Affably evil, my friend.
Advertisement

by Azrael » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:49 am

by Benuty » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:50 am
Azrael wrote:The united imperial sector wrote:So what it just shows kids how to act gender roles worked just fine in ancient and medieval times there are still villages were gender roles go on worldwide and they don't seem to complain about it.
Do you even pay attention to world events? The fact that women can be executed in some parts of the world for not obeying their husband? All the social struggles because of stuff like this?

by Aghny » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:50 am
Azrael wrote:The united imperial sector wrote:So what it just shows kids how to act gender roles worked just fine in ancient and medieval times there are still villages were gender roles go on worldwide and they don't seem to complain about it.
Do you even pay attention to world events? The fact that women can be executed in some parts of the world for not obeying their husband? All the social struggles because of stuff like this?

by The united imperial sector » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:50 am

by Aghny » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:51 am
The united imperial sector wrote:Condunum wrote:Apology accepted. Now can we get off this topic? Its not relevant to the thread.
Alright then, in my physiology class we actually discussed if a same sex couple adopted my teacher said even if the parents sexuality do not affect the child the child will be effected by his peers around him.I.E being bullied for having two fathers or two mothers.

by Condunum » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:51 am
Soldati senza confini wrote:Condunum wrote:I dunno what groups I could donate to to support immigration reform. Truth be told, I couldn't anyway. I'm broke right now and I'm strapped for cash when I have an income because I already donate a lot.
Oh I don't donate anything other than my time at this pointI'm also broke lol

by Soldati Senza Confini » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:51 am
Aghny wrote:Not to mention you can still practice gender roles if your partner agrees to it. (not the extreme forms like execution for disobeying)
Saying that it should be required by law is stupid.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Azrael » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:52 am
Aghny wrote:Azrael wrote:Do you even pay attention to world events? The fact that women can be executed in some parts of the world for not obeying their husband? All the social struggles because of stuff like this?
Not to mention you can still practice gender roles if your partner agrees to it. (not the extreme forms like execution for disobeying)
Saying that it should be required by law is stupid.
Benuty wrote:Saudi arabia has some pretty damn harsh laws about women, if your raped as a women you can be killed by your own family for defiling their honor, if you raise a hand against your husband he is allowed to beat you to "correct" you, if you skip going to the mosque or are caught driving you can be arrested and imprisoned.

by Norstal » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:52 am
The united imperial sector wrote:Condunum wrote:Apology accepted. Now can we get off this topic? Its not relevant to the thread.
Alright then, in my physiology class we actually discussed if a same sex couple adopted my teacher said even if the parents sexuality do not affect the child the child will be effected by his peers around him.I.E being bullied for having two fathers or two mothers.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Condunum » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:52 am
The united imperial sector wrote:Condunum wrote:Apology accepted. Now can we get off this topic? Its not relevant to the thread.
Alright then, in my physiology class we actually discussed if a same sex couple adopted my teacher said even if the parents sexuality do not affect the child the child will be effected by his peers around him.I.E being bullied for having two fathers or two mothers.

by The united imperial sector » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:52 am
Azrael wrote:Sheogorathian Isles wrote:
Your OK with mongering fascist, but can't stand being rude? I don't get this logic.
Affably evil, my friend.


by The united imperial sector » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:53 am
Norstal wrote:The united imperial sector wrote:Alright then, in my physiology class we actually discussed if a same sex couple adopted my teacher said even if the parents sexuality do not affect the child the child will be effected by his peers around him.I.E being bullied for having two fathers or two mothers.
That's true. But so does their parents being any type of minority. Should we stop minorities from having children then?

by Republica Newland » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:53 am
Azrael wrote:Republica Newland wrote:
Oh please do keep on entertaining meAaaaanddd? What happened? Did your brain explode mid-way through the sentence?
The next part of the post was irrelevant generalization about political viewpoints. Leaving it would've been a distraction from my main point.
Read up, yo!


by Azrael » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:54 am
Norstal wrote:The united imperial sector wrote:Alright then, in my physiology class we actually discussed if a same sex couple adopted my teacher said even if the parents sexuality do not affect the child the child will be effected by his peers around him.I.E being bullied for having two fathers or two mothers.
That's true. But so does their parents being any type of minority. Should we stop minorities from having children then?

by Urmanian » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:54 am
Freiheit Reich wrote:Divorce rates are higher in the USA now versus the 1950s when there were less gay rights. Perhaps gay rights is one factor in this among many??


by Menassa » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:54 am
Geo wrote:Grenartia wrote:
Again, nothing where Jesus says anything about it. Also, when the "be fruitful and multiply" suggestion was given, there were only 2 people on the planet. Now there's upwards of 7 billion. CLEARLY, REPRODUCTION IS NOT AN ISSUE ANYMORE. This should be painfully obvious to everybody.
Also, the Corinthians reference have nothing to do with reproduction.
Whether Jesus said it or not, it still is the word of God. THE WHOLESOME MOTHERFUCKING HOLY BIBLE IS THE WORD OF GOD, GOD DAMN IT. How hard is it for you to understand? It doesn't matter which book it is, which chapter, which verse, as long as it is in-the-Bible, it is officially Word-of-God. Also Bible never gets old, because it is the eternal word of God.

by The united imperial sector » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:55 am
Condunum wrote:The united imperial sector wrote:Alright then, in my physiology class we actually discussed if a same sex couple adopted my teacher said even if the parents sexuality do not affect the child the child will be effected by his peers around him.I.E being bullied for having two fathers or two mothers.
Okay, and? It's not different from the kids being bullied for other reasons. It's not a legitimate reason to block same sex marriage.

by Bekitropolis » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:55 am
) about it. 
by Aghny » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:56 am
Azrael wrote:Aghny wrote:
Not to mention you can still practice gender roles if your partner agrees to it. (not the extreme forms like execution for disobeying)
Saying that it should be required by law is stupid.
Women can wear suits and no one would bat an eye at them but the same wouldn't happen if I were to wear a dress.

by Benuty » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:56 am

by Soldati Senza Confini » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:56 am
Condunum wrote:There's actually a charity organization near me called Meals on Wheels. Look them up sometime, they're pretty good. Basically, they're an organization that allows you to come in and cook food, and take some home. I find myself regularly donating to this organization, because they helped me greatly in the past. I'm saddened, because the branch in my county is shutting down because of lack of funding.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Norstal » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:56 am
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by The Huskar Social Union » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:57 am
The child does not need to compensate for the loss of one parent, since they have two already. The child can call them both Daddy. FFSThe united imperial sector wrote:Condunum wrote:Okay, and? It's not different from the kids being bullied for other reasons. It's not a legitimate reason to block same sex marriage.
Alright true but how do you think that child would feel looking around seeing kids with a mom and dad calling them mommy or daddy.How will that child compansate for that loss of one parent is he supposed to call one guy daddy and the other mommy?

by Condunum » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:57 am
The united imperial sector wrote:Condunum wrote:Okay, and? It's not different from the kids being bullied for other reasons. It's not a legitimate reason to block same sex marriage.
Alright true but how do you think that child would feel looking around seeing kids with a mom and dad calling them mommy or daddy.How will that child compansate for that loss of one parent is he supposed to call one guy daddy and the other mommy?
Advertisement
Advertisement