Iran. That's the Asian country he's from. It's the only one that makes sense.
Advertisement

by Anachronous Rex » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:45 pm

by Samuraikoku » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:47 pm
Choronzon wrote:I do enjoy the WELL IN MY COUNTRY WE DONT DEFINE RAPE THAT WAY defense, as if that would mean anything other than his country is a misogynistic shithole.
Samuraikoku wrote:Aghny wrote:If it was an accident, but some call it murder, no sane judge will rule it as murder unless there are enough evidences to support that claim.
Same with rape. You can call it the law and say that no consent means rape, but no court will decide on just that. If you have proof as in something other than just your words then it is a different story.
So your argument shifted to "YOU CAN'T PROVE IT!"
Something a rape apologist would do.

by Aghny » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:48 pm
Anachronous Rex wrote:Come on Aghny, I'm still waiting to hear about vertebrate blastula.

by Revolutionary Stalin » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:49 pm

by Northern Dominus » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:49 pm
You're half correct. Yes only goes so far until no applies.Aghny wrote:Kvatchdom wrote:No, I'm saying that fucking a woman without consent if she's sleeping or something is the same thing as fucking anything else without consent.
It's rape.
Difference being a turtle can't speak or express properly (as far as i know). It can't object, but humans can.Northern Dominus wrote:Backpedalling furiously from your original position? You know the one which basically stated "no" means "Yes"?
It was, no is not always no and yes is not always yes.

by Dragoria » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:49 pm
And humans being threatened with death will choose to stay quiet and be raped rather than scream and fight, be raped anyway, and then be murdered. Which obviously makes it their own stupid fault.
No always means no.

by Condunum » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:49 pm
Aghny wrote:Condunum wrote:Some kid on the Internet with a very poor understanding of judicial proceedings and social interactions.
I never said that. I do wish i was a kid though. Not that i don't have any fun now. But it was good times.Anachronous Rex wrote:Come on Aghny, I'm still waiting to hear about vertebrate blastula.
http://bit.ly/10niTfW *Yawn. All the info you are going to need, atleast for now. Did i mention i was lazy ?

by Anachronous Rex » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:50 pm
Aghny wrote:Condunum wrote:Some kid on the Internet with a very poor understanding of judicial proceedings and social interactions.
I never said that. I do wish i was a kid though. Not that i don't have any fun now. But it was good times.Anachronous Rex wrote:Come on Aghny, I'm still waiting to hear about vertebrate blastula.
http://bit.ly/10niTfW *Yawn. All the info you are going to need, atleast for now. Did i mention i was lazy ?

by Dragoria » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:50 pm
Isn't that the middle-east, or do they overlap more than I'd thought?

by Kvatchdom » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:51 pm
Revolutionary Stalin wrote:If women doesn't approve then it's rape no matter how you try to say otherwise and those guys must be executed because it's disgusting some men do that to a poor women .

by Revolutionary Stalin » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:52 pm
Kvatchdom wrote:Revolutionary Stalin wrote:If women doesn't approve then it's rape no matter how you try to say otherwise and those guys must be executed because it's disgusting some men do that to a poor women .
However, what if the woman is fully consenting, and only afterwards feels bad about it and claims that she was raped? I read somewhere that about 8% of reports are like this

by Aghny » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:52 pm
Dragoria wrote:And humans being threatened with death will choose to stay quiet and be raped rather than scream and fight, be raped anyway, and then be murdered. Which obviously makes it their own stupid fault.Aghny wrote:
Difference being a turtle can't speak or express properly (as far as i know). It can't object, but humans can.
No always means no.Aghny wrote:
It was, no is not always no and yes is not always yes.
A "yes" obtained through force, threats, intimidation, intoxication, or other forms of coercion does not count.
A lack of a "yes" is a "no", a lack of a "no" is not a "yes".
Breaking any of those rules in a sexytype situation is rape.

by Anachronous Rex » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:52 pm

by Dragoria » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:54 pm
"She really wanted the sex, then changed her mind afterwards, the dumb slut".Kvatchdom wrote:Revolutionary Stalin wrote:If women doesn't approve then it's rape no matter how you try to say otherwise and those guys must be executed because it's disgusting some men do that to a poor women .
However, what if the woman is fully consenting, and only afterwards feels bad about it and claims that she was raped? I read somewhere that about 8% of reports are like this

by Aghny » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:54 pm
Anachronous Rex wrote:Aghny wrote:
I never said that. I do wish i was a kid though. Not that i don't have any fun now. But it was good times.
http://bit.ly/10niTfW *Yawn. All the info you are going to need, atleast for now. Did i mention i was lazy ?
Still didn't answer the question.
You could answer it in a word, or in four if you felt like being long-winded. Linking to the "let me google that for you was actually more work then just saying the answer. So come on, what's the matter? Why don't you know basic biology?

by Northern Dominus » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:54 pm
Alright then.Aghny wrote:Dragoria wrote:No always means no.
A "yes" obtained through force, threats, intimidation, intoxication, or other forms of coercion does not count.
A lack of a "yes" is a "no", a lack of a "no" is not a "yes".
Breaking any of those rules in a sexytype situation is rape.
Subjective unless proven otherwise.

by Samuraikoku » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:55 pm
Aghny wrote:Subjective unless proven otherwise.
Samuraikoku wrote:Aghny wrote:If it was an accident, but some call it murder, no sane judge will rule it as murder unless there are enough evidences to support that claim.
Same with rape. You can call it the law and say that no consent means rape, but no court will decide on just that. If you have proof as in something other than just your words then it is a different story.
So your argument shifted to "YOU CAN'T PROVE IT!"
Something a rape apologist would do.

by Choronzon » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:55 pm
Aghny wrote:Anachronous Rex wrote:Still didn't answer the question.
You could answer it in a word, or in four if you felt like being long-winded. Linking to the "let me google that for you was actually more work then just saying the answer. So come on, what's the matter? Why don't you know basic biology?
I don't see the point. I'd rather spend that time annoying someone because i simply not see things the way they do.

by Samuraikoku » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:55 pm
Aghny wrote:I don't see the point. I'd rather spend that time annoying someone because i simply not see things the way they do.

by Aghny » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:56 pm
Northern Dominus wrote:Alright then.Aghny wrote:
Subjective unless proven otherwise.
So if someone asks you if you want to be knocked to the ground and kicked in the ribs until your lungs collapse, you say no, and they do it anyway, that's subjective anyway right? Because clearly you were asking for it even though you decidedly said no.

by Anachronous Rex » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:57 pm
Aghny wrote:Anachronous Rex wrote:Still didn't answer the question.
You could answer it in a word, or in four if you felt like being long-winded. Linking to the "let me google that for you was actually more work then just saying the answer. So come on, what's the matter? Why don't you know basic biology?
I don't see the point. I'd rather spend that time annoying someone because i simply not see things the way they do.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]
Advertisement