NATION

PASSWORD

Same-Sex Marriage: Point of View

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:26 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:
Essos wrote:
That's not anyone elses problem but yours. Do not make your problems our problems.

People becoming addicts and having crack babies is everyone's problem.


Yes, it is. And therefore, to combat this, we should legalize prostitution.

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:27 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:People becoming addicts and having crack babies is everyone's problem.
Indeed it is, but this is not something that is created as a result prostitution, but rather is what causes people to turn to it in the first place. It is a dehumanizing and terrible experience for most. Those involved in it should be helped out if there hardships in any way possible. Ostracizing them, imprisoning them, and causing them to fear seeking help out of legal consequences is not something that can possibly help them.
Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist,
Sex-Positive Feminist, Queer, Trans-woman, Polyamorous

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Hathradic States
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29895
Founded: Mar 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hathradic States » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:28 pm

Grenartia wrote:
Hathradic States wrote:Just putting that out there, as it popped into my head. As I said before, I am pro-SSM.

Anything to make the rainbows go away. Anything.


I understand, Hathy, Your Awesomeness. :p

You know what, I'm just gonna put something else on that line for other :P

Liberals: Honestly I was wrong bout em.
I swear I'm not as terrible as you remember.
Sadly Proven Right in 2016
Final text here.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:31 pm

Hathradic States wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
I understand, Hathy, Your Awesomeness. :p

You know what, I'm just gonna put something else on that line for other :P


:lol:
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:31 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:Actors, musicians, and artists contribute to our culture, whores don't.
Art is beautiful, and certainly can inspire entire societies. However, it is perhaps one of the most subjective matters that exists, and apply objective value to it is next to impossible. Sex has also had an undeniable influence on human society. However, it is difficult to give the act itself objective value.
Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist,
Sex-Positive Feminist, Queer, Trans-woman, Polyamorous

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Hathradic States
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29895
Founded: Mar 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hathradic States » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:31 pm

Grenartia wrote:
Hathradic States wrote:You know what, I'm just gonna put something else on that line for other :P


:lol:

Done. :P

Liberals: Honestly I was wrong bout em.
I swear I'm not as terrible as you remember.
Sadly Proven Right in 2016
Final text here.

User avatar
Zweite Alaje
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9551
Founded: Oct 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Zweite Alaje » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:32 pm

Threlizdun wrote:
Zweite Alaje wrote:People becoming addicts and having crack babies is everyone's problem.
Indeed it is, but this is not something that is created as a result prostitution, but rather is what causes people to turn to it in the first place. It is a dehumanizing and terrible experience for most. Those involved in it should be helped out if there hardships in any way possible. Ostracizing them, imprisoning them, and causing them to fear seeking help out of legal consequences is not something that can possibly help them.

I never said we shouldn't help them, I am saying they are dirty and participating in a dishonorable practice.

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Zweite Alaje wrote:People becoming addicts and having crack babies is everyone's problem.


Yes, it is. And therefore, to combat this, we should legalize prostitution.

Goodness no, that's a terrible idea! We don't need any more prostitutes, that's all that will produce!!!
Geist über Körper, durch Aktionen Ehrung
Likes: Corporatism, Market Socialism, Syndicalism, Progressivism, Pantheism, Gaia Hypothesis, Centrism, Dirigisme

Dislikes: Capitalism, Liberalism, Conservatism, Libertarianism, Abortion, Modern Feminism
I've been: Communist , Fascist
Economic Left/Right: -7.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.18

NIFP
Please don't call me Zweite, Al or Ally is fine. Add 2548 posts, founded Oct 06, 2011

User avatar
Essos
Diplomat
 
Posts: 635
Founded: Apr 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Essos » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:33 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:
Threlizdun wrote:Indeed it is, but this is not something that is created as a result prostitution, but rather is what causes people to turn to it in the first place. It is a dehumanizing and terrible experience for most. Those involved in it should be helped out if there hardships in any way possible. Ostracizing them, imprisoning them, and causing them to fear seeking help out of legal consequences is not something that can possibly help them.

I never said we shouldn't help them, I am saying they are dirty and participating in a dishonorable practice.

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Yes, it is. And therefore, to combat this, we should legalize prostitution.

Goodness no, that's a terrible idea! We don't need any more prostitutes, that's all that will produce!!!



Why is this the case? Actually respond, stop arguing by assertion, and source your ignorant claims or shut your flap.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202544
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:34 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:Goodness no, that's a terrible idea! We don't need any more prostitutes, that's all that will produce!!!


Why not, Alaje? I mean, prostitution is a rendering of a service, like any other, when you come to think of it. Why not make it legal? People seek it anyway.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:34 pm

I need to find a source for this so gimme time, but IIRC legalizing, or rather decriminalizing prostitution significantly reduces rates of sexual abuse, sexual assault, and drug addiction.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:35 pm

Hathradic States wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
:lol:

Done. :P


ALL HAIL EL HATHISMO! :bow:

:p
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Hathradic States
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29895
Founded: Mar 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hathradic States » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:37 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:I need to find a source for this so gimme time, but IIRC legalizing, or rather decriminalizing prostitution significantly reduces rates of sexual abuse, sexual assault, and drug addiction.

And, if the government regulates it, more money.

Liberals: Honestly I was wrong bout em.
I swear I'm not as terrible as you remember.
Sadly Proven Right in 2016
Final text here.

User avatar
Hathradic States
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29895
Founded: Mar 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hathradic States » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:37 pm

Grenartia wrote:
Hathradic States wrote:Done. :P


ALL HAIL EL HATHISMO! :bow:

:p

:D

Liberals: Honestly I was wrong bout em.
I swear I'm not as terrible as you remember.
Sadly Proven Right in 2016
Final text here.

User avatar
Christian Democrats
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10089
Founded: Jul 29, 2009
New York Times Democracy

Postby Christian Democrats » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:39 pm

Essos wrote:
Christian Democrats wrote:I oppose same-sex marriage because men and women complement each other, and the law ought to reflect that. I oppose polygamy because an individual ought to devote his or her full attention to a single spouse and because our population is half male and half female. In short, marriage is a union between one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others.


Why? And source your reasoning.

Why? And source your reasoning.

You are incorrect on this point. Mena and women are not 1:1 ratio. Please try again.

For what do you want me to provide a source?

At birth, there are slightly more males. Among seniors, there are more females. During the ages at which people usually marry, the male-female ratio is roughly 1 to 1. At the 2010 Census, the United States was 51.6 percent male for ages 20 to 29.

Tlaceceyaya wrote:Why oppose them getting hospital visitation rights for the people they love?

Let's reform laws regarding hospital visitation instead of marriage laws.

The Steel Magnolia wrote:Morality is of course relative however.

Some people think rape is wrong; some people think it is acceptable. . . .

Grenartia wrote:
Christian Democrats wrote:I oppose same-sex marriage because 1. men and women complement each other, and the 2. law ought to reflect that. I oppose polygamy because an individual ought to devote his or her full attention to a single spouse and because our population is half male and half female. In short, marriage is a union between one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others.


1. Source? From a scientific, peer-reviewed, unbiased source.

2. No, it shouldn't. Because its inherently unconstitutional, and inherently against American values found in the Declaration of Independence (you know, the whole "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness" bit).

1. Have you ever taken a class in anatomy?

2. Since when is it unconstitutional for the laws of society to reflect scientific truths?
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
GA#160: Forced Marriages Ban Act (79%)
GA#175: Organ and Blood Donations Act (68%)^
SC#082: Repeal "Liberate Catholic" (80%)
GA#200: Foreign Marriage Recognition (54%)
GA#213: Privacy Protection Act (70%)
GA#231: Marital Rape Justice Act (81%)^
GA#233: Ban Profits on Workers' Deaths (80%)*
GA#249: Stopping Suicide Seeds (70%)^
GA#253: Repeal "Freedom in Medical Research" (76%)
GA#285: Assisted Suicide Act (70%)^
GA#310: Disabled Voters Act (81%)
GA#373: Repeal "Convention on Execution" (54%)
GA#468: Prohibit Private Prisons (57%)^

* denotes coauthorship
^ repealed resolution
#360: Electile Dysfunction
#452: Foetal Furore
#560: Bicameral Backlash
#570: Clerical Errors

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:40 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:I never said we shouldn't help them, I am saying they are dirty and participating in a dishonorable practice.
The fact that you are referring to their practice as "dirty and dishonorable" is part of the problem, and why most of them cannot seek help.
The Steel Magnolia wrote:Yes, it is. And therefore, to combat this, we should legalize prostitution.

Goodness no, that's a terrible idea! We don't need any more prostitutes, that's all that will produce!!!
You just said you wanted to help them. Did you completely ignore my line about how imprisoning these people who are truly victims in this case and making them fear seeking assistance cannot possibly do anything to help them? Prostitutes need to be treated as human beings that have in the vast majority of cases been forced into an occupation that is dehumanizing, dangerous, and self-destructive, not as criminals. They need support from society and helpful organizations, legal protection from pimps and clients, and regulations to ensure there relative health and safety.
Last edited by Threlizdun on Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist,
Sex-Positive Feminist, Queer, Trans-woman, Polyamorous

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Transhuman Proteus
Senator
 
Posts: 3788
Founded: Mar 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Transhuman Proteus » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:42 pm

Threlizdun wrote:
Zweite Alaje wrote:Actors, musicians, and artists contribute to our culture, whores don't.
Art is beautiful, and certainly can inspire entire societies. However, it is perhaps one of the most subjective matters that exists, and apply objective value to it is next to impossible. Sex has also had an undeniable influence on human society. However, it is difficult to give the act itself objective value.


Certainly seems to have been more than one or two actors, musicians and artists who've been inspired by, or enjoyed the services of, prostitutes as well.

Zweite Alaje wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Yes, it is. And therefore, to combat this, we should legalize prostitution.

Goodness no, that's a terrible idea! We don't need any more prostitutes, that's all that will produce!!!


Why do you think it would automitically produce more? There are a few countries in the world where it has been legalised, or decriminlised, and it hasn't exactly led to a massive upswing in prostitutes there.

It's a business like anything else, so for there to be more prostitutes there'd need to be more demand. And that would lead to more prostitutes whether it was legal or not, the difference being the prostitutes lack protection or assistance when illegal, hence all that bad stuff.
Last edited by Transhuman Proteus on Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Zweite Alaje
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9551
Founded: Oct 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Zweite Alaje » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:42 pm

Essos wrote:
Zweite Alaje wrote:I never said we shouldn't help them, I am saying they are dirty and participating in a dishonorable practice.


Goodness no, that's a terrible idea! We don't need any more prostitutes, that's all that will produce!!!



Why is this the case? Actually respond, stop arguing by assertion, and source your ignorant claims or shut your flap.

I am responding!!! How dare you tell me to shut me flap!!! You don't tell me shit!!!

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Zweite Alaje wrote:Goodness no, that's a terrible idea! We don't need any more prostitutes, that's all that will produce!!!


Why not, Alaje? I mean, prostitution is a rendering of a service, like any other, when you come to think of it. Why not make it legal? People seek it anyway.


I'm sure people want hitmen too, just because we want something doesn't mean we should have it.
Geist über Körper, durch Aktionen Ehrung
Likes: Corporatism, Market Socialism, Syndicalism, Progressivism, Pantheism, Gaia Hypothesis, Centrism, Dirigisme

Dislikes: Capitalism, Liberalism, Conservatism, Libertarianism, Abortion, Modern Feminism
I've been: Communist , Fascist
Economic Left/Right: -7.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.18

NIFP
Please don't call me Zweite, Al or Ally is fine. Add 2548 posts, founded Oct 06, 2011

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202544
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:44 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:I'm sure people want hitmen too, just because we want something doesn't mean we should have it.


Sure, but the rendering of a service like sex is not like wanting a hitman to kill someone.

Besides, with regulation and legalization, you also give these people protection from abusers like pimps or from human trafficking.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Essos
Diplomat
 
Posts: 635
Founded: Apr 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Essos » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:48 pm

Christian Democrats wrote:
Essos wrote:
Why? And source your reasoning.

Why? And source your reasoning.

You are incorrect on this point. Mena and women are not 1:1 ratio. Please try again.

For what do you want me to provide a source?

At birth, there are slightly more males. Among seniors, there are more females. During the ages at which people usually marry, the male-female ratio is roughly 1 to 1. At the 2010 Census, the United States was 51.6 percent male for ages 20 to 29.

Tlaceceyaya wrote:Why oppose them getting hospital visitation rights for the people they love?

Let's reform laws regarding hospital visitation instead of marriage laws.

The Steel Magnolia wrote:Morality is of course relative however.

Some people think rape is wrong; some people think it is acceptable. . . .

Grenartia wrote:
1. Source? From a scientific, peer-reviewed, unbiased source.

2. No, it shouldn't. Because its inherently unconstitutional, and inherently against American values found in the Declaration of Independence (you know, the whole "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness" bit).

1. Have you ever taken a class in anatomy?

2. Since when is it unconstitutional for the laws of society to reflect scientific truths?



Your first two propositions. That it is a necessary condition that men and women complement each other, and that polygamy is problematic for any reason.

It is not a necessary condition of the state of being a man or a woman that you are complemented by the opposite gender.

It is not a necessary condition of human relationships that all attention should be devoted to a single partner.

Of that 51.6 percent, how many are gay, and have no interest in women, or are asexual, and have no interest in anyone? Among other disqualifying factors.

User avatar
Zweite Alaje
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9551
Founded: Oct 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Zweite Alaje » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:48 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Zweite Alaje wrote:I'm sure people want hitmen too, just because we want something doesn't mean we should have it.


Sure, but the rendering of a service like sex is not like wanting a hitman to kill someone.

Besides, with regulation and legalization, you also give these people protection from abusers like pimps or from human trafficking.

I agree with the not punishing prostitutes part, like Threlizdun has said a lot of them are victims. I don't think legalizing it is the answer though.
Geist über Körper, durch Aktionen Ehrung
Likes: Corporatism, Market Socialism, Syndicalism, Progressivism, Pantheism, Gaia Hypothesis, Centrism, Dirigisme

Dislikes: Capitalism, Liberalism, Conservatism, Libertarianism, Abortion, Modern Feminism
I've been: Communist , Fascist
Economic Left/Right: -7.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.18

NIFP
Please don't call me Zweite, Al or Ally is fine. Add 2548 posts, founded Oct 06, 2011

User avatar
Transhuman Proteus
Senator
 
Posts: 3788
Founded: Mar 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Transhuman Proteus » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:50 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Why not, Alaje? I mean, prostitution is a rendering of a service, like any other, when you come to think of it. Why not make it legal? People seek it anyway.


I'm sure people want hitmen too, just because we want something doesn't mean we should have it.


Hitmen kill people. Ergo there is a good reason it shouldn't be allowed even if some people want to have people killed.

Prostitutes have sex with people. Yeah, there is kind of a big gulf between the two. As in one has lot of reasons justifying not just banning it, but activily ensuring no one goes down the path, while the other really doesn't.

User avatar
Essos
Diplomat
 
Posts: 635
Founded: Apr 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Essos » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:50 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:
Essos wrote:

Why is this the case? Actually respond, stop arguing by assertion, and source your ignorant claims or shut your flap.

I am responding!!! How dare you tell me to shut me flap!!! You don't tell me shit!!!

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Why not, Alaje? I mean, prostitution is a rendering of a service, like any other, when you come to think of it. Why not make it legal? People seek it anyway.


I'm sure people want hitmen too, just because we want something doesn't mean we should have it.



Appraently I just did.

You have not shown a single cause for any of your statements, merely unsourced assertions that these things are true. Your argument boils down to "It's yucky because I say so and you are gross and evil people who disagree." Show a source, or stop arguing.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202544
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:50 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Sure, but the rendering of a service like sex is not like wanting a hitman to kill someone.

Besides, with regulation and legalization, you also give these people protection from abusers like pimps or from human trafficking.

I agree with the not punishing prostitutes part, like Threlizdun has said a lot of them are victims. I don't think legalizing it is the answer though.


But don't you think that with legalization these sex industry workers could get medical insurance, for example? They can also perhaps form unions to protect themselves from work related problems.

And I'm ending my part on this mini-highjack before a mod applies the newspaper to me. :p
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:51 pm

Christian Democrats wrote:
Essos wrote:
Why? And source your reasoning.

Why? And source your reasoning.

You are incorrect on this point. Mena and women are not 1:1 ratio. Please try again.

For what do you want me to provide a source?

At birth, there are slightly more males. Among seniors, there are more females. During the ages at which people usually marry, the male-female ratio is roughly 1 to 1. At the 2010 Census, the United States was 51.6 percent male for ages 20 to 29.

Tlaceceyaya wrote:Why oppose them getting hospital visitation rights for the people they love?

Let's reform laws regarding hospital visitation instead of marriage laws.

The Steel Magnolia wrote:Morality is of course relative however.

Some people think rape is wrong; some people think it is acceptable. . . .

Grenartia wrote:
1. Source? From a scientific, peer-reviewed, unbiased source.

2. No, it shouldn't. Because its inherently unconstitutional, and inherently against American values found in the Declaration of Independence (you know, the whole "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness" bit).

1. Have you ever taken a class in anatomy?

2. Since when is it unconstitutional for the laws of society to reflect scientific truths?


1. That has nothing to do with this. Also, you seem to be indirectly trying to claim that the love a man has for another man is not as valid as the love a man has for a woman. Which means you're claiming men are incapable of loving men in the same way as women. Which is inherently sexist.

2. Prove to me that the inherently sexist concept of complimentarianism is valid, has a basis in science (again, peer-reviewed, unbiased, scientific sources), and that marriage has anything to do with reproduction (which is what you seem to be getting at), and I might be inclined to grant that point to you. Until then, there's less than a snowball's chance on Venus.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Transhuman Proteus
Senator
 
Posts: 3788
Founded: Mar 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Transhuman Proteus » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:56 pm

Christian Democrats wrote:1. Have you ever taken a class in anatomy?


Funny how few scientists, anatomists, doctors, psychologist thinks that is at all relevant. You want to take a super simple view based upon your interpretation of "in science class when we learned about reproduction " there is a whole lot of other stuff we should be making policy based on.

Like I hope you never eat processed foods, and that you actually go out and hunt/collect it in a way that burns lots of energy. Because our bodies didn't evolve to easily access high energy, low nutrient foods.

2. Since when is it unconstitutional for the laws of society to reflect scientific truths?


When they don't because they don't.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Atrito, Benuty, Des-Bal, Dimetrodon Empire, Drop Your Pants, Dtn, Google [Bot], Greater Guantanamo, Nilokeras, Suomaajland, Tarsonis, The Jamesian Republic, UnVerkhoyanska, Valrifall, Vassenor

Advertisement

Remove ads