Playing hard to get, you fox
I know how much you like to play games but we all know the truth: You're a treasure.
Advertisement

by Andaluciae » Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:55 am
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...

by WITCHA » Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:34 am


by Mad hatters in jeans » Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:36 pm
WITCHA wrote:by Eofaerwic » Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:02 am
So, have you got yours?
I'm from the Republic of Ireland, both my Grandfather's, 1Irish and 1English fought in WW11.
I am very proud of my heritage.
My Mother who is English and I sell Poppies every year here in Ireland.
Some People who I have known all my life refuse to speak to me when they see me selling Poppies, but think it's ok to speak to me at other times. Which to be honest I find very funny, needless to say I have no time for People like them.
The problem here in Ireland is that they think any money raised for Poppies is sent to England for the army to use, which is false.
So in answer to your question : Yes I have got mine


by Castleclose » Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:39 pm

by Mad hatters in jeans » Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:41 pm

by The chrisman union » Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:46 pm
Shebu wrote: 9 out of 10 times when you have a Ak47 pointed at you, you pay attention.
North Defese wrote:If I had a nickle and the head of everyone who called me [Defense], I'd be rich, and thrown in prison for all the mutliated corpses strewn about my house.
Tunizcha wrote:Never get in a staring contest with a cat. Even if you win, you still lose, because you just spent 5 minutes staring at a cat.
Canadai wrote:In Canadai, the vertically impaired are treated as equal citizens, and given ladders by the government.
Niur wrote:Lets all just get brain transplants to shark bodies.

by Ralvey » Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:52 pm
Corntownian wrote:Ralvey wrote:Lest we forget, armies across the world spend a lot of money marketing themselves to young (wo)men leaving school with few to no qualifications as the easy way to a fulfilling life. Once you sign up for what sounds like a great deal (pension, travel, "adventure" etc) you are sent off into situations you perhaps don't realise the extent of. Pressures from the right-leaning redtops in the UK are also unhelpful in dissuading people from running off for a slice of dulce et decorum. As such I think we have a duty to care of those short changed by our governments (and thus "ordinary" charities also receive my donations, before you go there).
I find it hard to believe that anyone joins the armed forces without even an inkling that there might be some killing involved in the job. Just because they think they'll get great benefits in exchange for occasional killing doesn't really make me think they're as much the victims of war as civilians.

by The Imperial Commissar » Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:49 pm
Corntownian wrote:I find it hard to believe that anyone joins the armed forces without even an inkling that there might be some killing involved in the job. Just because they think they'll get great benefits in exchange for occasional killing doesn't really make me think they're as much the victims of war as civilians.

by Eofaerwic » Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:15 pm
Cubic kms wrote:But most are neither esteemed heroes nor conscripted... They are were just ordinary people doing their jobs.

by Barzan » Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:07 pm
Eofaerwic wrote:Barzan wrote:Eofaerwic wrote:Blouman Empire wrote:
I bet they weren't even let them have a minute silence come 11am on the 11th of November.
Unfortunatley I won't either since I'm having my viva at 10am on the 11th and I seirously doubt that it's going to only take an hour.
On the other hand at my actual work they're actually holding a momorial service in the morning of the 11th.
You have to work on the 11th? I thought it would be a stat holiday in the UK. Then again, it isn't here except in a few provinces.
The 11th isn't - the official holiday is Remeberance Sunday. But a lot of places observe a 2 minutes silence on the 11th hour of the 11th.

by Cubic kms » Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:36 pm
Eofaerwic wrote:Cubic kms wrote:But most are neither esteemed heroes nor conscripted... They are were just ordinary people doing their jobs.
Actually if we're talking WWII vets, who are probably still the major recipients of British Legion funds, most of them were conscripted. But I take your point about ordinary people doing their jobs, unfortunatley their jobs resulted in them suffering long-term consequences, both physical and mental, and the simple fact is they do not get the support needed from the government.


by Barzan » Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:44 pm
Cubic kms wrote:Eofaerwic wrote:Cubic kms wrote:But most are neither esteemed heroes nor conscripted... They are were just ordinary people doing their jobs.
Actually if we're talking WWII vets, who are probably still the major recipients of British Legion funds, most of them were conscripted. But I take your point about ordinary people doing their jobs, unfortunatley their jobs resulted in them suffering long-term consequences, both physical and mental, and the simple fact is they do not get the support needed from the government.
Sorry, i was talking in context... i don't live in the UK![]()
But yes, soldiers are treated like batteries. After they run out, you dispose of them. That is the viewpoint of the government. Same with every other human, we become redundant after a certain age. A soldier just runs out earlier than most others.
These veterans protected the people in power, the government body and their interests. And the government is voted into power by society. Therefore the veterans were protecting society's interests. Then shouldn't it be society's job to provide for these veterans after they've done their job?

by Cubic kms » Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:07 pm
Barzan wrote:Cubic kms wrote:Eofaerwic wrote:Cubic kms wrote:But most are neither esteemed heroes nor conscripted... They are were just ordinary people doing their jobs.
Actually if we're talking WWII vets, who are probably still the major recipients of British Legion funds, most of them were conscripted. But I take your point about ordinary people doing their jobs, unfortunatley their jobs resulted in them suffering long-term consequences, both physical and mental, and the simple fact is they do not get the support needed from the government.
Sorry, i was talking in context... i don't live in the UK![]()
But yes, soldiers are treated like batteries. After they run out, you dispose of them. That is the viewpoint of the government. Same with every other human, we become redundant after a certain age. A soldier just runs out earlier than most others.
These veterans protected the people in power, the government body and their interests. And the government is voted into power by society. Therefore the veterans were protecting society's interests. Then shouldn't it be society's job to provide for these veterans after they've done their job?
Soldiers put their asses on the line for the politicians to play their games, the least the politicians can do is provide them with something in their old age.

by Barzan » Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:13 pm
Cubic kms wrote:Barzan wrote:Cubic kms wrote:Eofaerwic wrote:Cubic kms wrote:But most are neither esteemed heroes nor conscripted... They are were just ordinary people doing their jobs.
Actually if we're talking WWII vets, who are probably still the major recipients of British Legion funds, most of them were conscripted. But I take your point about ordinary people doing their jobs, unfortunatley their jobs resulted in them suffering long-term consequences, both physical and mental, and the simple fact is they do not get the support needed from the government.
Sorry, i was talking in context... i don't live in the UK![]()
But yes, soldiers are treated like batteries. After they run out, you dispose of them. That is the viewpoint of the government. Same with every other human, we become redundant after a certain age. A soldier just runs out earlier than most others.
These veterans protected the people in power, the government body and their interests. And the government is voted into power by society. Therefore the veterans were protecting society's interests. Then shouldn't it be society's job to provide for these veterans after they've done their job?
Soldiers put their asses on the line for the politicians to play their games, the least the politicians can do is provide them with something in their old age.
And who picked those politicians? We did. Its through our decisions that made those veterans like that. Everyone has a responsibility to these people. We can't just point fingers at those in charge when we're too cheap to put in some money for these people.
If half of everyone in the UK of working age (i'm gonna guess 20% of total pop (61.4 mil - '08)) put in $1 for this cause every year, the total would be $12.28 mil for support. Would you rather do this or for the government to increase taxes?

by Cubic kms » Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:26 pm
Barzan wrote:Cubic kms wrote:Barzan wrote:Cubic kms wrote:Eofaerwic wrote:Cubic kms wrote:But most are neither esteemed heroes nor conscripted... They are were just ordinary people doing their jobs.
Actually if we're talking WWII vets, who are probably still the major recipients of British Legion funds, most of them were conscripted. But I take your point about ordinary people doing their jobs, unfortunatley their jobs resulted in them suffering long-term consequences, both physical and mental, and the simple fact is they do not get the support needed from the government.
Sorry, i was talking in context... i don't live in the UK![]()
But yes, soldiers are treated like batteries. After they run out, you dispose of them. That is the viewpoint of the government. Same with every other human, we become redundant after a certain age. A soldier just runs out earlier than most others.
These veterans protected the people in power, the government body and their interests. And the government is voted into power by society. Therefore the veterans were protecting society's interests. Then shouldn't it be society's job to provide for these veterans after they've done their job?
Soldiers put their asses on the line for the politicians to play their games, the least the politicians can do is provide them with something in their old age.
And who picked those politicians? We did. Its through our decisions that made those veterans like that. Everyone has a responsibility to these people. We can't just point fingers at those in charge when we're too cheap to put in some money for these people.
If half of everyone in the UK of working age (i'm gonna guess 20% of total pop (61.4 mil - '08)) put in $1 for this cause every year, the total would be $12.28 mil for support. Would you rather do this or for the government to increase taxes?
I give the money for the poppy because I respect them, especially the ones from the World Wars, which were, in my opinion, the last respectable Western wars, as well as the most brutal. WWII was, of course, more righteous for the Allies than any other war.
As for taxes, they will be raised regardless -- even with the Tories. There's no way around it.

by Barzan » Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:27 pm
Cubic kms wrote:Yes but righteous or not, these people put their life on the line to protect the political beliefs of the majority of people in society. Hence veterans should be respected no matter what and also why they should be the responsibility of society.
To the government, they are merely tools of the political process. So if you have a problem with a war / conflict, it is an issue to take up with the government, not the veterans.

by Ryadn » Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:30 pm

by Mad hatters in jeans » Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:32 pm

by Ryadn » Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:38 pm

by Barzan » Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:42 pm
Ryadn wrote:
But do we U.S. Americans have a holiday that involves plucking your precious blue bells in quantity and pinning them to our sweaters?
(No, really, do we? I don't know anything about my country, but that sounds kind of cool)

by Cubic kms » Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:51 pm
Barzan wrote:Ryadn wrote:
But do we U.S. Americans have a holiday that involves plucking your precious blue bells in quantity and pinning them to our sweaters?
(No, really, do we? I don't know anything about my country, but that sounds kind of cool)
I dunno about the UK, but here we use felt poppies...


by The Imperial Commissar » Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:52 pm

by Eofaerwic » Sat Nov 07, 2009 3:17 am
Barzan wrote:I dunno about the UK, but here we use felt poppies...
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Continental Free States, Margraviate of Moravia, Necroghastia, Norse Inuit Union, Notanam, Page, The Emerald Expanse, The Holy Therns, Upper Ireland, Washington-Columbia, Xind
Advertisement