Same-Sex Marriage: Yea or Nay? And Explain!

by **Goath** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:13 pm

German Heresy wrote:Leviticus 20:13
If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.

That should be a good answer to your question

Oh, please...unless you're going to start killing gays in your front yard AND think that's ok, don't throw out Leviticus at me.

But, to your Leviticus 20:13 I say Leviticus 11:9-12:

9 These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye eat.
10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you:
11 They shall be even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye shall have their carcases in abomination.
12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.

God hates shrimp!

by **German Heresy** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:14 pm

The Tofu Islands wrote:
German Heresy wrote:Firstly
Book of Leviticus

I’d prefer Cypra Mundii’s answer on this.

If eir answer is Leviticus, then I’d ask why the majority of the laws in Leviticus (such as not wearing cloths with mixed fabric, the food commandments, various orders to stone people, etc.) are not followed. I’d also note that what’s forbidden in Leviticus is male-male sex, not same-sex marriage.

The church takes that what she needs and the lines which they don't like, they say that aren't true

by **Bormanico** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:16 pm

Goath wrote:
German Heresy wrote:Leviticus 20:13
If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.

That should be a good answer to your question

Oh, please...unless you're going to start killing gays in your front yard AND think that's ok, don't throw out Leviticus at me.

But, to your Leviticus 20:13 I say Leviticus 11:9-12:

9 These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye eat.
10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you:
11 They shall be even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye shall have their carcases in abomination.
12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.

God hates shrimp!

The shrimp had it coming though.

by **CornixPes II** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:16 pm

Why shouldn't same-sex couples be allowed to marry? They are people and they are in love, it should be recognised by law. Marriages only exist because they were once like business transactions. They are not anymore, they are about confirming two peoples' love for each other.

by **Milks Empire** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:17 pm

Albaron wrote:Think a minute: If we legalize gay-marriage, and it ebcoems acceptable, people who want to marry their dogs will use the same arguments we use now: "You let interracial marriages happen, why not gay marriages."
"You let gays marry, why not me and Mr. Wuffles"

Because Mr. Wuffles is a fucking DOG and dogs cannot give, oh, what's that word I'm looking for... Oh yes. CONSENT!
[/pwnage]

by **Rhodmhire** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:19 pm

Albaron wrote:"You let gays marry, why not me and Mr. Wuffles"

Because Mr. Wuffles and I have been committing adultery behind your back for the past fifteen years.

That's why you can't, simple logic.

by **Bormanico** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:19 pm

CornixPes II wrote:Why shouldn't same-sex couples be allowed to marry? They are people and they are in love, it should be recognised by law. Marriages only exist because they were once like business transactions. They are not anymore, they are about confirming two peoples' love for each other.

The funny thing is, even if it still was merely a business transaction it would STILL make sense. I think its just the Christians trying to show others they are still relevant (in terms of power) i would bet you Buddhists wouldn't be pulling this kind of crap.

by **The Tofu Islands** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:19 pm

*Cue a number of posts by Milks as e catches up with the thread.*

German Heresy wrote:The church takes that what she needs and the lines which they don't like, they say that aren't true

That usually seems to be the case...

by **Tekania** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:19 pm

German Heresy wrote:You should read Book of Leviticus it's funny! OK, not really funny, it's horrible!!!

I have decided to side with the conservatives on the religion issue... We should base law upon Leviticus....
On that note, I move immediately for public stoning to replace forum-warnings...

by **Farnhamia** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:20 pm

Tekania wrote:
German Heresy wrote:You should read Book of Leviticus it's funny! OK, not really funny, it's horrible!!!

I have decided to side with the conservatives on the religion issue... We should base law upon Leviticus....
On that note, I move immediately for public stoning to replace forum-warnings...

So this cotton-rayon blend I'm wearing is out, huh?

by **Goath** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:21 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Tekania wrote:
German Heresy wrote:You should read Book of Leviticus it's funny! OK, not really funny, it's horrible!!!

I have decided to side with the conservatives on the religion issue... We should base law upon Leviticus....
On that note, I move immediately for public stoning to replace forum-warnings...

So this cotton-rayon blend I'm wearing is out, huh?

*throws stones at you*

by **The Tofu Islands** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:21 pm

Farnhamia wrote:So this cotton-rayon blend I'm wearing is out, huh?

And I can’t eat rabbit

by **Farnhamia** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:23 pm

The Tofu Islands wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:So this cotton-rayon blend I'm wearing is out, huh?

And I can’t eat rabbit

And no bacon-lettuce-tomato sandwiches, either.

by **Ascon** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:34 pm

Milks Empire wrote:
Because Mr. Wuffles is a fucking DOG and dogs cannot give, oh, what's that word I'm looking for... Oh yes. CONSENT!
[/pwnage]

Totally. Consent is the KEY to everything! After all, there's nothing we do to animals unless they can consent to it.

I'm having a hamburger tonight for dinner.

by **Rhodmhire** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:37 pm

Ascon wrote:
Milks Empire wrote:
Because Mr. Wuffles is a fucking DOG and dogs cannot give, oh, what's that word I'm looking for... Oh yes. CONSENT!
[/pwnage]

Totally. Consent is the KEY to everything! After all, there's nothing we do to animals unless they can consent to it.

I'm having a hamburger tonight for dinner.

Our own common sense forms the boundaries of where to draw the lines.

Well, it should anyways.

by **Milks Empire** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:37 pm

Ascon wrote:
Milks Empire wrote:
Because Mr. Wuffles is a fucking DOG and dogs cannot give, oh, what's that word I'm looking for... Oh yes. CONSENT!
[/pwnage]

Totally. Consent is the KEY to everything! After all, there's nothing we do to animals unless they can consent to it.
I'm having a hamburger tonight for dinner.

Can a dog sign a contract?

by **Grave_n_idle** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:38 pm

Albaron wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:
Albaron wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:
Albaron wrote:I'm afraid I don't have enough time to debate my deeply held personal conviction on an internet forum with some person I don't know. I'm entitled to my opiniona s you are to yours.

Then I'm afraid we don't have time to do more than label you what you are: an intolerant bigot.

Same for you. Bigot.

Care to explain how I am a bigot?

You're intolerant of his opinions.

While people certainly entitled to their opinions, it is possible that their opinions might just be wrong, as is the case with Albaron.

And it is possible that yours are wrong as well. Who are we to decide what is wrong and right anyway?

In the US? The Constitution.

Which is why equality in marriage is inevitable.

by **JuNii** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:40 pm

Rhodmhire wrote:
Ascon wrote:
Milks Empire wrote:
Because Mr. Wuffles is a fucking DOG and dogs cannot give, oh, what's that word I'm looking for... Oh yes. CONSENT!
[/pwnage]

Totally. Consent is the KEY to everything! After all, there's nothing we do to animals unless they can consent to it.

I'm having a hamburger tonight for dinner.

Our own common sense forms the boundaries of where to draw the lines.

Well, it should anyways.

and we all know how common common sense is... right?

by **Bormanico** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:42 pm

Ascon wrote:
Milks Empire wrote:
Because Mr. Wuffles is a fucking DOG and dogs cannot give, oh, what's that word I'm looking for... Oh yes. CONSENT!
[/pwnage]

Totally. Consent is the KEY to everything! After all, there's nothing we do to animals unless they can consent to it.

I'm having a hamburger tonight for dinner.

Two gays marrying one another doesn't hurt anyone. People stopping to eat kinda does.

by **Ascon** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:47 pm

Rhodmhire wrote:
Ascon wrote:
Milks Empire wrote:
Because Mr. Wuffles is a fucking DOG and dogs cannot give, oh, what's that word I'm looking for... Oh yes. CONSENT!
[/pwnage]

Totally. Consent is the KEY to everything! After all, there's nothing we do to animals unless they can consent to it.

I'm having a hamburger tonight for dinner.

Our own common sense forms the boundaries of where to draw the lines.

Well, it should anyways.

Common sense? Hm... I'm not sure many political movements are driven by common sense these days.

Bowel movements, on the other hand, are generally far more useful AND are typically driven by common sense.

Milks Empire wrote:
Can a dog sign a contract?

Do you... normally find dogs in hamburgers?

I mean... Not that I'm judging here. I myself have partaken of a burger once that I strongly suspect was once a mutt of some kind, and frankly, it was quite good...
:eyebrow:

*ahem

Bormanico wrote:
Two gays marrying one another doesn't hurt anyone. People stopping to eat kinda does.

People stopping to eat only hurts somebody when they don't pull over fist.

by **Milks Empire** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:49 pm

Ascon wrote:
Milks Empire wrote:
Ascon wrote:
Milks Empire wrote:
Because Mr. Wuffles is a fucking DOG and dogs cannot give, oh, what's that word I'm looking for... Oh yes. CONSENT!
[/pwnage]

Totally. Consent is the KEY to everything! After all, there's nothing we do to animals unless they can consent to it.
I'm having a hamburger tonight for dinner.

Can a dog sign a contract?

Do you... normally find dogs in hamburgers?

I mean... Not that I'm judging here. I myself have partaken of a burger once that I strongly suspect was once a mutt of some kind, and frankly, it was quite good...

Stay on the fucking topic and answer the goddamn question. Can a dog sign a contract? Yes or no?

by **Ascon** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:51 pm

Milks Empire wrote:Stay on the fucking topic and answer the goddamn question. Can a dog sign a contract? Yes or no?

Oooh somebody is taking this discussion WAY too seriously.

c'mon. Chill. :kiss:

You know, in answer to your question, I once saw a German Shepherd that could drive a damn car. "Bull!" you say, but I'm telling you, I've got the photograph and everything.

Seriously... :lol:

That would make a badass national flag. Hmmmmmmmmmm

by **Milks Empire** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:53 pm

Ascon wrote:
Milks Empire wrote:Stay on the fucking topic and answer the goddamn question. Can a dog sign a contract? Yes or no?

Oooh somebody is taking this discussion WAY too seriously.

c'mon. Chill.

You know, in answer to your question, I once saw a German Shepherd that could drive a damn car. "Bull!" you say, but I'm telling you, I've got the photograph and everything.

Seriously...

That's not an answer. Yes, or no. Those are your options.

by **Bormanico** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:56 pm

Ascon is obviously trolling though, if he isn't all i can say is that in the case of eating meat, it different because Men should be allowed to "survive". If somehow gay marriage caused you to die, then you'd have a point. But it doesnt and you dont.

by **Bottle** » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:56 pm

Milks Empire wrote:
Ascon wrote:
Milks Empire wrote:
Because Mr. Wuffles is a fucking DOG and dogs cannot give, oh, what's that word I'm looking for... Oh yes. CONSENT!
[/pwnage]

Totally. Consent is the KEY to everything! After all, there's nothing we do to animals unless they can consent to it.
I'm having a hamburger tonight for dinner.

Can a dog sign a contract?

You have to keep in mind that in Homophobeland, marriage is not a mutual agreement between two fully aware and consenting individuals. After all, the Bible is pretty clear on the fact that female human beings are supposed to be sold into marriage, or at the very least are to simply go quietly when their male owner informs them that they have been traded in exchange for goats/sheep. A Biblical marriage is one in which a male person owns a female person as his unpaid domestic and sexual servant.

Consent is pretty irrelevant in that world.

Same-Sex Marriage: Yea or Nay? And Explain!

Who is online