NATION

PASSWORD

You Don't Exist, Apparently...

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Angleter
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12359
Founded: Apr 27, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Angleter » Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:36 pm

Ordo Mallus wrote:
Angleter wrote:Now let's get real here. Fact exists. I can make a statement:

Barack Obama is a member of the Democratic Party.

That is a fact, hence fact exists.

teh democratic party might be secretly the new communist party (countered! lol)


So? That could be true, probably not though. Whether that's true or not, Obama's still a Democrat.
Last edited by Angleter on Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[align=center]"I gotta tell you, this is just crazy, huh! This is just nuts, OK! Jeezo man."

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41256
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:36 pm

Angleter wrote:Now let's get real here. Fact exists. I can make a statement:

Barack Obama is a member of the Democratic Party.

That is a fact, hence fact exists.


Have you met Barack Obama?

User avatar
Angleter
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12359
Founded: Apr 27, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Angleter » Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:38 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Angleter wrote:Now let's get real here. Fact exists. I can make a statement:

Barack Obama is a member of the Democratic Party.

That is a fact, hence fact exists.


Have you met Barack Obama?


No, but he was filmed live on TV giving the keynote speech of the Democratic National Convention, and there are eyewitnesses to that.
[align=center]"I gotta tell you, this is just crazy, huh! This is just nuts, OK! Jeezo man."

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41256
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:42 pm

Angleter wrote:No, but he was filmed live on TV giving the keynote speech of the Democratic National Convention, and there are eyewitnesses to that.


Have you spoken to these eyewitnesses?

Are you expert enough to distinguish between a real recording of a speech and a professionally doctored forgery?

How do you know the broadcast was live?

Were those who have spoken of the event not coerced in some way?
Last edited by Fartsniffage on Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Lackadaisical2
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 50831
Founded: Mar 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Lackadaisical2 » Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:07 pm

Natapoc wrote:
EKJ-746 wrote:as far as i know my reality exists, i don't know about yours. as what i see, say or type could be something completely different to what is actually happening. i could be dreaming this all up, or you could, or someone else could. certainty cannot truly exist because existence is just a matter of perception.


Yeah and... lets pretend that there is an equal possibility that reality does exist as it does not exist. In other words there is a 50% chance that you are "real".

Lets go with the first assumption that reality is false and only, and entirely figment of imagination (mine or someone elses). If this is the case then nothing matters because it is not real anyway. Any actions I take have no real effects just as any non actions I take have no effects positive or negative as they are all an illusion.

Still going with the assumption of non reality lets assume I act as if it is real despite it being an illusion. There would be no real negative effects of such a silly action as treating this illusion of reality I'm stuck in as real.

Say I treat it as if it were not real: There would still be no actually effect as it is simply an illusion anyway.

Now assume instead that the there is a reality and it is not an illusion then if I act as if it were an illusion bad things could happen to me and others. We could die, we could feel pain so it would be dangerous in a real world to treat it as an illusion. Sharp objects actually are sharp and trains will run you over.

Continuing with our assumption that there is a reality lets say I treat this reality as if it were real. In this case I make choices based on this reality that are in the best interests of myself and others who do exist (as per the assumptions of the argument.) Since I've made these choices "rationally" I benefit and so do others. For example I do not step in front of moving trains because I feel they are a real.

We can conclude therefore that our best choice is to treat the world as real and rational because the risks of doing otherwise are greater with no rewards.


This is the same reasoning as to why I'm inlcined to worship God. If he doesn't exist I haven't hurt myself in believing that he does, but theres the off chance (I realize, much lower than reality being real) that I could benefit greatly.
Last edited by Lackadaisical2 on Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

User avatar
Hairless Kitten II
Senator
 
Posts: 4198
Founded: Jun 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Hairless Kitten II » Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:26 pm

Lackadaisical2 wrote:
This is the same reasoning as to why I'm inlcined to worship God. If he doesn't exist I haven't hurt myself in believing that he does, but theres the off chance (I realize, much lower than reality being real) that I could benefit greatly.


People who believe in god should not be afraid, people who do not believe in god must not be afraid for sure.

• Vote for The NationStates Razzies 2009
• Any similarities with reality is a mere coincidence
• No mods were harmed during the making of this posting
• Protégez les enfants: ne leur faites pas respirer votre commentaires`
• Quand tous les dégoûtés seront partis, il ne restera plus que les dégoûtants
• Please report me at the Moderation Section because I'm spoiling your day

User avatar
Mad hatters in jeans
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19119
Founded: Nov 14, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Mad hatters in jeans » Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:49 pm

try out a bit of Hume on existance.
Heh descartes really did a number on you didn't he?

User avatar
The_pantless_hero
Senator
 
Posts: 4302
Founded: Mar 19, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby The_pantless_hero » Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:55 pm

Angleter wrote:
Ordo Mallus wrote:
Angleter wrote:Now let's get real here. Fact exists. I can make a statement:

Barack Obama is a member of the Democratic Party.

That is a fact, hence fact exists.

teh democratic party might be secretly the new communist party (countered! lol)


So? That could be true, probably not though. Whether that's true or not, Obama's still a Democrat.

I don't think you quite understand the difference between a fact and an assertion.
Bottle wrote:Equality is a slippery slope, people, and if you give it to the gays you have to give it to the polygamists and if you give it to the polygamists you have to give it to the serial dog molesters and if you give it to the serial dog molesters you have to give it to the machine fetishists and the next thing you know you're being tied up by a trio of polygamist lesbian powerbooks and you can't get out because the safety word is case sensistive!

Doing what we must because we can

User avatar
Svenen (Ancient)
Attaché
 
Posts: 94
Founded: Oct 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Svenen (Ancient) » Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:59 pm

I suspect people don't exist when I'm not looking at them. They hardly exist when I'm looking at them, so this doesn't seem far off.

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:07 pm

I don't exist? Awesome, I guess that means my degree and my job doesn't exist either! Hey everybody, there's no need to do any work, let's all go home and play video games!

User avatar
CornixPes II
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 163
Founded: Jul 07, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby CornixPes II » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:25 pm

I'm fascinated by this idea and always have been. It is both completely enlightening and totally dangerous. There are people out there who can use this sort of radical existentialism to talk themselves into a total anarchic view of life, whereby they have nothing to lose because nothing truly exists. I generally use this debate to modify my perspective of life; I view things objectively, but I always have that niggling belief that what I am seeing needs irrefutable proof before I can completely believe it.

User avatar
Brewdomia
Senator
 
Posts: 4222
Founded: Jun 26, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Brewdomia » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:29 pm

The_pantless_hero wrote:
Rhodmhire wrote:Is nothing truly known? Is everything a guess?

Does fact exist?

The very fact you had that conversation proves there is one universal constant that is undeniable: stupidity.


see my sig quote.

User avatar
Zeppy
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10112
Founded: Oct 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Zeppy » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:31 pm

God doesn't exist? :(

;)

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:36 pm

I exist in my mind...its everything else I have to question, :lol:

User avatar
DrunkenDove
Diplomat
 
Posts: 624
Founded: Nov 15, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby DrunkenDove » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:38 pm

"I think, therefore I am."

He responded:

"You can never know, you can never be sure. Your life could be a mirage, a dream, etc."


That's not a good refutation. Evern if your life is a dream, that implies that there is a "you" that dreams it. Or at least a "someone".
The butterfly fluttered by.

User avatar
Rhodmhire
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17421
Founded: Jun 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodmhire » Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:20 pm

Wilgrove wrote:So....this is The Matrix?

*Goes jump off a building in an attempt to jump to the other one, falls, and dies*


Damn it, you should have sprouted wings and flown into the sun.

I knew not anything was possible.
Part of me grew up here. But part of growing up is leaving parts of ourselves behind.

User avatar
Rhodmhire
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17421
Founded: Jun 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodmhire » Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:21 pm

Zeppy wrote:God doesn't exist? :(

;)


Oh, I see what you did there. :lol:
Part of me grew up here. But part of growing up is leaving parts of ourselves behind.

User avatar
CornixPes II
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 163
Founded: Jul 07, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby CornixPes II » Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:21 pm

Not everything is possible. It's impossible to solve this debate.

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:22 pm

The self is a working assumption for most psychologists.

Many would agree that we start with others, and then use them as models to construct a model of the self.

Griffin, K Bartholomew - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994

So, oddly enough, the concept of other may predate the formed concept of self.
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
CornixPes II
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 163
Founded: Jul 07, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby CornixPes II » Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:25 pm

Pope Joan wrote:The self is a working assumption for most psychologists.

Many would agree that we start with others, and then use them as models to construct a model of the self.

Griffin, K Bartholomew - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994

So, oddly enough, the concept of other may predate the formed concept of self.


It's strange how most academic topics are built on inherent principles that are effectively 'working' and undecided. It's like economics and capital.

User avatar
Buffett and Colbert
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32382
Founded: Oct 05, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Buffett and Colbert » Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:27 pm

"You never know" is a crappy legitimisation of any conspiracy theory. Instead of debating how you know you exist, why not attack that?
If the knowledge isn't useful, you haven't found the lesson yet. ~Iniika
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Clever, but your Jedi mind tricks don't work on me.

His Jedi mind tricks are insignificant compared to the power of Buffy's sex appeal.
Keronians wrote:
Buffett and Colbert wrote:My law class took my virginity. And it was 100% consensual.

I accuse your precious law class of statutory rape.

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:29 pm

CornixPes II wrote:
Pope Joan wrote:The self is a working assumption for most psychologists.

Many would agree that we start with others, and then use them as models to construct a model of the self.

Griffin, K Bartholomew - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994

So, oddly enough, the concept of other may predate the formed concept of self.


It's strange how most academic topics are built on inherent principles that are effectively 'working' and undecided. It's like economics and capital.


By Jove, I think you've got it.

But every system has to start somewhere, doesn't it? You posit some unmoved mover, or whatever.
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:31 pm

Buffett and Colbert wrote:"You never know" is a crappy legitimisation of any conspiracy theory. Instead of debating how you know you exist, why not attack that?


But how do you know it's a crappy legitimisation? You don't, not for sure, therefore it's probably reasonable to assume that you don't exist. Get it, it makes perfect sense, because you never know, it may not make perfect sense, but how do I know that I never know? I don't, so I must know, because I don't know that I don't know, which is a contradiction. Perfect logic!
Last edited by Hydesland on Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
CornixPes II
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 163
Founded: Jul 07, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby CornixPes II » Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:32 pm

Pope Joan wrote:
CornixPes II wrote:
Pope Joan wrote:The self is a working assumption for most psychologists.

Many would agree that we start with others, and then use them as models to construct a model of the self.

Griffin, K Bartholomew - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994

So, oddly enough, the concept of other may predate the formed concept of self.


It's strange how most academic topics are built on inherent principles that are effectively 'working' and undecided. It's like economics and capital.


By Jove, I think you've got it.

But every system has to start somewhere, doesn't it? You posit some unmoved mover, or whatever.


I know, but in a twisted way it is quite amusing to know everything that we take for granted is based on principles which we've given up trying to define (in most cases).

User avatar
Pevisopolis
Minister
 
Posts: 2370
Founded: Feb 22, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Pevisopolis » Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:33 pm

Rhodmhire, your friend was probably high. I've had many a stoney thought along those exact same lines.
Jesus God almighty man, look at that lot over there! They've spotted us!

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Authors, Democratic Martian States, Drakonian Imperium, Point Blob, Riviere Renard, The Rio Grande River Basin, Xanates

Advertisement

Remove ads