Sumamba Buwhan wrote:Other: It depends on my cock size and skin color.
omg I'm Indian

Advertisement

by Call to power » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:07 pm

by Vault 10 » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:08 pm
Fartsniffage wrote:I'm hoping that wasn't just a setup so you can go on about watermelon and fried chicken.

by Neesika » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:08 pm
Hydesland wrote:If I look black, I will call myself black. If I look white, I will call myself white. If I look mixed, I will call myself mixed.





by Neesika » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:13 pm

by Sumamba Buwhan » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:16 pm

L | G | T | B | S | A | R | M | Y |
**Proud Sponsor Of The Militant Gay Agenda** |

by Fartsniffage » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:16 pm
Neesika wrote:I'm making a comparison here (not explicitly laid out, on purpose) to legislated blood quantum rules in regards to aboriginal peoples. Defining someone as 'Indian' or 'not Indian' is important, because it defines who is entitled to certain resources and who is not. I'm wondering how this sort of concept really works.
If your status as 'black' or 'white' or 'greek' or 'asian' or whatever was linked to some share in a certain limited pool of resources, there would probably be a need to strictly define who has membership and who does not, right? I'm wondering if blood quantum is the best way to go about this.

by Neesika » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:17 pm
Hydesland wrote:
1, 2, and 3 I would call black. 4 I would describe as white in that pic. I decide based on skin complexion.

by Neesika » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:19 pm
Fartsniffage wrote:We could just stop parcelling out resources based on race. Solves the whole problem quite quickly.

by Fassitude » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:20 pm
Neesika wrote:Say your mother's father is black, but her mother is white. Is YOUR mother black? Or white? Or do you think the average person sees her and understands that she is half and half? Say your father is white. Are you half black? Quarter black? At what point are you not black?

by EvilDarkMagicians » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:21 pm



by Fartsniffage » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:21 pm
Neesika wrote:Do you think that aboriginal people are allotted certain resources because of our race, or is it something else?

by Neesika » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:22 pm
Hydesland wrote:
It is if you define a black person as someone who has black skin.

by Neesika » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:23 pm
EvilDarkMagicians wrote:
Let's make this easier.
The two on the left are black.
The third on the right is white.
The last on the right is mixed race.
Simples.

by EvilDarkMagicians » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:23 pm
Fassitude wrote:Neesika wrote:Say your mother's father is black, but her mother is white. Is YOUR mother black? Or white? Or do you think the average person sees her and understands that she is half and half? Say your father is white. Are you half black? Quarter black? At what point are you not black?
I never cease to be amazed at the sort of jabberwocky people choose to think and care about... but you? This is so unexpectedly inane.

by EvilDarkMagicians » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:24 pm
Neesika wrote:EvilDarkMagicians wrote:
Let's make this easier.
The two on the left are black.
The third on the right is white.
The last on the right is mixed race.
Simples.
Buh?
All three darker skinned persons here look hispanic, to me.
No, actually the woman looks black, the man and the darker child look hispanic.

by Hydesland » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:26 pm
Neesika wrote:So if your brother is dark skinned, he is black, but you are not if your complexion is lighter? Does that really make sense?

by Sumamba Buwhan » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:29 pm

L | G | T | B | S | A | R | M | Y |
**Proud Sponsor Of The Militant Gay Agenda** |

by Fassitude » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:31 pm
EvilDarkMagicians wrote:People care about things you don't. I'm surprised you just don't move on.

by Lord-General Drache » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:34 pm
Mikertaz Kein wrote:Fartsniffage wrote:At the point the phrase "What up my nigger?" gets you a hospital stay rather than a knuckle bump.
Your first mistake is to use 'nigger' rather than 'nigga'. If you have African in you(:P), then you can say the terms restricted to use by that minority.
Please Note: 'My uncles cousins friends sisters brother is black so its okay...' is not a valid argument. You must be DIRECTLY of African ascendancy or of African Blood to use the term.

by Neesika » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:34 pm
Fassitude wrote:Neesika wrote:Say your mother's father is black, but her mother is white. Is YOUR mother black? Or white? Or do you think the average person sees her and understands that she is half and half? Say your father is white. Are you half black? Quarter black? At what point are you not black?
I never cease to be amazed at the sort of jabberwocky people choose to think and care about... but you? This is so unexpectedly inane.

by Neesika » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:37 pm

by Fassitude » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:39 pm
(I'm being sneaky)

by Fartsniffage » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:44 pm
Neesika wrote:We would not be entitled the land and resources we are entitled to were we not the original inhabitants of these lands. Our entitlement has been legislatively linked to our blood quantum. Is blood all that makes us Indian?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Benuty, Bovad, Renovated Germany, Shazbotdom, The Pirateariat
Advertisement