NATION

PASSWORD

Would you date a trans person?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Would you date a trans person?

I am a female; no I would not
25
3%
I am a male; no I would not
531
56%
other gender; no I would not
4
0%
I am a female; yes I would
76
8%
I am a male; yes I would
284
30%
other gender; yes I would
25
3%
 
Total votes : 945

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Mon Apr 15, 2013 12:09 am

Tovakestan wrote:I have nothing against Trans-genders, but I probably wouldn't date one because I plan on having biological children one day.

So if you have a relationship with someone and you find out later on they are infertile, are you going to ditch them for someone else?

User avatar
Gallade
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53326
Founded: Jul 14, 2009
Capitalizt

Postby Gallade » Mon Apr 15, 2013 12:16 am

Luveria wrote:
Tovakestan wrote:I have nothing against Trans-genders, but I probably wouldn't date one because I plan on having biological children one day.

So if you have a relationship with someone and you find out later on they are infertile, are you going to ditch them for someone else?

What if you knew the person was infertile beforehand, then chose not to date them?

I believe his point was as he/she wants children, they wouldn't knowingly enter a relationship knowing it couldn't lead to biological offspring.
|| Miss me with that factional BS || RIP Dyakovo. You were a true friend, you will be forever missed. ||

Français, en guerriers magnanimes, portez ou retenez vos coups! Épargnez ces tristes victimes à regret s'armant contre nous
My TG box is for friends, not food
Feel like making a direct change rather than just bickering over crises?
Help give orphaned children a safe environment to grow
Combat Homelessness

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Mon Apr 15, 2013 12:29 am

Gallade wrote:
Luveria wrote:So if you have a relationship with someone and you find out later on they are infertile, are you going to ditch them for someone else?

What if you knew the person was infertile beforehand, then chose not to date them?

That's no issue to me because first of all I'm not interested in women and secondly I wouldn't want children.

Gallade wrote:
Luveria wrote:So if you have a relationship with someone and you find out later on they are infertile, are you going to ditch them for someone else?

I believe his point was as he/she wants children, they wouldn't knowingly enter a relationship knowing it couldn't lead to biological offspring.

That seems a bit unfair as if having biological offspring matters more than a relationship with someone, and it's a bit hypocritical if finding out later on their partner is infertile and not leaving them, while maintaining a standard of not knowingly entering a relationship with someone infertile.

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65256
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Mon Apr 15, 2013 12:30 am

Luveria wrote:
Tovakestan wrote:I have nothing against Trans-genders, but I probably wouldn't date one because I plan on having biological children one day.

So if you have a relationship with someone and you find out later on they are infertile, are you going to ditch them for someone else?

what if he/she's instead is reduced infertile in the future due to reason x?
plot twist.
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Mon Apr 15, 2013 12:34 am

Immoren wrote:
Luveria wrote:So if you have a relationship with someone and you find out later on they are infertile, are you going to ditch them for someone else?

what if he/she's instead is reduced infertile in the future due to reason x?
plot twist.

This is what I'm wondering about too. I do consider it hypocrisy and an inconsistent standard if someone won't have a relationship with anyone infertile but would remain with them if they become infertile later. That makes no sense.
Last edited by Luveria on Mon Apr 15, 2013 12:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Gallade
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53326
Founded: Jul 14, 2009
Capitalizt

Postby Gallade » Mon Apr 15, 2013 12:34 am

Immoren wrote:
Luveria wrote:So if you have a relationship with someone and you find out later on they are infertile, are you going to ditch them for someone else?

what if he/she's instead is reduced infertile in the future due to reason x?
plot twist.

Stop. I couldn't possibly stand the drama. It's killing me.
|| Miss me with that factional BS || RIP Dyakovo. You were a true friend, you will be forever missed. ||

Français, en guerriers magnanimes, portez ou retenez vos coups! Épargnez ces tristes victimes à regret s'armant contre nous
My TG box is for friends, not food
Feel like making a direct change rather than just bickering over crises?
Help give orphaned children a safe environment to grow
Combat Homelessness

User avatar
Gallade
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53326
Founded: Jul 14, 2009
Capitalizt

Postby Gallade » Mon Apr 15, 2013 12:38 am

Luveria wrote:
Immoren wrote:what if he/she's instead is reduced infertile in the future due to reason x?
plot twist.

This is what I'm wondering about too. I do consider it hypocrisy and an inconsistent standard if someone won't have a relationship with anyone infertile but would remain with them if they become infertile later. That makes no sense.

You're not considering the complexity of human sentimentality. People come to love what they thought they would dislike.While they could say they want kids over a relationship, if they were in the situation where they later find their partner to be sterile, affection could win out over desires.

It's emotional marmite.
|| Miss me with that factional BS || RIP Dyakovo. You were a true friend, you will be forever missed. ||

Français, en guerriers magnanimes, portez ou retenez vos coups! Épargnez ces tristes victimes à regret s'armant contre nous
My TG box is for friends, not food
Feel like making a direct change rather than just bickering over crises?
Help give orphaned children a safe environment to grow
Combat Homelessness

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Mon Apr 15, 2013 12:40 am

Gallade wrote:
Luveria wrote:This is what I'm wondering about too. I do consider it hypocrisy and an inconsistent standard if someone won't have a relationship with anyone infertile but would remain with them if they become infertile later. That makes no sense.

You're not considering the complexity of human sentimentality. People come to love what they thought they would dislike.While they could say they want kids over a relationship, if they were in the situation where they later find their partner to be sterile, affection could win out over desires.

It's emotional marmite.

If someone gives having biological kids higher priority than being in a relationship with someone they love, their priorities are severely mixed up. I always thought people should be compatible with each other before considering having kids rather than having a checklist of:
1) isn't infertile
2) is attractive
etc.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:15 am

Luveria wrote:If someone gives having biological kids higher priority than being in a relationship with someone they love, their priorities are severely mixed up. I always thought people should be compatible with each other before considering having kids rather than having a checklist of:
1) isn't infertile
2) is attractive
etc.


Yes, but this tends to happen more often in other parts of the world than what you may imagine. :unsure:

Developed nations hardly have this issue at all.

And all of us have a mental checklist of what we want in a partner :p
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:16 am, edited 2 times in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:46 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Luveria wrote:If someone gives having biological kids higher priority than being in a relationship with someone they love, their priorities are severely mixed up. I always thought people should be compatible with each other before considering having kids rather than having a checklist of:
1) isn't infertile
2) is attractive
etc.


Yes, but this tends to happen more often in other parts of the world than what you may imagine. :unsure:

Developed nations hardly have this issue at all.

And all of us have a mental checklist of what we want in a partner :p


I have a mental checklist too as does everyone, I'm only saying if fertility is the first priority there is something very wrong with that.

And how do you find out if someone is infertile before you are in a relationship with them? That's ridiculous.
Do you say "You're attractive and I like you so I want to take you on a date, but you see the thing is I want kids someday and...I need to know if you're infertile because I don't want to be in a relationship with someone I can't have kids with."
*slap*

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:53 am

Luveria wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Yes, but this tends to happen more often in other parts of the world than what you may imagine. :unsure:

Developed nations hardly have this issue at all.

And all of us have a mental checklist of what we want in a partner :p


I have a mental checklist too as does everyone, I'm only saying if fertility is the first priority there is something very wrong with that.

And how do you find out if someone is infertile before you are in a relationship with them? That's ridiculous.
Do you say "You're attractive and I like you so I want to take you on a date, but you see the thing is I want kids someday and...I need to know if you're infertile because I don't want to be in a relationship with someone I can't have kids with."
*slap*


Yea, that may raise a lot of issues in dates, especially in the first one.

Although we can also issue ID Cards that also make a note about your fertility status. S for sterile and F for fertile.

That way we can just ask for ID before dating. And it'd be an awesome pickup line:

"Hey babe, can I see your ID? Ah, yea, your ID says you can't have children. Sorry, I just date Fs, not Ss".

Satire aside, yes, if you think fertility is first priority there's something wrong with that but hey, there are also women who just want a boyfriend to have babies. Either way is wrong though.
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Mon Apr 15, 2013 2:02 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Yea, that may raise a lot of issues in dates, especially in the first one.

Although we can also issue ID Cards that also make a note about your fertility status. S for sterile and F for fertile.

That way we can just ask for ID before dating.

Along with the ID cards stating sex, gender, and sexual orientation so that way no one gets 'deceived' or disappointed.

User avatar
The Holy Therns
Post Czar
 
Posts: 30309
Founded: Jul 09, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Holy Therns » Mon Apr 15, 2013 2:04 am

Luveria wrote:
Gallade wrote:You're not considering the complexity of human sentimentality. People come to love what they thought they would dislike.While they could say they want kids over a relationship, if they were in the situation where they later find their partner to be sterile, affection could win out over desires.

It's emotional marmite.

If someone gives having biological kids higher priority than being in a relationship with someone they love, their priorities are severely mixed up. I always thought people should be compatible with each other before considering having kids rather than having a checklist of:
1) isn't infertile
2) is attractive
etc.


You'd be surprised at how many people think humanity's on the verge of extinction if they don't make tons of babies to the point where that must be their purpose in life.

Luveria wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Yea, that may raise a lot of issues in dates, especially in the first one.

Although we can also issue ID Cards that also make a note about your fertility status. S for sterile and F for fertile.

That way we can just ask for ID before dating.

Along with the ID cards stating sex, gender, and sexual orientation so that way no one gets 'deceived' or disappointed.


Ah yes, wouldn't want to deceive anyone.
Platitude with attitude
Your new favorite.
MTF transperson. She/her. Lives in Sweden.
Also, N A N A ! ! !
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜

Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.

User avatar
Tokainians
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Apr 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Tokainians » Mon Apr 15, 2013 2:06 am

nope

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Mon Apr 15, 2013 2:07 am

Luveria wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Yea, that may raise a lot of issues in dates, especially in the first one.

Although we can also issue ID Cards that also make a note about your fertility status. S for sterile and F for fertile.

That way we can just ask for ID before dating.

Along with the ID cards stating sex, gender, and sexual orientation so that way no one gets 'deceived' or disappointed.


Too much info for a card, although we could use cards with chips and put all relevant info, including religion, in the card. Would make dating like a transaction: streamlined, secure, and fast. To read them we would use a special adapter for our smartphones.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Mon Apr 15, 2013 2:09 am

The Holy Therns wrote:
Luveria wrote:Along with the ID cards stating sex, gender, and sexual orientation so that way no one gets 'deceived' or disappointed.


Ah yes, wouldn't want to deceive anyone.


Of course! This solves the problem of "deception" and other dating issues nicely.

After all, everyone knows people love IDs with information easy to access.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
The Holy Therns
Post Czar
 
Posts: 30309
Founded: Jul 09, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Holy Therns » Mon Apr 15, 2013 2:10 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
The Holy Therns wrote:

Ah yes, wouldn't want to deceive anyone.


Of course! This solves the problem of "deception" and other dating issues nicely.

After all, everyone knows people love IDs with information easy to access.


Nothing is sexier than the magic words "Here's my card".
Platitude with attitude
Your new favorite.
MTF transperson. She/her. Lives in Sweden.
Also, N A N A ! ! !
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜

Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Mon Apr 15, 2013 2:11 am

The Holy Therns wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Of course! This solves the problem of "deception" and other dating issues nicely.

After all, everyone knows people love IDs with information easy to access.


Nothing is sexier than the magic words "Here's my card".


Don't forget to say it in that sexy, business-like voice either.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
The Batorys
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5703
Founded: Oct 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Batorys » Mon Apr 15, 2013 2:20 am

I haven't read all 116 pages of the thread.

In answer to the original question, yes, I would date someone who was trans.
Mallorea and Riva should resign
This is an alternate history version of Callisdrun.
Here is the (incomplete) Factbook
Ask me about The Forgotten Lands!
Pro: Feminism, environmentalism, BLM, LGBTQUILTBAG, BDSM, unions, hyphy, Lenin, Ho Chi Minh, Oakland, old San Francisco, the Alliance to Restore the Republic, and fully automated gay luxury space communism
Anti: Misogyny, fossil fuels, racism, homophobia, kink-shaming, capitalism, LA, Silicon Valley, techies, Brezhnev, the Galactic Empire, and the "alt-right"

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Mon Apr 15, 2013 5:35 am

Luveria wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Yes, but this tends to happen more often in other parts of the world than what you may imagine. :unsure:

Developed nations hardly have this issue at all.

And all of us have a mental checklist of what we want in a partner :p


I have a mental checklist too as does everyone, I'm only saying if fertility is the first priority there is something very wrong with that.

And how do you find out if someone is infertile before you are in a relationship with them? That's ridiculous.
Do you say "You're attractive and I like you so I want to take you on a date, but you see the thing is I want kids someday and...I need to know if you're infertile because I don't want to be in a relationship with someone I can't have kids with."
*slap*


Eh, people are allowed to be selfish and weird with their relationship choices.

User avatar
Lyassa and Nairoa
Diplomat
 
Posts: 747
Founded: Jun 29, 2006
Father Knows Best State

Postby Lyassa and Nairoa » Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:07 am

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Luveria wrote:
I have a mental checklist too as does everyone, I'm only saying if fertility is the first priority there is something very wrong with that.

And how do you find out if someone is infertile before you are in a relationship with them? That's ridiculous.
Do you say "You're attractive and I like you so I want to take you on a date, but you see the thing is I want kids someday and...I need to know if you're infertile because I don't want to be in a relationship with someone I can't have kids with."
*slap*


Eh, people are allowed to be selfish and weird with their relationship choices.


Indeed. And it´s a one-size-fits-all thing, works for every kind of relationship regardless of status, gender or choice of sexuality. If I choose to be in a relationship like with a lamp post it´s nobody´s business.

User avatar
French Union
Diplomat
 
Posts: 890
Founded: Jan 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby French Union » Mon Apr 15, 2013 7:02 am

No, I would not. Well, unless I had something definite to gain from the marriage, like access to a lot of wealth, then we'd have ring shopping to do.

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Mon Apr 15, 2013 7:06 am

French Union wrote:No, I would not. Well, unless I had something definite to gain from the marriage, like access to a lot of wealth, then we'd have ring shopping to do.

Is that your policy for everyone?

User avatar
French Union
Diplomat
 
Posts: 890
Founded: Jan 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby French Union » Mon Apr 15, 2013 7:14 am

Luveria wrote:
French Union wrote:No, I would not. Well, unless I had something definite to gain from the marriage, like access to a lot of wealth, then we'd have ring shopping to do.

Is that your policy for everyone?


Correct.

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Mon Apr 15, 2013 7:27 am

French Union wrote:
Luveria wrote:Is that your policy for everyone?


Correct.


That's... sad, somehow.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Canarsia, El Lazaro, Great Nelson, Senkaku, Torisakia, Washington Resistance Army, Xi Jinping Thought, Yasuragi

Advertisement

Remove ads