Ora Amaris wrote:New England and The Maritimes wrote:This argument is starting to bother me.
So I will join in and get even more bothered.
It is misogyny because it is not about "hating men" it is about "hating men who act like women." That's the whole fucking point. If you "act LIKE A WOMAN" you are discriminated against, not if you "are a man."
THIS x1000
You put it perfectly, Maritimes.Ostroeuropa wrote:I disagree that women are more disadvantaged in western society than men. I think men are probably more disadvantaged now.
Women have a safety net and won't fall below it. Men are expected to either be rich, conform to gender stereotypes, or suffer.
I fully accept my personal bias may be coloring the issue given that I give more of a shit about violence than capital.
If you believe that men are getting fucked over, then you'd be right, because not every man can conform to the perfect alpha male standard. And I agree that women don't look at this in feminism enough, much in the same way that the second wave didn't look at women of colour or transwomen. So, while feminists do think these issues warrant attention, they pay more attention to issues that directly affect women, such as the rape culture and pay gap.
THIS is why feminism (imo) needs to have a male perspective in order to carry forward, because the issues that men face in society when it comes to issues relating to gender come directly from the fact that men can't conform to the perfect alpha male standard.
While you definitely should be upset that you were discriminated in your domestic abuse case, instead of shunning feminism you should be the one to go up to them and say "This is why you need me."
The focus on women is inherent to feminism and feminist theory. It won't stop, so the only alternative is a gender egalitarian or gender abolitionist movement.




