NATION

PASSWORD

Who is harmed by same-sex marriage?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Menassa
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33851
Founded: Aug 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Menassa » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:10 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Menassa wrote:And this is the same Lot from the Bible?

Sodom wasn't punished by homosexuality, if you believe Ezekiel.


Yeah same Lot.

Sodom was not destroyed because of homosexuality.
Remember what Amalek did to you on your journey --- Do not Forget!
Their hollow inheritance.
This is my god and I shall exalt him
Jewish Discussion Thread בְּ
"A missionary uses the Bible like a drunk uses a lamppost, not so much for illumination, but for support"
"Imagine of a bunch of Zulu tribesmen told Congress how to read the Constitution, that's how it feels to a Jew when you tell us how to read our bible"
"God said: you must teach, as I taught, without a fee."
"Against your will you are formed, against your will you are born, against your will you live, against your will you die, and against your will you are destined to give a judgement and accounting before the king, king of all kings..."

User avatar
Evraim
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6148
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Evraim » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:11 pm

Menassa wrote:Until Reb Gershon nixed it... but he was only Ashkenazic.

Are you a supporter of polygamy, Men? :p

User avatar
Agymnum
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7393
Founded: Jul 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Agymnum » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:11 pm

Menassa wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
Yeah same Lot.

Sodom was not destroyed because of homosexuality.


It's fascinating to see my entire Christian childhood unraveled before my very eyes by someone who is far more a fervent believer than I ever was. Simply fascinating.
Glorious puppet of Highfort

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:11 pm

Slovenya wrote:1-if you look at most of our laws, the basic ones, it is all basically the 10 commandments, it is a guide for humans.

2- well when we are young we are taught how to be mothers and i never ever seen a guy or a father who knows better than a mother does. We give birth to a baby so we are first line of protection for a baby

3- am not a abhor person, and those people will adopt if they wish, there are plenty of orphans....but of course should be husband and wife to adopt


1 - You're preaching to the choir there. I already know or believe most basic laws and morality follow the Ten Commandments.

2 - I know, as someone who comes from a quite moderate family in that regard I will admit women have the upper hand on certain things, and that one of them is childcare (as much as women say "NO THAT IS NOT TRUE! GENDER ROLES ARE NOT TRUE!" it is, women are better at certain things than men are, and I'm not really ashamed to say it); what I am saying is that also women can be quite cruel to their children and leave much to be desired of their maternal instincts when you compare them to a father. It doesn't mean this is the general case, but it does happen quite often.

3 - Ok, at least you're not the kind of fundamental naturalist :)
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13989
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:12 pm

Who thinks they are hurt by it? The Republicans, the far right, the WBC, FOX News, several American conservatives, most people in the Bible Belt

Who are actually hurt by it? No one.
Republic of Nakong | 內江共和國 | IIwiki · Map · Kylaris
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Evraim
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6148
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Evraim » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:12 pm

Agymnum wrote:
Menassa wrote:Sodom was not destroyed because of homosexuality.


It's fascinating to see my entire Christian childhood unraveled before my very eyes by someone who is far more a fervent believer than I ever was. Simply fascinating.

Jews will do that to people. Especially, Menassa. I think it's a secret hobby of his. ;)

Ainin wrote:Who thinks they are hurt by it? The Republicans, the far right, the WBC, FOX News, several American conservatives, most people in the Bible Belt

Who are actually hurt by it? No one.

I'm a right-wing Republican... I see no problem with same-sex marriage.
Last edited by Evraim on Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Slovenya
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1276
Founded: Mar 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Slovenya » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:12 pm

just realized I mistyped single parent when I meant single person. If I adopt a kid (not anytime soon), I'll be a single parent.


my opinion is that a child should be entitle to have both parents, yes, a mother and also a father. so no, not a single person can adopt I dont think. BUT you can have your own opinions is fine
❧❃❂❁❀ Female, Floridan,Awesome!❀❁❂❃❧
Slavic-Venezuelan-American


Pro: Pan-Slavism, Moderate Islam, Socialism, Secularism, Putin/Russia, Bashar Assad
Anti: Zionism/Israel, Saudi Arabia, Radical Islam, Communism

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:12 pm

Slovenya wrote:
1 - And since when Christianity is the pinnacle of civilization? I mean we have Buddhism, Islam, atheism, deism, agnosticism, and yet they are good people with grounded, pacifist morals (except for the loons out there) so how is not following our doctrine barbaric?

2 - Yes, that is what I meant. And no, women are not born with a capacity to be maternal. In fact, men can also be maternal and caring as much as a woman and women can also be leaders at the house and do things a man can do, including being cold and emotionless towards their children. The fact that you think gender roles are absolute tells me of your extremely narrow viewpoint.

3 - To Abhor (verb): to regard with extreme repugnance or aversion; detest utterly; loathe; abominate. That being said, again, do you abhor people who are sterile and cannot conceive?


1-if you look at most of our laws, the basic ones, it is all basically the 10 commandments, it is a guide for humans.

2- well when we are young we are taught how to be mothers and i never ever seen a guy or a father who knows better than a mother does. We give birth to a baby so we are first line of protection for a baby

3- am not a abhor person, and those people will adopt if they wish, there are plenty of orphans....but of course should be husband and wife to adopt


1) Don't take us for idiots, please. No law in any Western nation bans children being disrespectful towards their parents. No law in any Western nation bans working on the Sabbath or worshipping other deities. And no law in any Western nation convicts us for feeling envious.

2) Again, reality refutes you. Practically all decent studies conducted so far agree that having two parents of the same gender is inherently the same as having two parents of opposite genders. What matters is individual responsibility and love for the children, not gender.

3) Oh, please! :roll:
Last edited by Liriena on Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:12 pm

Slovenya wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:He still hasn't told me how single parents are any less of parents.

First of all, am not a guy im a girl, second of all Im sorry if i left single parents out, and i know it exists. Its not their fault but they can raise children too...so they are not any less parents

Apologies. Anyhow, then families that do not consist of biological mother and father are still parents.

Also, for the record and sake of debate, there's been studies that show that children raised in gay partnerships are just fine and that they will not suddenly grow up more gay or whatever.
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Menassa
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33851
Founded: Aug 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Menassa » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:13 pm

Agymnum wrote:
Menassa wrote:Sodom was not destroyed because of homosexuality.


It's fascinating to see my entire Christian childhood unraveled before my very eyes by someone who is far more a fervent believer than I ever was. Simply fascinating.

That's literally in the Bible, Old Testament, straight up.

Evraim wrote:
Menassa wrote:Until Reb Gershon nixed it... but he was only Ashkenazic.

Are you a supporter of polygamy, Men? :p

Not since I support the Rabbis.
Remember what Amalek did to you on your journey --- Do not Forget!
Their hollow inheritance.
This is my god and I shall exalt him
Jewish Discussion Thread בְּ
"A missionary uses the Bible like a drunk uses a lamppost, not so much for illumination, but for support"
"Imagine of a bunch of Zulu tribesmen told Congress how to read the Constitution, that's how it feels to a Jew when you tell us how to read our bible"
"God said: you must teach, as I taught, without a fee."
"Against your will you are formed, against your will you are born, against your will you live, against your will you die, and against your will you are destined to give a judgement and accounting before the king, king of all kings..."

User avatar
Agymnum
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7393
Founded: Jul 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Agymnum » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:14 pm

Slovenya wrote:
just realized I mistyped single parent when I meant single person. If I adopt a kid (not anytime soon), I'll be a single parent.


my opinion is that a child should be entitle to have both parents, yes, a mother and also a father. so no, not a single person can adopt I dont think. BUT you can have your own opinions is fine


Wait, I'm confused. Is it your belief that single people CANNOT (as in are physically incapable of) take care of a child? Or are you saying that single people SHOULD NOT (in your opinion) take care of a child?

The two are completely different beliefs. One is pure hogwash, the other is an opinion (though offensive and ignorant).
Glorious puppet of Highfort

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42382
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:15 pm

Slovenya, quick question but where are you from?
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:15 pm

Slovenya wrote:
And this is the same Lot from the Bible?

Sodom wasn't punished by homosexuality, if you believe Ezekiel.


ya is the same prophet, Lut is Lot, and the story of Sodom and Gomorrah exist in the Quran too


And your Prophet, just like medieval Christians scholars, misinterpretated the tale of Sodom and Gomorrah as a fable on the evil of homosexuality. If you actually asked a rabbi, he would most likely tell you that Sodom and Gomorrah's sin was not homosexuality.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42382
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:15 pm

Agymnum wrote:
Slovenya wrote:
my opinion is that a child should be entitle to have both parents, yes, a mother and also a father. so no, not a single person can adopt I dont think. BUT you can have your own opinions is fine


Wait, I'm confused. Is it your belief that single people CANNOT (as in are physically incapable of) take care of a child? Or are you saying that single people SHOULD NOT (in your opinion) take care of a child?

The two are completely different beliefs. One is pure hogwash, the other is an opinion (though offensive and ignorant).


I'm pretty sure she was saying that single people should not be allowed to adopt.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Evraim
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6148
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Evraim » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:16 pm

Menassa wrote:Not since I support the Rabbis.

The language you used seemed to suggest otherwise in this instance. A Freudian slip, perhaps?

User avatar
Slovenya
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1276
Founded: Mar 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Slovenya » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:16 pm

Wait, I'm confused. Is it your belief that single people CANNOT (as in are physically incapable of) take care of a child? Or are you saying that single people SHOULD NOT (in your opinion) take care of a child?

The two are completely different beliefs. One is pure hogwash, the other is an opinion (though offensive and ignorant).


i think that single person can take care of a child yes of course, but i dont think they should be allowed to adopt. But its still better of course for an orphan who can nobody to have at least one parent :)
❧❃❂❁❀ Female, Floridan,Awesome!❀❁❂❃❧
Slavic-Venezuelan-American


Pro: Pan-Slavism, Moderate Islam, Socialism, Secularism, Putin/Russia, Bashar Assad
Anti: Zionism/Israel, Saudi Arabia, Radical Islam, Communism

User avatar
Menassa
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33851
Founded: Aug 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Menassa » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:16 pm

Liriena wrote:
Slovenya wrote:
ya is the same prophet, Lut is Lot, and the story of Sodom and Gomorrah exist in the Quran too


And your Prophet, just like medieval Christians scholars, misinterpretated the tale of Sodom and Gomorrah as a fable on the evil of homosexuality. If you actually asked a rabbi, he would most likely tell you that Sodom and Gomorrah's sin was not homosexuality.

Or Ezekiel.... he would also tell you that.
Remember what Amalek did to you on your journey --- Do not Forget!
Their hollow inheritance.
This is my god and I shall exalt him
Jewish Discussion Thread בְּ
"A missionary uses the Bible like a drunk uses a lamppost, not so much for illumination, but for support"
"Imagine of a bunch of Zulu tribesmen told Congress how to read the Constitution, that's how it feels to a Jew when you tell us how to read our bible"
"God said: you must teach, as I taught, without a fee."
"Against your will you are formed, against your will you are born, against your will you live, against your will you die, and against your will you are destined to give a judgement and accounting before the king, king of all kings..."

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:16 pm

Slovenya wrote:
just realized I mistyped single parent when I meant single person. If I adopt a kid (not anytime soon), I'll be a single parent.


my opinion is that a child should be entitle to have both parents, yes, a mother and also a father. so no, not a single person can adopt I dont think. BUT you can have your own opinions is fine

Yeah fuck your opinion, sorry. I'm not having my rights stripped because you think it's bad for the child when it's obviously not.
password scrambled

User avatar
Slovenya
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1276
Founded: Mar 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Slovenya » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:16 pm

Neutraligon wrote:Slovenya, quick question but where are you from?


Venezuela
❧❃❂❁❀ Female, Floridan,Awesome!❀❁❂❃❧
Slavic-Venezuelan-American


Pro: Pan-Slavism, Moderate Islam, Socialism, Secularism, Putin/Russia, Bashar Assad
Anti: Zionism/Israel, Saudi Arabia, Radical Islam, Communism

User avatar
Menassa
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33851
Founded: Aug 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Menassa » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:17 pm

Evraim wrote:
Menassa wrote:Not since I support the Rabbis.

The language you used seemed to suggest otherwise in this instance. A Freudian slip, perhaps?

No, someone else said the Bible didn't support something which it did.
Remember what Amalek did to you on your journey --- Do not Forget!
Their hollow inheritance.
This is my god and I shall exalt him
Jewish Discussion Thread בְּ
"A missionary uses the Bible like a drunk uses a lamppost, not so much for illumination, but for support"
"Imagine of a bunch of Zulu tribesmen told Congress how to read the Constitution, that's how it feels to a Jew when you tell us how to read our bible"
"God said: you must teach, as I taught, without a fee."
"Against your will you are formed, against your will you are born, against your will you live, against your will you die, and against your will you are destined to give a judgement and accounting before the king, king of all kings..."

User avatar
Slovenya
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1276
Founded: Mar 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Slovenya » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:17 pm

Yeah fuck your opinion, sorry. I'm not having my rights stripped because you think it's bad for the child when it's obviously not.


first of all you should not be vulgar about it. If you dont like my opinion then ok....in America you can do it if you want to, so be happy
❧❃❂❁❀ Female, Floridan,Awesome!❀❁❂❃❧
Slavic-Venezuelan-American


Pro: Pan-Slavism, Moderate Islam, Socialism, Secularism, Putin/Russia, Bashar Assad
Anti: Zionism/Israel, Saudi Arabia, Radical Islam, Communism

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:17 pm

Slovenya, please address this.

Individuality-ness wrote:
Slovenya wrote:First of all, am not a guy im a girl, second of all Im sorry if i left single parents out, and i know it exists. Its not their fault but they can raise children too...so they are not any less parents

Apologies. Anyhow, then families that do not consist of biological mother and father are still parents.

Also, for the record and sake of debate, there's been studies that show that children raised in gay partnerships are just fine and that they will not suddenly grow up more gay or whatever.
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:18 pm

Slovenya wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:Slovenya, quick question but where are you from?


Venezuela


Which means you live in a country in which both mainstream presidential candidates officially back LGBT rights to some degree.

Ouch.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Slovenya
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1276
Founded: Mar 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Slovenya » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:20 pm

Liriena wrote:
Slovenya wrote:
Venezuela


Which means you live in a country in which both mainstream presidential candidates officially back LGBT rights to some degree.

Ouch.


Ya they can back who they want to, its called free will...but people like me can still say what they think also
❧❃❂❁❀ Female, Floridan,Awesome!❀❁❂❃❧
Slavic-Venezuelan-American


Pro: Pan-Slavism, Moderate Islam, Socialism, Secularism, Putin/Russia, Bashar Assad
Anti: Zionism/Israel, Saudi Arabia, Radical Islam, Communism

User avatar
Agymnum
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7393
Founded: Jul 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Agymnum » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:20 pm

Liriena wrote:
Slovenya wrote:
Venezuela


Which means you live in a country in which both mainstream presidential candidates officially back LGBT rights to some degree.

Ouch.


I find it hilarious that Americans aren't picking up on this and ridiculing the US political system for not being as progressive as Venezuela. I mean, seriously, we're getting our asses beat in progressiveness by a nation that has a smaller GDP, population, and less land than us. That's sad.
Glorious puppet of Highfort

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Autumn Wind, Bienenhalde, Cessarea, General TM, Ifreann, Philjia, Simonia, Spirit of Hope, The Jamesian Republic, Uminaku, Yasuragi

Advertisement

Remove ads