Hehe... I'm quite certain of that.
Advertisement

by Distruzio » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:47 pm

by Agymnum » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:47 pm

by Screensaver » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:48 pm
Agymnum wrote:Screensaver wrote:
So you are saying that transexuals are dishonest cowards? That is highly insulting. Believe it or not I have a transgender friend who is actually honest about it and even proud of it. He (or she rather) doesn't take shit from anybody.
I doubt your transgender friend makes being transgender a topic of conversation on a first date.
There's being proud of something, and there's being obsessed about it.
For example, I'm proud to be an atheist. This doesn't mean I walk around loudly proclaiming to everyone who speaks to me, "I AM AN ATHEIST! I AM AN ATHEIST!"
See the difference? Your friend is proud of being a transgender, I'm sure, but I doubt he or she brings it up on a first date when there are infinitely more interesting topics to discuss - such as what he/she and his/her date have in common, for example.

by Agymnum » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:51 pm
Screensaver wrote:He doesn't plan on becoming a fake biological female.

by Condunum » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:52 pm
Screensaver wrote:Agymnum wrote:
I doubt your transgender friend makes being transgender a topic of conversation on a first date.
There's being proud of something, and there's being obsessed about it.
For example, I'm proud to be an atheist. This doesn't mean I walk around loudly proclaiming to everyone who speaks to me, "I AM AN ATHEIST! I AM AN ATHEIST!"
See the difference? Your friend is proud of being a transgender, I'm sure, but I doubt he or she brings it up on a first date when there are infinitely more interesting topics to discuss - such as what he/she and his/her date have in common, for example.
All of his friends know about it. He actually told me after just 2 hours of knowing him. Surprised me since he wasn't dressed like a girl at the time. And before anyone asks the answer is no. He doesn't plan on becoming a fake biological female.

by Screensaver » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:52 pm
Agymnum wrote:Screensaver wrote:He doesn't plan on becoming a fake biological female.
He's my issue with this statement: a transsexual is not "fake" in any way. A transsexual is literally a biological female except without the ovaries.
Fake would imply that a transsexual is wearing some sort of rubber body suit or has some sort of complex makeup on. They don't. Their hormonal levels and post-op appearance reflect their new gender. That's it, literally.
This is why people have a hard time understanding transsexuality. They make this assumption that a post-op transsexual is somehow a fake, "lesser" version of the supposed "real" individuals who are born of that gender. They aren't.

by Condunum » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:53 pm
Screensaver wrote:Agymnum wrote:
He's my issue with this statement: a transsexual is not "fake" in any way. A transsexual is literally a biological female except without the ovaries.
Fake would imply that a transsexual is wearing some sort of rubber body suit or has some sort of complex makeup on. They don't. Their hormonal levels and post-op appearance reflect their new gender. That's it, literally.
This is why people have a hard time understanding transsexuality. They make this assumption that a post-op transsexual is somehow a fake, "lesser" version of the supposed "real" individuals who are born of that gender. They aren't.
I am not buying a car from you.


by Zweite Alaje » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:54 pm

by Agymnum » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:54 pm
Screensaver wrote:I am not buying a car from you.

by Screensaver » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:55 pm

by Zweite Alaje » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:56 pm
Condunum wrote:Screensaver wrote:
All of his friends know about it. He actually told me after just 2 hours of knowing him. Surprised me since he wasn't dressed like a girl at the time. And before anyone asks the answer is no. He doesn't plan on becoming a fake biological female.
Your insistence on calling them fake is irritatingly ignorant.

by Agymnum » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:56 pm

by Screensaver » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:59 pm
Agymnum wrote:Screensaver wrote:
I got no problem with trans people. I am just saying that they will never truly be the opposite the sex. Just as a 2007 Toyota Prius will never be a 1966 Dodge Charger no matter how much you modify it.
I got no problem with immigrants.
I am just saying that they will never be true Americans, just like how a Japanese car will never be an American car no matter how much you modify it.
See the logical fallacy here?
PEOPLE =/= CARS

by Zweite Alaje » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:00 am
Condunum wrote:Zweite Alaje wrote:I'd hate to be the devil advocate here but his position isn't exactly wrong. Transsexuals are mentally genuine, but physically they aren't.
As far as society should be concerned though, MtF transsexuals are female, and FtM transsexuals are male. Although the jury is still out on that penis thing.

by Agymnum » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:01 am
Screensaver wrote:Immigrants being true americans is a cultural thing not a physical thing. Biological gender is.

by Distruzio » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:02 am

by Agymnum » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:03 am
Distruzio wrote:Screensaver wrote:
I got no problem with trans people. I am just saying that they will never truly be the opposite the sex. Just as a 2007 Toyota Prius will never be a 1966 Dodge Charger no matter how much you modify it.
Ah... but it will be a car. Your metaphor is poorly developed. A transgender isn't undergoing cosmetic surgery. They're undergoing corrective surgery. Sort of like replacing the weak valves in your 66' Charger to showroom condition. It's no different that having congenital heart corrective surgery to fix the ventricular septal defect a baby was born with.

by Screensaver » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:05 am
Agymnum wrote:Screensaver wrote:Immigrants being true americans is a cultural thing not a physical thing. Biological gender is.
Nope, nope, nope.
By your logic, only how I define people matters. Thus, I perceive immigrants to not be true Americans. If you are not born on American soil, you're not a true American.
I mean, this is how you treat transsexuals. Is this not okay? Surely if you can discriminate based on what gender transsexuals used to be, then I can discriminate based on what nationality immigrants used to be.

by Agymnum » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:07 am
Screensaver wrote:Your logic came from the fucking sewer. Am I discriminating against transexuals? I think they should have the right to vote, free speech, employment, education, housing, medical care, and all of that shit. I am just saying that they will never be truly the opposite sex. That is a fact. Your hatred towards immigrants is ignorant and flat out bigoted to the extreme.

by Screensaver » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:08 am
Agymnum wrote:Screensaver wrote:Your logic came from the fucking sewer. Am I discriminating against transexuals? I think they should have the right to vote, free speech, employment, education, housing, medical care, and all of that shit. I am just saying that they will never be truly the opposite sex. That is a fact. Your hatred towards immigrants is ignorant and flat out bigoted to the extreme.
You're not truly accepting them as their real gender. Is that not equitable to me not accepting immigrants as real Americans?
I'm willing to let them have jobs, housing, legal protections, etc. They will just never be true Americans. What's so wrong about that?

by Agymnum » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:10 am
Screensaver wrote:American isn't physical like your sex. They will truly be the opposite gender but never truly be the opposite sex. Learn the fucking difference between gender and sex and drop your fucking racism.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Achan, Albaaa, Australian rePublic, Cappedore, Democratic Poopland, Dimetrodon Empire, Nantoraka, Neo-American States, The Joeanian Republic, The marxist plains, The Two Jerseys, Valentian Elysium
Advertisement