
by Buffett and Colbert » Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:11 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Lunatic Goofballs » Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:22 pm

by Aelosia » Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:27 pm

by Aelosia » Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:30 pm

by Tubbsalot » Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:31 pm
Aelosia wrote:Mrs Jane "Chimpmolestor" Goodall?
I have heard and read about her a lot. If she ever comes here, I would gather a few hundred of my fellas and try to get her out of the country with posters and such. I don't know why you didn't even attempted to...

by Buffett and Colbert » Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:32 pm
Aelosia wrote:Mrs Jane "Chimpmolestor" Goodall?
I have heard and read about her a lot. If she ever comes here, I would gather a few hundred of my fellas and try to get her out of the country with posters and such. I don't know why you didn't even attempted to...
Eh... ¿qué?You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Buffett and Colbert » Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:33 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Aelosia » Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:37 pm

by The Orbital Death Ray » Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:41 pm

by Mad hatters in jeans » Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:41 pm
So NSG, in an effort to keep this from becoming too bloggy, I ask you this: Do you think environmentalism is something to pay close attention to? Who's work are you particularly fond of? What day to day things do you think improve the environment, and its inhabitants?

by Buffett and Colbert » Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:42 pm

You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Buffett and Colbert » Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:44 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Mad hatters in jeans » Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:44 pm
Almajoya wrote:Sorry, but I'm not impressed by Goodall in the least. I agree that the environment is important, but there are better ways of going about saving it than plastering your face everywhere.

by The Orbital Death Ray » Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:44 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:You were joking, right? Because, as I'm sure you know, this is based on no fact whatsoever.


by Rhodmhire » Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:45 pm


by Buffett and Colbert » Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:45 pm
Almajoya wrote:Sorry, but I'm not impressed by Goodall in the least. I agree that the environment is important, but there are better ways of going about saving it than plastering your face everywhere.

You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Aelosia » Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:47 pm
The Orbital Death Ray wrote:My goodness, are we closed-minded. Next thing you know, we'll be bringing race into things; oh sure, this candidate or this scientist might be speaking great things, but they're married across the sexual boundary!
It's a slippery slope. You discriminate against people for relationships with our closest biological cousins, and next up you'll be discriminating against relationships between race gaps.
Weirdos.

by Buffett and Colbert » Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:49 pm
Aelosia wrote:And no, I am not kidding. I read this years ago when I was working at the newspaper, I was shocked and double checked it, I am trying to find the source.

You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Rhodmhire » Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:49 pm
The Orbital Death Ray wrote:My goodness, are we closed-minded. Next thing you know, we'll be bringing race into things; oh sure, this candidate or this scientist might be speaking great things, but they're married across the sexual boundary!
It's a slippery slope. You discriminate against people for relationships with our closest biological cousins, and next up you'll be discriminating against relationships between race gaps.
Weirdos.

by Grave_n_idle » Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:51 pm
Aelosia wrote:I read about it several years ago. As far as I know, she herself confessed to it. Not a better source than Jane Goodall herself.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Al-Momenta, Authors, Democratic Martian States, Drakonian Imperium, Ifreann, James_xenoland, Point Blob, The Astral Mandate, The Rio Grande River Basin
Advertisement