I've also been to Detroit several times. I wouldn't be caught dead without a gun there.
Advertisement

by Mike the Progressive » Thu Apr 11, 2013 4:34 pm

by Greed and Death » Thu Apr 11, 2013 4:43 pm

by Galloism » Thu Apr 11, 2013 4:48 pm

by Benuty » Thu Apr 11, 2013 4:50 pm

by Kavadevo » Thu Apr 11, 2013 5:02 pm
I do have a cause, though. It is obscenity. I'm for it. -Tom Lehrer

by Reichsland » Fri Apr 12, 2013 7:20 am
Ainin wrote:Chernoslavia wrote:
Who's everyone? And care to elaborate on these ''dumb things'' you mentioned? Because last time I checked supporting your rights isnt dumb.
Everyone was obviously an exaggeration. The Second Amendment is honestly not very positively viewed in Europe and Canada and the NRA Leadership is just not helping their case by bitching all day about how nothing is the fault of guns.

by Sociobiology » Fri Apr 12, 2013 7:40 am
Cosara wrote:The Zeonic States wrote:I don't see anything wrong with non violent Felons being able to legally purchase and own a Firearm.
My Aunt's Boyfreind is a perfect example of a former gun owner who had to sell his firearms after a conviction for a Monetary related crime.
As for two strike jim who just served a dime for possession and battery? Those folks should not be able to obtain legally a firearm.
But as they say the devil is in the details when it comes such cases.
^This

by Cassadaigua » Fri Apr 12, 2013 7:46 am

by Gauthier » Fri Apr 12, 2013 7:52 am
Cassadaigua wrote:Convicted felons can own guns anywhere. They get them on the black market. Move on.
(This is why gun control will never work).

by Fireye » Fri Apr 12, 2013 8:10 am
Reichsland wrote:
Its really none of Europe's or Canada's business what we can and can't do inside the states.

by Esternial » Fri Apr 12, 2013 8:15 am

by Alyekra » Fri Apr 12, 2013 8:18 am
Esternial wrote:Nice approach by the NRA top brass.
Feel like you're losing ground -> endorse totally insane standpoints for some dumbshit reason.
Someone really needs to clean out the old and get some fresh heads in there. Figure most of them are rotten.

by Fireye » Fri Apr 12, 2013 8:24 am
Alyekra wrote:Esternial wrote:Nice approach by the NRA top brass.
Feel like you're losing ground -> endorse totally insane standpoints for some dumbshit reason.
Someone really needs to clean out the old and get some fresh heads in there. Figure most of them are rotten.
The way I look at it is the NRA and anti-gun groups are (Kind of) like the two parties in court. If either one existed by itself we'd be in trouble. Each team exists to balance out the other.
It'll balance out soon.

by Hiersolis Most High » Fri Apr 12, 2013 9:04 am

by Esternial » Fri Apr 12, 2013 11:00 am
Fireye wrote:Alyekra wrote:
The way I look at it is the NRA and anti-gun groups are (Kind of) like the two parties in court. If either one existed by itself we'd be in trouble. Each team exists to balance out the other.
It'll balance out soon.
It's nice to see two people who haven't fully read the OP & the article debating the merits of the issue so inaccurately.

by Geilinor » Fri Apr 12, 2013 11:26 am

by Big Jim P » Fri Apr 12, 2013 11:27 am
Reichsland wrote:Ainin wrote:Everyone was obviously an exaggeration. The Second Amendment is honestly not very positively viewed in Europe and Canada and the NRA Leadership is just not helping their case by bitching all day about how nothing is the fault of guns.
Its really none of Europe's or Canada's business what we can and can't do inside the states.

by Geilinor » Fri Apr 12, 2013 11:29 am
Kavadevo wrote:Eh, I don't see an issue with letting convicted felons buy a firearm. We afford them all other rights after they've been released and are off parole, so why should the right to own a firearm be any different? If our prison system focused or rehabilitation rather than putting the bad guys in timeout, this wouldn't even be an issue.

by Neo Art » Fri Apr 12, 2013 11:30 am
Big Jim P wrote:I wonder just how many people know that a convicted felon can petition his states governor for a reinstatement of his rights?
Apparently not many.

by Big Jim P » Fri Apr 12, 2013 11:30 am
Galloism wrote:greed and death wrote:A significant difference between where movement is held and the rest of Detroit.
Believe it or not, I've only been to Detroit once (other than at the airport terminal).
I was driving a tractor trailer at the time, where you're not allowed to carry firearms.
The yard was fenced, with barbed wire, they had an armed guard on the roof next door with a rifle, and they told me not to leave the yard.

Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Albaaa, Arvenia, Bradfordville, Dhemixia, Eire Agus Albion, Fartsniffage, Floofybit, Gun Manufacturers, Kitsuva, Majestic-12 [Bot], Northern Seleucia, Ostroeuropa, Tarsonis, Washington Resistance Army, Washington-Columbia
Advertisement