NATION

PASSWORD

Healthcare: Right or Privilege?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Celritannia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17114
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Celritannia » Thu Mar 21, 2013 4:32 pm

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Chinese Regions wrote:Paying for a service you have used is stealing apparently.


Given the choice she would have likely opted out of the system meaning no money out and no benefits in. She had no choice but to be part of the system. She used a service she was forced to pay for.


Seeing as you are an American, I am going to guess you are big on democracy, so I shall use a simple scenario.

A political Party has announced in their manifesto they will set up a universal healthcare system if they win the election.
This political party then wins with a landslide majority and thus establishes a UHS as promised in their political platform.
Is that wrong?

Also, Healthcare is a RIGHT!
Last edited by Celritannia on Thu Mar 21, 2013 4:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

My DeviantArt
Obey
When you annoy a Celritannian
U W0T M8?
Zirkagrad wrote:A person with a penchant for flying lions with long tongues, could possibly be a fan of Kiss. Maybe the classiest nation with a lion with its tongue hanging out. Enjoys only the finest tea.

Nakena wrote:NSG's Most Serene Salad
Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman.
Atheist, Environmentalist, Pansexual, Left-Libertarian.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Thu Mar 21, 2013 4:46 pm

Freiheit Reich wrote:You steal from me and offer me my money back, what should I say? 'No, I hate theft but if I take back my money it means I support theft'?

She took her money back, she was selfish as we should be. 'Virtue of Selfishness' she followed that code in this case.


Hypocrite.

User avatar
Twilliamson
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 104
Founded: Mar 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Twilliamson » Thu Mar 21, 2013 4:50 pm

yes the right to be able to live even if you are poor and sick seems preety good.

User avatar
Sciongrad
Minister
 
Posts: 3060
Founded: Mar 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Sciongrad » Thu Mar 21, 2013 4:56 pm

Of course it's a right. Unless you think that the lives of the poor and unfortunate mean less than the lives of the well-to-do.
Natalia Santos, Plenipotentiary and Permanent Scionite Representative to the World Assembly


Ideological Bulwark #271


User avatar
Oceania-Eurasia-Eastasia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 411
Founded: Feb 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Oceania-Eurasia-Eastasia » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:01 pm

Haydenish People wrote:Is healthcare a right or a privilege?

I think healthcare is a privilege. Why should anyone be entitled to the hard work of doctors and nurses? If you can not pay for something, the responsibility does not then fall on the government to pay for it. Unless it is provided by a private charitable organization, healthcare should absolutely not be free or paid for by the government.


I go to Veterans Administration hospitals, and never, ever leave with the contempt for my fellow Americans required to wish government were in charge of their healthcare as well.
"One common theme in history is that there was a pop quiz on Wednesdays."

OOC: American-Human married male, enjoys the separation of state and religion and seeks the separation of state and religion from everything else. MT / PMT RPer, but willing to try FT. I want a government small enough to overthrow with a vote.

IC: The Iron Heel + 1984 + Brave New World = 700 years worth of global dystopia to play with, er, as...

"Treat every question as if it were loaded. Never point a question at anyone or anything you don't intend to put a hole in."

User avatar
Wisconsin9
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35753
Founded: May 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wisconsin9 » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:02 pm

Freiheit Reich wrote:Here is what a smart lady believed:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objectivism_(Ayn_Rand)

Image


Samozaryadnyastan wrote:
Wisconsin9 wrote:But-but-but taxes are theft!

Which we've already established as bullshit in another thread because the Union has specific rights to collect tax from you.
Apologies if you were being sarcastic, I can't recall what your actual opinion on that topic was.

Well, I have a communist version of the Wisconsin flag, so... yes. I was absolutely serious. Taxes are theft, people kill people, impeach Obama. :ugeek:
~~~~~~~~
We are currently 33% through the Trump administration.
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:17 pm

Celritannia wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:
Given the choice she would have likely opted out of the system meaning no money out and no benefits in. She had no choice but to be part of the system. She used a service she was forced to pay for.


Seeing as you are an American, I am going to guess you are big on democracy, so I shall use a simple scenario.

A political Party has announced in their manifesto they will set up a universal healthcare system if they win the election.
This political party then wins with a landslide majority and thus establishes a UHS as promised in their political platform.
Is that wrong?

Also, Healthcare is a RIGHT!


Democracy can be dangerous (tyranny by majority). Certain rights and freedoms must be unalienable.

Healthcare should never be required (including having to pay for healthcare coverage).

Perhaps a clause that nobody should be forced to purchase a private company's goods (such as health insurance).

Democracy will cause more civil liberties to erode (such as gun rights). No, democracy is not always good unless some rights are unalienable.

Hitler had the popular majority on his side, does this mean the NAZIs were right? Today, many people say no but at the time most Germans loved Hitler and his crew. Yes, he did not have an election BUT judging by thousands cheering him it seems he would have done quite well in an election.
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:19 pm

Freiheit Reich wrote:Hitler had the popular majority on his side, does this mean the NAZIs were right? Today, many people say no but at the time most Germans loved Hitler and his crew. Yes, he did not have an election BUT judging by thousands cheering him it seems he would have done quite well in an election.


WRONG!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_federal_election,_March_1933
Last edited by Samuraikoku on Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Enadail
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5799
Founded: Jun 02, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Enadail » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:20 pm

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Celritannia wrote:
Seeing as you are an American, I am going to guess you are big on democracy, so I shall use a simple scenario.

A political Party has announced in their manifesto they will set up a universal healthcare system if they win the election.
This political party then wins with a landslide majority and thus establishes a UHS as promised in their political platform.
Is that wrong?

Also, Healthcare is a RIGHT!


Democracy can be dangerous (tyranny by majority). Certain rights and freedoms must be unalienable.

Healthcare should never be required (including having to pay for healthcare coverage).

Perhaps a clause that nobody should be forced to purchase a private company's goods (such as health insurance).

Democracy will cause more civil liberties to erode (such as gun rights). No, democracy is not always good unless some rights are unalienable.

Hitler had the popular majority on his side, does this mean the NAZIs were right? Today, many people say no but at the time most Germans loved Hitler and his crew. Yes, he did not have an election BUT judging by thousands cheering him it seems he would have done quite well in an election.


When he first came to power, most Germans loved him. As soon as he became a dictator, he instantly lost popularity. What does that say to your example?

User avatar
Enadail
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5799
Founded: Jun 02, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Enadail » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:22 pm

Oceania-Eurasia-Eastasia wrote:
Haydenish People wrote:Is healthcare a right or a privilege?

I think healthcare is a privilege. Why should anyone be entitled to the hard work of doctors and nurses? If you can not pay for something, the responsibility does not then fall on the government to pay for it. Unless it is provided by a private charitable organization, healthcare should absolutely not be free or paid for by the government.


I go to Veterans Administration hospitals, and never, ever leave with the contempt for my fellow Americans required to wish government were in charge of their healthcare as well.


Very strange, as I also have friends who go ot the VA and are thankful they have someone who can help cover their health concerns when they can't.

Of course, public healthcare would be the government funding you to go to the same doctors most of us are going to now, so I fail to see why it'd be an issue?

User avatar
Celritannia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17114
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Celritannia » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:24 pm

Freiheit Reich wrote:Democracy can be dangerous (tyranny by majority). Certain rights and freedoms must be unalienable.

Healthcare should never be required (including having to pay for healthcare coverage).

Perhaps a clause that nobody should be forced to purchase a private company's goods (such as health insurance).

Democracy will cause more civil liberties to erode (such as gun rights). No, democracy is not always good unless some rights are unalienable.

Hitler had the popular majority on his side, does this mean the NAZIs were right? Today, many people say no but at the time most Germans loved Hitler and his crew. Yes, he did not have an election BUT judging by thousands cheering him it seems he would have done quite well in an election.


The Labour victory in 1946 UK General Election (which was my scenario) never seemed to be tryannical. On the contrary, people applauded Attlee's government. He was not one for power, but rather, he wanted to ensure the people were safe and secure, thus his government established the wealfare system.
Last edited by Celritannia on Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:29 pm, edited 2 times in total.

My DeviantArt
Obey
When you annoy a Celritannian
U W0T M8?
Zirkagrad wrote:A person with a penchant for flying lions with long tongues, could possibly be a fan of Kiss. Maybe the classiest nation with a lion with its tongue hanging out. Enjoys only the finest tea.

Nakena wrote:NSG's Most Serene Salad
Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman.
Atheist, Environmentalist, Pansexual, Left-Libertarian.

User avatar
Oceania-Eurasia-Eastasia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 411
Founded: Feb 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Oceania-Eurasia-Eastasia » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:25 pm

Samuraikoku wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:Classic liberal argument, she addressed in in 1966 and liberals ignore her comments:

http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/libera ... -benefits/

http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/blo ... ecting-it/


Hipocrisy is hipocrisy, can't justify doing against what you preach now can you?


I'm not sure you can rape someone and then call her a slut for putting out before marriage.

Rand exercised her choice to collect money from a fund she had no choice in paying into. If paying into Social Security were voluntary, she would indeed be a hypocrite if she did not pay into it yet collected from it.

I'm no Rand fan, but the "Ayn Rand took welfare" line of attack is too facile to bring to an intellectual discussion.
"One common theme in history is that there was a pop quiz on Wednesdays."

OOC: American-Human married male, enjoys the separation of state and religion and seeks the separation of state and religion from everything else. MT / PMT RPer, but willing to try FT. I want a government small enough to overthrow with a vote.

IC: The Iron Heel + 1984 + Brave New World = 700 years worth of global dystopia to play with, er, as...

"Treat every question as if it were loaded. Never point a question at anyone or anything you don't intend to put a hole in."

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:27 pm

Oceania-Eurasia-Eastasia wrote:
Samuraikoku wrote:
Hipocrisy is hipocrisy, can't justify doing against what you preach now can you?


I'm not sure you can rape someone and then call her a slut for putting out before marriage.

Rand exercised her choice to collect money from a fund she had no choice in paying into. If paying into Social Security were voluntary, she would indeed be a hypocrite if she did not pay into it yet collected from it.

I'm no Rand fan, but the "Ayn Rand took welfare" line of attack is too facile to bring to an intellectual discussion.


This assuming taxation is theft. It's not.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:28 pm

Samuraikoku wrote:
Oceania-Eurasia-Eastasia wrote:
I'm not sure you can rape someone and then call her a slut for putting out before marriage.

Rand exercised her choice to collect money from a fund she had no choice in paying into. If paying into Social Security were voluntary, she would indeed be a hypocrite if she did not pay into it yet collected from it.

I'm no Rand fan, but the "Ayn Rand took welfare" line of attack is too facile to bring to an intellectual discussion.


This assuming taxation is theft. It's not.

It's rent.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:30 pm

Divair wrote:It's rent.


If you think taxation in terms of a contract, the an-caps and Randroids will tell you "BUT TEH STATE FORCED ME TO TEH CONTRACT!!!111". There is a legal obligation to pay taxes, in return for the State to provide basic subsistence means for the survival of the community. There is no contract, there is only the law. What citizens may think is irrelevant.

User avatar
Celritannia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17114
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Celritannia » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:35 pm

Samuraikoku wrote:
Divair wrote:It's rent.


If you think taxation in terms of a contract, the an-caps and Randroids will tell you "BUT TEH STATE FORCED ME TO TEH CONTRACT!!!111". There is a legal obligation to pay taxes, in return for the State to provide basic subsistence means for the survival of the community. There is no contract, there is only the law. What citizens may think is irrelevant.


According to Wikipedia, cited from Black's Law Dictionary, a tax is 'an enforced contribution'.
A person forced to contribute to the upkeep of the state they live in :P
Last edited by Celritannia on Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

My DeviantArt
Obey
When you annoy a Celritannian
U W0T M8?
Zirkagrad wrote:A person with a penchant for flying lions with long tongues, could possibly be a fan of Kiss. Maybe the classiest nation with a lion with its tongue hanging out. Enjoys only the finest tea.

Nakena wrote:NSG's Most Serene Salad
Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman.
Atheist, Environmentalist, Pansexual, Left-Libertarian.

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:37 pm

Pfft, healthcare. I am young and healthy, I will not need any doctors for a long while if everything goes right. But if I did, I might be just as content to go without medical help and try to get better on my own.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:37 pm

Celritannia wrote:According to Wikipedia, cited from Black's Law Dictionary, a tax is 'an enforced contribution'.
A person forced to contribute to the upkeep of the state they live in :P


What good is a law if it cannot be enforced?

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:38 pm

Celritannia wrote:
Samuraikoku wrote:
If you think taxation in terms of a contract, the an-caps and Randroids will tell you "BUT TEH STATE FORCED ME TO TEH CONTRACT!!!111". There is a legal obligation to pay taxes, in return for the State to provide basic subsistence means for the survival of the community. There is no contract, there is only the law. What citizens may think is irrelevant.


According to Wikipedia, cited from Black's Law Dictionary, a tax is 'an enforced contribution'.
A person forced to contribute to the upkeep of the state they live in :P

Well, yes, so is rent.

User avatar
Oceania-Eurasia-Eastasia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 411
Founded: Feb 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Oceania-Eurasia-Eastasia » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:40 pm

Enadail wrote:
Oceania-Eurasia-Eastasia wrote:
I go to Veterans Administration hospitals, and never, ever leave with the contempt for my fellow Americans required to wish government were in charge of their healthcare as well.


Very strange, as I also have friends who go ot the VA and are thankful they have someone who can help cover their health concerns when they can't.

Of course, public healthcare would be the government funding you to go to the same doctors most of us are going to now, so I fail to see why it'd be an issue?


It's not quite the same. We don't and won't have a government takeover of healthcare, even with Obamacare. But with the VA, you have a model of what that would look like. More Walter Reed and less Mayo Clinic. Another analogy would be FEMA trailers and slums everywhere if some genius decided the government needed to take over housing people.

The health care given to veterans by VA hospitals is mostly abominable compared to what people (with money) are getting in the private sector. The government needs to show it can handle the health care industry that is already under its purview before taking over the entire industry.

But, the argument is moot, really, as there is no government takeover of health care now or later.
"One common theme in history is that there was a pop quiz on Wednesdays."

OOC: American-Human married male, enjoys the separation of state and religion and seeks the separation of state and religion from everything else. MT / PMT RPer, but willing to try FT. I want a government small enough to overthrow with a vote.

IC: The Iron Heel + 1984 + Brave New World = 700 years worth of global dystopia to play with, er, as...

"Treat every question as if it were loaded. Never point a question at anyone or anything you don't intend to put a hole in."

User avatar
Vitaphone Racing
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10123
Founded: Aug 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Vitaphone Racing » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:40 pm

Divair wrote:
Celritannia wrote:
According to Wikipedia, cited from Black's Law Dictionary, a tax is 'an enforced contribution'.
A person forced to contribute to the upkeep of the state they live in :P

Well, yes, so is rent.

I wouldn't compare it to rent, personally. Rent is rent, tax is tax, the two are ultimately similar in concept but not interchangable terms. Rent is based on an agreement, you are mandated to pay your taxes whether you agree to the terms or not.
Last edited by Vitaphone Racing on Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Parhe on my Asian-ness.
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.

ayy lmao

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:41 pm

Oceania-Eurasia-Eastasia wrote: or later.

Don't count your eggs before they hatch.

User avatar
Celritannia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17114
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Celritannia » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:42 pm

Samuraikoku wrote:
Celritannia wrote:According to Wikipedia, cited from Black's Law Dictionary, a tax is 'an enforced contribution'.
A person forced to contribute to the upkeep of the state they live in :P


What good is a law if it cannot be enforced?


Law? I just said Black's Law Dictionary :unsure:
But then again, wouldn't taxes be enforced by certain agencies, like HM Revenue and Customs (UK) and Internal Revenue Service (US)?

My DeviantArt
Obey
When you annoy a Celritannian
U W0T M8?
Zirkagrad wrote:A person with a penchant for flying lions with long tongues, could possibly be a fan of Kiss. Maybe the classiest nation with a lion with its tongue hanging out. Enjoys only the finest tea.

Nakena wrote:NSG's Most Serene Salad
Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman.
Atheist, Environmentalist, Pansexual, Left-Libertarian.

User avatar
Poloian
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 9
Founded: Feb 26, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Poloian » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:43 pm

Souseiseki wrote:
Haydenish People wrote:Is healthcare a right or a privilege?

I think healthcare is a privilege. Why should anyone be entitled to the hard work of doctors and nurses? If you can not pay for something, the responsibility does not then fall on the government to pay for it. Unless it is provided by a private charitable organization, healthcare should absolutely not be free or paid for by the government.

Indeed, why should anyone have the right to not die a horrible death and go bankrupt in the process?


Yes because that never happens in Canadian hospitals.
:rofl:

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:44 pm

Poloian wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:Indeed, why should anyone have the right to not die a horrible death and go bankrupt in the process?


Yes because that never happens in Canadian hospitals.
:rofl:

Well, no, it doesn't. Free healthcare and what not.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bracadun, Google [Bot], Second Peenadian, Senkaku

Advertisement

Remove ads