NATION

PASSWORD

All Abortion Illegal in North Dakota

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:24 am

Osterreichischen wrote:Women are pregnant because they make a choice, whereas all life already consists of micro-organisms, it's not a choice it's how you exist.

Women are pregnant because they decided to engage in behavior that has obvious risks. If they would rather kill a baby than assume responsibility, that's a problem.


Rape. Your argument is invalid.

User avatar
Starkindler
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1277
Founded: Jun 24, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Starkindler » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:25 am

Yes, North Dakota. Give fetuses US citizenship by your Constitution. Then, simply have a few immigrants over, let's say a month. Have them conceive. Since the fetus is a valid US citizen in N-Dak. family protection kicks in (federal laws), and the conceived couple can immigrate. Eat what you cooked, republicans...

Seriously. :palm: :palm: :palm: You can't do anything against teens having sex. Even in your glorified dark Middle Ages, teens had sex. By then it wasn't a public issue however, because people could keep silent about it, or fathers simply forced them to marry. You can, however get over your prudish Christian ethics, and get normal sex ed to teens, and encourage them to use protection. Rather than keep them away from it, like with a ban on contraceptives, or having abstinence-only sex ed.

Also, incidents happen. 6 weeks abortion is pretty normal. Or if you want your dearest anti-choice message through, then maybe consider that impregnating a woman against her will is rape? No.. you can't live with that. Surely, you're too misogynist to even consider that women have feelings.

Or consider that if your bill gets through then it'd result in massive child negligence and a sharp increase in divorces? Because these children will grow up in unhappiness or poverty, and will have a great chance of becoming criminals. If I was a Bible-thumping Christian extremist like you, I would make up some data or use your nonsense about how disappearing fathers make boys gay, because homophobia is the only thing extremist Christians will consider superior to their God's word.

21st century. The Land of the Free.

Of course, I only aimed this post at the mindless Bible-drones who can't see anything behind what their parish says to them. I did not mean to hurt anyone who's not concerned, and was not talking about those Christians and believers of other religions who can distinguish faith from life.

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:25 am

Osterreichischen wrote:
The Realm of God wrote:
Oh, I see. I'm carrying arround several species of bacteria within my stomach and so is everyone else here. Remind me what my obligation to these living creatures is?

Oh and legally we retain our lawful rights from cradle to grave.


If you're comparing a living human inside of a woman to "several species of bacteria" then I can see where this will go.

Women are pregnant because they make a choice, whereas all life already consists of micro-organisms, it's not a choice it's how you exist.

Women are pregnant because they decided to engage in behavior that has obvious risks. If they would rather kill a baby than assume responsibility, that's a problem.

When you drive you do not consent to being run into. Your argument fails in this regard.
password scrambled

User avatar
Osterreichischen
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 120
Founded: Mar 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Osterreichischen » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:26 am

The Nuclear Fist wrote:
Osterreichischen wrote:
You mean talking about how I decided against joining the Wehrmacht because it wouldn't be fair to my family is a childish value?

You declined to join the Third Reich's armed forces?


I suggest you refrain from mocking Germany.

Wehrmacht is simply Army, Armed Forces, etc.

I use that word because it is more specific, and, it is called the Wehrmacht.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:26 am

Osterreichischen wrote:I suggest you refrain from mocking Germany.

Wehrmacht is simply Army, Armed Forces, etc.

I use that word because it is more specific, and, it is called the Wehrmacht.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundeswehr

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:27 am

Osterreichischen wrote:
The Nuclear Fist wrote:You declined to join the Third Reich's armed forces?


I suggest you refrain from mocking Germany.

Wehrmacht is simply Army, Armed Forces, etc.

I use that word because it is more specific, and, it is called the Wehrmacht.


Wehrmacht is specifically the term used for the German army during WWII.

Why don't you just say "the German military?" or just "the military"? We don't have to know you're from Germany.

User avatar
Ujh Uhj
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 189
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ujh Uhj » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:27 am

But, the only reason people have sex is to reproduce... right?!?!?!?!

User avatar
The Huskar Social Union
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58281
Founded: Apr 04, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Huskar Social Union » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:27 am

This violates the constitution, so the courts should deal with this soon.
Samuraikoku wrote:Still waiting, Cosara.

Do you honestly expect him to reply?
Irish Nationalist from Belfast / Leftwing / Atheist / Alliance Party voter
"I never thought in terms of being a leader, i thought very simply in terms of helping people" - John Hume 1937 - 2020



I like Miniature painting, Tanks, English Gals, Video games and most importantly Cheese.


User avatar
Spiritwolf
Diplomat
 
Posts: 944
Founded: Nov 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Spiritwolf » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:27 am

The Realm of God wrote:
Spiritwolf wrote:Not for much longer "Dear".


Your opinions sicken me. You deprive women of their right to liberty and right of free choice in direct violation of this nations constitution.

The Constitution of the United States of America protects ALL Americans rights to include those that have just been concieved. Women have been literally getting away with murder for far too long now. And yes, I fully intend to curtail this particular problem before more innocent children die. It's called a "VOTE". It is the ultimate use of force. And I am going to use it on you with extreme prejudice.

User avatar
His Noodliness the FSM
Attaché
 
Posts: 91
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby His Noodliness the FSM » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:27 am

By the way, since a fertilized egg attaches to the endometrium and feeds upon the mother's nutrients, it can biologically be called a parasite (you know what morning sickness is? Well that's actually the immunes system's response to a parasite. hormones are the only thing preventing the embryo from being killed). So all you anti abortion people are claiming that a woman should be forced to house a parasite. I can't imagine having a baby grow and feed off of you is so different than a guy having a tapeworm in his stomach.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:28 am

The Huskar Social Union wrote:Do you honestly expect him to reply?


He repeated the UHDR quite insistently, it should only be natural that he would read it before realizing it does not say what he wants it to say.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159117
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:28 am

Osterreichischen wrote:
The Realm of God wrote:
Oh, I see. I'm carrying arround several species of bacteria within my stomach and so is everyone else here. Remind me what my obligation to these living creatures is?

Oh and legally we retain our lawful rights from cradle to grave.


If you're comparing a living human inside of a woman to "several species of bacteria" then I can see where this will go.

Women are pregnant because they make a choice, whereas all life already consists of micro-organisms, it's not a choice it's how you exist.

Women also stop being pregnant because they make a choice. A choice to abort their pregnancy.

Women are pregnant because they decided to engage in behavior that has obvious risks. If they would rather kill a baby than assume responsibility, that's a problem.

The responsible thing to do if you find yourself pregnant and don't want to be, for whatever reason, is to end the pregnancy. Killing this "baby" is assuming responsibility.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:28 am

Starkindler wrote:Of course, I only aimed this post at the mindless Bible-drones who can't see anything behind what their parish says to them. I did not mean to hurt anyone who's not concerned, and was not talking about those Christians and believers of other religions who can distinguish faith from life.


Thank you for making the distinction :)
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
The Nuclear Fist
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33214
Founded: May 02, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nuclear Fist » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:28 am

Osterreichischen wrote:
The Nuclear Fist wrote:You declined to join the Third Reich's armed forces?


I suggest you refrain from mocking Germany.

Wehrmacht is simply Army, Armed Forces, etc.

I use that word because it is more specific, and, it is called the Wehrmacht.

The Wehrmacht is not the Bundeswehr. But please, don't let facts get in the way of your German fetishism.
[23:24] <Marquesan> I have the feeling that all the porn videos you watch are like...set to Primus' music, Ulysses.
Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .
THE ABSOLUTTM MADMAN ESCAPES JUSTICE ONCE MORE

User avatar
Osterreichischen
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 120
Founded: Mar 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Osterreichischen » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:28 am

Condunum wrote:
Osterreichischen wrote:
If you're comparing a living human inside of a woman to "several species of bacteria" then I can see where this will go.

Women are pregnant because they make a choice, whereas all life already consists of micro-organisms, it's not a choice it's how you exist.

Women are pregnant because they decided to engage in behavior that has obvious risks. If they would rather kill a baby than assume responsibility, that's a problem.

When you drive you do not consent to being run into. Your argument fails in this regard.


There's a huge difference.

Women having sex before marriage and getting inconveniently pregnant and then having an abortion because it doesn't fit into their lives, is not the same as "when you drive you do not consent to being run into."

The point is, if you're going to engage in pre-marital sexual behavior, without the ability or want to care for a child, then your ignorance is at fault, not the child.

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:28 am

Osterreichischen wrote:
The Realm of God wrote:
Oh, I see. I'm carrying arround several species of bacteria within my stomach and so is everyone else here. Remind me what my obligation to these living creatures is?

Oh and legally we retain our lawful rights from cradle to grave.


If you're comparing a living human inside of a woman to "several species of bacteria" then I can see where this will go.

Women are pregnant because they make a choice, whereas all life already consists of micro-organisms, it's not a choice it's how you exist.

Women are pregnant because they decided to engage in behavior that has obvious risks. If they would rather kill a baby than assume responsibility, that's a problem.

If a woman would rather give birth to a child rather than have an abortion when she wasn't ready or fully able to care for it, that is a bigger problem with worse consequences.
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

User avatar
Osterreichischen
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 120
Founded: Mar 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Osterreichischen » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:28 am

The Nuclear Fist wrote:
Osterreichischen wrote:
I suggest you refrain from mocking Germany.

Wehrmacht is simply Army, Armed Forces, etc.

I use that word because it is more specific, and, it is called the Wehrmacht.

The Wehrmacht is not the Bundeswehr. But please, don't let facts get in the way of your German fetishism.

Fetishism?

I am German you idiot.

User avatar
The Nuclear Fist
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33214
Founded: May 02, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nuclear Fist » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:29 am

Spiritwolf wrote:
The Realm of God wrote:
Your opinions sicken me. You deprive women of their right to liberty and right of free choice in direct violation of this nations constitution.

The Constitution of the United States of America protects ALL Americans rights to include those that have just been concieved. Women have been literally getting away with murder for far too long now. And yes, I fully intend to curtail this particular problem before more innocent children die. It's called a "VOTE". It is the ultimate use of force. And I am going to use it on you with extreme prejudice.

Roe vs Wade says abortion is a constitutional right. Sorry, dear, but the buck stops there. Full stop.
[23:24] <Marquesan> I have the feeling that all the porn videos you watch are like...set to Primus' music, Ulysses.
Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .
THE ABSOLUTTM MADMAN ESCAPES JUSTICE ONCE MORE

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:29 am

Spiritwolf wrote:The Constitution of the United States of America protects ALL Americans rights to include those that have just been concieved.


Roe vs. Wade says otherwise.

Spiritwolf wrote:Women have been literally getting away with murder for far too long now.


Murder is not defined that way.

Spiritwolf wrote:And yes, I fully intend to curtail this particular problem before more innocent children die. It's called a "VOTE". It is the ultimate use of force. And I am going to use it on you with extreme prejudice.


Semper-Fi, fake Marine.

User avatar
The Realm of God
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7562
Founded: Jan 26, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Realm of God » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:29 am

Osterreichischen wrote:
The Nuclear Fist wrote:You declined to join the Third Reich's armed forces?


I suggest you refrain from mocking Germany.

Wehrmacht is simply Army, Armed Forces, etc.

I use that word because it is more specific, and, it is called the Wehrmacht.


Your not German. Not by any stretch of the imagination, not if you can't tell us what the name of your army is. Which you should know, since you claim to have applied to join. Everything else you say is now in question.
British, Orthodox Christian, humanist and stoic.

Pro. Disraelian Progressive Conservatism, One Nation Toryism, Distributionism, Civil Liberties, Pro UK, Pro US Constitution. Pro USA.

Progressive Conservative Economic Right: 0.38 Social Libertarian -2.00.

Christian Democrat NSG Senate.

User avatar
Nua Corda
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8342
Founded: Jul 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nua Corda » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:30 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:
Ooh, are we finally doing this? I love this!

My name is The Rich Port, I've had sex with lots of women, picking up feminism as a by-product; my parents and their friends are the biggest hypocrites I've ever met in my life, and as a result they've colored my perception of "conservatives" as lying, selfish phonies mostly in it for themselves and valuing not looking bad in front of the neighbours as priority #1; I kinda have a problem with abortion, but I have a bigger problem with the people trying to ban it.


My name is long, so just call me Confini XD!

I haven't had any sex with women, but I picked up feminism as well, you wouldn't really say a bi-product since Christianity teaches this about women being equal as well. Personally conservative but politically liberal, I believe in egalitarianism but I also have a different set of rules (oftentimes FAR MORE STRICT) than the rules I have for others. While I believe that abortion is somewhat morally wrong, I will never push my beliefs onto another person, not even a significant other because she is free to do as she wishes. Of course, I do believe there has to be healthy discussion in a loving couple about this, but I honestly believe in the body sovereignty of a woman, and she would have the last word with what to do with her body.


I like this game.

My name is Corda. I haven't had sex with women (not for lack of desire to do so), but I have a strong belief in equality and sovereignty. You could probably sum up my social beliefs as "an it harm none, do what ye will", meaning that I don't believe I have a right to tell you what to do with your body unless you're endangering someone else. I don't pretend to have any special knowledge of women, and it's largely because of that that I firmly believe that abortion is none of my business. I believe that it's a big decision, and I'd personally prefer to discuss it with my partner, but I would always leave the final decision to her. And I would always strongly oppose those chauvinistic and misguided bastards who would take that right from her. I try to have respect for Conservatives, I really do, but the type of "Conservatives" we get around here, who I like to call "Regressives", really makes that hard. To put it bluntly, they come off as arrogant, ignorent, naive, sexist, poor-hating garbage who aught to be banned from the internet and sent back to grade school where they belong.
Call me Corda.
Sarcasm Warning! This post may not be entirely serious
Bullpups, Keymod and Magpul, oh my!
Bong Hits for Jesus!
Like Sci-Fi? Like Worldbuilding? Check out the Uprising Project!
Renegade for Life|Gun-toting Liberal. Because fuck stereotypes|Your friendly neighborhood gun nerd. Ask me anything!|Shameless Mass Effect Fan. I like Quarians a bit more than I should...|This nation is not a nation, and may or may not represent my views|I have been known to draw guns for folks, occasionally
Because people care, right?

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:30 am

Osterreichischen wrote:Fetishism?

I am German you idiot.


Then you should know it's Bundeswehr, unless you have a fetish for Nazis. Either that or you're not German.

User avatar
Tsuntion
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1939
Founded: Nov 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Tsuntion » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:30 am

Osterreichischen wrote:Women are pregnant because they decided to engage in behavior that has obvious risks. If they would rather kill a baby than assume responsibility, that's a problem.


Abortion is one way to assume responsibility (rather than just ignoring the situation).

The woman doesn't have to deal with a baby yet, just the pregnancy. She can take responsibility for it by terminating it if she doesn't want to have the baby, or by letting it continue if she does want the baby. Letting it continue when she doesn't want the baby and not making plans for the baby, ignoring the pregnancy and hoping stuff works out, etc. are ways of not taking responsibility.
I'm not a roleplayer, but check these out: The United Defenders League and The Versutian Federation.

The Emerald Dawn wrote:Jumpin' on the SOURCE-TRAIN!

CHOO CHOO MUFUKA! We be ridin' the rails, checkin' the trails, you get nothin' and your argument fails!

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:30 am

Osterreichischen wrote:
Condunum wrote:When you drive you do not consent to being run into. Your argument fails in this regard.


There's a huge difference.

Women having sex before marriage and getting inconveniently pregnant and then having an abortion because it doesn't fit into their lives, is not the same as "when you drive you do not consent to being run into."

The point is, if you're going to engage in pre-marital sexual behavior, without the ability or want to care for a child, then your ignorance is at fault, not the child.

Pregnancy is a risk of sex. You do not consent to that risk, even if you acknowledge that it may happen.

Also, slut shamming, nice. Good to know you're on the same mental level as a rapist.
password scrambled

User avatar
Osterreichischen
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 120
Founded: Mar 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Osterreichischen » Sat Mar 23, 2013 11:30 am

Desperate Measures wrote:
Osterreichischen wrote:
If you're comparing a living human inside of a woman to "several species of bacteria" then I can see where this will go.

Women are pregnant because they make a choice, whereas all life already consists of micro-organisms, it's not a choice it's how you exist.

Women are pregnant because they decided to engage in behavior that has obvious risks. If they would rather kill a baby than assume responsibility, that's a problem.

If a woman would rather give birth to a child rather than have an abortion when she wasn't ready or fully able to care for it, that is a bigger problem with worse consequences.


The problem is engaging in sexual behavior when you're not in a position to maintain a family in general. If you're not in a situation to take care of yourself and a small child, you're certainly not in a position to make the decision of having sex.

Why?

Because sex has obvious risks. Becoming Pregnant is one of them, and the biggest risk one must be aware of and prepared for.

If a woman would rather kill a baby than wait for marriage to have sex, I'd suggest taking a look at her priorities in life.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Adamede, Aguaria Major, Australian rePublic, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Elejamie, Germanic Templars, Heavenly Assault, La Xinga, Necroghastia, Rivogna, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads