Anachronous Rex wrote:Heltonia wrote:
Let me put it this way. Just because something isnt blue, it doesnt necessarily mean it can only be red.
Yes, that's what a false dichotomy is. I get it.
That's not what happened here. Essentially, it was said that something is blue, because something else says that it is blue. It is pointed out that said something else does not really say that it is blue, or blue in all circumstances, and so there is no reason to think that it is blue.
Or to put it more simply, "nu-uh."
Then why is homosexuality a sin?



