NATION

PASSWORD

"Women want sex, just not with YOU."

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Aghny
Diplomat
 
Posts: 949
Founded: Mar 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aghny » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:28 pm

Condunum wrote:
Dragoria wrote: Please, PLEASE don't encourage them to confuse implied consent and non-verbal consent.
"She takes her clothes off" is non-verbal consent (active/enthusiastic participation)
Implied consent is "she never said yes, but I could tell she wanted it because X (outfit, alcohol consumption, "didn't say no").

Implied Consent is in cases where a police officer tells you to take a breathalyzer and you refuse, go to court, and the judge says "By operating a car, you gave implied consent to the breathalyzer".
Implied consent will not hold up as a defense against a rape charge.

It's the same. Your actions display non-verbal consent to the breathalyzer, no? In that sense, non-verbal consent is a very dodgy,hard to prove stance. Which is why you need to prove real, verbal consent as a defense. Otherwise, rape.


How can you prove verbal consent in the court of law if there are no witnesses or a taperecorder or something ? Yeah, rape.


Samuraikoku wrote:
Aghny wrote:Or, you just need it written in simpler sentences.


Then do, by all means.


Na, i am not going to change my way of writing just for you.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:28 pm

I will now make a more question related topic:

Is there a woman who would like to have sex with me? :lol:

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:29 pm

Choronzon wrote:What I don't understand is why people insist on trying so hard to justify their shitty behavior and rapist like attitudes rather than correct them. Are their egos so fragile where admitting that perhaps you were looking at something wrong or a particular view is harmful will just shatter their self image and worth? Or is there some more sinister motive which gets certain posters so defensive when you talk about consent and rape culture?

Dude, you're talking about the kind of person who would argue with their wife or girlfriend until they left, all because they can't handle being wrong. There's no fucking way their mind will let them change; change means they were wrong.
password scrambled

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:29 pm

Aghny wrote:Na, i am not going to change my way of writing just for you.


How anti-pedagogic, "professor".

User avatar
Choronzon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9936
Founded: Apr 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Choronzon » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:29 pm

Samuraikoku wrote:Is there a woman who would like to have sex with me? :lol:

All the women on NSG who don't immediately say "no" in this thread are clearly consenting.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:30 pm

Choronzon wrote:
Samuraikoku wrote:Is there a woman who would like to have sex with me? :lol:

All the women on NSG who don't immediately say "no" in this thread are clearly consenting.


Yes to Ljvonia and Aghny. Not for me. :(

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:31 pm

Aghny wrote:
Condunum wrote:It's the same. Your actions display non-verbal consent to the breathalyzer, no? In that sense, non-verbal consent is a very dodgy,hard to prove stance. Which is why you need to prove real, verbal consent as a defense. Otherwise, rape.


How can you prove verbal consent in the court of law if there are no witnesses or a taperecorder or something ? Yeah, rape.

if you can't prove it, you can't prove it. But that's why it's innocent until proven guilty, smart one.
password scrambled

User avatar
Aghny
Diplomat
 
Posts: 949
Founded: Mar 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aghny » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:31 pm

Condunum wrote:
Aghny wrote:
Assumptions doesn't have to be true. And one can in the same way assume consent.

In that case, then she didn't consent. Case closed.


Nope, that is the same as saying, she didn't object. Case closed.

Samuraikoku wrote:
Aghny wrote:Different countries mean i won't be detained for what you consider rape, because that is not the law here.


You will in America, Argentina, Germany and Lithuania. And if you're somewhere else, please show me where. I'll search the appropriate law as I did with Ljvonia.


Like i said, asia is all you are getting.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:32 pm

Aghny wrote:Like i said, asia is all you are getting.


Afraid, are we, "professor"?

User avatar
Northern Dominus
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14337
Founded: Aug 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Dominus » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:33 pm

Samuraikoku wrote:I will now make a more question related topic:

Is there a woman who would like to have sex with me? :lol:
Yes... you just have to be willing to look long and hard or pay enough :p
Battletech RP: Giant walking war machines, space to surface fighters, and other implements blowing things up= lots of fun! Sign up here
We even have a soundtrack!

RIP Caroll Shelby 1923-2012
Aurora, Oak Creek, Happy Valley, Sandy Hook. Just how high a price are we willing to pay?

User avatar
Kvatchdom
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8111
Founded: Nov 08, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kvatchdom » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:34 pm

Aghny wrote:
Condunum wrote:In that case, then she didn't consent. Case closed.


Nope, that is the same as saying, she didn't object. Case closed.

Samuraikoku wrote:
You will in America, Argentina, Germany and Lithuania. And if you're somewhere else, please show me where. I'll search the appropriate law as I did with Ljvonia.


Like i said, asia is all you are getting.

What the fuck? If you don't have consent, it's always rape. I don't care what laws say, that is the definition.
boo
Left-wing nationalist, socialist, souverainist and anti-American.

User avatar
Aghny
Diplomat
 
Posts: 949
Founded: Mar 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aghny » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:34 pm

Condunum wrote:
Aghny wrote:
How can you prove verbal consent in the court of law if there are no witnesses or a taperecorder or something ? Yeah, rape.

if you can't prove it, you can't prove it. But that's why it's innocent until proven guilty, smart one.


So now everyone should have witnesses and a way to record things before sex ? :eyebrow:

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:34 pm

Aghny wrote:
Condunum wrote:In that case, then she didn't consent. Case closed.


Nope, that is the same as saying, she didn't object. Case closed.

sex is an act that requires two-party participation. If one party does not participate, there is no consent. The reason we have implied objection is because of people like you.
password scrambled

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:35 pm

Northern Dominus wrote:Yes... you just have to be willing to look long and hard or pay enough :p


I'm waiting for an answer. Not that I think I'll be getting any. :p

But hey, it's some sort of training.

User avatar
Anachronous Rex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Anachronous Rex » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:35 pm

Samuraikoku wrote:
Aghny wrote:Like i said, asia is all you are getting.


Afraid, are we, "professor"?

The only biology professor in the world who doesn't know first year biology. But apparently he's not an "expert," "just a professor."

I'm struggling to guess what Asian country he could be from, because frankly even Turkmenistan has higher standards. Myanmar maybe?
My humor is like church wine: dry and tasteless.
If you are not sure if I am being serious, assume that I am not.

Summer is coming...

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:35 pm

Aghny wrote:
Condunum wrote:if you can't prove it, you can't prove it. But that's why it's innocent until proven guilty, smart one.


So now everyone should have witnesses and a way to record things before sex ? :eyebrow:

...Have you never read through the witness testimonies in a single rape case? Ever? Like, fuck. You have to be to the bone ignorant to think this.
password scrambled

User avatar
Dragoria
Minister
 
Posts: 2850
Founded: Oct 12, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Dragoria » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:36 pm

Condunum wrote:
Dragoria wrote: Please, PLEASE don't encourage them to confuse implied consent and non-verbal consent.
"She takes her clothes off" is non-verbal consent (active/enthusiastic participation)
Implied consent is "she never said yes, but I could tell she wanted it because X (outfit, alcohol consumption, "didn't say no").

Implied Consent is in cases where a police officer tells you to take a breathalyzer and you refuse, go to court, and the judge says "By operating a car, you gave implied consent to the breathalyzer".
Implied consent will not hold up as a defense against a rape charge.

It's the same. Your actions display non-verbal consent to the breathalyzer, no? In that sense, non-verbal consent is a very dodgy,hard to prove stance. Which is why you need to prove real, verbal consent as a defense. Otherwise, rape.
Notsomuch. With the breathalyzer, they'll take your revocation of the "implied consent" of you operating your car to be an admission of guilt in some places. The court will side with the police officer saying "implied consent, breathalyzer nao" no matter how loudly you yell "NO".
Implied consent is not nonverbal consent. It's "I assumed you meant yes and went ahead with that assumed yes even though you never said yes or actively said no because [reason]".
While non-verbal consent is "you said yes without words, by actively or enthusiastically participating in [x]".

In sexytype situations, implied consent is rape, non-verbal consent isn't.
"Alliances are fun. I'm in. Unless this is an alliance which I already joined, in which case I'm out. Quint's an asshole." ~Quintolania
"I thought you were like the manliest man ever. If someone told me you were a brilliant swordsman and hunted deer on foot and unarmed, I wouldn't have thought that it was much of an exaggeration." ~Murbleflip

Que Sera, Sera

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:36 pm

Kvatchdom wrote:What the fuck? If you don't have consent, it's always rape. I don't care what laws say, that is the definition.


He's saying laws that define what is rape are just "opinionnnnnnnnnnnnns!" and not facts. Say, were you in a murder case, would you tell the judge "but the law is just an OPINION! It's not a fact!"?

User avatar
Choronzon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9936
Founded: Apr 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Choronzon » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:36 pm

Aghny wrote:
Condunum wrote:if you can't prove it, you can't prove it. But that's why it's innocent until proven guilty, smart one.


So now everyone should have witnesses and a way to record things before sex ? :eyebrow:

You're terrible at this.

User avatar
Kvatchdom
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8111
Founded: Nov 08, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kvatchdom » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:36 pm

Samuraikoku wrote:
Kvatchdom wrote:What the fuck? If you don't have consent, it's always rape. I don't care what laws say, that is the definition.


He's saying laws that define what is rape are just "opinionnnnnnnnnnnnns!" and not facts. Say, were you in a murder case, would you tell the judge "but the law is just an OPINION! It's not a fact!"?

These people exist? :eek:
boo
Left-wing nationalist, socialist, souverainist and anti-American.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:36 pm

Anachronous Rex wrote:I'm struggling to guess what Asian country he could be from, because frankly even Turkmenistan has higher standards. Myanmar maybe?


I think he's a professor the same way I am a Captain of the Ultramarines.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:37 pm

Kvatchdom wrote:These people exist? :eek:


Look no further than Aghny.

User avatar
Aghny
Diplomat
 
Posts: 949
Founded: Mar 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aghny » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:37 pm

Samuraikoku wrote:
Aghny wrote:Like i said, asia is all you are getting.


Afraid, are we, "professor"?


No, i just like my anonymity in the internet. Although you could easily narrow it down if you knew how. Find the clues yourself though sherlock

Kvatchdom wrote:What the fuck? If you don't have consent, it's always rape. I don't care what laws say, that is the definition.


Not according to all. Why i have been arguing that it is subjective unless proven otherwise.

User avatar
Kvatchdom
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8111
Founded: Nov 08, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kvatchdom » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:37 pm

Samuraikoku wrote:
Kvatchdom wrote:These people exist? :eek:


Look no further than Aghny.

Eww.
boo
Left-wing nationalist, socialist, souverainist and anti-American.

User avatar
Dragoria
Minister
 
Posts: 2850
Founded: Oct 12, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Dragoria » Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:37 pm

Anachronous Rex wrote:
Samuraikoku wrote:
Afraid, are we, "professor"?

The only biology professor in the world who doesn't know first year biology. But apparently he's not an "expert," "just a professor."

I'm struggling to guess what Asian country he could be from, because frankly even Turkmenistan has higher standards. Myanmar maybe?
Does North Korea count?
"Alliances are fun. I'm in. Unless this is an alliance which I already joined, in which case I'm out. Quint's an asshole." ~Quintolania
"I thought you were like the manliest man ever. If someone told me you were a brilliant swordsman and hunted deer on foot and unarmed, I wouldn't have thought that it was much of an exaggeration." ~Murbleflip

Que Sera, Sera

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads