NATION

PASSWORD

Gay Marriage Legalized In France

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Mkuki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10584
Founded: Sep 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mkuki » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:30 pm

Valcouria wrote:
Mkuki wrote:But you just said "Two gays cannot naturally procreate by themselves"... :?

...Perhaps a rephrasing, then...two individuals of the same gender (which is the definition of homosexuality)...I do respect your play on words, though.

What play on words? That was your statement.
Economic Left/Right: -4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

Political Test (Results)
Who Do I Side With?
Vision of the Justice Party - Justice Party Platform
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
HAVE FUN BURNING IN HELL!

User avatar
Valcouria
Minister
 
Posts: 3012
Founded: Jul 06, 2012
Corporate Police State

Postby Valcouria » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:30 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Valcouria wrote: :palm: :palm: :palm:
AGAIN...not about the fact of overpopulation. It's about the ability to create the next generation (THE ABILITY, NOT THE FACT). Gays cannot do this. Only man and woman can do this.


With current technology, homosexuals can do it. Hopefully we will eventually have artificial wombs, male eggs and female sperm (we are getting there).

Then the human race will be no more...it will be some God-awful Frankenstein's monster of a species that I don't think would be worth living in.
Pro: Social Conservatism, Traditionalist Conservatism, Fiscal Conservatism, National Conservatism, Theo-democracy, Pro-Life, Capital Punishment
Anti: Social Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, LGBT/Gay Marriage, Pro-Choice, Secularism, Atheism

"In matters of style, swim with the current: in matters of principle, stand like a rock." -Thomas Jefferson
"Liberty must be limited in order to be possessed."-Edmund Burke

User avatar
Mystletainn
Minister
 
Posts: 2683
Founded: Feb 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Mystletainn » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:30 pm

Ah... The never ending circle argument.... WE STUMBLED UPON EEETTTT.
Luddites, Biocons, and deniers beware

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:31 pm

Valcouria wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
With current technology, homosexuals can do it. Hopefully we will eventually have artificial wombs, male eggs and female sperm (we are getting there).

Then the human race will be no more...it will be some God-awful Frankenstein's monster of a species that I don't think would be worth living in.

Wah wah.
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13979
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:31 pm

Valcouria wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:In vitro.

You're wrong.

Next.

In vitro...REQUIRES A MALE SPERM AND A FEMALE EGG...a man...and a woman...why is this so hard to accept? Man and woman are NEEDED to procreate, even by unnatural methods.

But I thought you said gays could procreate... Unnatural =/= Impossible
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Agymnum
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7393
Founded: Jul 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Agymnum » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:31 pm

Valcouria wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
With current technology, homosexuals can do it. Hopefully we will eventually have artificial wombs, male eggs and female sperm (we are getting there).

Then the human race will be no more...it will be some God-awful Frankenstein's monster of a species that I don't think would be worth living in.


Have fun not being part of our species.

I'll be busy vegetating, like I always do.

*vegetates*
Glorious puppet of Highfort

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40542
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:32 pm

Valcouria wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:In vitro.

You're wrong.

Next.

In vitro...REQUIRES A MALE SPERM AND A FEMALE EGG...a man...and a woman...why is this so hard to accept? Man and woman are NEEDED to procreate, even by unnatural methods.


Did you miss the part where I mentioned male eggs, female sperm, and eventually artificial wombs?
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13979
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:32 pm

Valcouria wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
With current technology, homosexuals can do it. Hopefully we will eventually have artificial wombs, male eggs and female sperm (we are getting there).

Then the human race will be no more...it will be some God-awful Frankenstein's monster of a species that I don't think would be worth living in.

Cry me a river.

Truth is, society is gonna change for the better or the worse, and whether you like it or not.

Evolution at work, folks.
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:33 pm

Valcouria wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
With current technology, homosexuals can do it. Hopefully we will eventually have artificial wombs, male eggs and female sperm (we are getting there).

Then the human race will be no more...it will be some God-awful Frankenstein's monster of a species that I don't think would be worth living in.

Then take the metal aspirin. We're already capable of doing this. This is old shit. We're bringing species back that have died centuries prior. And if your demented hateful god didn't want it to happen, he should have not put the power there to do it in the first place. But since your abusive, monster of a deity didn't do shit about it, it proves one of two things:

1. There's no such thing as god;
2. He doesn't like you very much.

User avatar
Mystletainn
Minister
 
Posts: 2683
Founded: Feb 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Mystletainn » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:33 pm

Ainin wrote:
Valcouria wrote:Then the human race will be no more...it will be some God-awful Frankenstein's monster of a species that I don't think would be worth living in.

Cry me a river.

Truth is, society is gonna change for the better or the worse, and whether you like it or not.

Evolution at work, folks.

Cue the denial of evolution in 3, 2, 1...
Luddites, Biocons, and deniers beware

User avatar
Valcouria
Minister
 
Posts: 3012
Founded: Jul 06, 2012
Corporate Police State

Postby Valcouria » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:33 pm

Mkuki wrote:
Valcouria wrote:They are performing a heterosexual act, which is normal for procreation. Whether they are gay or not in this scenario has no bearing on this.

But you said it does. :?

Two gays cannot naturally procreate by themselves.

My understanding of the word gay is two...individuals of the same gender. Your scenario, despite labeling the procreators as homosexual, are performing a heterosexual act. A gay MAN and WOMAN can procreate. But NOT two gays (same gender) themselves.
Pro: Social Conservatism, Traditionalist Conservatism, Fiscal Conservatism, National Conservatism, Theo-democracy, Pro-Life, Capital Punishment
Anti: Social Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, LGBT/Gay Marriage, Pro-Choice, Secularism, Atheism

"In matters of style, swim with the current: in matters of principle, stand like a rock." -Thomas Jefferson
"Liberty must be limited in order to be possessed."-Edmund Burke

User avatar
Lyassa and Nairoa
Diplomat
 
Posts: 747
Founded: Jun 29, 2006
Father Knows Best State

Postby Lyassa and Nairoa » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:33 pm

Valcouria wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
With current technology, homosexuals can do it. Hopefully we will eventually have artificial wombs, male eggs and female sperm (we are getting there).

Then the human race will be no more...it will be some God-awful Frankenstein's monster of a species that I don't think would be worth living in.


:clap:

User avatar
Agymnum
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7393
Founded: Jul 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Agymnum » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:33 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Valcouria wrote:In vitro...REQUIRES A MALE SPERM AND A FEMALE EGG...a man...and a woman...why is this so hard to accept? Man and woman are NEEDED to procreate, even by unnatural methods.


Did you miss the part where I mentioned male eggs, female sperm, and eventually artificial wombs?


Shall I link him male eggs and female sperm?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Male_egg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_sperm

The future will be brighter tomorrow. ~ Dan Quayle

Yeah, it's a shit quote by a shitty vice president. Sue me.
Glorious puppet of Highfort

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13979
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:34 pm

Valcouria wrote:
Mkuki wrote:But you said it does. :?


My understanding of the word gay is two...individuals of the same gender. Your scenario, despite labeling the procreators as homosexual, are performing a heterosexual act. A gay MAN and WOMAN can procreate. But NOT two gays (same gender) themselves.

But they're still gay, so... I fail to see how your argument stands. The way I see it, your argument is sitting on a wobbly chair on the verge of collapse.
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Valcouria
Minister
 
Posts: 3012
Founded: Jul 06, 2012
Corporate Police State

Postby Valcouria » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:34 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Valcouria wrote:They are performing a heterosexual act, which is normal for procreation. Whether they are gay or not in this scenario has no bearing on this.


they are still homosexuals who are capable of procreating. As soon as the act is complete they can go right back to their normal partner and enjoy life with them.

Just another example of the debauched society we live in...I long for the days when sex was strictly between a married man and woman.

And, in my opinion, gays wouldn't be doing that in the first place.
Pro: Social Conservatism, Traditionalist Conservatism, Fiscal Conservatism, National Conservatism, Theo-democracy, Pro-Life, Capital Punishment
Anti: Social Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, LGBT/Gay Marriage, Pro-Choice, Secularism, Atheism

"In matters of style, swim with the current: in matters of principle, stand like a rock." -Thomas Jefferson
"Liberty must be limited in order to be possessed."-Edmund Burke

User avatar
Agymnum
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7393
Founded: Jul 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Agymnum » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:34 pm

Lyassa and Nairoa wrote:
Valcouria wrote:Then the human race will be no more...it will be some God-awful Frankenstein's monster of a species that I don't think would be worth living in.


:clap:


Go enjoy being a hermit, then, because the rest of us are going to enjoy the fruits of genetic engineering.

And I'm going to go vegetate and contemplate philosophy.

*vegetates*
Glorious puppet of Highfort

User avatar
Mystletainn
Minister
 
Posts: 2683
Founded: Feb 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Mystletainn » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:35 pm

Valcouria wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
they are still homosexuals who are capable of procreating. As soon as the act is complete they can go right back to their normal partner and enjoy life with them.

Just another example of the debauched society we live in...I long for the days when sex was strictly between a married man and woman.

And, in my opinion, gays wouldn't be doing that in the first place.

They want a kid... Then they do it?
Luddites, Biocons, and deniers beware

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13979
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:35 pm

Valcouria wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
they are still homosexuals who are capable of procreating. As soon as the act is complete they can go right back to their normal partner and enjoy life with them.

Just another example of the debauched society we live in...I long for the days when sex was strictly between a married man and woman.

And, in my opinion, gays wouldn't be doing that in the first place.

You want to live in Medieval Europe? Sure, go ahead. Oh wait! You can't.
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Valcouria
Minister
 
Posts: 3012
Founded: Jul 06, 2012
Corporate Police State

Postby Valcouria » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:35 pm

Mystletainn wrote:
Valcouria wrote:Last time I checked, religion depends on Scripture, which explains why the good old Catholic Church has not bowed to the pressures of society.

Last time I checked the Catholic church is more liberal now than it was a decade ago.

Tada~~

Last time I checked, there are still groups that adhere to traditional Church doctrine (SSPX)...some of which I have contemplated joining.
Pro: Social Conservatism, Traditionalist Conservatism, Fiscal Conservatism, National Conservatism, Theo-democracy, Pro-Life, Capital Punishment
Anti: Social Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, LGBT/Gay Marriage, Pro-Choice, Secularism, Atheism

"In matters of style, swim with the current: in matters of principle, stand like a rock." -Thomas Jefferson
"Liberty must be limited in order to be possessed."-Edmund Burke

User avatar
Lyassa and Nairoa
Diplomat
 
Posts: 747
Founded: Jun 29, 2006
Father Knows Best State

Postby Lyassa and Nairoa » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:36 pm

Ainin wrote:
Valcouria wrote:Then the human race will be no more...it will be some God-awful Frankenstein's monster of a species that I don't think would be worth living in.

Truth is, society is gonna change for the better or the worse, and whether you like it or not.


If it´s gonna be a homo-directed society, then it´ll surely be worse. Decadent. Pointless. Inane.

User avatar
Mystletainn
Minister
 
Posts: 2683
Founded: Feb 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Mystletainn » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:36 pm

Valcouria wrote:
Mystletainn wrote:Last time I checked the Catholic church is more liberal now than it was a decade ago.

Tada~~

Last time I checked, there are still groups that adhere to traditional Church doctrine (SSPX)...some of which I have contemplated joining.

How cute.
Luddites, Biocons, and deniers beware

User avatar
Kalckalinkd
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 383
Founded: Sep 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Kalckalinkd » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:36 pm

Good for them

User avatar
Agymnum
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7393
Founded: Jul 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Agymnum » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:36 pm

Valcouria wrote:Just another example of the debauched society we live in...I long for the days when sex was strictly between a married man and woman.

And, in my opinion, gays wouldn't be doing that in the first place.


Ah, yes, the good old days when white people were superior to everyone.

The good old days when you beat a nigger's ass when he said hello to your sister.

The good old days when you chopped up a chink when he took your job for less pay.

The good old days when you went to Klan meetings and burned the cross, and people LIKED you for doing that.

The good old days when everyone knew their place, women stayed at home, and no one complained when you asked someone to make you a sandwich.

Those were the days. :roll:
Glorious puppet of Highfort

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13979
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:36 pm

Valcouria wrote:
Mystletainn wrote:Last time I checked the Catholic church is more liberal now than it was a decade ago.

Tada~~

Last time I checked, there are still groups that adhere to traditional Church doctrine (SSPX)...some of which I have contemplated joining.

They still believe that the universe revolves around the perfectly flat Earth?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No

If answer is no, your argument is invalid.
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Mystletainn
Minister
 
Posts: 2683
Founded: Feb 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Mystletainn » Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:36 pm

Lyassa and Nairoa wrote:
Ainin wrote:Truth is, society is gonna change for the better or the worse, and whether you like it or not.


If it´s gonna be a homo-directed society, then it´ll surely be worse. Decadent. Pointless. Inane.

So... Spiteful...

Rawr.
Luddites, Biocons, and deniers beware

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Dimetrodon Empire, Dumb Ideologies, El Lazaro, Elejamie, Emotional Support Crocodile, Gran Cordoba, Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum, La Xinga, New Imperial Britannia, Oceasia, Perikuresu, Pizza Friday Forever91, Rary, Tlaceceyaya, Yasuragi

Advertisement

Remove ads