Gay Marriage Legalized In France

[Agymnum]

I just lost all faith in you.
You literally said hitler was good, and now condoning torture.
You get the lost faith in humanity award.

So instead of torture lets ask captured enemys who would gladly strap a bomb to their chest nicely for information?

1. If they're willing to strap bombs to their chest and detonate them, they'll either be impossible to break by torture (they'll die first) or they'll feed you misinformation.
2. This is off-topic. Get back on-topic.

[The Broken Imperial Sector]

So instead of torture lets ask captured enemys who would gladly strap a bomb to their chest nicely for information?

1. If they're willing to strap bombs to their chest and detonate them, they'll either be impossible to break by torture (they'll die first) or they'll feed you misinformation.
2. This is off-topic. Get back on-topic.

Your right my bad.

[Benuty]

More like the Twilight zone from Hell.

Which ring of hell are we talking about?

The abode of the treasonous, the ring of traitors of sanity & reason.

[New Libertarian States]

I just lost all faith in you.
You literally said hitler was good, and now condoning torture.
You get the lost faith in humanity award.

So instead of torture lets ask captured enemys who would gladly strap a bomb to their chest nicely for information?

That's usually not the scenario.
Usually, torture happens when you step out of line.
Hey, that Boston bomber seems to be talking quite nicely without torture. Care to explain?

[New Krikkit]

Excuses. See, you being DEATed (to think we were safe) is now an excuse for you never to answer an argument again. You can just sit back naked in your chair and eat grapes while you order servants to get you wine.

Okay then I don't think that you can love another man the way that a man could love a woman. You just can't your a man your genitalia exist to help procreate the species.

So what about those straight couples that choose not to procreate? Are you going to force them to "continue the species"?

[The empire of Washington]

For Christ sake can we have one gay marriage thread that does not turn into petty 6th grade B.S.?

There's no valid anti-same sex marriage argument that isn't petty 6th grade B.S.

Case-in-point, we have people resorting to the fact it's disgusting, to the fact it's unnatural (which is false), to the fact it can't bear children (so can't old people or sterile people or celibate people, but they still get married), and to the fact that it's against their religious beliefs (separation of church and state nullifies this).

Dont start finger pointing hurling the word bigot and mocking others religious beliefs is hardly mature.

[Agymnum]

Excuses. See, you being DEATed (to think we were safe) is now an excuse for you never to answer an argument again. You can just sit back naked in your chair and eat grapes while you order servants to get you wine.

Okay then I don't think that you can love another man the way that a man could love a woman. You just can't your a man your genitalia exist to help procreate the species.

I'm an asexual. I choose not to procreate because sex does not benefit me whatsoever. That, and I hate children. A lot. They annoy me: they're smelly, they cry too much, and they're not very bright (with a few exceptions).

My genitalia exist for my own choosing, and not to procreate.

[Frisivisia]

Okay then I don't think that you can love another man the way that a man could love a woman. You just can't your a man your genitalia exist to help procreate the species.

I'm an asexual. I choose not to procreate because sex does not benefit me whatsoever. That, and I hate children. A lot. They annoy me: they're smelly, they cry too much, and they're not very bright (with a few exceptions).

My genitalia exist for my own choosing, and not to procreate.

But sex is awesome.

[Agymnum]

There's no valid anti-same sex marriage argument that isn't petty 6th grade B.S.

Case-in-point, we have people resorting to the fact it's disgusting, to the fact it's unnatural (which is false), to the fact it can't bear children (so can't old people or sterile people or celibate people, but they still get married), and to the fact that it's against their religious beliefs (separation of church and state nullifies this).

Dont start finger pointing hurling the word bigot and mocking others religious beliefs is hardly mature.

I never hurled the word bigot. I merely pointed out that separation of church and state nullifies any religious explanation for not legalizing gay marriage.

[Benuty]

Okay then I don't think that you can love another man the way that a man could love a woman. You just can't your a man your genitalia exist to help procreate the species.

I'm an asexual. I choose not to procreate because sex does not benefit me whatsoever. That, and I hate children. A lot. They annoy me: they're smelly, they cry too much, and they're not very bright (with a few exceptions).

My genitalia exist for my own choosing, and not to procreate.

Dr Alan grant is that you?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnTsVTNrvC0

[Valcouria]

In every example, however, it was man and woman. And as I said, polygamy was only allowed because it was necessary due to a lack of manpower. And I'm focusing on society, I'm focusing on continuing the species of homo sapiens. Once the natural functions of this species are replaced, we won't be humans anymore. As I said, we'll have become some freak-of-nature species that I personally would not want to be a part of.

So a minority of homosexuals will be the downfall of humanity?
Can you accurately source this?
Most mammals have homosexuality, if you didn't know.

Legitimizing homosexuality will lead to lower birth rates, in all likelihood, and this will begin a slow, steady decline of the human race. And, as I have said, it will open the floodgates of more morally depraved behavior (legalized incest, polygamy, pederasty, zoophilia, etc.).
And as for other mammals with homosexuality, they only serve to augment my argument that they do not contribute to the procreation of their species, and are thus nothing but defects.

[Soldati Senza Confini]

Which ring of hell are we talking about?

The abode of the treasonous, the ring of traitors of sanity & reason.

well, I call dibs on the title of "Great Dreadlord of the Irrational Christians"; since that seems like an appropriate title for the type of ring we're on.

[Frisivisia]

So a minority of homosexuals will be the downfall of humanity?
Can you accurately source this?
Most mammals have homosexuality, if you didn't know.

Legitimizing homosexuality will lead to lower birth rates, in all likelihood, and this will begin a slow, steady decline of the human race. And, as I have said, it will open the floodgates of more morally depraved behavior (legalized incest, polygamy, pederasty, zoophilia, etc.).
And as for other mammals with homosexuality, they only serve to augment my argument that they do not contribute to the procreation of their species, and are thus nothing but defects.

[citation needed]

[Agymnum]

I'm an asexual. I choose not to procreate because sex does not benefit me whatsoever. That, and I hate children. A lot. They annoy me: they're smelly, they cry too much, and they're not very bright (with a few exceptions).

My genitalia exist for my own choosing, and not to procreate.

But sex is awesome.

It's smelly, dirty, and I get nothing from it (no pleasure sensations for me, apparently).

It's appalling.

[Valcouria]

Dont start finger pointing hurling the word bigot and mocking others religious beliefs is hardly mature.

I never hurled the word bigot. I merely pointed out that separation of church and state nullifies any religious explanation for not legalizing gay marriage.

In my opinion, separation of church and state is farcical, since it is inevitable that politicians will act in conformity with their beliefs. In the end, only the total integration or destruction of religion into the government will be what is triumphant...especially in cases like these.

[Condunum]

Excuses. See, you being DEATed (to think we were safe) is now an excuse for you never to answer an argument again. You can just sit back naked in your chair and eat grapes while you order servants to get you wine.

Okay then I don't think that you can love another man the way that a man could love a woman. You just can't your a man your genitalia exist to help procreate the species.

Do you just enjoy saying stupid things, or is it by accident?

[The empire of Washington]

Okay then I don't think that you can love another man the way that a man could love a woman. You just can't your a man your genitalia exist to help procreate the species.

I'm an asexual. I choose not to procreate because sex does not benefit me whatsoever. That, and I hate children. A lot. They annoy me: they're smelly, they cry too much, and they're not very bright (with a few exceptions).
Holy hell Uncle Jeff is that you?
My genitalia exist for my own choosing, and not to procreate.

[The Broken Imperial Sector]

Okay then I don't think that you can love another man the way that a man could love a woman. You just can't your a man your genitalia exist to help procreate the species.

Do you just enjoy saying stupid things, or is it by accident?

I assume it sounds stupid by accident I guess.

[Greater Pokarnia]

(no pleasure sensations for me, apparently).

I feel sorry for you.

[Benuty]

So a minority of homosexuals will be the downfall of humanity?
Can you accurately source this?
Most mammals have homosexuality, if you didn't know.

Legitimizing homosexuality will lead to lower birth rates, in all likelihood, and this will begin a slow, steady decline of the human race. And, as I have said, it will open the floodgates of more morally depraved behavior (legalized incest, polygamy, pederasty, zoophilia, etc.).
And as for other mammals with homosexuality, they only serve to augment my argument that they do not contribute to the procreation of their species, and are thus nothing but defects.

Oh please, the ancient greeks did it, although under a non-christian moral compass and turned out some of the greatest works in history. You can't honestly say homosexuality destroys nations..look the thebes legion one of the most fear military units in all of ancient greece.

[Agymnum]

I never hurled the word bigot. I merely pointed out that separation of church and state nullifies any religious explanation for not legalizing gay marriage.

In my opinion, separation of church and state is farcical, since it is inevitable that politicians will act in conformity with their beliefs. In the end, only the total integration or destruction of religion into the government will be what is triumphant...especially in cases like these.

The the only valid choice is to destroy religion. Religion divides people as there are multiple religions, making integration nearly impossible unless a completely new state-run religion (which everyone would have to adopt) was created.

Look, I'm fine with coexisting with religion, but if you're pushing me to the wall and saying "theocracy or state atheism", I'm going with state atheism.

[Costa Alegria]

The only Being I love is God and the Trinity He is in.

And therefore, that gives you an excuse to act like a complete prick towards people whose "lifestyle choices" you don't agree with? Does that give you an excuse to support the denial of rights to other people on the basis of a religion where even it's adherents support this? I know plenty of Christians who support LBGT rights and there are a surprising amount of churches where I live who are perfectly happy to marry homosexuals. So you cannot hide behind the veil of religion any longer.

The sinner at least has the possibility of being redeemed from their ways.

Right, because apparently homosexuals choose to be who they are because they like pissing off people like you? Does that mean I choose to have Aspergers Syndrome?

Most that I've seen have been.

Ooh, so therefore you interacting with a select group of people is therefore proof of all heterosexual

The ones that haven't been are the result of two people blindly following their emotions without proper knowledge.

Right, because it's do God damn easy predicting what people would do. You can so totally tell someone is a violent person from looking at them.

Divorce wouldn't be necessary if people didn't blindly follow their emotions into one only later to find out they made a mistake.

Because it's do Goddamned easy to tell if someone is a cheater or is a violent person.

Abuse falls into that category; a person should know that the other individual is abusive before getting married, otherwise it's their fault.

So abuse victims had it coming? Jesus Fucking Christ, you didn't just fucking say that, did you? So, if you were my partner and I beat the living shit out of you, it'd be your fault because you had it coming.

Holy shit. How low can this argument get? And you claim to be on the "moral" high-ground. There's nothing moralistic about supporting domestic abuse.

Foolish for sticking to their guns?

Foolish for thinking that you can win an argument with me.

I would be apt to think that those that don't are the fools.

Don't use words if you don't know what they mean.

[The empire of Washington]

Dont start finger pointing hurling the word bigot and mocking others religious beliefs is hardly mature.

I never hurled the word bigot. I merely pointed out that separation of church and state nullifies any religious explanation for not legalizing gay marriage.

I didnt mean you, also a cast away phrase from a more than 200 year old letter, that is often used out of context is nullifacation?

[The Marxist State]

I love that France did this! Hopefully with the current Supreme Court cases the United States can take one step toward being next.

[New Libertarian States]

So a minority of homosexuals will be the downfall of humanity?
Can you accurately source this?
Most mammals have homosexuality, if you didn't know.

Legitimizing homosexuality will lead to lower birth rates, in all likelihood, and this will begin a slow, steady decline of the human race. And, as I have said, it will open the floodgates of more morally depraved behavior (legalized incest, polygamy, pederasty, zoophilia, etc.).
And as for other mammals with homosexuality, they only serve to augment my argument that they do not contribute to the procreation of their species, and are thus nothing but defects.

1) Most states that legalized gay marriage are gaining, not losing people.
Same goes for the majority of countries.
2)Morality is subjective, and your trying to connect gay marriage to rape? Tasteful, but been proven wrong.
3)They don't CONTRIBUATE, but they survive and flourish.