Condunum wrote:Dragoria wrote: Please, PLEASE don't encourage them to confuse implied consent and non-verbal consent.
"She takes her clothes off" is non-verbal consent (active/enthusiastic participation)
Implied consent is "she never said yes, but I could tell she wanted it because X (outfit, alcohol consumption, "didn't say no").
Implied Consent is in cases where a police officer tells you to take a breathalyzer and you refuse, go to court, and the judge says "By operating a car, you gave implied consent to the breathalyzer".
Implied consent will not hold up as a defense against a rape charge.
It's the same. Your actions display non-verbal consent to the breathalyzer, no? In that sense, non-verbal consent is a very dodgy,hard to prove stance. Which is why you need to prove real, verbal consent as a defense. Otherwise, rape.
How can you prove verbal consent in the court of law if there are no witnesses or a taperecorder or something ? Yeah, rape.
Na, i am not going to change my way of writing just for you.







