So? That could be true, probably not though. Whether that's true or not, Obama's still a Democrat.
Advertisement

by Angleter » Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:36 pm

by Fartsniffage » Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:36 pm
Angleter wrote:Now let's get real here. Fact exists. I can make a statement:
Barack Obama is a member of the Democratic Party.
That is a fact, hence fact exists.

by Angleter » Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:38 pm

by Fartsniffage » Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:42 pm
Angleter wrote:No, but he was filmed live on TV giving the keynote speech of the Democratic National Convention, and there are eyewitnesses to that.

by Lackadaisical2 » Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:07 pm
Natapoc wrote:EKJ-746 wrote:as far as i know my reality exists, i don't know about yours. as what i see, say or type could be something completely different to what is actually happening. i could be dreaming this all up, or you could, or someone else could. certainty cannot truly exist because existence is just a matter of perception.
Yeah and... lets pretend that there is an equal possibility that reality does exist as it does not exist. In other words there is a 50% chance that you are "real".
Lets go with the first assumption that reality is false and only, and entirely figment of imagination (mine or someone elses). If this is the case then nothing matters because it is not real anyway. Any actions I take have no real effects just as any non actions I take have no effects positive or negative as they are all an illusion.
Still going with the assumption of non reality lets assume I act as if it is real despite it being an illusion. There would be no real negative effects of such a silly action as treating this illusion of reality I'm stuck in as real.
Say I treat it as if it were not real: There would still be no actually effect as it is simply an illusion anyway.
Now assume instead that the there is a reality and it is not an illusion then if I act as if it were an illusion bad things could happen to me and others. We could die, we could feel pain so it would be dangerous in a real world to treat it as an illusion. Sharp objects actually are sharp and trains will run you over.
Continuing with our assumption that there is a reality lets say I treat this reality as if it were real. In this case I make choices based on this reality that are in the best interests of myself and others who do exist (as per the assumptions of the argument.) Since I've made these choices "rationally" I benefit and so do others. For example I do not step in front of moving trains because I feel they are a real.
We can conclude therefore that our best choice is to treat the world as real and rational because the risks of doing otherwise are greater with no rewards.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

by Hairless Kitten II » Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:26 pm
Lackadaisical2 wrote:
This is the same reasoning as to why I'm inlcined to worship God. If he doesn't exist I haven't hurt myself in believing that he does, but theres the off chance (I realize, much lower than reality being real) that I could benefit greatly.

by Mad hatters in jeans » Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:49 pm

by The_pantless_hero » Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:55 pm
Angleter wrote:
So? That could be true, probably not though. Whether that's true or not, Obama's still a Democrat.
Bottle wrote:Equality is a slippery slope, people, and if you give it to the gays you have to give it to the polygamists and if you give it to the polygamists you have to give it to the serial dog molesters and if you give it to the serial dog molesters you have to give it to the machine fetishists and the next thing you know you're being tied up by a trio of polygamist lesbian powerbooks and you can't get out because the safety word is case sensistive!

by Svenen (Ancient) » Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:59 pm

by CornixPes II » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:25 pm

by DrunkenDove » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:38 pm
"I think, therefore I am."
He responded:
"You can never know, you can never be sure. Your life could be a mirage, a dream, etc."

by Rhodmhire » Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:20 pm
Wilgrove wrote:So....this is The Matrix?
*Goes jump off a building in an attempt to jump to the other one, falls, and dies*

by CornixPes II » Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:21 pm

by Pope Joan » Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:22 pm

by CornixPes II » Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:25 pm
Pope Joan wrote:The self is a working assumption for most psychologists.
Many would agree that we start with others, and then use them as models to construct a model of the self.
Griffin, K Bartholomew - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994
So, oddly enough, the concept of other may predate the formed concept of self.

by Buffett and Colbert » Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:27 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Pope Joan » Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:29 pm
CornixPes II wrote:Pope Joan wrote:The self is a working assumption for most psychologists.
Many would agree that we start with others, and then use them as models to construct a model of the self.
Griffin, K Bartholomew - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994
So, oddly enough, the concept of other may predate the formed concept of self.
It's strange how most academic topics are built on inherent principles that are effectively 'working' and undecided. It's like economics and capital.

by Hydesland » Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:31 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:"You never know" is a crappy legitimisation of any conspiracy theory. Instead of debating how you know you exist, why not attack that?

by CornixPes II » Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:32 pm
Pope Joan wrote:CornixPes II wrote:Pope Joan wrote:The self is a working assumption for most psychologists.
Many would agree that we start with others, and then use them as models to construct a model of the self.
Griffin, K Bartholomew - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994
So, oddly enough, the concept of other may predate the formed concept of self.
It's strange how most academic topics are built on inherent principles that are effectively 'working' and undecided. It's like economics and capital.
By Jove, I think you've got it.
But every system has to start somewhere, doesn't it? You posit some unmoved mover, or whatever.

by Pevisopolis » Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:33 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Authors, Democratic Martian States, Drakonian Imperium, Point Blob, Riviere Renard, The Rio Grande River Basin, Xanates
Advertisement