NATION

PASSWORD

Is the EU likely to unite?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Do you think the EU is likely to become The United States of Europe?

Yes, definately and without a doubt.
23
7%
It is a possibility, but not in the near future.
161
47%
I hope not!
89
26%
No, too much power leads to conflict ect.
72
21%
 
Total votes : 345

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:48 am

Risottia wrote:
Libertarian California wrote:Russia might be a slightly pissed.

Actually, the US would be far more pissed about it.

As if we really gave a fuck, though.

I don't know, man, that new free trade agreement might make them happy that regulations and what not will be further standardized.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:49 am

Free Council Communes wrote:
CTALNH wrote:Either you shoot them or indoctrinate them.

I have to disagree with Comrade CTALNH here.

actually it has logic.
Rich families will make their children hate us.
So either you shoot them or take their children away and then teach how to become proper citizens
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:50 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:To get back on topic, assuming the EU were going to unite would there be a war of any kind?
I doubt it.


No. There'd probably be small groups of lunatic nationalists, and UKIP and their ilk like the PVV across the continent would be really pissed, but I doubt that Farage and his ilk would actually dare take up weapons. They'd just shout.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
Libertarian California
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: May 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Libertarian California » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:50 am

Free Council Communes wrote:
Libertarian California wrote:


You sound like a Christian. You throw it quotes for people with a mythical status and think it somehow proves your point.


The Bible is true because the Bible says it's true.
:palm:
Capitalism is a religion, it advocates complete devotion to profits.


No it's not. Capitalists aren't devoted to any tangible thing. Each capitalist is an individual looking to pursue his own goals and dreams. Oftentimes, it is profits, but not always. Capitalism can't be a religion because it varies for each person because it is an individualist ideology.

Capitalism is more like a personality.
I'm a trans-beanstalk giantkin. My pronouns are fee/fie/foe/fum.

American nationalist

I am the infamous North California (DEATed 11/13/12). Now in the NS "Hall of Fame", or whatever
(Add 2137 posts)

On the American Revolution
Everyone should watch this video

User avatar
Free Council Communes
Diplomat
 
Posts: 955
Founded: Feb 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Council Communes » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:50 am

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
As a perfect example of this, nothing would prevent FST here from running "To the right" of me if we were to suddenly turn the UK syndicalist.
If I understand correctly, he's somewhat more minarchist than I am, and yet both of us are "socialists" despite being pretty big on market forces and such, and democracy.


Well, yeah. There are all sorts of things chasing around my mind which I haven't quite sorted out yet; hopefully they'll be something properly coherent by the end of the year. :p

Essentially, I'm somewhat neutral towards the market; I can accept its necessity in the current world state of affairs and for a time after the revolution, but ideally I'd like to see a situation eventually where labour is mechanised and sufficiently efficient that it produces enough for everyone, eliminating the market as a thing.

But post-revolution, I wouldn't have a problem with capitalists doing their own thing and forming capitalist communes or capitalist businesses in general, provided it was with the common consent of those involved and that they were willing to be taxed to an extent.

I mean, in the end I'd like to see Europe as a collection of communes under a night-watchman state; essentially a vastly devolved EU, but one in which there is nonetheless the potential to act on the world stage through elected and recallable officials, before an eventual transition to full communism if the majority of those within the minarchist EU were in favour.

Exactly. You are not a market abolitionist, you are a bourgeois Mutualist. I myself believe parecon to be the best system for market abolitionism.
DEATH TO FASCISM, FREEDOM TO THE PEOPLE!
Left Communist, Anti-Establishmentarian Populist, New Atheist, Ethical Egotist & Satanic Hedonist
Supporter of the PKK & the DHKP/C
Economic Left/Right:Economic Left/Right: -10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: Economic Left/Right: -7.44
For: LGBTQ/Kink Rights, Anarchism, Libertinism, Internet Privacy & Piracy, Guns, Socialist Feminism, Republicanism, Beppe Grillo, Men's Rights
Against: Conformism, Conservatism, Morality, Copyrights, Capitalism, Radical Feminism, USA, China, Russia, DPRK, EU, Turkey, NATO, UN

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:50 am

Libertarian California wrote:No it's not. Capitalists aren't devoted to any tangible thing. Each capitalist is an individual looking to pursue his own goals and dreams. Oftentimes, it is profits, but not always. Capitalism can't be a religion because it varies for each person because it is an individualist ideology.

Capitalism is more like a personality.

I'm a capitalist and I'm not devoted to profits. What now? Universe explodes?

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57853
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:50 am

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:To get back on topic, assuming the EU were going to unite would there be a war of any kind?
I doubt it.


No. There'd probably be small groups of lunatic nationalists, and UKIP and their ilk like the PVV across the continent would be really pissed, but I doubt that Farage and his ilk would actually dare take up weapons. They'd just shout.


I sincerely doubt UKIP would, the BNP is another matter. I expect they and their equivalents may well fight.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Free Council Communes
Diplomat
 
Posts: 955
Founded: Feb 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Council Communes » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:51 am

CTALNH wrote:
Free Council Communes wrote:I have to disagree with Comrade CTALNH here.

actually it has logic.
Rich families will make their children hate us.
So either you shoot them or take their children away and then teach how to become proper citizens

I do agree with re-educating the children, but I believe the parents right to free speech must be respected.
DEATH TO FASCISM, FREEDOM TO THE PEOPLE!
Left Communist, Anti-Establishmentarian Populist, New Atheist, Ethical Egotist & Satanic Hedonist
Supporter of the PKK & the DHKP/C
Economic Left/Right:Economic Left/Right: -10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: Economic Left/Right: -7.44
For: LGBTQ/Kink Rights, Anarchism, Libertinism, Internet Privacy & Piracy, Guns, Socialist Feminism, Republicanism, Beppe Grillo, Men's Rights
Against: Conformism, Conservatism, Morality, Copyrights, Capitalism, Radical Feminism, USA, China, Russia, DPRK, EU, Turkey, NATO, UN

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:52 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
No. There'd probably be small groups of lunatic nationalists, and UKIP and their ilk like the PVV across the continent would be really pissed, but I doubt that Farage and his ilk would actually dare take up weapons. They'd just shout.


I sincerely doubt UKIP would, the BNP is another matter. I expect they and their equivalents may well fight.


And they'd be killed in the streets if they took up arms, because there's not many of them and they have the military potential of the average pub at half past three on a Saturday afternoon.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
Libertarian California
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: May 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Libertarian California » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:52 am

Divair wrote:
Libertarian California wrote:No it's not. Capitalists aren't devoted to any tangible thing. Each capitalist is an individual looking to pursue his own goals and dreams. Oftentimes, it is profits, but not always. Capitalism can't be a religion because it varies for each person because it is an individualist ideology.

Capitalism is more like a personality.

I'm a capitalist and I'm not devoted to profits. What now? Universe explodes?



Each capitalist is an individual looking to pursue his own goals and dreams. Oftentimes, it is profits, but not always
.

Communists say whaaaaaaaat?
I'm a trans-beanstalk giantkin. My pronouns are fee/fie/foe/fum.

American nationalist

I am the infamous North California (DEATed 11/13/12). Now in the NS "Hall of Fame", or whatever
(Add 2137 posts)

On the American Revolution
Everyone should watch this video

User avatar
Saruhan
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8013
Founded: Feb 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Saruhan » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:52 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
No. There'd probably be small groups of lunatic nationalists, and UKIP and their ilk like the PVV across the continent would be really pissed, but I doubt that Farage and his ilk would actually dare take up weapons. They'd just shout.


I sincerely doubt UKIP would, the BNP is another matter. I expect they and their equivalents may well fight.

Yes, i'm sure the European armed forces, all 1.5 million of them, would be scared of their Muslamic ray guns
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

User avatar
Saruhan
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8013
Founded: Feb 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Saruhan » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:53 am

Free Council Communes wrote:
CTALNH wrote:actually it has logic.
Rich families will make their children hate us.
So either you shoot them or take their children away and then teach how to become proper citizens

I do agree with re-educating the children, but I believe the parents right to free speech must be respected.

Re-educating? See, this is why I don't trust you whatsoever
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:53 am

Saruhan wrote:
Free Council Communes wrote:I do agree with re-educating the children, but I believe the parents right to free speech must be respected.

Re-educating? See, this is why I don't trust you whatsoever

1984, man.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57853
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:53 am

Saruhan wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
I sincerely doubt UKIP would, the BNP is another matter. I expect they and their equivalents may well fight.

Yes, i'm sure the European armed forces, all 1.5 million of them, would be scared of their Muslamic ray guns


I'm more concerned that we'd either need prior constraint
(to stop them before they do anything technically illegal)
or they may blow up a building or something before we actually shoot them.

No doubt we'd win, i'm just concerned we may lose some key buildings in the process. Thats a big reason why decentralization is a must if the EU unites.
Organizing itself into a coherent national entity is going to be hard enough already, we don't need a vast amount of high level beaurocrats wiped out in the first weeks.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Free Council Communes
Diplomat
 
Posts: 955
Founded: Feb 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Council Communes » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:54 am

Libertarian California wrote:
Free Council Communes wrote: :palm:
Capitalism is a religion, it advocates complete devotion to profits.


No it's not. Capitalists aren't devoted to any tangible thing. Each capitalist is an individual looking to pursue his own goals and dreams. Oftentimes, it is profits, but not always. Capitalism can't be a religion because it varies for each person because it is an individualist ideology.

Capitalism is more like a personality.

The idea that capitalism is some kind of individualist system motivated by greed is so pathetically incorrect.
Read the quotes I put here. And they are my own, I just had the characters I made up say them.
DEATH TO FASCISM, FREEDOM TO THE PEOPLE!
Left Communist, Anti-Establishmentarian Populist, New Atheist, Ethical Egotist & Satanic Hedonist
Supporter of the PKK & the DHKP/C
Economic Left/Right:Economic Left/Right: -10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: Economic Left/Right: -7.44
For: LGBTQ/Kink Rights, Anarchism, Libertinism, Internet Privacy & Piracy, Guns, Socialist Feminism, Republicanism, Beppe Grillo, Men's Rights
Against: Conformism, Conservatism, Morality, Copyrights, Capitalism, Radical Feminism, USA, China, Russia, DPRK, EU, Turkey, NATO, UN

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54739
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:55 am

Divair wrote:
Risottia wrote:Actually, the US would be far more pissed about it.

As if we really gave a fuck, though.

I don't know, man, that new free trade agreement might make them happy that regulations and what not will be further standardized.

Well, this means the US of A will need to conform their production to EU standards if they want to sell their goods here.
And, let's be honest about it: who DOES NOT want to have an easy access to the EU market?
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Free Council Communes
Diplomat
 
Posts: 955
Founded: Feb 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Council Communes » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:55 am

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
I sincerely doubt UKIP would, the BNP is another matter. I expect they and their equivalents may well fight.


And they'd be killed in the streets if they took up arms, because there's not many of them and they have the military potential of the average pub at half past three on a Saturday afternoon.

UKIP is still not nearly as bad as you make it sound. I don't like them, but at least they oppose the EU.
DEATH TO FASCISM, FREEDOM TO THE PEOPLE!
Left Communist, Anti-Establishmentarian Populist, New Atheist, Ethical Egotist & Satanic Hedonist
Supporter of the PKK & the DHKP/C
Economic Left/Right:Economic Left/Right: -10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: Economic Left/Right: -7.44
For: LGBTQ/Kink Rights, Anarchism, Libertinism, Internet Privacy & Piracy, Guns, Socialist Feminism, Republicanism, Beppe Grillo, Men's Rights
Against: Conformism, Conservatism, Morality, Copyrights, Capitalism, Radical Feminism, USA, China, Russia, DPRK, EU, Turkey, NATO, UN

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57853
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:56 am

Risottia wrote:
Divair wrote:I don't know, man, that new free trade agreement might make them happy that regulations and what not will be further standardized.

Well, this means the US of A will need to conform their production to EU standards if they want to sell their goods here.
And, let's be honest about it: who DOES NOT want to have an easy access to the EU market?


Would you be opposed to the US having a say on those standards too?
In the event of a united EU, i'd be arguing pretty heavily for a new supra-national entity similar to it that'd include the US, maybe Japan, australia etc. as a production standard / free trade zone.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Saruhan
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8013
Founded: Feb 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Saruhan » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:56 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Saruhan wrote:Yes, i'm sure the European armed forces, all 1.5 million of them, would be scared of their Muslamic ray guns


I'm more concerned that we'd either need prior constraint
(to stop them before they do anything technically illegal)
or they may blow up a building or something before we actually shoot them.

No doubt we'd win, i'm just concerned we may lose some key buildings in the process.

That's why I would suggest putting guards around main structure's in the Union's provinces, as well as putting the New Province's and former State's special forces on high alert for a month to a few weeks
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

User avatar
Arglorand
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12597
Founded: Jan 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arglorand » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:56 am

Divair wrote:
Saruhan wrote:Re-educating? See, this is why I don't trust you whatsoever

1984, man.

Ingsoc, the way to the future.
Kosovo is Morrowind. N'wah.
Impeach Dagoth Ur, legalise Daedra worship, the Empire is theft. Nerevarine 3E 427.

Pros: Dunmeri independence, abolition of the Empire, the Daedra, Morag Tong, House Redoran, Ashlander interests, abolitionism, Dissident Priests, canonisation of St. Jiub the Cliff Racer Slayer.
Cons: Imperials, the Empire, the False Tribunal, Dagoth Ur, House Hlaalu, Imperials, the Eight Divines, "Talos", "Nords", Imperial unionism, Imperials.

I am a: Social Democrat | Bright green | Republican | Intersectional feminist | Civic nationalist | Multiculturalist
(and i blatantly stole this from Old Tyrannia)

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:57 am

Arglorand wrote:
Divair wrote:1984, man.

Ingsoc, the way to the future.

War is peace, etc. etc.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:58 am

Risottia wrote:
Divair wrote:I don't know, man, that new free trade agreement might make them happy that regulations and what not will be further standardized.

Well, this means the US of A will need to conform their production to EU standards if they want to sell their goods here.
And, let's be honest about it: who DOES NOT want to have an easy access to the EU market?

And European companies will have easy access to the USA. Win-win. I honestly cannot wait for that agreement.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54739
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:58 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Risottia wrote:Well, this means the US of A will need to conform their production to EU standards if they want to sell their goods here.
And, let's be honest about it: who DOES NOT want to have an easy access to the EU market?


Would you be opposed to the US having a say on those standards too?


Yes.
Not a member of the European Union... no say on the EU standards. Just like not a member of the USA, no say on the USA standards.

Well, although, there's the WTO and the ISO for overall standardization, right? Or even a joint EU-NAFTA standardization bureau. That would be cool.
Last edited by Risottia on Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:59 am, edited 2 times in total.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Imperiatom
Minister
 
Posts: 2416
Founded: Mar 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperiatom » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:58 am

Libertarian California wrote:
Imperiatom wrote:
Exactly all the country's have gained Independence from Britain in the past so they have no desire to lose their independence and being from Britain myself i have no wish to impose our political control over those nations again. And as you say apart from the moment of Independence we have all supported each other through troubles from WW1 to 9/11



Indeed. While there may have been some wavering (Suez, Panama), we've generally got each other's backs in a crisis.

I'm trying to popularize the term Anglobros.


That is a good term. I feel much more at home when i go to the US than when i go to the EU. I also have family in new zealand, south Africa and the US, we are one people that happen to be spread around the world and we use each others culture to further develop our identity be that through economic, music, film or trying to bring democracy to the world. Take suez, if i had been around then i probably would not have been in favor of it and there were many protests in Britain at the time.

I hope that the relationship no friendship never changes.

User avatar
Free Council Communes
Diplomat
 
Posts: 955
Founded: Feb 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Council Communes » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:59 am

Arglorand wrote:
Divair wrote:1984, man.

Ingsoc, the way to the future.

How ironic coming from a social democrat. Look what you traitors did to Rosa in Germany!
& I am advocating free speech. I'm just saying the children shouldn't grow up in a family that will poison their minds before they are old enough to think for themselves.
DEATH TO FASCISM, FREEDOM TO THE PEOPLE!
Left Communist, Anti-Establishmentarian Populist, New Atheist, Ethical Egotist & Satanic Hedonist
Supporter of the PKK & the DHKP/C
Economic Left/Right:Economic Left/Right: -10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: Economic Left/Right: -7.44
For: LGBTQ/Kink Rights, Anarchism, Libertinism, Internet Privacy & Piracy, Guns, Socialist Feminism, Republicanism, Beppe Grillo, Men's Rights
Against: Conformism, Conservatism, Morality, Copyrights, Capitalism, Radical Feminism, USA, China, Russia, DPRK, EU, Turkey, NATO, UN

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bawkie, GuessTheAltAccount

Advertisement

Remove ads