilt,
Respect yourself, respect all life, celebrate oneness with the universe.
Economic Left/Right: -7.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.49
Factbook Entry

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Australian rePublic, Dimetrodon Empire, El Lazaro, Nantoraka, Rary, The marxist plains

Advertisement

Remove ads