NATION

PASSWORD

All Abortion Illegal in North Dakota

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36778
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:03 pm

Salandriagado wrote:
Cosara wrote:The woman made the mistake, so she should have to suffer the consequences.


You realise that you literally just said that women are at fault for being raped, right?


He must be a Saudi Arabia legalist.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity.
Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111685
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:03 pm

Sunny Skies wrote:I'm absolutely against abortion and I will speak against in all cases.

Though, as I'm neither a woman nor a conservative, I realize that what I belive to be right or wrong has no value on the decisions of another person. I think abortion should be decriminalized on the grounds that it will happen regardless of its legal status, and the best thing is to make it legal and that people should be allowed to do what they want with their bodies.

No matter what anybody says though, unless in case of rape, a phoetus that will be born severely handicapped or incapable of living long, or risk to the mother's life, I don't find any argument that can justify the fact that you're killing a human being and justifying the killing to be reasonable because not only it cannot defend itself, it can't even sustain itself biologically. A foetus is the single most fragile form of human life and killing it for the sole reason that the pregnancy is unwanted is something incredibly unethical and cruel; sentience does not change the right of life of someone, a person is a coma is still entitles to its rights regardless of the fact it's also incapable of sustaining itself, a person that has suffered a severe accident and lost most of its ability to function is also incapable of sustaining itself. All of those people require someone's care, and to me, an abortion is like if a nurse taking care of a senile old person decided to strangle him just because caring for him is an annoyance.

It's none of your business, sorry. Government intrusion in an incredibly intimate aspect of women's lives.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Kengburg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1506
Founded: Dec 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Kengburg » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:03 pm

Sunny Skies wrote:I'm absolutely against abortion and I will speak against in all cases.

Though, as I'm neither a woman nor a conservative, I realize that what I belive to be right or wrong has no value on the decisions of another person. I think abortion should be decriminalized on the grounds that it will happen regardless of its legal status, and the best thing is to make it legal and that people should be allowed to do what they want with their bodies.

No matter what anybody says though, unless in case of rape, a phoetus that will be born severely handicapped or incapable of living long, or risk to the mother's life, I don't find any argument that can justify the fact that you're killing a human being and justifying the killing to be reasonable because not only it cannot defend itself, it can't even sustain itself biologically. A foetus is the single most fragile form of human life and killing it for the sole reason that the pregnancy is unwanted is something incredibly unethical and cruel; sentience does not change the right of life of someone, a person is a coma is still entitles to its rights regardless of the fact it's also incapable of sustaining itself, a person that has suffered a severe accident and lost most of its ability to function is also incapable of sustaining itself. All of those people require someone's care, and to me, an abortion is like if a nurse taking care of a senile old person decided to strangle him just because caring for him is an annoyance.

You just practically ignored the last 30+ pages, a fetus is not a developed human being. Get educated, or read the past ten pages.
Last edited by Kengburg on Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
My Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: 1.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.21
Proud Allied State of the Union of Human Supremacists, Ave Humanitas!

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111685
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:03 pm

Benuty wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
You realise that you literally just said that women are at fault for being raped, right?


He must be a Saudi Arabia legalist.

I put that in my signature, it was so absurd.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36778
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:04 pm

Ujh Uhj wrote:It's funny, I can't remember having all those constitutional rights when I was a fetus. Right, that's because I wasn't sapient.


You mean sentient?

Well even if you were, you wouldn't be able to see outside of your mother so its clearly redundant.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity.
Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Fintanland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1767
Founded: Aug 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Fintanland » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:04 pm

Sunny Skies wrote:No matter what anybody says though, unless in case of rape, a phoetus that will be born severely handicapped or incapable of living long, or risk to the mother's life, I don't find any argument that can justify the fact that you're killing a human being and justifying the killing to be reasonable because not only it cannot defend itself, it can't even sustain itself biologically. A foetus is the single most fragile form of human life and killing it for the sole reason that the pregnancy is unwanted is something incredibly unethical and cruel; sentience does not change the right of life of someone, a person is a coma is still entitles to its rights regardless of the fact it's also incapable of sustaining itself, a person that has suffered a severe accident and lost most of its ability to function is also incapable of sustaining itself. All of those people require someone's care, and to me, an abortion is like if a nurse taking care of a senile old person decided to strangle him just because caring for him is an annoyance.

Fetuses do not "require some care". They are literally unable to live without the mother. And that is a huge difference, since it means one person will be forced to provide for them for months, apparently without right to renounce that obligation.
Pro: Communists, Trotskyists, neo-Trotskyists, crypto-Trotskyists, union leaders, Communist union leaders, atheists, agnostics, long-haired weirdos, short-haired weirdos, football supporters, namby- pamby probation officers, foreign surgeons - headshrinkers, Wedgwood Benn, keg bitter, punk rock, glue- sniffers, Play For Today, squatters, Clive Jenkins, Roy Jenkins, Up Jenkins, up everybody's, Chinese restaurants

Anti: Thugs, bully-boys, psychopaths, sacked policemen, security guards, sacked security guards, racialists, Pakistani-bashers, queer-bashers, Chinese-bashers, anybody-bashers, Rear Admirals, Vice-Admirals, fascists, neo-fascists, crypto-fascists, loyalists, neo- loyalists, crypto-loyalists.

(With apologies to "The Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin")

User avatar
Ujh Uhj
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 189
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ujh Uhj » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:04 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:
Ujh Uhj wrote:..........he was implying that the Nazi salute is appropriate given the authoritarian-ness of the situation


There's nothing wrong with authoritarianism.

There is plenty wrong with authoritarianism.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:04 pm

Cosara wrote:EXACTLY! That's the message that I've preached throughout this thread! Finally, someone gets it!


YOU zip it! Just because I commend his mother doesn't mean I am pro-life! I am very much against any and all abortion bans you people may think because women are going to abort anyways, and if they can't find a legal way they are going to do it clandestinely at the risk of their health.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Carpathia and Moldova
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1117
Founded: Apr 28, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Carpathia and Moldova » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:05 pm

Ceannairceach wrote:Children aren't involved in abortions, so the rights of children are irrelevant.

I'd like to note that, if you were aborted, you would not ever have cared. Because you couldn't. You wouldn't have ever had feelings, or opinions, or anything, because you were not a person yet. And not forgiving your own mother for trying to deal with an emotional time in her life by considering all the possible avenues she might take? What a horrible, ungrateful person you are. You should feel bad.


Well, if I'm ungrateful, then you have no idea what its like working your back off from the age of 12 to satisfy your mother's heroin addiction, which is why she got pregnant in the first place, cuz, you know. Hard to remember about condoms when you're high on dope.

Not forgiving my mother for wanting to deal with an emotional time? How about not forgiving my mother for trying to kill me and causing a truckload of health issues to me, with which I now have to live for my entire life.
A collective regime of peace and love...
- The Soviet Star Union -
General Information | Military & Technology | Important People
FT Factbook (WIP)




User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:05 pm

Awkwardturtleland wrote:
Kengburg wrote:(Image)
So True



Abortion. Men don't understand the impact that abortion makes on a woman's life. Just because the baby daddy doesn't want the outcome of a broken condom or sheer stupidity, then they shouldn't have done it. The fetus is still a baby. You can't deny that. I mean, sure, if you know the baby is going to be brain-dead or you're going to die from having it, that's good. Saving yourself from death and heartbreak. But if you're just stupid, suck it up. The baby will teach you to grow up.


that is an unfair generalization. many men understand the pain involved because they are involved with a woman who has to make the decision.
whatever

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111685
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:06 pm

Carpathia and Moldova wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:Children aren't involved in abortions, so the rights of children are irrelevant.

I'd like to note that, if you were aborted, you would not ever have cared. Because you couldn't. You wouldn't have ever had feelings, or opinions, or anything, because you were not a person yet. And not forgiving your own mother for trying to deal with an emotional time in her life by considering all the possible avenues she might take? What a horrible, ungrateful person you are. You should feel bad.


Well, if I'm ungrateful, then you have no idea what its like working your back off from the age of 12 to satisfy your mother's heroin addiction, which is why she got pregnant in the first place, cuz, you know. Hard to remember about condoms when you're high on dope.

Not forgiving my mother for wanting to deal with an emotional time? How about not forgiving my mother for trying to kill me and causing a truckload of health issues to me, with which I now have to live for my entire life.

Your mother wanting an abortion caused you health issues? You're really bad at this.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Asperia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 15
Founded: Aug 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Asperia » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:06 pm

Sunny Skies wrote:I'm absolutely against abortion and I will speak against in all cases.

Though, as I'm neither a woman nor a conservative, I realize that what I belive to be right or wrong has no value on the decisions of another person. I think abortion should be decriminalized on the grounds that it will happen regardless of its legal status, and the best thing is to make it legal and that people should be allowed to do what they want with their bodies.

No matter what anybody says though, unless in case of rape, a phoetus that will be born severely handicapped or incapable of living long, or risk to the mother's life, I don't find any argument that can justify the fact that you're killing a human being and justifying the killing to be reasonable because not only it cannot defend itself, it can't even sustain itself biologically. A foetus is the single most fragile form of human life and killing it for the sole reason that the pregnancy is unwanted is something incredibly unethical and cruel; sentience does not change the right of life of someone, a person is a coma is still entitles to its rights regardless of the fact it's also incapable of sustaining itself, a person that has suffered a severe accident and lost most of its ability to function is also incapable of sustaining itself. All of those people require someone's care, and to me, an abortion is like if a nurse taking care of a senile old person decided to strangle him just because caring for him is an annoyance.


Non-sapience and non-sentience of the fetus.

As for comas, there is usually a chance of waking up (even if they're diagnosed as permanent), so I disagree with DNR in those cases without the consent and/or obvious pain of the unconscious/dying.
The views expressed in the text above do not necessarily represent that of the Lunar Exclave of Asperia. Oh, wait, I am Asperia. Nevermind.
The political stats hidden below may fluctuate based on how confidently I can strongly agree with positions I know nothing about.
Economic Left/Right: -1.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.41

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:06 pm

Cosara wrote:
Genivaria wrote:Except that's not a choice.
Here in the real world most of us (at least in the US) have to own a vehicle in order to get to work on time, in order to make money, in order to eat.
Perhaps you'd like to join the rest of us in reality?

In reality, driving is not a choice?


For most people, no, it isn't. I'm an exception, in that I live within walking distance of where I work, but I am very much a rarity.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Ujh Uhj
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 189
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ujh Uhj » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:06 pm

Benuty wrote:
Ujh Uhj wrote:It's funny, I can't remember having all those constitutional rights when I was a fetus. Right, that's because I wasn't sapient.


You mean sentient?

Well even if you were, you wouldn't be able to see outside of your mother so its clearly redundant.

No. Well, both apply.

User avatar
Lunalia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 621
Founded: Oct 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lunalia » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:06 pm

Cosara wrote:
Fintanland wrote:Except nobody is saying that. "worthless"? "sack"? "should"? "brutally"? "murdered"? Those are all your own words.

You have repeatedly said that fetuses are just sack of cell parasites and the mothers should have the right to play god and decide if they want the child growing inside of them to have a life, or if she should just say "No life for you." and take the fetus's life before it even begins.

The problem with your logic is that you are saying that the fetus should have the right to say "I get to use your body!" to the mother. Generally that is something that parasites say. Pregnancy... can have a lot of harmful side effects, even with modern medicine. If the mother is not one hundred percent willing to experience them, these side effects become torture. By equating fetuses with personhood, you are saying that you support forcing women to endure nine months of torture inflicted by another human being. Imprisonment and torture for nine months is generally considered a pretty major crime.

Additionally, the adoption system (in the United States, I can give no observations from other countries) is horribly broken. It is easier to adopt a child from another country than it is to adopt a baby here. The system is weighted heavily in favor of heterosexual white Christian couples being able to adopt, and all others being rejected. A fraction of all babies put up for adoption (1-3%) are adopted each year. The rest get to be in foster homes, which have a high probability of being abusive. There is a high rate of suicide and drug overdose death among children who grow up in the adoption system.

Yes, a woman who does not want to be pregnant could have the baby and give it up for adoption. She would, however, be playing Russian roulette with her health and mental well-being, and with the baby's health and mental well-being. Choosing to humanely abort a fetus is choosing to not risk the fetus's health. Additionally, according to the texts that many pro lifers consider sacred, aborting a fetus is equivalent to giving it an express ticket to paradise. I personally do not believe this, but... it is another argument, from text that they consider important.

Don't get me wrong, it would be wonderful if it was possible to remove a first trimester fetus from a woman's body and grow it in a lab until it is at the end of its third trimester, and then give it directly into the arms of a loving family with no risk of it ending up in a foster system. But modern technology is not yet at that point, and until that scenario is possible, abortion is the only solution that does not end in thousands of unwanted babies trapped in the adoption system each year.

.... Which it would be nice if they were all donated to the Vatican, but that would be using them as punishments, and I don't believe in using children as punishments.
Last edited by Lunalia on Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:11 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Wikkiwallana wrote:
Auralia wrote:
The Catholic Church teaches that participation in gay "commitment ceremonies" is wrong.

You may not have noticed, but New Mexico is not located in Vatican City.

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:07 pm

Carpathia and Moldova wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:Children aren't involved in abortions, so the rights of children are irrelevant.

I'd like to note that, if you were aborted, you would not ever have cared. Because you couldn't. You wouldn't have ever had feelings, or opinions, or anything, because you were not a person yet. And not forgiving your own mother for trying to deal with an emotional time in her life by considering all the possible avenues she might take? What a horrible, ungrateful person you are. You should feel bad.


Well, if I'm ungrateful, then you have no idea what its like working your back off from the age of 12 to satisfy your mother's heroin addiction, which is why she got pregnant in the first place, cuz, you know. Hard to remember about condoms when you're high on dope.

Not forgiving my mother for wanting to deal with an emotional time? How about not forgiving my mother for trying to kill me and causing a truckload of health issues to me, with which I now have to live for my entire life.

Well, why don't we just have a pity party for you, then. That's obviously what you want. But why don't we actually get on topic, rather than dive into your obviously interesting past?

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Atnae
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 148
Founded: Apr 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Atnae » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:08 pm

Cosara wrote:
Atnae wrote:the keys required to ask What about rape? are on the verge of giving out.

I view aborting a rape child as wrong, because a rape child is no less prescious than a child that happened through consensually.


Don't get me wrong, it's a shitty situation for all involved except the rapist. And the most important part IMO is that through abortion, the mother's entire life may not be utterly derailed through medical care, maternity leave and then all the related cost and effort of maintaining a child which reminds her every time she looks at the child of that one godawful night where everything went to shit. I'm not saying abortion is a happy solution, I'm saying it is a better solution than forcing her to continue with the pregnancy and child for almost 20 years.
FRP, FRP and a bit more FRP
(futureRP, fantasyRP and freakyRP)

User avatar
Munrova
Envoy
 
Posts: 335
Founded: Mar 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Munrova » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:08 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:
Ujh Uhj wrote:..........he was implying that the Nazi salute is appropriate given the authoritarian-ness of the situation


There's nothing wrong with authoritarianism.

Yep. All those authoritarian regimes throughout history ended with rainbows and happiness, am I right?

Right?
    Alert Level 0 - Absolute Peace
    Alert Level 1 - Increased readiness
    Alert Level 2 - Above-normal readiness
    Alert Level 3 - Units ready to mobilize within 15 minutes
    Alert Level 4 - Units mobilized
    Alert Level 5 - WMD's ready to be deployed
    Alert Level 6 - WMD's have been deployed
The Democratic States of Munrova has what it calls "glorious and ever-present ultranationalism". Led by Scot Munroe, the nation has a large military, omnipresent police force, and great patriotic fervor.
    721,880 in Army
    481,253 in Navy
    401,044 active in the Air Force

User avatar
Zweite Alaje
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9551
Founded: Oct 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Zweite Alaje » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:09 pm

Ujh Uhj wrote:
Zweite Alaje wrote:
There's nothing wrong with authoritarianism.

There is plenty wrong with authoritarianism.

Not in a situation like this. This pro-"choice" business must be dealt with harshly.
Geist über Körper, durch Aktionen Ehrung
Likes: Corporatism, Market Socialism, Syndicalism, Progressivism, Pantheism, Gaia Hypothesis, Centrism, Dirigisme

Dislikes: Capitalism, Liberalism, Conservatism, Libertarianism, Abortion, Modern Feminism
I've been: Communist , Fascist
Economic Left/Right: -7.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.18

NIFP
Please don't call me Zweite, Al or Ally is fine. Add 2548 posts, founded Oct 06, 2011

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:10 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:Vazzy, Christ doesn't like slavery.

Its not slavery. It gives person-hood to embryos!


And thereby implicitly legalises on-demand abortion.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:10 pm

Carpathia and Moldova wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:Children aren't involved in abortions, so the rights of children are irrelevant.

I'd like to note that, if you were aborted, you would not ever have cared. Because you couldn't. You wouldn't have ever had feelings, or opinions, or anything, because you were not a person yet. And not forgiving your own mother for trying to deal with an emotional time in her life by considering all the possible avenues she might take? What a horrible, ungrateful person you are. You should feel bad.


Well, if I'm ungrateful, then you have no idea what its like working your back off from the age of 12 to satisfy your mother's heroin addiction, which is why she got pregnant in the first place, cuz, you know. Hard to remember about condoms when you're high on dope.

Not forgiving my mother for wanting to deal with an emotional time? How about not forgiving my mother for trying to kill me and causing a truckload of health issues to me, with which I now have to live for my entire life.


leaving your particular circumstances out of it...WHY WOULD ANYONE WANT TO FORCE A HEROIN ADDICT TO HAVE A BABY? (yes I was shouting)
whatever

User avatar
Ujh Uhj
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 189
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ujh Uhj » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:11 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:
Ujh Uhj wrote:There is plenty wrong with authoritarianism.

Not in a situation like this. This pro-"choice" business must be dealt with harshly.

Mmmkay then say that. Authoritarianism in general is a bad thing. Giving rights to a fetus that trump the rights of a fully sapient, sentient, and productive human being is also a bad thing.

User avatar
Wisconsin9
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35753
Founded: May 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wisconsin9 » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:11 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:
Ujh Uhj wrote:There is plenty wrong with authoritarianism.

Not in a situation like this. This pro-"choice" business must be dealt with harshly.

Don't like an opinion? BRING OUT THE FASCISM, MOTHERFUCKERS!
~~~~~~~~
We are currently 33% through the Trump administration.
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:11 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:
Ujh Uhj wrote:There is plenty wrong with authoritarianism.

Not in a situation like this. This pro-"choice" business must be dealt with harshly.


You're adoreable.
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111685
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:11 pm

Wisconsin9 wrote:
Zweite Alaje wrote:Not in a situation like this. This pro-"choice" business must be dealt with harshly.

Don't like an opinion? BRING OUT THE FASCISM, MOTHERFUCKERS!

Well, FEMA has to do something with those camps.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Adamede, Aguaria Major, Australian rePublic, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Elejamie, Germanic Templars, Heavenly Assault, La Xinga, Necroghastia, Rivogna, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads