Mock General Legislature

by **Greed and Death** » Wed Nov 04, 2009 7:29 pm

the problem is either we have elections of some legislatures and everyone else loses interest.
Or we what NSG normally gets when we debate a topic with a poll arguing and cloning to rig votes.

by **Nadkor** » Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:26 pm

Would this be a totally US-centric thing? Or am I just reading the OP in that way?

by **Erich Dahmer** » Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:18 pm

Kryozerkia wrote:
Vittos Ordination wrote:
Kryozerkia wrote:You mean like hiatus periods on certain redundant topics? I'm all for it and would happily sponsor a policy like that.

How about a NSG union that actually attempted to control posting trends by simply coordinating what we respond to?

Who needs moderators?

NSG. Obviously. Because people will still find a way to break, bend. maim, contort and otherwise horribly mutilate every rule when given the opportunity?

YOU LIE!

Have you now faith in your fellow poptarts?

by **Vittos Ordination** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:44 am

Nadkor wrote:Would this be a totally US-centric thing? Or am I just reading the OP in that way?

My summary was US-centric, as I am US-centric, but we would certainly address problems as if they were existing in a fictional country. Perhaps we could examine country specific problems as well. It would certainly give us USians a chance to get in tune with other nation's politics.

by **Ifreann** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:57 am

*becomes a rogue poster*
Mwahaha, your laws mean nothing to me!

by **Vittos Ordination** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:04 am

*shuns Ifreann*

Wait....

by **Soheran** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:13 am

Aren't you against legislatures?

by **Vittos Ordination** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:20 am

Soheran wrote:Aren't you against legislatures?

Not inherently.

I am all for representative legislatures whose decisions are passed down upon contractually associated peoples. I would prefer a different title, but legislature seems best for the purposes of this thread.

by **Risottia** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:32 am

Maurepas wrote:
Vittos Ordination wrote:Who needs moderators?

That sounds alot like Socialism,

More like anarchy, actually.

Anyway, if it's not too much US-centered, count me in. It's not like I'm not interested in US politics, it's just that I know very little about it.

by **Vittos Ordination** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:50 am

OK, so far about the only condition established is that it will not be US-centric. It may be either a fictional blank-slate nation, or we may examine policy issues from various nations.

I have this list of people who have expressed interest, let me know if you are interested, and we will get the ball rolling.

Vittos Ordination
Czardas
Pevisopolis
WWII History Geeks
United Dependencies
Risottia

I placed this in the OP as well.

by **Jello Biafra** » Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:16 am

I enjoyed the NS General Parliament, so I approve of this idea.

by **Zeppy** » Sat Nov 07, 2009 1:12 pm

I am not a antique nation so I don't know if I can join but this sounds like a great idea.

by **Dyakovo** » Sat Nov 07, 2009 1:14 pm

Kryozerkia wrote:
Vittos Ordination wrote:
Kryozerkia wrote:You mean like hiatus periods on certain redundant topics? I'm all for it and would happily sponsor a policy like that.

How about a NSG union that actually attempted to control posting trends by simply coordinating what we respond to?

Who needs moderators?

NSG. Obviously. Because people will still find a way to break, bend. maim, contort and otherwise horribly mutilate every rule when given the opportunity?

I ~~resent~~ resemble that remark...

Mock General Legislature

Who is online