NATION

PASSWORD

Should democracy get tough on communist party's in the west?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Should democracy get tough on communist party's in the west?

YES execute all members
34
8%
YES Imprison all members
5
1%
YES outlaw the formation of communist party's
31
7%
NO keep the status quo
370
84%
 
Total votes : 440

User avatar
Anachronous Rex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Anachronous Rex » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:54 pm

The Broken Imperial Sector wrote:
Agymnum wrote:
Should we not do the same for conservatism? I meant, it restricts the freedoms of others and it promotes extreme nationalism which is hurtful to the internationalist world we now live in.

It's a slippery slope you're sliding down there. For there to be true freedom, one must accept ideologies one both loves and hates. Freedom is a two-way street, son.

First of don't call me son. And communism is a direct threat to democracy at least conservatism still allows elections and free speech.

Show me one example of an actual democracy being overthrown by communist revolution?
My humor is like church wine: dry and tasteless.
If you are not sure if I am being serious, assume that I am not.

Summer is coming...

User avatar
Imperiatom
Minister
 
Posts: 2416
Founded: Mar 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperiatom » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:54 pm

New Panti wrote:
The Broken Imperial Sector wrote:Communism does not work, it is a tool power hungry men use to get their nations working class to place them in power.

If communism does not work, please tell me how China is still communist. Communism itself isn't evil. The way rules generally use it is.


Its not communist its state capitalist.

User avatar
Agymnum
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7393
Founded: Jul 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Agymnum » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:54 pm

The Broken Imperial Sector wrote:
Agymnum wrote:
Should we not do the same for conservatism? I meant, it restricts the freedoms of others and it promotes extreme nationalism which is hurtful to the internationalist world we now live in.

It's a slippery slope you're sliding down there. For there to be true freedom, one must accept ideologies one both loves and hates. Freedom is a two-way street, son.

First of don't call me son. And communism is a direct threat to democracy at least conservatism still allows elections and free speech.


Don't call you son why? I call people various nicknames and they don't seem to have an issue with it.

More on-point, conservatism doesn't allow equal rights. Who was against blacks being able to vote? Conservatives. Who was against women being able to vote? Conservatives. Who is against gay marriage? Conservatives.

Conservatives only allow freedom so long as it benefits them. Beyond that they are oppressive.
Glorious puppet of Highfort

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:54 pm

National Socialists of America wrote:No, because the commies would never gain power in the west. Besides, anyone with half a brain knows Communism would never work.

Is Italy the west? They almost did. Actually a lot of West European countries had some communist scares. Now we all know democratic socialism or social democracy is not really communism but it would seem that there is more and more sympathy to something more and more mixed every day.
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

User avatar
Garwall
Minister
 
Posts: 3412
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Garwall » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:54 pm

The Broken Imperial Sector wrote:
Agymnum wrote:
Should we not do the same for conservatism? I meant, it restricts the freedoms of others and it promotes extreme nationalism which is hurtful to the internationalist world we now live in.

It's a slippery slope you're sliding down there. For there to be true freedom, one must accept ideologies one both loves and hates. Freedom is a two-way street, son.

First of don't call me son. And communism is a direct threat to democracy at least conservatism still allows elections and free speech.


If anything, Communism is a direct boon to Democracy. It overthrows the ruling class of citizens that form the legislative body of a nation, and allow the collective of individuals to decide as a group their course of action. Communism is a threat to Republicanism (not the U.S. Political Party, the form of government).
1 Student
Nationality: Yankee
Religion: Atheist
Ideology: Socialist
Issues: State Capitalism/Full Citizenship
Cash Reserves: ~1$
Revoltrisk: 85%
Militancy: 9
Counsciousness: 12
"For Home and Countrymen!"

-Battle-cry used by Garwall Revolutionaries as they storm the Capitol Building, raising the Rebel Flag.
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=132814#p6655830
Above: The Treaty of Belgratz, the Document ratifying the Socialist Party's rise to power in Garwall.

[15:43] <Parhe> For some reason
[15:43] <Parhe> I feel safe whenever Gar is here
[15:43] <Parhe> Not sure why, Garwall always made me feel safe

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:55 pm

TaQud wrote:
Vareiln wrote:You know, if a party is outlawed, it ain't much of a democracy.

this.

I'd bet Luveria would like this topic.

Do you disagree with Germany having outlawed the NSDAP? Perhaps you would prefer nazism was allowed to remain since democracy shouldn't restrict dangerous political organizations which seek to end democracy.

User avatar
Agymnum
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7393
Founded: Jul 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Agymnum » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:55 pm

Nationalist State of Knox wrote:
Agymnum wrote:
Agreed. Shoot the Jews and put the Commies in labor camps. That'll teach those pinkos who's boss!

No, not the labor camps.

Labour camps on the other hand...


The addition of the letter u adds so much class, you know.
Glorious puppet of Highfort

User avatar
The Broken Imperial Sector
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1012
Founded: Mar 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Broken Imperial Sector » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:55 pm

Anachronous Rex wrote:
The Broken Imperial Sector wrote:First of don't call me son. And communism is a direct threat to democracy at least conservatism still allows elections and free speech.

Show me one example of an actual democracy being overthrown by communist revolution?

Can't but it is still opposed to democracy. Most countries that had communist revolutions were third world countries thus making the communist ideas appealing to that countries workers.
Last edited by The Broken Imperial Sector on Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
We can not allow this nation or this world to be destroyed from the inside out!

User avatar
Harkback Union
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17382
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Harkback Union » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:55 pm

"Should democracy get tough on communist party's in the west?"
"No, Keep the status quo"

As if there was democracy in the west... (except for N-eu and the swiss)
As if the status quo wasn't already tough on communist party's... (same exceptions)
As if it made sense to use democracy aginst democratic parites... (except for elitist communist parties, but there is almost none of those today)

User avatar
Arumdaum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24546
Founded: Oct 21, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Arumdaum » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:55 pm

The Broken Imperial Sector wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Show me one example of an actual democracy being overthrown by communist revolution?

Can't but it is still opposed to democracy.

No it's not. This only shows that you have no idea on what the definition of communism even is.
LITERALLY UNLIKE ANY OTHER RP REGION & DON'T REPORT THIS SIG
█████████████████▌TIANDI ____________██____██
_______███▌MAP _______________██_____██_████████
█████████████████▌WIKI _______██______██___██____██
_______████ DISCORD ________██████___██____██______█

____████__████ SIGNUP _________██___████___██____
__████_______████_____________██______██__________██
████____________████_______█████████___███████████

User avatar
Agymnum
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7393
Founded: Jul 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Agymnum » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:56 pm

Luveria wrote:
TaQud wrote:this.

I'd bet Luveria would like this topic.

Do you disagree with Germany having outlawed the NSDAP? Perhaps you would prefer nazism was allowed to remain since democracy shouldn't restrict dangerous political organizations which seek to end democracy.


Nazism should have remained legal on principle. If the German democracy is really doing a bang-up job the people would have no reason to turn to Nazism.

Making it illegal means that you know you're doing a shitty job because *gasp* people might actually turn to Nazism because their current government sucks dick.
Glorious puppet of Highfort

User avatar
Imperiatom
Minister
 
Posts: 2416
Founded: Mar 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperiatom » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:56 pm

Albion Rhodesia wrote:Personally, I'm all in favor of going back to the old ways, and by that I mean blacklisting communists and barring them from any employment that involves national security/anywhere in which a security clearance has to be held.

Now some will say, "What about freedom of speech/ideology" however due to the nature of communism being an ideology hell bent on taking out the establishment through a spontaneous workers revolution(as any hardened Marxist would tell you), that any communist is already rallying in, or preparing to engage in treasonous activity against his own homeland.

Also, if communists want to live in a "worker's paradise" as they continuously quote, they can always immigrate to North Korea, Communist China or Cuba where they can have all the proletarian state that they can stomach.



I doubt many will take you up on that offer.
Last edited by Imperiatom on Wed Apr 03, 2013 4:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Nationalist State of Knox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10293
Founded: Feb 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nationalist State of Knox » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:56 pm

Agymnum wrote:
Nationalist State of Knox wrote:No, not the labor camps.

Labour camps on the other hand...


The addition of the letter u adds so much class, you know.

It does. I'm effectively a nobleman, now.
Last edited by Gilgamesh on Mon Aru 17, 2467 BC 10:56am, edited 1 time in total.
Call me Knox.
Biblical Authorship
God is Malevolent.
Bible Inaccuracies
Ifreann wrote:Knox: /ˈɡɪl.ɡə.mɛʃ/
Impeach Enlil, legalise dreaming, mortality is theft. GILGAMESH 2474 BC

User avatar
Chestaan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6977
Founded: Sep 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chestaan » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:56 pm

The Broken Imperial Sector wrote:Yes communism is a threat to freedom and democracy. Any and all members of any communist group should be imprisoned or possibly executed.


"Communism is a threat to democracy! To end this threat, let's destroy democracy!"
Council Communist
TG me if you want to chat, especially about economics, you can never have enough discussions on economics.Especially game theory :)
Economic Left/Right: -9.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.62

Getting the Guillotine

User avatar
Agymnum
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7393
Founded: Jul 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Agymnum » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:57 pm

Imperiatom wrote:
Albion Rhodesia wrote:Personally, I'm all in favor of going back to the old ways, and by that I mean blacklisting communists and barring them from any employment that involves national security/anywhere in which a security clearance has to be held.

Now some will say, "What about freedom of speech/ideology" however due to the nature of communism being an ideology hell bent on taking out the establishment through a spontaneous workers revolution(as any hardened Marxist would tell you), that any communist is already rallying in, or preparing to engage in treasonous activity against his own homeland.

Also, if communists want to live in a "worker's paradise" as they continuously quote, they can always immigrate to North Korea, Communist China or Cuba where they can have all the proletarian state that they can stomach.



I doubt may will take you up on that offer.


North Korea is not communist. China is not communist.

I've been to Cuba. Nice place, good healthcare.
Glorious puppet of Highfort

User avatar
Fourth Hellenic Republic
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 13
Founded: Nov 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Re: Should democracy get tough on communist party's in the w

Postby Fourth Hellenic Republic » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:57 pm

I am an anti-communist and I say we should keep the status quo and let the communist parties operate but the government should't allow them to get in power because communism has had a dark history.
Last edited by Fourth Hellenic Republic on Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
For: Democratic Socialism, Social democracy, Social liberalism, Democracy, Civil libertarianism, Libertarian socialism, and Secularism.
Against: Communism, Marxism-Leninism, Stalinism, Maoism, Juche, Fascism, Nazism, Anarchism and state religion.
I am an atheist. I support secularism and support the USA, UN and other western democratic allies.

User avatar
New Panti
Minister
 
Posts: 2094
Founded: Nov 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby New Panti » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:57 pm

The Broken Imperial Sector wrote:
Agymnum wrote:
Should we not do the same for conservatism? I meant, it restricts the freedoms of others and it promotes extreme nationalism which is hurtful to the internationalist world we now live in.

It's a slippery slope you're sliding down there. For there to be true freedom, one must accept ideologies one both loves and hates. Freedom is a two-way street, son.

First of don't call me son. And communism is a direct threat to democracy at least conservatism still allows elections and free speech.

Actually, communism seems more geared towards democracy because everyone is equal, while in capitalism some people have more power, etc. By saying communism is a direct threat to communism you couldn't be more wrong. Communism is a threat to capitalism, and vice-versa.

User avatar
Garwall
Minister
 
Posts: 3412
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Garwall » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:57 pm

Before we proceed we need to separate the governmental forms of "Democracy" and a "Republic". Democracy is where all citizens participate in the formation of laws and governing, while a Republic involves the use of elected officials to determine laws and rule a nation. Pure Democracy has never truly been put into effect, even by the most democratic of nations. All "Democracies" are actually Republics, formed on Democratic ideals.

In fact, the term "Democracy" has been widely dissociated with what it actually should represent, much in the same way that Communism has.
1 Student
Nationality: Yankee
Religion: Atheist
Ideology: Socialist
Issues: State Capitalism/Full Citizenship
Cash Reserves: ~1$
Revoltrisk: 85%
Militancy: 9
Counsciousness: 12
"For Home and Countrymen!"

-Battle-cry used by Garwall Revolutionaries as they storm the Capitol Building, raising the Rebel Flag.
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=132814#p6655830
Above: The Treaty of Belgratz, the Document ratifying the Socialist Party's rise to power in Garwall.

[15:43] <Parhe> For some reason
[15:43] <Parhe> I feel safe whenever Gar is here
[15:43] <Parhe> Not sure why, Garwall always made me feel safe

User avatar
Yue-Laou
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 434
Founded: Nov 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yue-Laou » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:57 pm

If a party is unconstitutional and it's goal is to get rid of democracy it should be forbidden.

User avatar
The Broken Imperial Sector
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1012
Founded: Mar 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Broken Imperial Sector » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:57 pm

Arumdaum wrote:
The Broken Imperial Sector wrote:Can't but it is still opposed to democracy.

No it's not. This only shows that you have no idea on what the definition of communism even is.

It is a stateless classless society where the workers control the means of production.
We can not allow this nation or this world to be destroyed from the inside out!

User avatar
Fedeledland
Senator
 
Posts: 3785
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Fedeledland » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:58 pm

OP: No.

The Broken Imperial Sector wrote:
Agymnum wrote:
Should we not do the same for conservatism? I meant, it restricts the freedoms of others and it promotes extreme nationalism which is hurtful to the internationalist world we now live in.

It's a slippery slope you're sliding down there. For there to be true freedom, one must accept ideologies one both loves and hates. Freedom is a two-way street, son.

First of don't call me son. And communism is a direct threat to democracy at least conservatism still allows elections and free speech.


And democratic socialism and democratic communism don't..?
Factbook (FanT·FT)
Embassies
Political Info (OOC)
WARNING: My writing might contain amounts of extreme pomp and purple prose. Read at your own caution.
QUE VIVA EL REY!

User avatar
Agymnum
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7393
Founded: Jul 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Agymnum » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:58 pm

The Broken Imperial Sector wrote:
Arumdaum wrote:No it's not. This only shows that you have no idea on what the definition of communism even is.

It is a stateless classless society where the workers control the means of production.


And you're calling that undemocratic?

Let me refine Arumdaum's statement: You have no idea on what the definition of democracy even is.
Glorious puppet of Highfort

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:58 pm

Agymnum wrote:
The Broken Imperial Sector wrote:First of don't call me son. And communism is a direct threat to democracy at least conservatism still allows elections and free speech.


Don't call you son why? I call people various nicknames and they don't seem to have an issue with it.

More on-point, conservatism doesn't allow equal rights. Who was against blacks being able to vote? Conservatives. Who was against women being able to vote? Conservatives. Who is against gay marriage? Conservatives.

Conservatives only allow freedom so long as it benefits them. Beyond that they are oppressive.

Yes because American reactionaries are the be all end all definition of conservatism. :roll:
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

User avatar
Arumdaum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24546
Founded: Oct 21, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Arumdaum » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:58 pm

The Broken Imperial Sector wrote:
Arumdaum wrote:No it's not. This only shows that you have no idea on what the definition of communism even is.

It is a stateless classless society where the workers control the means of production.

If not by democracy, how do you expect such a society to run?
LITERALLY UNLIKE ANY OTHER RP REGION & DON'T REPORT THIS SIG
█████████████████▌TIANDI ____________██____██
_______███▌MAP _______________██_____██_████████
█████████████████▌WIKI _______██______██___██____██
_______████ DISCORD ________██████___██____██______█

____████__████ SIGNUP _________██___████___██____
__████_______████_____________██______██__________██
████____________████_______█████████___███████████

User avatar
New Panti
Minister
 
Posts: 2094
Founded: Nov 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby New Panti » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:58 pm

Garwall wrote:Before we proceed we need to separate the governmental forms of "Democracy" and a "Republic". Democracy is where all citizens participate in the formation of laws and governing, while a Republic involves the use of elected officials to determine laws and rule a nation. Pure Democracy has never truly been put into effect, even by the most democratic of nations. All "Democracies" are actually Republics, formed on Democratic ideals.

In fact, the term "Democracy" has been widely dissociated with what it actually should represent, much in the same way that Communism has.

Actually, the only example of true democracy was that of ancient Athens, and it was not an efficient form of government.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abaro, Adamede, Corporate Collective Salvation, Dimetrodon Empire, Emotional Support Crocodile, Fractalnavel, Galactic Powers, Greater Guantanamo, Ifreann, Necroghastia, New Ciencia, Perikuresu, Risottia, Tarsonis, The Two Jerseys, Uiiop, Valrifall, Valyxias, Vassenor

Advertisement

Remove ads