Advertisement

by Maurepas » Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:30 pm
SF Penguins wrote:Because without the right to bear arms they don't have to listen to you cause if they got the guns and you don't i'm sure you're really going to stand up to the goverment.


by Bavin » Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:32 pm
SF Penguins wrote:And look at Europe there siging away there soverignty to the Lisbon treaty and the EU

by Spartan Philidelphia » Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:33 pm
SF Penguins wrote:No Shit there are gun laws i'm not apposed to background checks, but when they try to start banning certain firearms then where do they stop. And no i'm not reading from a conspiracy website this just what i've got to say from what I've researched try it.


by National Corporations » Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:33 pm
Maurepas wrote:SF Penguins wrote:Because without the right to bear arms they don't have to listen to you cause if they got the guns and you don't i'm sure you're really going to stand up to the goverment.
I cant make heads or tails of that sentence...
But, I seriously doubt a handgun or hunting rifle is taking out an Abrams anytime soon anyway, even if they were being "taken away",

by Augarundus » Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:35 pm
Sdaeriji wrote:I'm sure this will be locked, but:
I find it highly suspect that people like you were completely silent for 8 years of the Bush Administration running roughshod over the Constitution, taking more and broader tyrannical powers for the executive branch than any administration since FDR, all in the name of "fighting terrorism", but now that a Democrat wants to give people health insurance, it's suddenly time for armed revolution. Your hypocrisy sickens me.

by TerraPublica » Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:36 pm
Spartan Philidelphia wrote:SF Penguins wrote:No Shit there are gun laws i'm not apposed to background checks, but when they try to start banning certain firearms then where do they stop. And no i'm not reading from a conspiracy website this just what i've got to say from what I've researched try it.
First they take our rifles. Second, they take our houses and souls!!!


by Neesika » Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:37 pm
SF Penguins wrote:What do you think about the federal goverment and if you are tired of the tyranny like i am, then Post IT

by Neesika » Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:39 pm
Sdaeriji wrote:I'm sure this will be locked, but:
I find it highly suspect that people like you were completely silent for 8 years of the Bush Administration running roughshod over the Constitution, taking more and broader tyrannical powers for the executive branch than any administration since FDR, all in the name of "fighting terrorism", but now that a Democrat wants to give people health insurance, it's suddenly time for armed revolution. Your hypocrisy sickens me.

by Bavin » Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:39 pm
Augarundus wrote:
People like him? (or me)
You think us to be Republicans (btw, I've never known this person before. I use 'us' to mean the collective of conservatives and moderates); we are not. Well... I am not.
Our silence over the last 8 years?
Well... I'm 13 years old, so I doubt I could have been very vocal at 5. However, my political models, Glenn Beck and Bill O'Reilly, certainly weren't silent for 8 years. They staunchly opposed Bush's totalitarian policies of wire taps and economic socialism since their implementation, and I recognize Bush's massive faults as well.
Obama is simply a fast-acting version of what Bush intended to introduce in a much slower dive into socio-economic marxism.


by Pevisopolis » Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:57 pm
SF Penguins wrote:Because without the right to bear arms they don't have to listen to you cause if they got the guns and you don't i'm sure you're really going to stand up to the goverment.

by Goath » Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:18 pm
National Corporations wrote:The American political system has slowly taken almost every right it can from the state governments and this has made our leadership further and further detached from the people they represent... senators serving 20-30 years in office have no idea what their people want a federal government that tells smaller more rural states that they have to spend their money in certain ways because the larger more populous states out vote them... i say return power to State and local governments and let the states make their own choices not big brother.

Maurepas wrote:SF Penguins wrote:Because without the right to bear arms they don't have to listen to you cause if they got the guns and you don't i'm sure you're really going to stand up to the goverment.
I cant make heads or tails of that sentence...
But, I seriously doubt a handgun or hunting rifle is taking out an Abrams anytime soon anyway, even if they were being "taken away",
No it won't but a good hunting rifle can take out a tank commander at a half mile, and what he is saying is its a right and one that a vast majority wants protected and most importantly it is IN the Constitution and for that reason alone the rules for removing or editing the Constitution should be followed.

by Free Soviets » Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:25 pm
Augarundus wrote:However, my political models, Glenn Beck and Bill O'Reilly, certainly weren't silent for 8 years. They staunchly opposed Bush's totalitarian policies of wire taps and economic socialism since their implementation

by Tokos » Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:26 pm

by Free Soviets » Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:26 pm
National Corporations wrote:i say return power to State and local governments and let the states make their own choices not big brother.

by Maurepas » Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:28 pm
Tokos wrote:I don't understand the argument that simple firearms can't give government agents, etc., some serious grief. I mean… Iraq…

by Soratsin » Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:31 pm
SF Penguins wrote:If you get your news from CNN, Fox, Msnbc or any other major news station then of course your going to think that i'm crazy cause they're bought off by the parties and as far as that stuff being a fact of democracy, well why settle for that and by the way we are a REUBLIC. And for you who said I don't the constituion, I'm pretty sure that I know my rights and that when the goverment starts talking about taking any of them away I get just a little concerned and maybe you should to instead of always playing your video games, research on your own on the Internet, Look up Alex Jones, you'll see what i'm talking about, and no, he's not crazy and I don't do meth and yes I do like beer

by The Black Forrest » Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:35 pm
SF Penguins wrote:One I hated bush and i realize what the hell he did to the consituiont. Two I hate Obama because he is no better and is proposing with his health care bill to essentially Kill your grandmother. and Three, I Think the partys have ruined America.

by Tokos » Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:36 pm
"The Emperor said it - I believe it - that settles it!"

by The Union of Myanmar » Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:40 pm

by New Kereptica » Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:41 pm
The Union of Myanmar wrote:The National Council of Myanmar has decided to improve relations with the federal government of the United States of America.
Blouman Empire wrote:Natural is not nature.
KiloMikeAlpha wrote:Umm hmm.... mind if I siggy that as a reminder to those who think that it is cool to shove their bat-shit crazy atheist beliefs on those of us who actually have a clue?
Teccor wrote:You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.
Bluth Corporation wrote:No. A free market literally has zero bubbles.
JJ Place wrote:I have a few more pressing matters to attend to right now; I'll be back later this evening to continue my one-man against the world struggle.
Mercator Terra wrote: Mental illness is a myth.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Angeloid Astraea, Attempted Socialism, Elejamie, Fartsniffage, Ifreann, James_xenoland, Lativs, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Ostroeuropa, Point Blob, Reich of the New World Order, Sorcery, Transitional Global Authority, Trivalve
Advertisement