Perhaps he is from a future in which furries are common?
Advertisement

by Anachronous Rex » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:07 pm

by The Emerald Dawn » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:07 pm

by Nailed to the Perch » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:07 pm
Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

by The Blaatschapen » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:07 pm

by Anachronous Rex » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:08 pm

by Zweite Alaje » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:08 pm
Meryuma wrote:Zweite Alaje wrote:You could see it like that, I'm against attempts force a language into a certain form. I hate organizations like the French Academy.
Beyond an agreed spelling convention, I don't see a reason for it.
Attempts to prevent linguistic change are bad, but I don't see what's bad about coining new words or using words in new ways. That's natural change.Zohai wrote:If you date a trans man it might be more complicated, but you'll still have to be a bit gay. Maybe not fully gay but you're problably somewhat into guys. Despite him being born a woman, as a straight dude I wouldn't do it .
obviously not
Wait, dating a trans man is less gay? I don't know what kind of warped ideas you need to have to think it's less gay to date the same gender.
Also, if it's obviously not gay to date a woman with a hysterectomy, why would it be gay to date a post-op transwoman?Zweite Alaje wrote:Here we go with this again....
There a social problem? PATRIARCHY TEH EBUL MEN!!!
Men are victims of patriarchy too.

by The Emerald Dawn » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:09 pm

by The Blaatschapen » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:09 pm

by Gandoor » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:09 pm

by Nailed to the Perch » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:09 pm
Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

by Ibwa » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:10 pm
I'm over it, your "animals don't have souls" talk is making me tired.
by Anachronous Rex » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:10 pm


by Anachronous Rex » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:11 pm

by The Emerald Dawn » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:11 pm
Nailed to the Perch wrote:The Emerald Dawn wrote:So why belittle them? What possible good can come from it? Or are you so insecure in yourself that you have to diminish hardships of one class to prove some point?
I don't think the intent was to belittle actual hardships faced by men, but simply to eyeroll at the ridiculousness of the notion that men face all the "societal hardships" while women are on a "pedestal."
Dousmilia wrote:Poor men, such hardships they face.

by Cristos Templars » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:11 pm

by The Emerald Dawn » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:12 pm
Cristos Templars wrote:HEEEEEELLLLLLLLLL NOOOOOOOOOOO!!! Don't get me wrong. I have nothing against gays, lesbiens, nor trannies. Be proud of who you are and let no one tell you otherwise. But if I found out my girlfriend was really a dude, I would stick his or hers head in a boiling deep fryer.

by The Emerald Dawn » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:12 pm
Dousmilia wrote:The Emerald Dawn wrote:So why belittle them? What possible good can come from it? Or are you so insecure in yourself that you have to diminish hardships of one class to prove some point?
I'm not belittling them, I'm saying that the notion that men are having all the societal hardships dumped on them is stupid.

by Anachronous Rex » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:13 pm

by Nailed to the Perch » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:14 pm
The Emerald Dawn wrote:The Blaatschapen wrote:
I might have traces of Neanderthal in me?
Giggity.Nailed to the Perch wrote:
I don't think the intent was to belittle actual hardships faced by men, but simply to eyeroll at the ridiculousness of the notion that men face all the "societal hardships" while women are on a "pedestal."Dousmilia wrote:Poor men, such hardships they face.
Didn't lead me there.
Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

by The Blaatschapen » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:14 pm
Anachronous Rex wrote:The Blaatschapen wrote:
That is debatable.
Well they were always chemically interfertile. The only other criterion is that they won't interbreed under usual circumstances.
But as we know know, they were basically absorbed into the greater human population, which indicates the opposite. That the only factor preventing interbreeding was geography.


by Zweite Alaje » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:15 pm
Cristos Templars wrote:HEEEEEELLLLLLLLLL NOOOOOOOOOOO!!! Don't get me wrong. I have nothing against gays, lesbiens, nor trannies. Be proud of who you are and let no one tell you otherwise. But if I found out my girlfriend was really a dude, I would stick his or hers head in a boiling deep fryer.

by Anachronous Rex » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:15 pm
Cristos Templars wrote:HEEEEEELLLLLLLLLL NOOOOOOOOOOO!!! Don't get me wrong. I have nothing against gays, lesbiens, nor trannies. Be proud of who you are and let no one tell you otherwise. But if I found out my girlfriend was really a dude, I would stick his or hers head in a boiling deep fryer.

by Anachronous Rex » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:16 pm
The Blaatschapen wrote:Anachronous Rex wrote:Well they were always chemically interfertile. The only other criterion is that they won't interbreed under usual circumstances.
But as we know know, they were basically absorbed into the greater human population, which indicates the opposite. That the only factor preventing interbreeding was geography.
Soo... they're like Aussies then?

Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Achan, Bienenhalde, Emotional Support Crocodile, Galloism, Grinning Dragon, Incelastan, Juansonia, Ostroeuropa, Philjia, Stellar Colonies, The Huskar Social Union
Advertisement