NATION

PASSWORD

What's so bad about men not being sex crazed?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:09 am

Judeochrist wrote:You people here should understand that sex is a very taboo things, it is a big deal and should not be taken lightly. Even to atheists.

Sex is even more of a big deal for women.

K, I see what the problem is.

You are celibate yet you intrude on those who aren't.

So, why are you surprised or even offended when they call you "faggot" when you're calling them the equivalent of "faggot" as well?
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:11 am

Norstal wrote:
Judeochrist wrote:You people here should understand that sex is a very taboo things, it is a big deal and should not be taken lightly. Even to atheists.

Sex is even more of a big deal for women.

K, I see what the problem is.

You are celibate yet you intrude on those who aren't.

So, why are you surprised or even offended when they call you "faggot" when you're calling them the equivalent of "faggot" as well?

Because being called gay is worse than being called a slut? I don't know, I don't understand their logic.
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Forster Keys
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19584
Founded: Mar 08, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Forster Keys » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:13 am

Judeochrist wrote:You people here should understand that sex is a very taboo things, it is a big deal and should not be taken lightly. Even to atheists.

Sex is even more of a big deal for women.


It is what you make it.
The blue sky above beckons us to take our freedom, to paint our path across its vastness. Across a million blades of grass, through the roars of our elation and a thousand thundering hooves, we begin our reply.

User avatar
Forster Keys
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19584
Founded: Mar 08, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Forster Keys » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:14 am

Individuality-ness wrote:
Norstal wrote:K, I see what the problem is.

You are celibate yet you intrude on those who aren't.

So, why are you surprised or even offended when they call you "faggot" when you're calling them the equivalent of "faggot" as well?

Because being called gay is worse than being called a slut? I don't know, I don't understand their logic.


Neither are bad?
The blue sky above beckons us to take our freedom, to paint our path across its vastness. Across a million blades of grass, through the roars of our elation and a thousand thundering hooves, we begin our reply.

User avatar
Anachronous Rex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Anachronous Rex » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:14 am

Judeochrist wrote:You people here should understand that sex is a very taboo things, it is a big deal and should not be taken lightly. Even to atheists.

Sex is even more of a big deal for women.

You're what? 15? You've never had sex, and you don't intend to, you clearly don't know anything about it and have done no research, but you feel as though you can lecture all of us on the subject?

The problem isn't just that you're wrong. The problem is that you lack the experience and mental tools to even calculate how wrong you are.
My humor is like church wine: dry and tasteless.
If you are not sure if I am being serious, assume that I am not.

Summer is coming...

User avatar
Tarsonis Survivors
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15693
Founded: Feb 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tarsonis Survivors » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:14 am

i love the sentiment of "Being celibate is fine, as long as it's not for moral reasons."

User avatar
Anachronous Rex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Anachronous Rex » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:16 am

Tarsonis Survivors wrote:i love the sentiment of "Being celibate is fine, as long as it's not for moral reasons."

You don't see the backhanded insult in that?

Maybe it's just me being Scandinavian, but that absolutely reeks of condescension and passive aggression.
My humor is like church wine: dry and tasteless.
If you are not sure if I am being serious, assume that I am not.

Summer is coming...

User avatar
Inkol
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Mar 17, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Inkol » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:20 am

Well I agree. If we chase women we are lustful animals and yet if we do not we are outcasts to society. We all live in a world where we are torn apart by people for our own choices even if they do not effect others. What you do with your Sex life is yours and yours alone. Let them judge you but in the end its how you feel about yourself.

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:20 am

Forster Keys wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:Because being called gay is worse than being called a slut? I don't know, I don't understand their logic.

Neither are bad?

Of course not. I'm trying to understand here and I'm failing to understand.
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Free Detroit
Diplomat
 
Posts: 980
Founded: Aug 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Detroit » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:22 am

Tarsonis Survivors wrote:i love the sentiment of "Being celibate is fine, as long as it's not for moral reasons."


Well, that's because celibacy for moral reasons implies a whole bunch of related, invalid moral judgments about sex. I.e. celibacy is fine, but celibacy for moral reasons implies you're a moron.

Now, does that mean it's good to be a sex-crazed brute who drips raw testosterone from the pores on his hairy back? Er, no. But sex is not particularly serious, as far as habits and behaviors go. Ain't nothin' but a thang, as one might have said c. 1996.
Political Compass:

Economic Left/Right: -9.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.74
Non-interventionist/Interventionist: -7.42
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: -7.71

*** Anarcho-Syndicalist ***

User avatar
Tarsonis Survivors
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15693
Founded: Feb 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tarsonis Survivors » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:24 am

Anachronous Rex wrote:
Tarsonis Survivors wrote:i love the sentiment of "Being celibate is fine, as long as it's not for moral reasons."

You don't see the backhanded insult in that?

Maybe it's just me being Scandinavian, but that absolutely reeks of condescension and passive aggression.



it's called sarcasm.....which you pretty much defined.

User avatar
Al-Quarra
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1595
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Al-Quarra » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:25 am

this is just nonsense... I've only really went for a girl like two times or something, i don't care of the rest of the girls.... I do get laid however (prostitutes)

But no one ever called me anything for the reason that i don't go after any girl like some rabbit...

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:26 am

Tarsonis Survivors wrote:i love the sentiment of "Being celibate is fine, as long as it's not for moral reasons."

Here's the thing: no one gives a damn if one's celibate. No one.

But if you're saying that you're doing for moral reasons, that implies that anyone who disagrees with your viewpoint is immoral. And when you go on to say that only your morals are right and everyone who disagrees is going to pay for their sins, and comparing them to rapists and degenerates, you've got a few problems.
Last edited by Individuality-ness on Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Al-Quarra
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1595
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Al-Quarra » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:28 am

Individuality-ness wrote:
Norstal wrote:K, I see what the problem is.

You are celibate yet you intrude on those who aren't.

So, why are you surprised or even offended when they call you "faggot" when you're calling them the equivalent of "faggot" as well?

Because being called gay is worse than being called a slut? I don't know, I don't understand their logic.


Nobody does... the meaning of these words are alot different, and nobody can becouse a woman is no men (exept in Thailand)

User avatar
Tarsonis Survivors
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15693
Founded: Feb 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tarsonis Survivors » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:28 am

Free Detroit wrote:
Tarsonis Survivors wrote:i love the sentiment of "Being celibate is fine, as long as it's not for moral reasons."


Well, that's because celibacy for moral reasons implies a whole bunch of related, invalid moral judgments about sex. I.e. celibacy is fine, but celibacy for moral reasons implies you're a moron.

Now, does that mean it's good to be a sex-crazed brute who drips raw testosterone from the pores on his hairy back? Er, no. But sex is not particularly serious, as far as habits and behaviors go. Ain't nothin' but a thang, as one might have said c. 1996.



And that proves you're hypocritical ass. There are many cultures that view premarital sex as immoral . You claim you want these people to respect your beliefs while at the same time denigrating theirs.

User avatar
Tarsonis Survivors
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15693
Founded: Feb 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tarsonis Survivors » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:29 am

Individuality-ness wrote:
Tarsonis Survivors wrote:i love the sentiment of "Being celibate is fine, as long as it's not for moral reasons."

Here's the thing: no one gives a damn if one's celibate. No one.

But if you're saying that you're doing for moral reasons, that implies that anyone who disagrees with your viewpoint is immoral. And when you go on to say that only your morals are right and everyone who disagrees is going to pay for their sins, and comparing them to rapists and degenerates, you've got a few problems.



so you have a problem with religious people.

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:31 am

Tarsonis Survivors wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:Here's the thing: no one gives a damn if one's celibate. No one.

But if you're saying that you're doing for moral reasons, that implies that anyone who disagrees with your viewpoint is immoral. And when you go on to say that only your morals are right and everyone who disagrees is going to pay for their sins, and comparing them to rapists and degenerates, you've got a few problems.

so you have a problem with religious people.

No, I have a problem with preachy people who tell me that I have to follow their dusty old book of myths.
Last edited by Individuality-ness on Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Free Detroit
Diplomat
 
Posts: 980
Founded: Aug 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Detroit » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:32 am

Tarsonis Survivors wrote:
Free Detroit wrote:
Well, that's because celibacy for moral reasons implies a whole bunch of related, invalid moral judgments about sex. I.e. celibacy is fine, but celibacy for moral reasons implies you're a moron.

Now, does that mean it's good to be a sex-crazed brute who drips raw testosterone from the pores on his hairy back? Er, no. But sex is not particularly serious, as far as habits and behaviors go. Ain't nothin' but a thang, as one might have said c. 1996.



And that proves you're hypocritical ass. There are many cultures that view premarital sex as immoral . You claim you want these people to respect your beliefs while at the same time denigrating theirs.


Huh? I never asked for respect, and I don't really respect unfounded beliefs (e.g., "faith"). There's no sound moral reason to abstain from sex before marriage. None.

That said, lighten up.
Political Compass:

Economic Left/Right: -9.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.74
Non-interventionist/Interventionist: -7.42
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: -7.71

*** Anarcho-Syndicalist ***

User avatar
Tarsonis Survivors
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15693
Founded: Feb 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tarsonis Survivors » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:33 am

Individuality-ness wrote:
Tarsonis Survivors wrote:so you have a problem with religious people.

No, I have a problem with preachy people who tell me that I have to follow their dusty old book of myths.



now who's the condescending one?

User avatar
Tarsonis Survivors
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15693
Founded: Feb 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tarsonis Survivors » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:34 am

Free Detroit wrote:
Tarsonis Survivors wrote:

And that proves you're hypocritical ass. There are many cultures that view premarital sex as immoral . You claim you want these people to respect your beliefs while at the same time denigrating theirs.


Huh? I never asked for respect, and I don't really respect unfounded beliefs (e.g., "faith"). There's no sound moral reason to abstain from sex before marriage. None.

That said, lighten up.



lighten up? You just spat on my beliefs and called people like me morons.

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65251
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:37 am

There's nothing wrong in men not being sex crazed.
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Anachronous Rex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Anachronous Rex » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:41 am

Tarsonis Survivors wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:You don't see the backhanded insult in that?

Maybe it's just me being Scandinavian, but that absolutely reeks of condescension and passive aggression.



it's called sarcasm.....which you pretty much defined.

I caught that. I don't quite know what you think I'm saying, but clearly it's not what you think I'm saying.
My humor is like church wine: dry and tasteless.
If you are not sure if I am being serious, assume that I am not.

Summer is coming...

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:42 am

Judeochrist wrote:
Olivaero wrote:Erm... I dont know... nothing? in fact most of the Girls I know prefer men who aren't "sex crazed" (well for a meaningful relationship any ways) If your feeling pressure to be like that... just hang out with more girls would be my advice. Of course it might not do much for people thinking you're gay.... but who really gives a fuck what people think?


Once I was accused of being gay just for eating lunch with a bunch of girls. They say that gay guys have girls for friends.

I think you should get better friends or know if they are joking.
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Free Detroit
Diplomat
 
Posts: 980
Founded: Aug 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Detroit » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:42 am

Tarsonis Survivors wrote:
Free Detroit wrote:
Huh? I never asked for respect, and I don't really respect unfounded beliefs (e.g., "faith"). There's no sound moral reason to abstain from sex before marriage. None.

That said, lighten up.



lighten up? You just spat on my beliefs and called people like me morons.


Yes, lighten up. You're getting angry at words on a screen that could be coming from anyone on the damn planet, kid.

If you make a public statement of position, sometimes people will demand you back that up (I believe I can back mine up, can you?)... other times, people will think you're a moron, and it's your responsibility to either roll with it or defend yourself. That's the bitch about living amongst rational creatures - we expect communication.
Political Compass:

Economic Left/Right: -9.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.74
Non-interventionist/Interventionist: -7.42
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: -7.71

*** Anarcho-Syndicalist ***

User avatar
Tarsonis Survivors
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15693
Founded: Feb 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tarsonis Survivors » Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:42 am

Anachronous Rex wrote:
Tarsonis Survivors wrote:

it's called sarcasm.....which you pretty much defined.

I caught that. I don't quite know what you think I'm saying, but clearly it's not what you think I'm saying.

apparently we are not on the same page.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Armeattla, Oneid1, Raskana, The Great state of Joseon, The Huskar Social Union, The Jamesian Republic, Yasuragi

Advertisement

Remove ads