East Williamsburg wrote:What's so wrong with what I said?
If a women having a career and a life of her own is so threatening to you, please, go celibate.
Advertisement

by Individuality-ness » Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:43 am
East Williamsburg wrote:What's so wrong with what I said?

by Forster Keys » Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:45 am

by Kandorith » Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:45 am
☾ Great Empire of Kanyori | 大宮来国 | Arashi Kanyori Yokoku ☽
Overview | Constitution | Anthem | Imperial Anthem | Armed Forces | Foreign Affairs | Emperor
Shinonome Kyoai Headlines:BREAKING NEWS: Shinonome Kyoai temporarily shuts down after Hiyashi sale announcement. | Prime Minister Yoshiro Murakami to address the nation on the Meiyi conflict. | New technology will bring stiff competition to Tenkyo's public transport network, announces Kaito Corporation.

by Individuality-ness » Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:46 am
Forster Keys wrote:Individuality-ness wrote:If a women having a career and a life of her own is so threatening to you, please, go celibate.
I'm not sure that's what he's saying. It's more the perhaps inaccurate concept that a woman whose more successful than he might be deliberately trying to sabotage his own masculinity,

by East Williamsburg » Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:47 am

by East Williamsburg » Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:47 am
Forster Keys wrote:Individuality-ness wrote:If a women having a career and a life of her own is so threatening to you, please, go celibate.
I'm not sure that's what he's saying. It's more the perhaps inaccurate concept that a woman whose more successful than he might be deliberately trying to sabotage his own masculinity,

by Forster Keys » Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:47 am
East Williamsburg wrote:Great Nepal wrote:Go back and read what you said again. Hint: Start after "just as long as...."
As long as her career doesn't get used as a source of conflict, as long as she doesn't feel entitled to overrule everything I say because she may happen to make the same amount or more than me, as long as she generally treats me as an equal and not a handbag or a walking dildo?
Sexist, I know.

by The Steel Magnolia » Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:48 am
East Williamsburg wrote:Great Nepal wrote:Go back and read what you said again. Hint: Start after "just as long as...."
As long as her career doesn't get used as a source of conflict, as long as she doesn't feel entitled to overrule everything I say because she may happen to make the same amount or more than me, as long as she generally treats me as an equal and not a handbag or a walking dildo?
Sexist, I know.

by Saiwania » Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:48 am
Duckistan wrote:I don't know nor do I care. Women complicate the whole thing. If they would just be as interested in fucking as I and many other guys are then perhaps pursuing them would be more worth it.
Duckistan wrote:Instead you've got to date them, shill out money, romance them, shill out more money, and subtly convince them to sleep with you. You can't just be like "hey, want to fuck?" because if you do you might get slapped, not just physically, but maybe legally, because the justice system has been tweeked by annoying feminazis to make it almost criminal to try and seduce a woman. It's now sexual harassment, even if it is the only time you've asked. At least that's how I see it.
Duckistan wrote:Celibacy sounds boring.

by Forster Keys » Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:49 am

by Indira » Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:50 am
Olivaero wrote:Erm... I dont know... nothing? in fact most of the Girls I know prefer men who aren't "sex crazed" (well for a meaningful relationship any ways) If your feeling pressure to be like that... just hang out with more girls would be my advice. Of course it might not do much for people thinking you're gay.... but who really gives a fuck what people think?

by Grave_n_idle » Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:51 am
East Williamsburg wrote:Great Nepal wrote:Go back and read what you said again. Hint: Start after "just as long as...."
As long as her career doesn't get used as a source of conflict, as long as she doesn't feel entitled to overrule everything I say because she may happen to make the same amount or more than me, as long as she generally treats me as an equal and not a handbag or a walking dildo?
Sexist, I know.

by East Williamsburg » Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:52 am

by Grave_n_idle » Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:54 am
East Williamsburg wrote:Forster Keys wrote:
I'm not sure that's what he's saying. It's more the perhaps inaccurate concept that a woman whose more successful than he might be deliberately trying to sabotage his own masculinity,
/assuming that can, like, never possibly happen, evar.
Women can degrade men just as easily as men can degrade women. It isn't one way.

by East Williamsburg » Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:55 am
Grave_n_idle wrote:East Williamsburg wrote:
/assuming that can, like, never possibly happen, evar.
Women can degrade men just as easily as men can degrade women. It isn't one way.
Maybe it's just your phrasing - but I think the reason you're coming in for so much conflict is that it reads like you're saying a woman with a better job than you is somehow doing that as a way to make your testicles look small.

by Forster Keys » Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:55 am
Grave_n_idle wrote:East Williamsburg wrote:
/assuming that can, like, never possibly happen, evar.
Women can degrade men just as easily as men can degrade women. It isn't one way.
Maybe it's just your phrasing - but I think the reason you're coming in for so much conflict is that it reads like you're saying a woman with a better job than you is somehow doing that as a way to make your testicles look small.

by The Steel Magnolia » Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:56 am
East Williamsburg wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:
Maybe it's just your phrasing - but I think the reason you're coming in for so much conflict is that it reads like you're saying a woman with a better job than you is somehow doing that as a way to make your testicles look small.
No, that's just how people are interpreting it due to their preconceptions.

by Individuality-ness » Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:57 am
East Williamsburg wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:Maybe it's just your phrasing - but I think the reason you're coming in for so much conflict is that it reads like you're saying a woman with a better job than you is somehow doing that as a way to make your testicles look small.
No, that's just how people are interpreting it due to their preconceptions.

by Anachronous Rex » Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:58 am
East Williamsburg wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:
Maybe it's just your phrasing - but I think the reason you're coming in for so much conflict is that it reads like you're saying a woman with a better job than you is somehow doing that as a way to make your testicles look small.
No, that's just how people are interpreting it due to their preconceptions.

by Arcomo » Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:59 am

by East Williamsburg » Fri Mar 29, 2013 10:00 am

by The Steel Magnolia » Fri Mar 29, 2013 10:01 am
East Williamsburg wrote:Maybe I am.
Additionally maybe, in fact, many men still believe they're the dominant gender, so they're oblivious to the fact that a large proportion of women do, in fact, want to exploit them sexually. To admit that this is the case is damaging to their masculinity.
If only NOBODY exploited ANYBODY for their bodies as a socially encouraged norm, amirite?

by East Williamsburg » Fri Mar 29, 2013 10:01 am
Anachronous Rex wrote:East Williamsburg wrote:
No, that's just how people are interpreting it due to their preconceptions.
No, that's pretty much how you originally put it, and then you backtracked.
Which is fine, such a stance is embarrassing, and you should backtrack. So I'm happy to pretend you never said anything like that, just so long as you're happy to never say or think it again.

by Forster Keys » Fri Mar 29, 2013 10:02 am
East Williamsburg wrote:Maybe I am.
Additionally maybe, in fact, many men still believe they're the dominant gender, so they're oblivious to the fact that a large proportion of women do, in fact, want to exploit them sexually. To admit that this is the case is damaging to their masculinity.
If only NOBODY exploited ANYBODY for their bodies as a socially encouraged norm, amirite?

by Samuraikoku » Fri Mar 29, 2013 10:03 am
East Williamsburg wrote:No, I said that I wanted a woman with a career. I never said I didn't want a woman with a career.
Christ...
East Williamsburg wrote:I want a woman with a career of her own, just as long as she doesn't use it to challenge me as a person and tries to form a constructive partnership.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alksearia, Arcturus Novus, Azmen Emirates, Des-Bal, Elejamie, Faj Tasarru, Galloism, Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States, Herador, Ifreann, Kubra, Lativs, Necroghastia, New Anarchisticstan, Saint Norm, Tarsonis, Tlaceceyaya, Valyxias
Advertisement