White supremacy

[Avenio]

It said modern Homo sapiens specifically?

no it didnt, but that word is greek (i think), Qur'an is ancient arabic. I dont think God was speaking scientifically, but more of explaining how we are unique and not evolved from a lesser species

Lovely how the deference to scientific sources vanishes when it emerges that the papers didn't say what you thought they said.

Not surprising, of course, but lovely all the same.

[Vietnam]

It said modern Homo sapiens specifically?

no it didnt, but that word is greek (i think), Qur'an is ancient arabic. I dont think God was speaking scientifically, but more of explaining how we are unique and not evolved from a lesser species

explain pls

[New haven america]

It said modern Homo sapiens specifically?

no it didnt, but that word is greek (i think), Qur'an is ancient arabic. I dont think God was speaking scientifically, but more of explaining how we are unique and not evolved from a lesser species

All humans are animals too, were smart animals but still animals, no more no less.

[Anachronous Rex]

It said modern Homo sapiens specifically?

no it didnt, but that word is greek (i think), Qur'an is ancient arabic. I dont think God was speaking scientifically, but more of explaining how we are unique and not evolved from a lesser species

Well, then the Qur'an is wrong.

[Agymnum]

Why did we suddenly pull the Koran out? Have we forgotten that religious texts are not a basis for scientific nor historical fact?

[New haven america]

Why did we suddenly pull the Koran out? Have we forgotten that religious texts are not a basis for scientific nor historical fact?

Because we were talking about human origins(Relevant with the topic) and someone pulled out religion.

[Agymnum]

Why did we suddenly pull the Koran out? Have we forgotten that religious texts are not a basis for scientific nor historical fact?

Because we were talking about human origins(Relevant with the topic) and someone pulled out religion.

You understand that the only valid human origin theory is the theory of evolution, right?

That's like the only scientifically-accepted theory, and thus the only theory you can use when debating politics and social issues since it's the only one with empirical proof.

[New haven america]

Because we were talking about human origins(Relevant with the topic) and someone pulled out religion.

You understand that the only valid human origin theory is the theory of evolution, right?

That's like the only scientifically-accepted theory, and thus the only theory you can use when debating politics and social issues since it's the only one with empirical proof.

Well I said White Supremacy was wrong because human ancestors are from Africa, so White Supremacy didn't make since. Then it just exploded.(I said I wasn't trying to threadjack)

[Agymnum]

You understand that the only valid human origin theory is the theory of evolution, right?

That's like the only scientifically-accepted theory, and thus the only theory you can use when debating politics and social issues since it's the only one with empirical proof.

Well I said White Supremacy was wrong because human ancestors are from Africa, so White Supremacy didn't make since. Then it just exploded.

Technically that lends to the whole black supremacy thing, but let's not go down that route. Gets uglier.

[The New Sea Territory]

Because we were talking about human origins(Relevant with the topic) and someone pulled out religion.

You understand that the only valid human origin theory is the theory of evolution, right?

That's like the only scientifically-accepted theory, and thus the only theory you can use when debating politics and social issues since it's the only one with empirical proof.

Yes but billions support religion. Who do we listen to: a select few or the masses? Oh, I thought you were a leftist. Don't you like the masses?

[Agymnum]

You understand that the only valid human origin theory is the theory of evolution, right?

That's like the only scientifically-accepted theory, and thus the only theory you can use when debating politics and social issues since it's the only one with empirical proof.

Yes but billions support religion. Who do we listen to: a select few or the masses? Oh, I thought you were a leftist. Don't you like the masses?

I like helping lift the masses out of ignorance and poverty, if that's what you're asking.

Endorsing religion enslaves the masses - it harms them, rather than saving them.

[Eladisia]

I am a young white male looking to explore the possibilities of black booty.

If interested, send an email to smokepole420@fake.net

[Divair]

Yes but billions support religion. Who do we listen to: a select few or the masses?

Whoever's right. Not that every single religious person doesn't understand evolution. Rather, I think you'd find that the majority understand it.

[Agymnum]

Yes but billions support religion. Who do we listen to: a select few or the masses?

Whoever's right. Not that every single religious person doesn't understand evolution. Rather, I think you'd find that the majority understand it.

What's embarrassing is that they understand it and yet continue to deny it, as if denying it makes it any less supported by scientific evidence.

[Divair]

Whoever's right. Not that every single religious person doesn't understand evolution. Rather, I think you'd find that the majority understand it.

What's embarrassing is that they understand it and yet continue to deny it, as if denying it makes it any less supported by scientific evidence.

No. I cannot honestly find a single person who understands evolution properly and denies it. They either understand and accept it or don't and deny it.

[Vietnam]

You understand that the only valid human origin theory is the theory of evolution, right?

That's like the only scientifically-accepted theory, and thus the only theory you can use when debating politics and social issues since it's the only one with empirical proof.

Yes but billions support religion. Who do we listen to: a select few or the masses? Oh, I thought you were a leftist. Don't you like the masses?

:sibirsky:

[Agymnum]

What's embarrassing is that they understand it and yet continue to deny it, as if denying it makes it any less supported by scientific evidence.

No. I cannot honestly find a single person who understands evolution properly and denies it. They either understand and accept it or don't and deny it.

I've met a few who insist on forced ignorance. They understand the theory when I ask them to explain it, and then add, "But since God doesn't support evolution in the Bible, it must be wrong. Doesn't matter how much scientific proof there is for it."

[Lamassu]

I believe in White Supremacy, but I'm not going to go out and kill a whole bunch of minorities and breach 14/88 while I do it. There are peaceful ways to conduct supremacist beliefs, like the living room of your house or in organized, permitted protests and assemblies.

Ah, another member of the 101st Fighting Keyboardists, eh?

I suppose in your case it would be the SS-Kämpfenschreibkräfte, though.

i'm not an internet tough guy those are my beliefs and if you don't believe it, then its your own fault.

[Agymnum]

Ah, another member of the 101st Fighting Keyboardists, eh?

I suppose in your case it would be the SS-Kämpfenschreibkräfte, though.

i'm not an internet tough guy those are my beliefs and if you don't believe it, then its your own fault.

It's my fault that I, as an Asian, refuse to acknowledge that some white people are arrogant enough to think that their race is better than other races?

Please, that's bullshit.

[Vietnam]

I believe in White Supremacy, but I'm not going to go out and kill a whole bunch of minorities and breach 14/88 while I do it. There are peaceful ways to conduct supremacist beliefs, like the living room of your house or in organized, permitted protests and assemblies.

What makes you think "white people" are superior?

[Avenio]

i'm not an internet tough guy those are my beliefs and if you don't believe it, then its your own fault.

My fault? Oh no, rather the opposite. Considering your reception in this thread, the onus is entirely upon you as to why we should take you seriously at all.

[Nazi Flower Power]

Well I said White Supremacy was wrong because human ancestors are from Africa, so White Supremacy didn't make since. Then it just exploded.

Technically that lends to the whole black supremacy thing, but let's not go down that route. Gets uglier.

Wut?

Humans evolving from a common ancestor in Africa doesn't support or refute any form of racial supremacist thought. I have no idea why that fact is recited so often in these race threads. Having a common ancestor at one point in our history does not make it impossible for meaningful divisions to evolve later. If -- hypothetically for the sake of argument -- there was a meaningful difference between the races, knowing where the human species originated would not tell us anything about the relationship between races.

[Democratic Koyro]

I prefer Asian women over Whites.

[Agymnum]

I prefer Asian women over Whites.

Asians age like a... a fine wine, I'd say.

[New haven america]

Ah, another member of the 101st Fighting Keyboardists, eh?

I suppose in your case it would be the SS-Kämpfenschreibkräfte, though.

i'm not an internet tough guy those are my beliefs and if you don't believe it, then its your own fault.

Well white people in the US are now the minority 49%