I don't know, man, that new free trade agreement might make them happy that regulations and what not will be further standardized.
Advertisement

by CTALNH » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:49 am

by Of the Free Socialist Territories » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:50 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:To get back on topic, assuming the EU were going to unite would there be a war of any kind?
I doubt it.

by Libertarian California » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:50 am

by Free Council Communes » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:50 am
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
As a perfect example of this, nothing would prevent FST here from running "To the right" of me if we were to suddenly turn the UK syndicalist.
If I understand correctly, he's somewhat more minarchist than I am, and yet both of us are "socialists" despite being pretty big on market forces and such, and democracy.
Well, yeah. There are all sorts of things chasing around my mind which I haven't quite sorted out yet; hopefully they'll be something properly coherent by the end of the year.![]()
Essentially, I'm somewhat neutral towards the market; I can accept its necessity in the current world state of affairs and for a time after the revolution, but ideally I'd like to see a situation eventually where labour is mechanised and sufficiently efficient that it produces enough for everyone, eliminating the market as a thing.
But post-revolution, I wouldn't have a problem with capitalists doing their own thing and forming capitalist communes or capitalist businesses in general, provided it was with the common consent of those involved and that they were willing to be taxed to an extent.
I mean, in the end I'd like to see Europe as a collection of communes under a night-watchman state; essentially a vastly devolved EU, but one in which there is nonetheless the potential to act on the world stage through elected and recallable officials, before an eventual transition to full communism if the majority of those within the minarchist EU were in favour.

by Divair » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:50 am
Libertarian California wrote:No it's not. Capitalists aren't devoted to any tangible thing. Each capitalist is an individual looking to pursue his own goals and dreams. Oftentimes, it is profits, but not always. Capitalism can't be a religion because it varies for each person because it is an individualist ideology.
Capitalism is more like a personality.

by Ostroeuropa » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:50 am
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:To get back on topic, assuming the EU were going to unite would there be a war of any kind?
I doubt it.
No. There'd probably be small groups of lunatic nationalists, and UKIP and their ilk like the PVV across the continent would be really pissed, but I doubt that Farage and his ilk would actually dare take up weapons. They'd just shout.

by Free Council Communes » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:51 am

by Of the Free Socialist Territories » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:52 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
No. There'd probably be small groups of lunatic nationalists, and UKIP and their ilk like the PVV across the continent would be really pissed, but I doubt that Farage and his ilk would actually dare take up weapons. They'd just shout.
I sincerely doubt UKIP would, the BNP is another matter. I expect they and their equivalents may well fight.

by Libertarian California » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:52 am
Divair wrote:Libertarian California wrote:No it's not. Capitalists aren't devoted to any tangible thing. Each capitalist is an individual looking to pursue his own goals and dreams. Oftentimes, it is profits, but not always. Capitalism can't be a religion because it varies for each person because it is an individualist ideology.
Capitalism is more like a personality.
I'm a capitalist and I'm not devoted to profits. What now? Universe explodes?
.Each capitalist is an individual looking to pursue his own goals and dreams. Oftentimes, it is profits, but not always

by Saruhan » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:52 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
No. There'd probably be small groups of lunatic nationalists, and UKIP and their ilk like the PVV across the continent would be really pissed, but I doubt that Farage and his ilk would actually dare take up weapons. They'd just shout.
I sincerely doubt UKIP would, the BNP is another matter. I expect they and their equivalents may well fight.
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

by Saruhan » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:53 am
Free Council Communes wrote:CTALNH wrote:actually it has logic.
Rich families will make their children hate us.
So either you shoot them or take their children away and then teach how to become proper citizens
I do agree with re-educating the children, but I believe the parents right to free speech must be respected.
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

by Ostroeuropa » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:53 am

by Free Council Communes » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:54 am
Libertarian California wrote:
No it's not. Capitalists aren't devoted to any tangible thing. Each capitalist is an individual looking to pursue his own goals and dreams. Oftentimes, it is profits, but not always. Capitalism can't be a religion because it varies for each person because it is an individualist ideology.
Capitalism is more like a personality.

by Risottia » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:55 am

by Free Council Communes » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:55 am
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
I sincerely doubt UKIP would, the BNP is another matter. I expect they and their equivalents may well fight.
And they'd be killed in the streets if they took up arms, because there's not many of them and they have the military potential of the average pub at half past three on a Saturday afternoon.

by Ostroeuropa » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:56 am
Risottia wrote:Divair wrote:I don't know, man, that new free trade agreement might make them happy that regulations and what not will be further standardized.
Well, this means the US of A will need to conform their production to EU standards if they want to sell their goods here.
And, let's be honest about it: who DOES NOT want to have an easy access to the EU market?

by Saruhan » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:56 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:Saruhan wrote:Yes, i'm sure the European armed forces, all 1.5 million of them, would be scared of their Muslamic ray guns
I'm more concerned that we'd either need prior constraint
(to stop them before they do anything technically illegal)
or they may blow up a building or something before we actually shoot them.
No doubt we'd win, i'm just concerned we may lose some key buildings in the process.
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

by Arglorand » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:56 am

by Divair » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:58 am
Risottia wrote:Divair wrote:I don't know, man, that new free trade agreement might make them happy that regulations and what not will be further standardized.
Well, this means the US of A will need to conform their production to EU standards if they want to sell their goods here.
And, let's be honest about it: who DOES NOT want to have an easy access to the EU market?

by Risottia » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:58 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:Risottia wrote:Well, this means the US of A will need to conform their production to EU standards if they want to sell their goods here.
And, let's be honest about it: who DOES NOT want to have an easy access to the EU market?
Would you be opposed to the US having a say on those standards too?

by Imperiatom » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:58 am
Libertarian California wrote:Imperiatom wrote:
Exactly all the country's have gained Independence from Britain in the past so they have no desire to lose their independence and being from Britain myself i have no wish to impose our political control over those nations again. And as you say apart from the moment of Independence we have all supported each other through troubles from WW1 to 9/11
Indeed. While there may have been some wavering (Suez, Panama), we've generally got each other's backs in a crisis.
I'm trying to popularize the term Anglobros.

by Free Council Communes » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:59 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bawkie, GuessTheAltAccount
Advertisement