NATION

PASSWORD

Feminists sabotage yet another talk on men's equality

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:52 pm

Sailsia wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Besides the fact that you know it does.

Men are privileged in society. That is a fact. There are certain disadvantages they faces because of the patriarchy, yes, but it is inevitably rooted in misogyny when referring to a systematic or institutionalized level.

What is this institutionalized level? You believe in a conspiracy, very similar to that of those who believe in the NWO. Who are these patriarchs?



Natapoc wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Patriarchy theory.


The existence of patriarchy is well documented.

For example, one aspect of patriarchy is "a society ruled by men".


Out of 44 presidents ZERO have been women and all 44 have been men, 100% of presidents in the united states have been male.

Only 20 out of 100 senators are women: The highest number of women in history. At 80% men are making the rules.

The house has 79 women (another record number, thanks to feminism) but still that only comes out to 17.7% of all seats held by women. Giving men more than 80% of the rule making power of the house.

Outside of politics there are others who make the rules: About 3% of the CEO's of publicly traded companies are female (The highest percent in history). So 97% of publicly traded companies are ruled by men (Again men are making the rules and doing the ruling)

Another group involved in ruling is police officers. Only 13% of law enforcement positions are held by women.

That number drops further when you consider women in supervisory roles within law enforcement at 7%..

Do you want more numbers to show that men, as a class are doing the ruling? These numbers alone should be sufficient to prove patriarchy.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57904
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:53 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Sailsia wrote:I'm referring to the theoretical patriarchy. You claim the scales are tipped against women, I say they're tipped against men as well as against women, and that feminism cannot actually create equality because it doesn't recognize that the scales are tipped against men as well.


Besides the fact that you know it does.

Men are privileged in society. That is a fact. There are certain disadvantages they faces because of the patriarchy, yes, but it is inevitably rooted in misogyny when referring to a systematic or institutionalized level.


I disagree that women are more disadvantaged in western society than men. I think men are probably more disadvantaged now.
Women have a safety net and won't fall below it. Men are expected to either be rich, conform to gender stereotypes, or suffer.
I fully accept my personal bias may be coloring the issue given that I give more of a shit about violence than capital.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:54 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:54 pm

New England and The Maritimes wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
I don't know.

Probably not, if I'm honest - I'm nothing if not a moderate and a realist. That does not mean, however, it's not a goal worth fighting for.

Every piece of resistance, every time I stand in the face of people like TJ and Ostro, every time I assert my value and my agency, every time I defy all of those who would see me dead and devalued - every time I fight for my rights, every time I fight for equality.

I will always do this. Every action of mine is political, my very being is defiant, and it will remain so until I die.

The least I can do is try my hardest to ease the burden on everyone else.

I don't think you're a moderate when you're fighting back. There's no middle ground to be had. It's all or nothing, and we need to fight to the death for the ultimate end goal of a free society. :)


I'll concede that, yeah. I wouldn't say there's no moderation possible (I had someone on tumblr say I reeked of internal cissexism because I didn't think "lady boner" was transphobic), but yes, absolutely.

User avatar
Freelanderness
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10526
Founded: Feb 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Freelanderness » Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:55 pm

Sailsia wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Besides the fact that you know it does.

Men are privileged in society. That is a fact. There are certain disadvantages they faces because of the patriarchy, yes, but it is inevitably rooted in misogyny when referring to a systematic or institutionalized level.

What is this institutionalized level? You believe in a conspiracy, very similar to that of those who believe in the NWO. Who are these patriarchs?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_chief_executive_officers

etc, etc.
. ♕ I am your LORD and saviour, for I am Jesus Christina Confess your sins, and ye shall be forgiven. ❤ .
One of Le Sexiest NSers 2013. Call me ¡¥. Now a fascist because rape is bad, mmkay.
Meet the TET Pantheon
"What I hope most of all is that you understand what I mean when I tell you that, even though I do not know you, and even though I may never meet you, laugh with you cry with you or kiss you, I love you." - Evey (V for Vendetta)
Alleniana wrote:
New Manvir wrote:Well, it's obvious the Native Americans didn't really have a history. They were just loafing about, waiting for some white people to show up so the real fun could start.

The party don't start till I walk in
-Tik Tok, by Christopher Columbus

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:55 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Besides the fact that you know it does.

Men are privileged in society. That is a fact. There are certain disadvantages they faces because of the patriarchy, yes, but it is inevitably rooted in misogyny when referring to a systematic or institutionalized level.


I disagree that women are more disadvantaged in western society than men. I think men are probably more disadvantaged now.
Women have a safety net and won't fall below it. Men are expected to either be rich, conform to gender stereotypes, or suffer.
I fully accept my personal bias may be coloring the issue given that I give more of a shit about violence than capital.


If you gave more of a shit about violence you'd give a fuck about rape culture.

User avatar
Sailsia
Senator
 
Posts: 4475
Founded: Mar 05, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sailsia » Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:55 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:Also, considering feminists are routinely flipping back and forth between
"We'll address your issues too!"
and
"IT'S A WOMENS RIGHTS MOVEMENT WE DONT HAVE TO DEAL WITH THAT!"
often from the same poster, how the fuck am I supposed to take anything you say seriously.
Maybe before complaining that people don't understand feminism you should get together and actually make a coherent and cohesive platform or something.

I've been saying this for years. It would make things so much easier, wouldn't it?
RIP RON PAUL
Author of the U.S. Constitution
July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57904
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:55 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
I disagree that women are more disadvantaged in western society than men. I think men are probably more disadvantaged now.
Women have a safety net and won't fall below it. Men are expected to either be rich, conform to gender stereotypes, or suffer.
I fully accept my personal bias may be coloring the issue given that I give more of a shit about violence than capital.


If you gave more of a shit about violence you'd give a fuck about rape culture.


I do care about rape culture. I don't see how that alters anything about my post.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:56 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
If you gave more of a shit about violence you'd give a fuck about rape culture.


I do care about rape culture.


Liar.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57904
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:56 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
I do care about rape culture.


Liar.


Cool argument bro. Rape culture is, from what I understand, a web of falsehoods and misconceptions pervating society and general culture with regard to the issue of rape.
Some of those effect men too, but even if they didn't i'd still care. Gendered violence is abhorrent.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Freelanderness
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10526
Founded: Feb 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Freelanderness » Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:57 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Besides the fact that you know it does.

Men are privileged in society. That is a fact. There are certain disadvantages they faces because of the patriarchy, yes, but it is inevitably rooted in misogyny when referring to a systematic or institutionalized level.


I disagree that women are more disadvantaged in western society than men. I think men are probably more disadvantaged now.
Women have a safety net and won't fall below it. Men are expected to either be rich, conform to gender stereotypes, or suffer.
I fully accept my personal bias may be coloring the issue given that I give more of a shit about violence than capital.

Where's your stats?
. ♕ I am your LORD and saviour, for I am Jesus Christina Confess your sins, and ye shall be forgiven. ❤ .
One of Le Sexiest NSers 2013. Call me ¡¥. Now a fascist because rape is bad, mmkay.
Meet the TET Pantheon
"What I hope most of all is that you understand what I mean when I tell you that, even though I do not know you, and even though I may never meet you, laugh with you cry with you or kiss you, I love you." - Evey (V for Vendetta)
Alleniana wrote:
New Manvir wrote:Well, it's obvious the Native Americans didn't really have a history. They were just loafing about, waiting for some white people to show up so the real fun could start.

The party don't start till I walk in
-Tik Tok, by Christopher Columbus

User avatar
Sailsia
Senator
 
Posts: 4475
Founded: Mar 05, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sailsia » Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:57 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Sailsia wrote:No, but your ideology is entirely focused on eliminating the patriarchy. So are you saying its a goal that is impossible to accomplish?


I don't know.

Probably not, if I'm honest - I'm nothing if not a moderate and a realist. That does not mean, however, it's not a goal worth fighting for.

Every piece of resistance, every time I stand in the face of people like TJ and Ostro, every time I assert my value and my agency, every time I defy all of those who would see me dead and devalued - every time I fight for my rights, every time I fight for equality.

I will always do this. Every action of mine is political, my very being is defiant, and it will remain so until I die.

The least I can do is try my hardest to ease the burden on everyone else.

The funny thing is, all you're doing is BEING a burden on everyone else. You're kicking and screaming for an ideology that is flawed. Why would you waste all that time and effort in something you know won't work? If it's own premise for existence is wrong, why wouldn't you reject the whole thing? You can believe in equality without believing in an ideology. That's the whole premise of being an independent thinker.
RIP RON PAUL
Author of the U.S. Constitution
July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:58 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Liar.


Cool argument bro. Rape culture is, from what I understand, a web of falsehoods and misconceptions pervating society and general culture with regard to the issue of rape.
Some of those effect men too, but even if they didn't i'd still care. Gendered violence is abhorrent.


You can in no way reconcile your utter lack of empathy for victims and your claimed hatred of rape culture.

User avatar
Sailsia
Senator
 
Posts: 4475
Founded: Mar 05, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sailsia » Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:58 pm

Freelanderness wrote:
Sailsia wrote:What is this institutionalized level? You believe in a conspiracy, very similar to that of those who believe in the NWO. Who are these patriarchs?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_chief_executive_officers

etc, etc.

That tells me nothing.
RIP RON PAUL
Author of the U.S. Constitution
July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:59 pm

Sailsia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:Also, considering feminists are routinely flipping back and forth between
"We'll address your issues too!"
and
"IT'S A WOMENS RIGHTS MOVEMENT WE DONT HAVE TO DEAL WITH THAT!"
often from the same poster, how the fuck am I supposed to take anything you say seriously.
Maybe before complaining that people don't understand feminism you should get together and actually make a coherent and cohesive platform or something.

I've been saying this for years. It would make things so much easier, wouldn't it?


The problem with this is the same as Christianity: it is so diverse you can't judge people because of their association to feminism, you have to judge them individually.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57904
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:59 pm

Freelanderness wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
I disagree that women are more disadvantaged in western society than men. I think men are probably more disadvantaged now.
Women have a safety net and won't fall below it. Men are expected to either be rich, conform to gender stereotypes, or suffer.
I fully accept my personal bias may be coloring the issue given that I give more of a shit about violence than capital.

Where's your stats?


Males have a higher workplace mortality
Males are not likely to receive assistance in domestic violence or rape issues.
Males are routinely considered fair game for violence, whereas women are not.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:59 pm

Sailsia wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
I don't know.

Probably not, if I'm honest - I'm nothing if not a moderate and a realist. That does not mean, however, it's not a goal worth fighting for.

Every piece of resistance, every time I stand in the face of people like TJ and Ostro, every time I assert my value and my agency, every time I defy all of those who would see me dead and devalued - every time I fight for my rights, every time I fight for equality.

I will always do this. Every action of mine is political, my very being is defiant, and it will remain so until I die.

The least I can do is try my hardest to ease the burden on everyone else.

The funny thing is, all you're doing is BEING a burden on everyone else. You're kicking and screaming for an ideology that is flawed. Why would you waste all that time and effort in something you know won't work? If it's own premise for existence is wrong, why wouldn't you reject the whole thing? You can believe in equality without believing in an ideology. That's the whole premise of being an independent thinker.


Crime and poverty are impossible to eliminate too, should we stop fighting against crime then? Should we abolish all our laws because they do not work universally?

User avatar
Sailsia
Senator
 
Posts: 4475
Founded: Mar 05, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sailsia » Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:59 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
I do care about rape culture.


Liar.

Wonderful argument.
Last edited by Sailsia on Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
RIP RON PAUL
Author of the U.S. Constitution
July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57904
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:59 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Cool argument bro. Rape culture is, from what I understand, a web of falsehoods and misconceptions pervating society and general culture with regard to the issue of rape.
Some of those effect men too, but even if they didn't i'd still care. Gendered violence is abhorrent.


You can in no way reconcile your utter lack of empathy for victims and your claimed hatred of rape culture.


Why do you think I lack empathy for victims?
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:00 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
You can in no way reconcile your utter lack of empathy for victims and your claimed hatred of rape culture.


Why do you think I lack empathy for victims?


You care nothing for mental health, you care nothing about promoting public safety.

User avatar
United Dependencies
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13659
Founded: Oct 22, 2007
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby United Dependencies » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:01 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:I can just as easily demonstrate that people with hair are dominating society. It wouldn't mean that theres a systematic oppression of bald people. That society is run by people with hair and by men is somewhat a given.
That doesn't address patriarchy theory, you've just defined one part of it, not addressed or sourced it's actual argument.

Seriously? That's your argument?

Let me reiterate that women make up about 1/2 of the people in our society. Now look at all those stats that Natapoc just posted.

Doesn't that strike as the least bit odd? Even a little?
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.

Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.

This is Nationstates we're here to help

Are you a native or resident of North Carolina?

User avatar
Natapoc
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19864
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Natapoc » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:02 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:Males are routinely considered fair game for violence, whereas women are not.


Where do you get this from? Does this include all forms of violence? I highly doubt this.

And since when is ANYONE fair game for violence? Committing acts of violence against anyone is wrong regardless of their gender.
Did you see a ghost?

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:02 pm

Sailsia wrote:The funny thing is, all you're doing is BEING a burden on everyone else. You're kicking and screaming for an ideology that is flawed. Why would you waste all that time and effort in something you know won't work? If it's own premise for existence is wrong, why wouldn't you reject the whole thing? You can believe in equality without believing in an ideology. That's the whole premise of being an independent thinker.


You sound like those anti-immigration folks who call themselves "independent thinkers" but reek of stupid bullshit rhetoric.

Free thinking doesn't involve being a fucking douchebag. Free thinking involves taking the best of every doctrine and school of thought and evaluate an idea's merits.

What you are suggesting is intellectual dishonesty and something akin to not being a free thinker.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57904
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:02 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Why do you think I lack empathy for victims?


You care nothing for mental health, you care nothing about promoting public safety.


No. See, like I said, if you want me to pay taxes so people can get therapy i'm all for it. I care a lot about having a quick an visible response to violence.
What I don't care about is peoples feelings being hurt, and the fact you are incapable of seperating the two is sad.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Sailsia
Senator
 
Posts: 4475
Founded: Mar 05, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sailsia » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:02 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Sailsia wrote:The funny thing is, all you're doing is BEING a burden on everyone else. You're kicking and screaming for an ideology that is flawed. Why would you waste all that time and effort in something you know won't work? If it's own premise for existence is wrong, why wouldn't you reject the whole thing? You can believe in equality without believing in an ideology. That's the whole premise of being an independent thinker.


Crime and poverty are impossible to eliminate too, should we stop fighting against crime then? Should we abolish all our laws because they do not work universally?

Except, it's entirely possible to reduce crime and poverty to near non-existence without creating a dictatorship. The same can't be said for feminism.
RIP RON PAUL
Author of the U.S. Constitution
July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57904
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:03 pm

Natapoc wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:Males are routinely considered fair game for violence, whereas women are not.


Where do you get this from? Does this include all forms of violence? I highly doubt this.

And since when is ANYONE fair game for violence? Committing acts of violence against anyone is wrong regardless of their gender.


Females striking males will often react harshly if they defend themselves and other males will enter the fray to attack the male defending themselves.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Acts238, Ayris, Canarsia, El Lazaro, EuroStralia, Isomedia, Nilokeras, Orcuo, Rusticus I Damianus, Senkaku, TheKeyToJoy, Washington Resistance Army, Xi Jinping Thought

Advertisement

Remove ads