Gay Marriage Legalized In France

[The Broken Imperial Sector]

You should watch a few movies here is a list:
Forest Gump
1984
Star Ship Troopers

What do these have to do with fucking anything.

Thats where the whole "stupid is as stupid does" quote came from.

[Valcouria]

Legitimizing homosexuality will lead to lower birth rates.

HOW! NO ONE who makes this argument has been able to provide a SINGLE piece of evidence for this from any of the many states and countries that have legalized marriage, let alone a decent explanation.

And, as I have said, it will open the floodgates of more morally depraved behavior (legalized incest, polygamy, pederasty, zoophilia, etc.)

And as everyone else has said, this is a fucking stupid argument because.
A. Incest has very clear negative effects are far as health goes.
B. What's wrong with polygamy if all parties are consenting?
C. Children can't give consent to marriage.
D. FOR GOD'S SAKE ANIMALS ARE NOT CAPABLE OF GIVING CONSENT

If gay people can marry as heterosexual people, then they will be less inclined (and be unnaturally able) to procreate. Maybe not right away, but over time this will likely become apparent.
A. You're putting up a double standard with polygamy, since, as you say, 'what's wrong if all parties are consenting?' But yes, incest will have horrible effects on the human population.
B. The relationship between one man and one woman is superior to that of many men and women...for one, the specter of jealousy is much less present, and it is impossible to love more than one person the same way.
C./D. Consent is a subjective thing...it could be changed at will by society to allow for these, if it so desired.

[New Libertarian States]

Legitimizing homosexuality will lead to lower birth rates.

And do you have proof? Japan hasn't legalised gay marriage and it's birth rate has been declining for decades.

And as for other mammals with homosexuality, they only serve to augment my argument that they do not contribute to the procreation of their species, and are thus nothing but defects.

God created all animals. Therefore, God created animals with homosexuality. And if God created man in his image, therefore he might have had a fabulous side himself. After all, if he is such a benevolent and all-loving God, I can't imagine that his image is reflected in people like you.

Oh, and as for homosexuals being defects, I suggest one looks in the mirror. I think ultra-religious people have some sort of defect in that they believe the most abhorrent bullshit.

This man/woman, deserves all the the cupcakes.

[Soldati Senza Confini]

You should watch a few movies here is a list:
Forest Gump
1984
Star Ship Troopers

What do these have to do with fucking anything.
Mind not threadjacking to get around your stupid comments?

I know this is off-topic, but I'll ask anyways:

Where the hell do you get those awesome pictures of cats?! They are awesome!

[Condunum]

What do these have to do with fucking anything.

Thats where the whole "stupid is as stupid does" quote came from.

No, that's where they were popularized. You're still dodging the fact that you made a completely fucking stupid statement that proves you have absolutely zero knowledge of human psychology.

[Condunum]

What do these have to do with fucking anything.
Mind not threadjacking to get around your stupid comments?

I know this is off-topic, but I'll ask anyways:

Where the hell do you get those awesome pictures of cats?! They are awesome!

Deviant Art. The one I have right now I'm using while I wait for the artist who made it to open his commissions back up.

[Valcouria]

Legitimizing homosexuality will lead to lower birth rates.

And do you have proof? Japan hasn't legalised gay marriage and it's birth rate has been declining for decades.

And as for other mammals with homosexuality, they only serve to augment my argument that they do not contribute to the procreation of their species, and are thus nothing but defects.

God created all animals. Therefore, God created animals with homosexuality. And if God created man in his image, therefore he might have had a fabulous side himself. After all, if he is such a benevolent and all-loving God, I can't imagine that his image is reflected in people like you.

Oh, and as for homosexuals being defects, I suggest one looks in the mirror. I think ultra-religious people have some sort of defect in that they believe the most abhorrent bullshit.

That's because Japan is, I believe, doing what the rest of us should do; practice abstinence.
God created homosexuality to test our love for His dual creation of man and woman; the strong are able to overcome the defect, while the weak succumb to it.

And as for trying to shame me into silence (again), I already know I'm destined for purgatory. I accept it.

[Agymnum]

Thats where the whole "stupid is as stupid does" quote came from.

No, that's where they were popularized. You're still dodging the fact that you made a completely fucking stupid statement that proves you have absolutely zero knowledge of human psychology.

I would suggest he widen his frame of reference if he believes "stupid is as stupid does" was actually invented on Forrest Gump, 1984, or Starship Troopers.

[New Libertarian States]

HOW! NO ONE who makes this argument has been able to provide a SINGLE piece of evidence for this from any of the many states and countries that have legalized marriage, let alone a decent explanation.


And as everyone else has said, this is a fucking stupid argument because.
A. Incest has very clear negative effects are far as health goes.
B. What's wrong with polygamy if all parties are consenting?
C. Children can't give consent to marriage.
D. FOR GOD'S SAKE ANIMALS ARE NOT CAPABLE OF GIVING CONSENT

If gay people can marry as heterosexual people, then they will be less inclined (and be unnaturally able) to procreate. Maybe not right away, but over time this will likely become apparent.
A. You're putting up a double standard with polygamy, since, as you say, 'what's wrong if all parties are consenting?' But yes, incest will have horrible effects on the human population.
B. The relationship between one man and one woman is superior to that of many men and women...for one, the specter of jealousy is much less present, and it is impossible to love more than one person the same way.
C./D. Consent is a subjective thing...it could be changed at will by society to allow for these, if it so desired.

A)Where does gay marriage lead to incest?
B)FOR GODS SAKE, source this, or stop making this bullshit statement
C)No,means no, yes means yes.
Not that hard.

[Valcouria]

So, since France legalized gay marriage, following US foreign policy, we need to invade Belgium.

Clearly, this is the only logical course of action left to us to prevent the Great Gay Horde from taking over global cheese markets.

Belgium hasn't legalized it either?
.-.
That's odd, considering that their president is fabulously homosexual.

Erm...Belgium's a monarchy.

[Costa Alegria]

First, I find it humorous that you are trying to shame me into silence.

No need for me to do anything. I'm not the one that believes that homosexuals are defects and defends domestic violence by saying "dat bitch had it coming".

Those Christians prefer to focus solely on the love part rather than the institutional part of marriage.

Because that's what most marriages are about. Love. Sealing the bond in front of whatever deity you worship has been done for thousands of years before Christianity even existed.

It should be a balance, and my own belief is toward the latter rather than the former.

Whatever you believe doesn't count for shit. It's about time you learnt this.

To the educated person, someone's habits and traits should make it obvious. But, when blinded by petty emotion, the logic tends to go out the window.

Firstly, you wouldn't be talking about yourself now? Because no educated person would even make an attempt to assume that anyone had it coming. Secondly, people find telling what people are really like difficult in some ways.

Ties in to three; they don't deserve it.

Oh, so that makes it all better. Apparently, if you had it coming, you didn't deserve whatever it was. Logic at it's finest.

I wouldn't support domestic abuse at all.

Bullshit. You said that people who got abused had it coming.

What you call an argument I would prefer to call 'verbal shaming.' But, to each his own.

What argument? I'm merely saying "you're wrong" to everything you say. If there is any shaming being done, it's because you have such shameful opinions. Don't blame me for your hateful bigoted opinions just because I, and everyone else, sees them for what they really are.

[Agymnum]

That's because Japan is, I believe, doing what the rest of us should do; practice abstinence.
God created homosexuality to test our love for His dual creation of man and woman; the strong are able to overcome the defect, while the weak succumb to it.

And as for trying to shame me into silence (again), I already know I'm destined for purgatory. I accept it.

Well I'm destined to be worm food, and I accept that. Maybe a tree will grow on me one day, who knows?

And if abstinence is so great, why does God object to homosexual relations? Clearly he's against heterosexual relations if he's pro-abstinence, and yet people say sex is a holy act. Should not homosexual relations be a holy act under this logic as well?

Or is God just being a douche?

[New Libertarian States]

And do you have proof? Japan hasn't legalised gay marriage and it's birth rate has been declining for decades.



God created all animals. Therefore, God created animals with homosexuality. And if God created man in his image, therefore he might have had a fabulous side himself. After all, if he is such a benevolent and all-loving God, I can't imagine that his image is reflected in people like you.

Oh, and as for homosexuals being defects, I suggest one looks in the mirror. I think ultra-religious people have some sort of defect in that they believe the most abhorrent bullshit.

That's because Japan is, I believe, doing what the rest of us should do; practice abstinence.
God created homosexuality to test our love for His dual creation of man and woman; the strong are able to overcome the defect, while the weak succumb to it.

And as for trying to shame me into silence (again), I already know I'm destined for purgatory. I accept it.

We're not shaming you, your pulling bullocks out your ass, were striking it down with facts.
And a magic man in the sky created a thing to fuck people over, instead of not creating it in the first place?
WHY?!

[New Libertarian States]

Belgium hasn't legalized it either?
.-.
That's odd, considering that their president is fabulously homosexual.

Erm...Belgium's a waffle .

Fixed

[Benuty]

Humorous response

[Valcouria]

If gay people can marry as heterosexual people, then they will be less inclined (and be unnaturally able) to procreate. Maybe not right away, but over time this will likely become apparent.
A. You're putting up a double standard with polygamy, since, as you say, 'what's wrong if all parties are consenting?' But yes, incest will have horrible effects on the human population.
B. The relationship between one man and one woman is superior to that of many men and women...for one, the specter of jealousy is much less present, and it is impossible to love more than one person the same way.
C./D. Consent is a subjective thing...it could be changed at will by society to allow for these, if it so desired.

A)Where does gay marriage lead to incest?
B)FOR GODS SAKE, source this, or stop making this bullshit statement
C)No,means no, yes means yes.
Not that hard.

A. If marriage between people of the same sex becomes the norm, then other unnatural relationships will likely be legalized (such as marriages between siblings and the like).
B. I already have. Man and woman can naturally have children via the sex act. To me, this makes their relationship superior to gay ones, since the latter cannot naturally (via the sex act) replicate the outcome.
C. Indeed...as of now, the law says children cannot give consent, nor can animals...but children can say 'yes' or 'no', and animals in heat can demonstrate their consent in a physical manner.

[Soldati Senza Confini]

(Image)

Humorous response

Why?! You sir, have won the internetz

[Costa Alegria]

That's because Japan is, I believe, doing what the rest of us should do; practice abstinence.

Wrong again.

Both of them attribute high working hours and high job insecurity for younger people are some of the reasons why the Japanese birth rate is falling.

God created homosexuality to test our love for His dual creation of man and woman; the strong are able to overcome the defect, while the weak succumb to it.

Therefore, God must love homosexuals. After all, he created them, did he not? And he has unconditional love for everyone, does he not?

And as for trying to shame me into silence (again), I already know I'm destined for purgatory. I accept it.

And as I said, blame me all you want but you have no one but yourself to blame.

[Frisivisia]

A)Where does gay marriage lead to incest?
B)FOR GODS SAKE, source this, or stop making this bullshit statement
C)No,means no, yes means yes.
Not that hard.

A. If marriage between people of the same sex becomes the norm, then other unnatural relationships will likely be legalized (such as marriages between siblings and the like).
B. I already have. Man and woman can naturally have children via the sex act. To me, this makes their relationship superior to gay ones, since the latter cannot naturally (via the sex act) replicate the outcome.
C. Indeed...as of now, the law says children cannot give consent, nor can animals...but children can say 'yes' or 'no', and animals in heat can demonstrate their consent in a physical manner.

A) Source?
B) Should the elderly and infertile be able to marry?
C) Yes or no from a child does not consent make.

[Soldati Senza Confini]

A)Where does gay marriage lead to incest?
B)FOR GODS SAKE, source this, or stop making this bullshit statement
C)No,means no, yes means yes.
Not that hard.

A. If marriage between people of the same sex becomes the norm, then other unnatural relationships will likely be legalized (such as marriages between siblings and the like).
B. I already have. Man and woman can naturally have children via the sex act. To me, this makes their relationship superior to gay ones, since the latter cannot naturally (via the sex act) replicate the outcome.
C. Indeed...as of now, the law says children cannot give consent, nor can animals...but children can say 'yes' or 'no', and animals in heat can demonstrate their consent in a physical manner.

1 - No not necessarily. There has to be a de-sensitivity of these "taboos" first before allowing it. Incest is pretty much still not acceptable at all by even gay people.

2 - So having a child is burden of superiority? Does that mean infertile women are "inferior"? How dignified of you Mr. Good Will!

3 - Animals don't even have the same cognitive reasoning as a human. And children are not mature enough to give proper consent.

[Valcouria]

First, I find it humorous that you are trying to shame me into silence.

No need for me to do anything. I'm not the one that believes that homosexuals are defects and defends domestic violence by saying "dat bitch had it coming".

Those Christians prefer to focus solely on the love part rather than the institutional part of marriage.

Because that's what most marriages are about. Love. Sealing the bond in front of whatever deity you worship has been done for thousands of years before Christianity even existed.

It should be a balance, and my own belief is toward the latter rather than the former.

Whatever you believe doesn't count for shit. It's about time you learnt this.

To the educated person, someone's habits and traits should make it obvious. But, when blinded by petty emotion, the logic tends to go out the window.

Firstly, you wouldn't be talking about yourself now? Because no educated person would even make an attempt to assume that anyone had it coming. Secondly, people find telling what people are really like difficult in some ways.

Ties in to three; they don't deserve it.

Oh, so that makes it all better. Apparently, if you had it coming, you didn't deserve whatever it was. Logic at it's finest.

I wouldn't support domestic abuse at all.

Bullshit. You said that people who got abused had it coming.

What you call an argument I would prefer to call 'verbal shaming.' But, to each his own.

What argument? I'm merely saying "you're wrong" to everything you say. If there is any shaming being done, it's because you have such shameful opinions. Don't blame me for your hateful bigoted opinions just because I, and everyone else, sees them for what they really are.

1. You can try to twist my words to allow for you to shame me as you see fit, but I don't support domestic violence at all. I merely said that those people who are abused were foolish in the first place for allowing their emotions to get in the way of blatant facts.
2. If my beliefs don't count, then yours don't either; it's all relative.
5. I could really care less about your opinions on my beliefs; they won't change no matter how much shaming you try (matter of fact, they might get worse because of it).

[Wazkyraque]

Belgium hasn't legalized it either?
.-.
That's odd, considering that their president is fabulously homosexual.

Erm...Belgium's a monarchy.

They have a prime minister, Elio di Rupo, who is gay. I shouldn't have used the term "President", my mistake.
I figured that the of king of Belgium was more like Queen Elizabeth II. As in she is essentially a glorified tourist attraction.

[New Libertarian States]

A)Where does gay marriage lead to incest?
B)FOR GODS SAKE, source this, or stop making this bullshit statement
C)No,means no, yes means yes.
Not that hard.

A. If marriage between people of the same sex becomes the norm, then other unnatural relationships will likely be legalized (such as marriages between siblings and the like).
B. I already have. Man and woman can naturally have children via the sex act. To me, this makes their relationship superior to gay ones, since the latter cannot naturally (via the sex act) replicate the outcome.
C. Indeed...as of now, the law says children cannot give consent, nor can animals...but children can say 'yes' or 'no', and animals in heat can demonstrate their consent in a physical manner.

A)Because..... Why?I don't see too many incest pride parades
B)Where can I find said source? Unless its from you, which ISN'T a source.
3)Were not talking about dogs or cats, were talking about PEOPLE.

[Soldati Senza Confini]

1. You can try to twist my words to allow for you to shame me as you see fit, but I don't support domestic violence at all. I merely said that those people who are abused were foolish in the first place for allowing their emotions to get in the way of blatant facts.
2. If my beliefs don't count, then yours don't either; it's all relative.
5. I could really care less about your opinions on my beliefs; they won't change no matter how much shaming you try (matter of fact, they might get worse because of it).

1 - Bullshit, when you are with someone you HAVE to use emotions. Shit, it seems you have never loved anyone.

2 - Your beliefs are pathetic, and as a fellow Christian I have no reservations telling you so

5 - As a Christian, I also find your close-mindedness completely idiotic. You are the kind of people Jesus was warning people about not becoming. Self-Righteous people don't belong in a society which was primarily founded on love and harmony.

[Thafoo]

This is going the way of all debates ._.