NATION

PASSWORD

All Abortion Illegal in North Dakota

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:36 pm

Auralia wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:Because abortion can end in the expulsion without termination of the fetus' life. But it would die anyway. So the killing of it is a merciful act.


:roll: So depriving someone of oxygen, then stabbing them, is just mercy killing because they were going to die of asphyxiation anyways?

Yup. But the merciful act is kind of pointless, as it lacks the mental function necessary to identify what mercy is.

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Auralia
Senator
 
Posts: 4982
Founded: Dec 15, 2011
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Auralia » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:36 pm

Ceannairceach wrote:
Auralia wrote:
But that doesn't change the fact that custody is initially assigned to the biological parent, and the parent must go through proper legal channels to reassign custody to someone else.

Great idea! Let's appeal to religion and assign abortion centers the legal ability to assign God the custody of aborted fetuses.


That's not a response to my argument.
Catholic Commonwealth of Auralia
"Amor sequitur cognitionem."

User avatar
Ujh Uhj
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 189
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ujh Uhj » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:36 pm

Fintanland wrote:
Ujh Uhj wrote:But the adoption system is so messed up in America that we're importing babies instead of adopting actual Americans. There is an argument that women shouldn't have abortions because they can utilize adoption, but that view is clouded and ignorant and takes into account none of the opinions of the woman.

My point was actually that you do not have an obligation to have your child even after birth. You can use adoption.

I understand your argument; and I apologize for implying otherwise. I was just noting that adoption is not any reason that abortion should be outlawed.

User avatar
Lunalia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 621
Founded: Oct 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lunalia » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:36 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:
Asperia wrote:Hmm, put it up for adoption?
/thread

Adoption and abortion are two different things. You cannot use that as your end-all answer, as that still implies that women are born to be baby incubators.

This. Exactly this.
Wikkiwallana wrote:
Auralia wrote:
The Catholic Church teaches that participation in gay "commitment ceremonies" is wrong.

You may not have noticed, but New Mexico is not located in Vatican City.

User avatar
Kengburg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1506
Founded: Dec 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Kengburg » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:37 pm

A man walks through urban Detroit at 1:00 AM. He gets robbed by a thug, who takes all the money he has for rent, and the money in his wallet. Isn't the man entitled to the money back even though he knew the risks of walking through Detroit at 1:00 AM?

The same goes for unintentionally pregnant women, they knew the risks that the condom might break, but they should be able to resume they're lives and not have to raise a child (which is a big responsibility) that they probably do not have the funds to raise. Did you know just a regular vaginal birth at a hospital costs $9,000+? Who the hell can afford that when working a $20,000 a year job!
Last edited by Kengburg on Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
My Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: 1.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.21
Proud Allied State of the Union of Human Supremacists, Ave Humanitas!

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:37 pm

Auralia wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:Great idea! Let's appeal to religion and assign abortion centers the legal ability to assign God the custody of aborted fetuses.


That's not a response to my argument.

No, its a solution to a problem.

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Christian Democrats
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10089
Founded: Jul 29, 2009
New York Times Democracy

Postby Christian Democrats » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:37 pm

Ceannairceach wrote:
Christian Democrats wrote:If most abortions are not late-term, how can "the baby . . . [theoretically] live after abortion" (your words)?

Because abortion can end in the expulsion without termination of the fetus' life. But it would die anyway. So the killing of it is a merciful act.

Killing is not a merciful act if it were possible to "save" the individual who is dying.

Do I show mercy toward a starving woman if I kill her to stop her suffering when I had the means to feed her?
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
GA#160: Forced Marriages Ban Act (79%)
GA#175: Organ and Blood Donations Act (68%)^
SC#082: Repeal "Liberate Catholic" (80%)
GA#200: Foreign Marriage Recognition (54%)
GA#213: Privacy Protection Act (70%)
GA#231: Marital Rape Justice Act (81%)^
GA#233: Ban Profits on Workers' Deaths (80%)*
GA#249: Stopping Suicide Seeds (70%)^
GA#253: Repeal "Freedom in Medical Research" (76%)
GA#285: Assisted Suicide Act (70%)^
GA#310: Disabled Voters Act (81%)
GA#373: Repeal "Convention on Execution" (54%)
GA#468: Prohibit Private Prisons (57%)^

* denotes coauthorship
^ repealed resolution
#360: Electile Dysfunction
#452: Foetal Furore
#560: Bicameral Backlash
#570: Clerical Errors

User avatar
Atnae
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 148
Founded: Apr 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Atnae » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:37 pm

Cosara wrote:
Ujh Uhj wrote:But the adoption system is so messed up in America that we're importing babies instead of adopting actual Americans. There is an argument that women shouldn't have abortions because they can utilize adoption, but that view is clouded and ignorant and takes into account none of the opinions of the woman.

Not to mention, Russian President, Valdimir Putin's American Adoption Ban (which bans Americans from adopting Russian children) cuts off a good deal of adoptions from another country.
I actually support these bans, not on the ground that I think Americans shouldn't be able to adopt from Russia, but I support it on the grounds that it's their country, and they can pass whatever they want. Just so you know,

So you support all the crazy BS that china pulls off on the grounds that it's their country, and they can pass whatever they want.
FRP, FRP and a bit more FRP
(futureRP, fantasyRP and freakyRP)

User avatar
Carpathia and Moldova
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1117
Founded: Apr 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Carpathia and Moldova » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:37 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Carpathia and Moldova wrote:The issue here is a lot more complicated. Yes, I support this legislation, due to the fact that I consider abortion to be murder of the worse kind. While I would approve of it in situations that are endangering a mother's life, abortion because a woman "doesn't feel like it" is evil and wrong.

As for cases of rape-induced pregnancy, I agree that women are victims, but what fault does the child have? Is the child guilty that some deranged idiot raped a woman? No. Then why should the child die?

Its true that in many cases, women find themselves in the situation of an unwanted pregnancy, but those children didn't ask to be conceived. The blame should not be put on them. Usually with unwanted pregnancy, the fault belongs to the consenting couple. If they were irresponsible enough not to use protection, then they should face the consequences. Saying that a woman should be allowed to have an abortion because it was a mistake, would be like saying that someone who ran over a person with a car should not go to jail, because, you know, it was a mistake and no one wanted that.

On the other hand, the law should be more strict with the father. In other words, the biological father should be forced by the law to provide for the child. Same goes for rapists. And also, the penalty for rape is too small.

Oh, good, so we'll force a rape victim or someone who gets pregnant because she had a tad too much to drink to not only have a child but we'll force her into a relationship with someone who either violated her or can't even remember her name. Excellent plan.


I'm not saying anything about forcing anyone into a relationship. By providing for the child, I mean financially. As for the ones who get pregnant because they had too much to drink, well its their own fault. If we go along the line of what you say, then we should let the people who drive drunk and kill someone go free, because, you know, it was a mistake and poor souls just had a bit too much to drink.

The point is, people should be held responsible for their actions. If you make a mistake, you must face the consequences. No exceptions whatsoever. I am one of those who believe that the law should be absolute and no clemency should be given, ever. Justice before mercy.
A collective regime of peace and love...
- The Soviet Star Union -
General Information | Military & Technology | Important People
FT Factbook (WIP)




User avatar
Lunalia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 621
Founded: Oct 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lunalia » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:37 pm

Xsyne wrote:
Christian Democrats wrote:Is it the fault of the lifeform inside you that he was conceived?

Uh, yes? Do you not know how conception happens?

A sperm cell beats the other sperm cells to an egg :D
So yes. By winning said race, it is the sperm cell's fault that it won.
Last edited by Lunalia on Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Wikkiwallana wrote:
Auralia wrote:
The Catholic Church teaches that participation in gay "commitment ceremonies" is wrong.

You may not have noticed, but New Mexico is not located in Vatican City.

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:37 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:Yeah, you heard me right.

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/03/22/1764141/north-dakota-passes-personhood wrote:North Dakota lawmakers voted on Friday afternoon to pass a “personhood” abortion ban, which would endow fertilized eggs with all the rights of U.S. citizens and effectively outlaw abortion. The measure, which passed the Senate last month, passed the House by a 57-35 vote and now heads to a ballot vote, likely in the next November election.

A personhood ban could have far-reaching consequences even beyond abortion care, since it will charge doctors who damage embryos with criminal negligence. Doctors in the state say it will also prevent them from performing in vitro fertilization, and some medical professionals have vowed to leave the state if it is signed into law.

Personhood measures are so extreme that some pro-life Republicans in the state have come out against them, planning to join a pro-choice rally in the state capital on Monday to oppose the far-right abortion restriction. “We have stepped over the line,” Republican state Rep. Kathy Hawken (R-Fargo) said of the recent push to pass personhood. “North Dakota hasn’t even passed a primary seatbelt law, but we have the most invasive attack on women’s health anywhere.”

Personhood advocates have pushed their agenda in states throughout the country over the past several years, but their measures have so far been unable to advance. Anti-choice lawmakers in North Dakota, who have already pushed through a stringent six-week abortion ban, were actually considering two different types of personhood legislation — one to immediately amend the state’s constitution to redefine life as beginning at conception, and one to put a personhood amendment on the ballot. The House voted down the first and passed the second.


I'm so appalled I can't even make light of this. I cannot believe it will be upheld by the inevitable SCOTUS challenge, but I'm literally so in shock I can't even make light of it. I can't quite imagine what

I mean, in the event of fetal resorption, should the surviving fetus be charged with homicide?

Should charges be laid before birth? Or after?

And in either event, should it be tried as an adult?

If fertilized eggs are US Citizens in North Dakota, does this mean birth certificates are issued at the first sign of pregnancy? Social Security numbers? Child support hearings held? Will the 2020 Census be required to list them, maybe with ages measured in Expected Negative Age? Or does one's age now begin counting upwards at the likely date of conception? Or the day the pregnancy is verified? Is that retroactive?


But there I go, thinking about things.

GOOD JOB NORTH DAKOTA :clap:
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:37 pm

Vazdania wrote:GOOD JOB NORTH DAKOTA :clap:

Vazzy, Christ doesn't like slavery.

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Fintanland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1767
Founded: Aug 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Fintanland » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:37 pm

Ujh Uhj wrote:I understand your argument; and I apologize for implying otherwise. I was just noting that adoption is not any reason that abortion should be outlawed.

Very true. Sure, contraception and adoption are alternatives to abortion that should be encouraged, but I realize that one is not always 100 % efficient, and the other one is much more painful for the mother, who still has to go through pregnancy.
Pro: Communists, Trotskyists, neo-Trotskyists, crypto-Trotskyists, union leaders, Communist union leaders, atheists, agnostics, long-haired weirdos, short-haired weirdos, football supporters, namby- pamby probation officers, foreign surgeons - headshrinkers, Wedgwood Benn, keg bitter, punk rock, glue- sniffers, Play For Today, squatters, Clive Jenkins, Roy Jenkins, Up Jenkins, up everybody's, Chinese restaurants

Anti: Thugs, bully-boys, psychopaths, sacked policemen, security guards, sacked security guards, racialists, Pakistani-bashers, queer-bashers, Chinese-bashers, anybody-bashers, Rear Admirals, Vice-Admirals, fascists, neo-fascists, crypto-fascists, loyalists, neo- loyalists, crypto-loyalists.

(With apologies to "The Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin")

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:38 pm

Ceannairceach wrote:
Vazdania wrote:GOOD JOB NORTH DAKOTA :clap:

Vazzy, Christ doesn't like slavery.

Its not slavery. It gives person-hood to embryos!
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:38 pm

how come is it that I'm against abortion and I have empirical proof coming from a country with a ban on abortions,and I know why is it a bad idea and these fundamentalists are not even capable of seeing it?! :roll:
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:39 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:Vazzy, Christ doesn't like slavery.

Its not slavery. It gives person-hood to embryos!

In exchange for enslaving women to nonsentient, nonsapient beings.

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Fintanland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1767
Founded: Aug 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Fintanland » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:39 pm

Vazdania wrote:Its not slavery. It gives person-hood to embryos!

And then gives them the right to enslave women
Pro: Communists, Trotskyists, neo-Trotskyists, crypto-Trotskyists, union leaders, Communist union leaders, atheists, agnostics, long-haired weirdos, short-haired weirdos, football supporters, namby- pamby probation officers, foreign surgeons - headshrinkers, Wedgwood Benn, keg bitter, punk rock, glue- sniffers, Play For Today, squatters, Clive Jenkins, Roy Jenkins, Up Jenkins, up everybody's, Chinese restaurants

Anti: Thugs, bully-boys, psychopaths, sacked policemen, security guards, sacked security guards, racialists, Pakistani-bashers, queer-bashers, Chinese-bashers, anybody-bashers, Rear Admirals, Vice-Admirals, fascists, neo-fascists, crypto-fascists, loyalists, neo- loyalists, crypto-loyalists.

(With apologies to "The Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin")

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111674
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:39 pm

Carpathia and Moldova wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:Oh, good, so we'll force a rape victim or someone who gets pregnant because she had a tad too much to drink to not only have a child but we'll force her into a relationship with someone who either violated her or can't even remember her name. Excellent plan.


I'm not saying anything about forcing anyone into a relationship. By providing for the child, I mean financially. As for the ones who get pregnant because they had too much to drink, well its their own fault. If we go along the line of what you say, then we should let the people who drive drunk and kill someone go free, because, you know, it was a mistake and poor souls just had a bit too much to drink.

The point is, people should be held responsible for their actions. If you make a mistake, you must face the consequences. No exceptions whatsoever. I am one of those who believe that the law should be absolute and no clemency should be given, ever. Justice before mercy.

Driving drunk is a crime. Getting pregnant accidentally isn't, or at least, shouldn't be. I do get the impression that some people here think it is, morally, anyway.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:39 pm

Christian Democrats wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:It can survive. For a few moments. Then it dies all on its own.

Most abortions are not late-term, and thus do not involve limb removal.

If most abortions are not late-term, how can "the baby . . . [theoretically] live after abortion" (your words)?

In the abortions that are late-term. In those abortions, they need to do dilation and evacuation and the fetus is viable.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Atnae
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 148
Founded: Apr 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Atnae » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:39 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:how come is it that I'm against abortion and I have proof why is it a bad idea and these fundamentalists are not even capable of seeing it?! :roll:

because your proof is airtight in the same way that walrus is Australia
Last edited by Atnae on Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
FRP, FRP and a bit more FRP
(futureRP, fantasyRP and freakyRP)

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:40 pm

Ceannairceach wrote:
Vazdania wrote:Its not slavery. It gives person-hood to embryos!

In exchange for enslaving women to nonsentient, nonsapient beings.

That are still human.
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Kengburg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1506
Founded: Dec 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Kengburg » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:40 pm

Ceannairceach wrote:
Vazdania wrote:GOOD JOB NORTH DAKOTA :clap:

Vazzy, Christ doesn't like slavery.

Titus 2:9 - "Slaves are to be submissive to their own masters in everything; they are to be well-pleasing, not argumentative."
My Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: 1.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.21
Proud Allied State of the Union of Human Supremacists, Ave Humanitas!

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:40 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:Vazzy, Christ doesn't like slavery.

Its not slavery. It gives person-hood to embryos!

Shall I wear the pink shackes to the hospital bed?
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Carpathia and Moldova
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1117
Founded: Apr 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Carpathia and Moldova » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:40 pm

Kingdoms of Cal wrote:
Carpathia and Moldova wrote:The issue here is a lot more complicated. Yes, I support this legislation, due to the fact that I consider abortion to be murder of the worse kind.


Fine jail "god" he is the one most guilty of the most.


I would, if God existed.
A collective regime of peace and love...
- The Soviet Star Union -
General Information | Military & Technology | Important People
FT Factbook (WIP)




User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:40 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:In exchange for enslaving women to nonsentient, nonsapient beings.

That are still human.

Sure, they are of our species. But that doesn't give them the right to enslave people.

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Commonwealth of Adirondack, Dakran, Fartsniffage, Necroghastia, The Sherpa Empire, Xmara

Advertisement

Remove ads