Abdju wrote:For libertarians, surely Bluth Corporation counts for something...
I dont think Randites count for anything in these type threads, I mean, A=A!

Advertisement

by Dyakovo » Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:49 pm
Sarkhaan wrote:"Crazy bitch with amazing voice who likes sex". At least, I'm pretty sure that's what her First Nations name translates to.

by Vault 10 » Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:49 pm
Hydesland wrote:We have a number of people with right wing economics but 'liberal' stances on social freedom. I'm not sure they would appreciate being lumped into a group with New Mitanni.

by Rhodmhire » Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:50 pm
Abdju wrote:For libertarians, surely Bluth Corporation counts for something...

by Grave_n_idle » Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:24 pm
Vault 10 wrote:A lot of libertarians have a tough choice deciding whom to vote for, and actually think of particular candidates and stances, with different votes in different elections, rather than mindlessly vote for the left or right wing like sheep.


by Buffett and Colbert » Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:25 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Maurepas » Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:25 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:Vault 10 wrote:A lot of libertarians have a tough choice deciding whom to vote for, and actually think of particular candidates and stances, with different votes in different elections, rather than mindlessly vote for the left or right wing like sheep.
Because, of course, that's what everyone else does.


by Dyakovo » Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:25 pm
Maurepas wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:Vault 10 wrote:A lot of libertarians have a tough choice deciding whom to vote for, and actually think of particular candidates and stances, with different votes in different elections, rather than mindlessly vote for the left or right wing like sheep.
Because, of course, that's what everyone else does.
Thats what I do, but, for some reason the shepherds dont think i have a thick enough coat to sheer me,

by South Lorenya » Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:28 pm

by Vault 10 » Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:28 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:Vault 10 wrote:A lot of libertarians have a tough choice deciding whom to vote for, and actually think of particular candidates and stances, with different votes in different elections, rather than mindlessly vote for the left or right wing like sheep.
Because, of course, that's what everyone else does.

by Grave_n_idle » Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:54 pm
Vault 10 wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:Vault 10 wrote:A lot of libertarians have a tough choice deciding whom to vote for, and actually think of particular candidates and stances, with different votes in different elections, rather than mindlessly vote for the left or right wing like sheep.
Because, of course, that's what everyone else does.
I doubt anything short of the skies collapsing would ever convince you to vote for the right wing.
Would it?

by New Mitanni » Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:40 pm
Hydesland wrote:That's a rather large group, a libertarian and a fascist could both be considered 'right wing', but would have completely opposite views.

by Grave_n_idle » Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:41 pm
New Mitanni wrote:Hydesland wrote:That's a rather large group, a libertarian and a fascist could both be considered 'right wing', but would have completely opposite views.
Fascism is commonly but improperly regarded as "right wing."
The correct scale has total government control of society at the far left and anarchy at the far right.

by New Mitanni » Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:42 pm


by Buffett and Colbert » Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:42 pm
New Mitanni wrote:Hydesland wrote:That's a rather large group, a libertarian and a fascist could both be considered 'right wing', but would have completely opposite views.
Fascism is commonly but improperly regarded as "right wing."
The correct scale has total government control of society at the far left and anarchy at the far right.

You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Anti-Social Darwinism » Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:47 pm

by Dyakovo » Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:30 pm
Anti-Social Darwinism wrote:It's nice to know that NSG doesn't categorize me as either left or right. Moderate is exactly where I want to be. Of course, moderate is defined as "using common sense and sound information in making decisions about individual issues."

by Tezdrian » Sat Nov 07, 2009 10:21 am

by Conserative Morality » Sat Nov 07, 2009 10:28 am

by United Russian State » Sat Nov 07, 2009 10:31 am

by Rhodmhire » Sat Nov 07, 2009 10:43 am
Conserative Morality wrote:I believe I'm on the right of the right-left spectrum.


by Gauntleted Fist » Sat Nov 07, 2009 10:47 am

by Conserative Morality » Sat Nov 07, 2009 10:52 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bovad, Dimetrodon Empire, Grinning Dragon, Outer Sparta, Page, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement