So, it seems you can't refute the fact South Korea's growth in economy, as a result of Korean reunification, is going to dramatically increase. I'll leave it at that. I'm not sure what you're talking about, in terms of "voic[ing] your argument"...
Advertisement

by Fruition (Ancient) » Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:13 am

by Grand Britannia » Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:15 am

by Alimprad » Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:16 am
Arumdaum wrote:Alimprad wrote:if you hadnt noticed, im anti UN, so I think they should just go die somewhere, and USA, well Im anti them to, but they could just hurry up and FLATTEN NORTH KOREA ALREADY!, but the world is run by liberals so wev got a long wait
That's an idiotic idea. Why the hell should we flatten NK? You want America to be the next Nazi Germany or something?

by Vietnam » Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:16 am
Fruition wrote:Tiami wrote:Proper reasoning only goes far. If you can back it by variable, legit sources, then your reasoning can be accepted.
As to answer your question... I already voiced my argument to yours.
So, it seems you can't refute the fact South Korea's growth in economy, as a result of Korean reunification, is going to dramatically increase. I'll leave it at that. I'm not sure what you're talking about, in terms of "voic[ing] your argument"...

by Tiami » Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:16 am
Fruition wrote:Tiami wrote:Proper reasoning only goes far. If you can back it by variable, legit sources, then your reasoning can be accepted.
As to answer your question... I already voiced my argument to yours.
So, it seems you can't refute the fact South Korea's growth in economy, as a result of Korean reunification, is going to dramatically increase. I'll leave it at that. I'm not sure what you're talking about, in terms of "voic[ing] your argument"...

by Vietnam » Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:17 am
Tiami wrote:Fruition wrote:
So, it seems you can't refute the fact South Korea's growth in economy, as a result of Korean reunification, is going to dramatically increase. I'll leave it at that. I'm not sure what you're talking about, in terms of "voic[ing] your argument"...
No, I am aware of South Korean economical growth, but China's growth still outclasses SK's. Even with a reunified Korea, China would still maintain a sizable growth advantage.
As for the second part of your post, I was pointing out that I responded to my argument.

by Vietnam » Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:17 am
Alimprad wrote:Arumdaum wrote:That's an idiotic idea. Why the hell should we flatten NK? You want America to be the next Nazi Germany or something?
I guess that would be an added bonus, though it wouldnt to change much, it invaded paketan to spread democracy, Im pretty sure invading places to force your beliefs on them is pretty facist.


by Fruition (Ancient) » Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:19 am
Vietnam wrote:Fruition wrote:
So, it seems you can't refute the fact South Korea's growth in economy, as a result of Korean reunification, is going to dramatically increase. I'll leave it at that. I'm not sure what you're talking about, in terms of "voic[ing] your argument"...
Do you really think reunification will result in a dramatic increase in economic growth?.. Perhaps for the northern part, but definitely not for the south. People from the north would be flocking down south for better living conditions, wages would drop dramatically, and companies would exploit and take advantage of cheap (formerly North Korean) labor, leaving former South Koreans unemployed. Welfare, South Korea's universal healthcare, and other programs would have to be dramatically altered as to better fit the entire country, as the GDP per capita of Korea would drop dramatically from South Korea levels.

by Ironrite » Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:21 am
Alimprad wrote:Divair wrote:Did you miss the part where the USA is an ally of SK and both SK and NK are in the UN?
if you hadnt noticed, im anti UN, so I think they should just go die somewhere, and USA, well Im anti them to, but they could just hurry up and FLATTEN NORTH KOREA ALREADY!, but the world is run by liberals so wev got a long wait
so we now have to nuke every country that threatens us (as an American)? We don't have enough nukes to do that. 
Tekania wrote:OMGeverynameistaken wrote:Because some people are under the impression that you have to read him his rights AS YOU ARREST HIM NO MATTER WHAT, even if he's bleeding out from a bullet hole in his neck and was subsequently sedated for a few days.
"Do you understand your rights as I have explained them to you?"
"(bubbling noises)"
Two gurgles for yes, one for no.

by Vietnam » Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:21 am
Fruition wrote:Vietnam wrote:Do you really think reunification will result in a dramatic increase in economic growth?.. Perhaps for the northern part, but definitely not for the south. People from the north would be flocking down south for better living conditions, wages would drop dramatically, and companies would exploit and take advantage of cheap (formerly North Korean) labor, leaving former South Koreans unemployed. Welfare, South Korea's universal healthcare, and other programs would have to be dramatically altered as to better fit the entire country, as the GDP per capita of Korea would drop dramatically from South Korea levels.
Reasonable, but why is China not allowing this to happen? If they truly value human rights, they should be aiding the reunification of Korea.

by Tiami » Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:21 am
Vietnam wrote:Alimprad wrote:I guess that would be an added bonus, though it wouldnt to change much, it invaded paketan to spread democracy, Im pretty sure invading places to force your beliefs on them is pretty facist.
So you want us to be recognized for genocide?
We invaded Paketan to spread democracy? Where's Paketan? And no, that's not fascism. Go look it up.

by Tiami » Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:22 am
Ironrite wrote:Alimprad wrote:if you hadnt noticed, im anti UN, so I think they should just go die somewhere, and USA, well Im anti them to, but they could just hurry up and FLATTEN NORTH KOREA ALREADY!, but the world is run by liberals so wev got a long wait
so we now have to nuke every country that threatens us (as an American)? We don't have enough nukes to do that.

by Vietnam » Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:22 am
Ironrite wrote:Alimprad wrote:if you hadnt noticed, im anti UN, so I think they should just go die somewhere, and USA, well Im anti them to, but they could just hurry up and FLATTEN NORTH KOREA ALREADY!, but the world is run by liberals so wev got a long wait
so we now have to nuke every country that threatens us (as an American)? We don't have enough nukes to do that.

by Fruition (Ancient) » Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:23 am
Vietnam wrote:Fruition wrote:
Reasonable, but why is China not allowing this to happen? If they truly value human rights, they should be aiding the reunification of Korea.
Dude you aren't even trying to any of my arguments .__.
Only reasonable?
But either, North Korea currently acts as a buffer for China, and China currently receives bargain deals from North Korea to exploit its natural resources. China does not want the North Korean regime to collapse, as such a thing would cause mass instability in Northeast Asia. Not to mention, many Koreans themselves don't even want reunification.


by Ironrite » Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:26 am
Tekania wrote:OMGeverynameistaken wrote:Because some people are under the impression that you have to read him his rights AS YOU ARREST HIM NO MATTER WHAT, even if he's bleeding out from a bullet hole in his neck and was subsequently sedated for a few days.
"Do you understand your rights as I have explained them to you?"
"(bubbling noises)"
Two gurgles for yes, one for no.

by Ironrite » Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:26 am
Tekania wrote:OMGeverynameistaken wrote:Because some people are under the impression that you have to read him his rights AS YOU ARREST HIM NO MATTER WHAT, even if he's bleeding out from a bullet hole in his neck and was subsequently sedated for a few days.
"Do you understand your rights as I have explained them to you?"
"(bubbling noises)"
Two gurgles for yes, one for no.

by Vietnam » Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:27 am
Fruition wrote:Vietnam wrote:Dude you aren't even trying to any of my arguments .__.
Only reasonable?
But either, North Korea currently acts as a buffer for China, and China currently receives bargain deals from North Korea to exploit its natural resources. China does not want the North Korean regime to collapse, as such a thing would cause mass instability in Northeast Asia. Not to mention, many Koreans themselves don't even want reunification.
How do you know many Koreans don't want reunification? Families, I mean, generations of families have been split in Korea. Plus, what gives China the right to exploit North Korean resources? If their economy is growing at a thriving level, they should learn to restrain themselves and make profit for their nation in a fair and ethical manner. Well, ethical, heh.... no minimum wage for your country's laborers and torturing buddhist monks of your western neighbouring nations.
You really think people will generally try to refrain from obtaining huge amounts of wealth? Money is also something that the North Korean regime needs to stay alive. Also, when did I ever claim that China was being ethical over everything they do? All you're doing is attacking strawmen.
by Fruition (Ancient) » Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:28 am


by The Tiger Kingdom » Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:30 am

by New England and The Maritimes » Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:31 am
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.


by Fruition (Ancient) » Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:33 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: A m e n r i a, A Place Somewhere, Bruhssians, Ifreann, Imperiul romanum, Jilia, Kavanos, Lativs, Oneid1, Rary, The Jamesian Republic
Advertisement