NATION

PASSWORD

Gun Permit

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Would you support this law, explain

Yes
56
27%
Yes, but with modification (make it stricter)
48
23%
Yes, but with modification (make it looser)
33
16%
No
45
21%
No, but I would not oppose it either
4
2%
Random absurdity pickle
25
12%
 
Total votes : 211

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:58 pm

Llamalandia wrote:
Geilinor wrote:FBI agents won't be doing the work. There would be separate employees to manage NICS administration.


Oh so you're saying we would create another new federal agency, given how much money this govt already wastes on daily basis no thank you. :p

No. Do you think the NICS has FBI agents doing administration? The people who work on that would be FBI employees, but not agents. An FBI agent actually goes out into the field, but the FBI has many non-agent positions.
Last edited by Geilinor on Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Llamalandia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: Dec 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Llamalandia » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:00 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Llamalandia wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong but the current background check system works by seeing if you are a criminal. If you make up a fake name address and dob (and assuming you don't get very unlucky and choose the name of an actual criminal) you won't be flagged as a prohibited person and would be approved for a firearm would you not?

Hello, fingerprints?


Fingerprints aren't currently required to buy a gun (at least federally states may for handguns i believe) so unless your suggesting fingerprinting people when they buy a gun in the future (which costs more money) I don't see how the background check ever catches anyone except people stupid enough to use their real name.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72260
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:02 pm

Llamalandia wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Hello, fingerprints?


Fingerprints aren't currently required to buy a gun (at least federally states may for handguns i believe) so unless your suggesting fingerprinting people when they buy a gun in the future (which costs more money) I don't see how the background check ever catches anyone except people stupid enough to use their real name.

I cannot speak as to whether its the law in every state, but in those which I've purchased firearms I've always been required to present ID.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Sociobiology
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18396
Founded: Aug 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sociobiology » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:03 pm

Llamalandia wrote:
Sociobiology wrote:
who is proposing having the states do it?
This would be a federal proposal, paid for by a fee when you get the licence.


how do you think background checks work?
Also what does the FBI have to do with it?


Correct me if I'm wrong but the current background check system works by seeing if you are a criminal. If you make up a fake name address and dob (and assuming you don't get very unlucky and choose the name of an actual criminal) you won't be flagged as a prohibited person and would be approved for a firearm would you not?

I will correct you, for one thing you would need a fake social security number that matches that information as well as a drivers licence and thus a complete fake identity.
many states include a blind fingerprint check (one that checks for matches in databases but does not add to them) or medical records.
Last edited by Sociobiology on Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I think we risk becoming the best informed society that has ever died of ignorance. ~Reuben Blades

I got quite annoyed after the Haiti earthquake. A baby was taken from the wreckage and people said it was a miracle. It would have been a miracle had God stopped the earthquake. More wonderful was that a load of evolved monkeys got together to save the life of a child that wasn't theirs. ~Terry Pratchett

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72260
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:06 pm

Sociobiology wrote:
greed and death wrote:Driving a car on public roads is different from owning a gun in your home.
A license to carry in public is a reasonable compromise that treats gun ownership like car ownership, and look the states already have that.

no I compare it to owning dynamite, and should have similar licencing.

I think the first problem is that you find a handheld ranged weapon that hits one target at a time similar in nature to explosives that can take out a whole city block at once.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:06 pm

Sociobiology wrote:
Llamalandia wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong but the current background check system works by seeing if you are a criminal. If you make up a fake name address and dob (and assuming you don't get very unlucky and choose the name of an actual criminal) you won't be flagged as a prohibited person and would be approved for a firearm would you not?

I will correct you, for one thing you would need a fake social security number that matches that information as well as a drivers licence and thus a complete fake identity.
many states include a blind fingerprint check (one that checks for matches in databases but does not add to them) or medical records.

That's true. Very few people would dare faking their social security number.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:07 pm

Geilinor wrote:
greed and death wrote:

Why would FBI agents be assigned such tasks?

A very nitpicky distinction especially since the administrative posts in the FBI often require prior law enforcement experience.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:08 pm

greed and death wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Why would FBI agents be assigned such tasks?

A very nitpicky distinction especially since the administrative posts in the FBI often require prior law enforcement experience.

They can make a position that doesn't. All those employees would do is manage the gun registry.
Last edited by Geilinor on Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72260
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:10 pm

greed and death wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Why would FBI agents be assigned such tasks?

A very nitpicky distinction especially since the administrative posts in the FBI often require prior law enforcement experience.

And, given there are only 56 FBI field offices, would create an immense administrative burden on those seeking to exercise their constitutional rights.

Unless the whole permit can be done via mail order, which would destroy the purpose entirely.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:11 pm

Galloism wrote:
Sociobiology wrote:no I compare it to owning dynamite, and should have similar licencing.

I think the first problem is that you find a handheld ranged weapon that hits one target at a time similar in nature to explosives that can take out a whole city block at once.

Also dynamite can spontaneously explode if stored incorrectly, guns tend to just rust to a non functioning status if improperly stored.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72260
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:14 pm

greed and death wrote:
Galloism wrote:I think the first problem is that you find a handheld ranged weapon that hits one target at a time similar in nature to explosives that can take out a whole city block at once.

Also dynamite can spontaneously explode if stored incorrectly, guns tend to just rust to a non functioning status if improperly stored.

Well... if maintained improperly, it could theoretically explode in a person's hand when attempted to be used.

Of course, the only hurts the weilder, not everyone on his/her block.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Llamalandia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: Dec 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Llamalandia » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:15 pm

Sociobiology wrote:
Llamalandia wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong but the current background check system works by seeing if you are a criminal. If you make up a fake name address and dob (and assuming you don't get very unlucky and choose the name of an actual criminal) you won't be flagged as a prohibited person and would be approved for a firearm would you not?

I will correct you, for one thing you would need a fake social security number that matches that information as well as a drivers licence and thus a complete fake identity.
many states include a blind fingerprint check (one that checks for matches in databases but does not add to them) or medical records.


I wasn't aware that gun purchases required a SSN I though it was just valid photo id (pretty easy to fake teens do it all the time) Name DOB and address but again if I'm wrong let me know. :)

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:16 pm

Galloism wrote:
greed and death wrote:A very nitpicky distinction especially since the administrative posts in the FBI often require prior law enforcement experience.

And, given there are only 56 FBI field offices, would create an immense administrative burden on those seeking to exercise their constitutional rights.

Unless the whole permit can be done via mail order, which would destroy the purpose entirely.

I was assuming we would tolerate the creation of thousands of new offices of the FBI.
I do not see more than a 30 minute travel time and a 15 minute wait time to be reasonable.

All these issues could be avoided if local law enforcement did the registration, they normally have numerous police stations and normally have a few officers on duty to take public complaints and assist with arrest. Of course that now brings us back congress can not force the states to do it.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:16 pm

Galloism wrote:
greed and death wrote:Also dynamite can spontaneously explode if stored incorrectly, guns tend to just rust to a non functioning status if improperly stored.

Well... if maintained improperly, it could theoretically explode in a person's hand when attempted to be used.

Of course, the only hurts the weilder, not everyone on his/her block.

Let me guess your not a fan of glocks.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Llamalandia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: Dec 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Llamalandia » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:17 pm

Galloism wrote:
Llamalandia wrote:
Fingerprints aren't currently required to buy a gun (at least federally states may for handguns i believe) so unless your suggesting fingerprinting people when they buy a gun in the future (which costs more money) I don't see how the background check ever catches anyone except people stupid enough to use their real name.

I cannot speak as to whether its the law in every state, but in those which I've purchased firearms I've always been required to present ID.


Right and no one has ever made a fake id :lol:

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:19 pm

Llamalandia wrote:
Galloism wrote:I cannot speak as to whether its the law in every state, but in those which I've purchased firearms I've always been required to present ID.


Right and no one has ever made a fake id :lol:

IDs are still reliable enough to be used for every registration purpose on the planet.
Last edited by Geilinor on Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72260
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:19 pm

Llamalandia wrote:
Galloism wrote:I cannot speak as to whether its the law in every state, but in those which I've purchased firearms I've always been required to present ID.


Right and no one has ever made a fake id :lol:

Sure, if the shop owner doesnt spot it, but unless it links to a real person, the background check would come back "never heard of him".
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72260
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:20 pm

greed and death wrote:
Galloism wrote:Well... if maintained improperly, it could theoretically explode in a person's hand when attempted to be used.

Of course, the only hurts the weilder, not everyone on his/her block.

Let me guess your not a fan of glocks.

You noticed.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Gun Manufacturers
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9975
Founded: Jan 23, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gun Manufacturers » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:21 pm

Lemanrussland wrote:It seems reasonable to me, I would be perfectly fine with that, along with a requirement to conceal firearms if you want to carry them in a public place (open carry, in an inappropriate situation/place, is extremely disruptive and causes more trouble than it's worth, in my opinion), and restrictions on so-called "destructive devices". I would also support forensically fingerprinting guns so that bullets from crime scenes can be traced back to the gun which fired them.

The great danger of registration, at least among more extreme gun rights advocates, is that it's an avenue for future seizure. I recognize that concern. In an ideal world, where we could leave gun control limited to that, I would definitely support this sort of set up.


Destructive devices ARE restricted. You can't just walk in, buy one at your local gun store, and walk out with it. It takes getting an NFA tax stamp from the ATF (which involves paperwork, a background check, a $200 check for the tax stamp, and several months of waiting) before you can own one.
Gun control is like trying to solve drunk driving by making it harder for sober people to own cars.

Any accident you can walk away from is one I can laugh at.

DOJ's interpretation of the 2nd Amendment: http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/fi ... -p0126.pdf

Natapoc wrote:...You should post more in here so I don't seem like the extremist...


Auraelius wrote:If you take the the TITANIC, and remove the letters T, T, and one of the I's, and add the letters C,O,S,P,R, and Y you get CONSPIRACY. oOooOooooOOOooooOOOOOOoooooooo


Maineiacs wrote:Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and get drunk all day.


Luw wrote:Politics is like having two handfuls of shit - one that smells bad and one that looks bad - and having to decide which one to put in your mouth.

User avatar
Llamalandia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: Dec 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Llamalandia » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:22 pm

Galloism wrote:
Llamalandia wrote:
Right and no one has ever made a fake id :lol:

Sure, if the shop owner doesnt spot it, but unless it links to a real person, the background check would come back "never heard of him".


Right but the only way to that is to either call the dmv which issue license or check a social security number which would require interfacing with the SSA which I don't believe th NICS system is allowed to do but again correct me if I'm wrong on needing a SSN to buy a gun.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72260
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:23 pm

Llamalandia wrote:
Galloism wrote:Sure, if the shop owner doesnt spot it, but unless it links to a real person, the background check would come back "never heard of him".


Right but the only way to that is to either call the dmv which issue license or check a social security number which would require interfacing with the SSA which I don't believe th NICS system is allowed to do but again correct me if I'm wrong on needing a SSN to buy a gun.

It's been so long since I bought a new one, I flat out don't remember.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Llamalandia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: Dec 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Llamalandia » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:23 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Llamalandia wrote:
Right and no one has ever made a fake id :lol:

IDs are still reliable enough to be used for every registration purpose on the planet.


and yet teens still use them to buy alcohol now don't they (though states have started cracking down on fakies) :)

User avatar
Occupied Deutschland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18796
Founded: Oct 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Occupied Deutschland » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:24 pm

Galloism wrote:
Llamalandia wrote:
Right but the only way to that is to either call the dmv which issue license or check a social security number which would require interfacing with the SSA which I don't believe th NICS system is allowed to do but again correct me if I'm wrong on needing a SSN to buy a gun.

It's been so long since I bought a new one, I flat out don't remember.

ATF offers e-form 4473s for download if anyone feels like checking. I believe the SSN box says that its optional but will help in positive identification, meaning less likelihood of a false positive.

Edit: From the ATF 4473 FAQ
Q: Is a Social Security card a proper means of identification for purchasing a firearm from an FFL?

No. A Social Security card, alien registration card, or military identification alone does not contain sufficient information to identify a firearms purchaser. However, a purchaser may be identified by any combination of government-issued documents which together establish all of the required information: Name, residence address, date of birth, and photograph of the holder.

No SSN it seems.
Last edited by Occupied Deutschland on Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'm General Patton.
Even those who are gone are with us as we go on.

Been busy lately--not around much.

User avatar
Llamalandia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: Dec 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Llamalandia » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:26 pm

Based on a quick googling it appears a ssn isn't required by the feds for purchasing a gun though some states and cities do sometimes require it for hand gun purchases. If anyone more authoritative than myself wishes to weigh in though it would be greatly appreciated :)

User avatar
Conceptina
Attaché
 
Posts: 66
Founded: Aug 18, 2012
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Conceptina » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:27 pm

I think that people should own guns but there should be some guidlines before the purchase of a firearm is official. My recommendations:

1. The person should go through a basic safety course with the firearm they intend to buy and learn the basics of being a responsible gun owner (for example: muzzle control, proper trigger discipline, etc....This would reduce the rate of firearms related accidents and stupidity. The gun that kills the most people is the one that is unloaded :palm: )

2. Psychological evaluations on the person intending to buy the weapon (Most whackjobs shooting up schools and theaters don't have a previous criminal record, allowing them to pass background checks.A psych eval would be more effective at weeding the nutjobs out.)

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Des-Bal, Fartsniffage, Likhinia

Advertisement

Remove ads