NATION

PASSWORD

Who is harmed by same-sex marriage?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Norjagen
Diplomat
 
Posts: 666
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Norjagen » Mon Apr 01, 2013 10:28 pm

Norstal wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:But... Baby Jesus has two daddies...

Two daddies and one woman. More like polygamy. Hmmm, then again, God should be both sexes.

So.. Two daddies AND two mommies?
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:The shoe is the pie of the Middle East. The poor bastards. :(

Economic Left/Right: -0.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.33

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Mon Apr 01, 2013 10:28 pm

Norjagen wrote:
Norstal wrote:Two daddies and one woman. More like polygamy. Hmmm, then again, God should be both sexes.

So.. Two daddies AND two mommies?

Who would the second mom be?
password scrambled

User avatar
Norjagen
Diplomat
 
Posts: 666
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Norjagen » Mon Apr 01, 2013 10:34 pm

Condunum wrote:
Norjagen wrote:So.. Two daddies AND two mommies?

Who would the second mom be?

Well, if god could potentially be considered to be both male and female and neither at all, God could fill both roles. That, or he fills the "T" in their whole polygamous LGBTS cluster-coitus.
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:The shoe is the pie of the Middle East. The poor bastards. :(

Economic Left/Right: -0.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.33

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Mon Apr 01, 2013 10:35 pm

Norjagen wrote:
Condunum wrote:Who would the second mom be?

Well, if god could potentially be considered to be both male and female and neither at all, God could fill both roles. That, or he fills the "T" in their whole polygamous LGBTS cluster-coitus.

...Oh yeah, I am both male and female. I guess that works :P
password scrambled

User avatar
Anachronous Rex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Anachronous Rex » Mon Apr 01, 2013 10:37 pm

Condunum wrote:
Norjagen wrote:Well, if god could potentially be considered to be both male and female and neither at all, God could fill both roles. That, or he fills the "T" in their whole polygamous LGBTS cluster-coitus.

...Oh yeah, I am both male and female. I guess that works :P

Tiamat?

Oh fuck that... I am not going through watery armageddon. Someone get Marduk in here quick.
My humor is like church wine: dry and tasteless.
If you are not sure if I am being serious, assume that I am not.

Summer is coming...

User avatar
Free Detroit
Diplomat
 
Posts: 980
Founded: Aug 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Detroit » Mon Apr 01, 2013 10:43 pm

Norjagen wrote:
Condunum wrote:Who would the second mom be?

Well, if god could potentially be considered to be both male and female and neither at all, God could fill both roles. That, or he fills the "T" in their whole polygamous LGBTS cluster-coitus.


"T" is for....

Tentacles!

Image
Political Compass:

Economic Left/Right: -9.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.74
Non-interventionist/Interventionist: -7.42
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: -7.71

*** Anarcho-Syndicalist ***

User avatar
Norjagen
Diplomat
 
Posts: 666
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Norjagen » Mon Apr 01, 2013 10:46 pm

Free Detroit wrote:
Norjagen wrote:Well, if god could potentially be considered to be both male and female and neither at all, God could fill both roles. That, or he fills the "T" in their whole polygamous LGBTS cluster-coitus.


"T" is for....

Tentacles!

Image

I've watched enough questionable and/or shameful animated films to know that never ends well.
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:The shoe is the pie of the Middle East. The poor bastards. :(

Economic Left/Right: -0.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.33

User avatar
Free Detroit
Diplomat
 
Posts: 980
Founded: Aug 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Detroit » Mon Apr 01, 2013 10:49 pm

Norjagen wrote:
Free Detroit wrote:
"T" is for....

Tentacles!

(Image)

I've watched enough questionable and/or shameful animated films to know that never ends well.


It ended by making possible the redemption of your eternal soul... :rofl:

... via tentacle rape.
Last edited by Free Detroit on Mon Apr 01, 2013 10:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Political Compass:

Economic Left/Right: -9.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.74
Non-interventionist/Interventionist: -7.42
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: -7.71

*** Anarcho-Syndicalist ***

User avatar
Trussvania
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 137
Founded: Mar 08, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Trussvania » Mon Apr 01, 2013 10:52 pm

The people getting married.

BA DUM CHINK!

User avatar
Grocery Store Music
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 439
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Grocery Store Music » Mon Apr 01, 2013 10:53 pm

A conservative's sexual certitude.
The Governor of NSG

User avatar
Free Detroit
Diplomat
 
Posts: 980
Founded: Aug 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Detroit » Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:41 pm

My serious response:

Same sex marriage hurts everyone - just like any other kind of state sanctioned marriage.

The LBGT activist community has, at times, betrayed the left that traditionally supports it, and I see this as one of those issues. I sympathize, deeply, with LGBT people who want to be treated "like everyone else" and live "normal" lives. But I think it's disturbing and defeatist to simply buckle toward standards of normalcy that have been designed to be exclusionary.

I feel the same way about gay Catholics - just... why? Why should I help you join a square/straight society that has oppressed you as well as many, many more people who are not like you? So you can become the oppressor?

Why would I - and I am speaking as a radical leftist, feminist, and ardent supporter of LGBT rights in general - want to help add numbers to the other side? Frankly, as an activist, I feel terribly used and devalued by people who think I should support their right to be included in an oppressive system.

It's as if, as a leftist, I am expected to support gay marriage because any demands that the LGBT community has are automatically in sync with other oppressed groups. They are not. I would not march in support of the "African-American radical-right libertarians" because they identify - in part, at least - with an oppressed minority, why the hell would I march in support of conservative gays?

Somebody explain the reasoning to me, please. I am regularly troubled by this and unsure how to resolve it...
Last edited by Free Detroit on Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:43 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Political Compass:

Economic Left/Right: -9.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.74
Non-interventionist/Interventionist: -7.42
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: -7.71

*** Anarcho-Syndicalist ***

User avatar
Tlaceceyaya
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9932
Founded: Oct 17, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Tlaceceyaya » Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:47 pm

Free Detroit wrote:My serious response:

Same sex marriage hurts everyone - just like any other kind of state sanctioned marriage.

The LBGT activist community has, at times, betrayed the left that traditionally supports it, and I see this as one of those issues. I sympathize, deeply, with LGBT people who want to be treated "like everyone else" and live "normal" lives. But I think it's disturbing and defeatist to simply buckle toward standards of normalcy that have been designed to be exclusionary.

I feel the same way about gay Catholics - just... why? Why should I help you join a square/straight society that has oppressed you as well as many, many more people who are not like you? So you can become the oppressor?

Why would I - and I am speaking as a radical leftist, feminist, and ardent supporter of LGBT rights in general - want to help add numbers to the other side? Frankly, as an activist, I feel terribly used and devalued by people who think I should support their right to be included in an oppressive system.

It's as if, as a leftist, I am expected to support gay marriage because any demands that the LGBT community has are automatically in sync with other oppressed groups. They are not. I would not march in support of the "African-American radical-right libertarians" because they identify - in part, at least - with an oppressed minority, why the hell would I march in support of conservative gays?

Somebody explain the reasoning to me, please. I am regularly troubled by this and unsure how to resolve it...

Somebody explain to me what the fuck you're saying in that. I am troubled by this and unsure how to figure out what you're saying.
Last edited by Tlaceceyaya on Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Economic Left/Right -9.75, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian -8.87
Also, Bonobos.
I am a market socialist, atheist, more to come maybe at some point
Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.

User avatar
Free Detroit
Diplomat
 
Posts: 980
Founded: Aug 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Detroit » Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:56 pm

Tlaceceyaya wrote:Somebody explain to me what the fuck you're saying in that. I am troubled by this and unsure how to figure out what you're saying.


tl;dr

Gay marriage supports an inherently conservative, outmoded type of social structure under the guise of progressivism, and it irritates me.
Political Compass:

Economic Left/Right: -9.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.74
Non-interventionist/Interventionist: -7.42
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: -7.71

*** Anarcho-Syndicalist ***

User avatar
Tlaceceyaya
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9932
Founded: Oct 17, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Tlaceceyaya » Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:57 pm

Free Detroit wrote:
Tlaceceyaya wrote:Somebody explain to me what the fuck you're saying in that. I am troubled by this and unsure how to figure out what you're saying.


tl;dr

Gay marriage supports an inherently conservative, outmoded type of social structure under the guise of progressivism, and it irritates me.

Marriage?
Economic Left/Right -9.75, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian -8.87
Also, Bonobos.
I am a market socialist, atheist, more to come maybe at some point
Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:57 pm

Free Detroit wrote:
Tlaceceyaya wrote:Somebody explain to me what the fuck you're saying in that. I am troubled by this and unsure how to figure out what you're saying.


tl;dr

Gay marriage supports an inherently conservative, outmoded type of social structure under the guise of progressivism, and it irritates me.

Would you like some lenseless horn-rimmed glasses to go with that Hipsterism?
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
Free Detroit
Diplomat
 
Posts: 980
Founded: Aug 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Detroit » Tue Apr 02, 2013 12:01 am

Tlaceceyaya wrote:Marriage?


Yes, marriage.

If the argument is that the left should support efforts toward gay marriage, I think it's bullshit. The main reasons centering on the fact that the institution of state-sponsored marriage stands against other, more important issues for broad social equality and freedom from oppression for all people.

I equate it with the outrage over gay people being denied communion in Catholic churches - the institution is inherently exclusionary, discriminatory, and socially backward... so you want help joining them from all the other people that said institution would continue to discriminate against, exclude, and oppress even if your own group's goals were met? the fuck?
Last edited by Free Detroit on Tue Apr 02, 2013 12:02 am, edited 2 times in total.
Political Compass:

Economic Left/Right: -9.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.74
Non-interventionist/Interventionist: -7.42
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: -7.71

*** Anarcho-Syndicalist ***

User avatar
Anachronous Rex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Anachronous Rex » Tue Apr 02, 2013 12:02 am

Free Detroit wrote:
Tlaceceyaya wrote:Somebody explain to me what the fuck you're saying in that. I am troubled by this and unsure how to figure out what you're saying.


tl;dr

Gay marriage supports an inherently conservative, outmoded type of social structure under the guise of progressivism, and it irritates me.

Don't let the best be the enemy of the good.
My humor is like church wine: dry and tasteless.
If you are not sure if I am being serious, assume that I am not.

Summer is coming...

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Tue Apr 02, 2013 12:03 am

Free Detroit wrote:
Tlaceceyaya wrote:Marriage?


Yes, marriage.

If the argument is that the left should support efforts toward gay marriage, I think it's bullshit. The main reasons centering on the fact that the institution of state-sponsored marriage stands against other, more important issues for broad social equality and freedom from oppression for all people.

I equate it with the outrage over gay people being denied communion in Catholic churches - the institution is inherently exclusionary, discriminatory, and socially backward... so you want help joining them from all the other people that said institution would continue to discriminate against, exclude, and oppress even if your own group's goals were met? the fuck?

Marriage helps society. It's a stable environment in which children can grow and be cared for. It's not perfect, it doesn't always work out, but it helps.
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
Free Detroit
Diplomat
 
Posts: 980
Founded: Aug 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Detroit » Tue Apr 02, 2013 12:04 am

Anachronous Rex wrote:
Free Detroit wrote:
tl;dr

Gay marriage supports an inherently conservative, outmoded type of social structure under the guise of progressivism, and it irritates me.

Don't let the best be the enemy of the good.


That's fair, but in this case I'm not sure it applies. The LGBT activist community has a history of being only dubiously committed to the other principles of leftism (and, thus, to the main groups that have consistently supported them for at least a century or so).
Political Compass:

Economic Left/Right: -9.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.74
Non-interventionist/Interventionist: -7.42
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: -7.71

*** Anarcho-Syndicalist ***

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Tue Apr 02, 2013 12:04 am

Anachronous Rex wrote:
Free Detroit wrote:
tl;dr

Gay marriage supports an inherently conservative, outmoded type of social structure under the guise of progressivism, and it irritates me.

Don't let the best be the enemy of the good.

But that's what anarcho-communists do. They support pipe-dreams.
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
Free Detroit
Diplomat
 
Posts: 980
Founded: Aug 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Detroit » Tue Apr 02, 2013 12:05 am

Frisivisia wrote:Marriage helps society. It's a stable environment in which children can grow and be cared for. It's not perfect, it doesn't always work out, but it helps.


I'm not sure it does, any more than any other committed monogamous partnership between parents.

I certainly don't think it requires state intervention.
Political Compass:

Economic Left/Right: -9.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.74
Non-interventionist/Interventionist: -7.42
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: -7.71

*** Anarcho-Syndicalist ***

User avatar
Free Detroit
Diplomat
 
Posts: 980
Founded: Aug 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Detroit » Tue Apr 02, 2013 12:07 am

Frisivisia wrote:But that's what anarcho-communists do. They support pipe-dreams.


I do have a thing for lost causes, it's true... and, it's not like I would vote against gay marriage.

But, still, I'd like to see some laundry aired one of these days.
Political Compass:

Economic Left/Right: -9.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.74
Non-interventionist/Interventionist: -7.42
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: -7.71

*** Anarcho-Syndicalist ***

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Tue Apr 02, 2013 12:09 am

Free Detroit wrote:
Frisivisia wrote:Marriage helps society. It's a stable environment in which children can grow and be cared for. It's not perfect, it doesn't always work out, but it helps.


I'm not sure it does, any more than any other committed monogamous partnership between parents.

I certainly don't think it requires state intervention.

State intervention encourages marriage and staying in marriage, and marriage helps society.
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
Free Detroit
Diplomat
 
Posts: 980
Founded: Aug 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Detroit » Tue Apr 02, 2013 12:13 am

Frisivisia wrote:State intervention encourages marriage and staying in marriage, and marriage helps society.


Maybe it's just pathological then, but my experience says otherwise. I tend to see state intervention encouraging marriage and staying in marriage - including troubled and abusive marriages that negatively affect children.

While I agree that state policy can encourage marriage and discourage divorce, I'm not so sure there's a real net positive effect for society.
Political Compass:

Economic Left/Right: -9.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.74
Non-interventionist/Interventionist: -7.42
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: -7.71

*** Anarcho-Syndicalist ***

User avatar
Anachronous Rex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Anachronous Rex » Tue Apr 02, 2013 12:13 am

Free Detroit wrote:
Frisivisia wrote:But that's what anarcho-communists do. They support pipe-dreams.


I do have a thing for lost causes, it's true... and, it's not like I would vote against gay marriage.

But, still, I'd like to see some laundry aired one of these days.

I'm already regretting saying this, but if you want to win these big social battles, you sort of have to "Jew" them a little bit.

"Compromise" every time your opponents give ground, but never be satisfied. Take them apart piecemeal.
My humor is like church wine: dry and tasteless.
If you are not sure if I am being serious, assume that I am not.

Summer is coming...

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Czechostan, Galloism, Google [Bot], Haganham, Ifreann, Maryland-Delaware, Port Caverton, The Sherpa Empire, Tunzei

Advertisement

Remove ads