NATION

PASSWORD

Same-Sex Marriage: Point of View

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
CVT Temp
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1860
Founded: Oct 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby CVT Temp » Sun Mar 17, 2013 2:06 pm

Why are we still arguing about what the big book of multiple choice says?
Иф ю кан рид дис, ю ар рили борд ор ю ар Россияне.

User avatar
The Realm of God
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7562
Founded: Jan 26, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Realm of God » Sun Mar 17, 2013 2:18 pm

Cerantia wrote:
The Realm of God wrote:I will not go as far as some and apply pejoratives to your beliefs. However you will need to consider the fact that biblical fundamentalism is the primary cause of misery for the LGBTQ community. As you seem to be deeply concerned with matters of personal morality I will tell you that I disagree with your views, however it seems that you also care about the well being of people as well. Therefore I shall give you two pieces of advice and two theological theories and statements to procrastinate on. Firstly the country you reside in is a secular state, therefore we must discount religion in matters of public governance, secondly is to take the limitation on gay marriage and apply it to yourself, how would you feel if you were not allowed to marry someone who you loved and wanted to spend your life with, is that person's happiness unimportant to you?

Theologically you will find no prohibition against same sex marriage (however to be intellectually honest I have to admit that there is criticism of gay sex) nowhere is marriage defined in the way social conservatives describe it. You also have to consider that the bible is not the be all and end all of Christianity, I encourage you to read some well thought out theological tracts and to explore the world outside of sola scriptura. Finally consider that Jesus brought a message of forgivness and tolerance, do not be lead down the path of hate and accidentaly oppress people in the name of morality "he who is without sin cast the first stone."

With Sincerity.

RoG.


Within the New Testament? 1 Corinthians 6:1-20 (sorry, stated 12-20 earlier).

Yet still, I understand that somewhat. Not nearly as much as a homosexual myself, but I understand, to an extent. I don't want to offend someone, or hurt someone, or prevent someone from loving their partner. But at the same time... what if I'm right, and they're wrong? Is it just for me to say 'OK, go ahead', only to know in the end, when they die, they go to hell? Or what if you're right? What if I'm crying 'Lord, Lord' and not really know what God's trying to do here?

It's... not simply a matter of morality. It's a matter of I care about my friend. I care that he is being made fun of for being homosexual, and being avoided by some of my friends. I care that, according to what I believe, and what I have read, my friend is committing a sin every time he even thinks of a man in that way. I care that, if he doesn't come to know the Lord, he will have eternal damnation.

Quite frankly, that scares me. It scares me more than my car crash, where someone almost died. It scares me more than knowing my Dad was flying home from Boston during 9/11. It scares me more than knowing a tornado passed through my hometown, and 'curved' around our property line. It keeps me up at night.

And you know the worst part? No matter who is right, someone's wrong. If I'm right, then homosexuals are sinning day in and day out, and they go to hell unless they come to know the Lord. If you're right, millions upon millions of Christians are putting people who are doing absolutely nothing wrong in the eyes of God in the wrong light, causing them to stumble, and are thus condemned to hell. And if the atheists are right - well, we all die in the end anyways. Eventually this planet will be engulfed by the sun and this galaxy will collide with another, and 50 billion years or so or whatever it was in the future, it doesn't matter.

God, this is depressing.


Hell, oh they only taught you St Augustine in your Sunday School didn't they. I was an atheist growing up so I never went to Sunday school but really should read up on the apocastatsis. In Eastern Orthodoxy, all people who are not unrepentantly evil will one day ascend to heaven. This is because God is infinitly merciful and Jesus said he would 'gather everyone to him.'This is called Origenist theology

Here are some passages Orthodox Christians use to promote this view.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apocatastasis
British, Orthodox Christian, humanist and stoic.

Pro. Disraelian Progressive Conservatism, One Nation Toryism, Distributionism, Civil Liberties, Pro UK, Pro US Constitution. Pro USA.

Progressive Conservative Economic Right: 0.38 Social Libertarian -2.00.

Christian Democrat NSG Senate.

User avatar
Dooom35796821595
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9309
Founded: Sep 11, 2011
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Dooom35796821595 » Sun Mar 17, 2013 2:23 pm

Cerantia wrote:
Khadgar wrote:Your religion is not my problem. My sexuality is not your business.

Exactly. So then why should the Church have to marry you? If it's outside the Church, then we don't have to condone it.


the church is still subject to the law, law says its legal and refusal could be illegal in itself.
besides, have you read the bible? one half contradicts the other.
When life gives you lemons, you BURN THEIR HOUSE DOWN!
Anything can be justified if it is cool. If at first you don't succeed, destroy all in your way.
"Your methods are stupid! Your progress has been stupid! Your intelligence is stupid! For the sake of the mission, you must be terminated!”

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sun Mar 17, 2013 2:26 pm

Dooom35796821595 wrote:
Cerantia wrote:Exactly. So then why should the Church have to marry you? If it's outside the Church, then we don't have to condone it.


the church is still subject to the law, law says its legal and refusal could be illegal in itself.
besides, have you read the bible? one half contradicts the other.


Refusal would not be illegal. Churches have never, ever been forced to marry any two people whatsoever by the U.S. government. Never. Not at any point that I'm aware of in the entire history of our nation, no matter what the reasons given may have been. To this day, there are churches that will refuse to marry interracial couples, and the U.S. government will not force them to do so.

User avatar
New Chalcedon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12226
Founded: Sep 20, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby New Chalcedon » Sun Mar 17, 2013 2:28 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Dooom35796821595 wrote:
the church is still subject to the law, law says its legal and refusal could be illegal in itself.
besides, have you read the bible? one half contradicts the other.


Refusal would not be illegal. Churches have never, ever been forced to marry any two people whatsoever by the U.S. government. Never. Not at any point that I'm aware of in the entire history of our nation, no matter what the reasons given may have been. To this day, there are churches that will refuse to marry interracial couples, and the U.S. government will not force them to do so.


Oh, leave him be. He's having far too much fun being persecuted to deal with the plebian reality that no Christian church in the USA has ever been forced to go against its conscience.
Fuck it all. Let the world burn - there's no way roaches could do a worse job of being decent than we have.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sun Mar 17, 2013 2:30 pm

New Chalcedon wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Refusal would not be illegal. Churches have never, ever been forced to marry any two people whatsoever by the U.S. government. Never. Not at any point that I'm aware of in the entire history of our nation, no matter what the reasons given may have been. To this day, there are churches that will refuse to marry interracial couples, and the U.S. government will not force them to do so.


Oh, leave him be. He's having far too much fun being persecuted to deal with the plebian reality that no Christian church in the USA has ever been forced to go against its conscience.


Argh. If he really wants to be a martyr that badly, lumber and nails are cheap.

User avatar
Distruzio
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23841
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Distruzio » Sun Mar 17, 2013 9:30 pm

Hurdegaryp wrote:
Divair wrote:It's the other way around, lad ;)

So man created God, therefore the deeds of God are actually the deeds of man. This means that God evolves.


Actually, it would mean that our understanding of God evolves and changes. Even if Man created God.
Eastern Orthodox Christian

Anti-Progressive
Conservative

Anti-Feminist
Right leaning Distributist

Anti-Equity
Western Chauvanist

Anti-Globalism
Nationalist

User avatar
Vredlandia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5097
Founded: Sep 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Vredlandia » Sun Mar 17, 2013 10:46 pm

Isn't "to lay with a man as you would with a man, or lay with a woman as you would with a woman" out of context? I'm not sure, but I think I saw this statement a while ago and someone proved it to be out of context.

Well, but regarding the topic: I'm gay myself and see no reason not to allow same sex marriages. If one loves eachother one should have the right to marry. That simple.

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sun Mar 17, 2013 10:55 pm

Gay marriage is great and doesn't do shit for LGBT people who really need help.

And I can very, very easily see people saying "You can get married now, what more do you want?" when there are countless issues still at hand. Homelessness, employment, health care, widespread discrimination and societal oppression, increased risks of suicide, prostitution, alcoholism, drug abuse. Homophobia and transphobia is widespread, and must be dealt with.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Sun Mar 17, 2013 10:56 pm

Cerantia wrote:
The Realm of God wrote:I will not go as far as some and apply pejoratives to your beliefs. However you will need to consider the fact that biblical fundamentalism is the primary cause of misery for the LGBTQ community. As you seem to be deeply concerned with matters of personal morality I will tell you that I disagree with your views, however it seems that you also care about the well being of people as well. Therefore I shall give you two pieces of advice and two theological theories and statements to procrastinate on. Firstly the country you reside in is a secular state, therefore we must discount religion in matters of public governance, secondly is to take the limitation on gay marriage and apply it to yourself, how would you feel if you were not allowed to marry someone who you loved and wanted to spend your life with, is that person's happiness unimportant to you?

Theologically you will find no prohibition against same sex marriage (however to be intellectually honest I have to admit that there is criticism of gay sex) nowhere is marriage defined in the way social conservatives describe it. You also have to consider that the bible is not the be all and end all of Christianity, I encourage you to read some well thought out theological tracts and to explore the world outside of sola scriptura. Finally consider that Jesus brought a message of forgivness and tolerance, do not be lead down the path of hate and accidentaly oppress people in the name of morality "he who is without sin cast the first stone."

With Sincerity.

RoG.


Within the New Testament? 1 Corinthians 6:1-20 (sorry, stated 12-20 earlier).

Yet still, I understand that somewhat. Not nearly as much as a homosexual myself, but I understand, to an extent. I don't want to offend someone, or hurt someone, or prevent someone from loving their partner. But at the same time... what if I'm right, and they're wrong? Is it just for me to say 'OK, go ahead', only to know in the end, when they die, they go to hell? Or what if you're right? What if I'm crying 'Lord, Lord' and not really know what God's trying to do here?

It's... not simply a matter of morality. It's a matter of I care about my friend. I care that he is being made fun of for being homosexual, and being avoided by some of my friends. I care that, according to what I believe, and what I have read, my friend is committing a sin every time he even thinks of a man in that way. I care that, if he doesn't come to know the Lord, he will have eternal damnation.

Quite frankly, that scares me. It scares me more than my car crash, where someone almost died. It scares me more than knowing my Dad was flying home from Boston during 9/11. It scares me more than knowing a tornado passed through my hometown, and 'curved' around our property line. It keeps me up at night.

And you know the worst part? No matter who is right, someone's wrong. If I'm right, then homosexuals are sinning day in and day out, and they go to hell unless they come to know the Lord. If you're right, millions upon millions of Christians are putting people who are doing absolutely nothing wrong in the eyes of God in the wrong light, causing them to stumble, and are thus condemned to hell. And if the atheists are right - well, we all die in the end anyways. Eventually this planet will be engulfed by the sun and this galaxy will collide with another, and 50 billion years or so or whatever it was in the future, it doesn't matter.

God, this is depressing.


Of course, the only option that is consistent with the known facts of homosexuality, and the theology of a merciful, loving God is that "millions upon millions of Christians are putting people who are doing absolutely nothing wrong in the eyes of God in the wrong light". Obviously, a God that creates somebody with an attraction to the same gender as themselves, and then arbitrarily declares that attraction (which does no inherent harm to anybody) to be a sin of cannot be considered merciful or loving by any sane definition. Such a God would be a colossal dick who should be opposed at every turn (it is also because of this logic that I cannot reconcile my Christian beliefs with a permanent Hell).
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Essos
Diplomat
 
Posts: 635
Founded: Apr 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Essos » Sun Mar 17, 2013 10:58 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:Gay marriage is great and doesn't do shit for LGBT people who really need help.

And I can very, very easily see people saying "You can get married now, what more do you want?" when there are countless issues still at hand. Homelessness, employment, health care, widespread discrimination and societal oppression, increased risks of suicide, prostitution, alcoholism, drug abuse. Homophobia and transphobia is widespread, and must be dealt with.


What's inherently wrong with prostitution?

Also, tangent, I dislike applying phobia to hate of gays. We don't call racism against blacks negrophobia, lets call it what it is. Hate, not fear.

User avatar
Lesbia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1194
Founded: Nov 05, 2011
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Lesbia » Sun Mar 17, 2013 10:59 pm

Regnum Dominae wrote:You do not have the right to force your religion on others.

Marriage is a union between any two people, regardless of gender or sexuality.

> Says one cannot "force" religion on another
> "Forces" opinion on another
We're Lesbians, not lesbians.

Economic Left/Right: -2.25
Authoritarian/Libertarian: -3.13
Updated July 18, 2016

Supporting HRC for president.

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:00 pm

Essos wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:Gay marriage is great and doesn't do shit for LGBT people who really need help.

And I can very, very easily see people saying "You can get married now, what more do you want?" when there are countless issues still at hand. Homelessness, employment, health care, widespread discrimination and societal oppression, increased risks of suicide, prostitution, alcoholism, drug abuse. Homophobia and transphobia is widespread, and must be dealt with.


What's inherently wrong with prostitution?

Also, tangent, I dislike applying phobia to hate of gays. We don't call racism against blacks negrophobia, lets call it what it is. Hate, not fear.


Absolutely nothing is wrong with prostitution, so long it is consensual and only filled with adults.

I'm personally friends with people who went into the sex trade industry at 13. Others, at 12 or 11 precisely because of (specifically anti-trans) bigotry.

And okay, fine, if you want to have a semantic argument that's at this point in time irrelevant to how the majority of the population uses the word.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:00 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:Gay marriage is great and doesn't do shit for LGBT people who really need help.

And I can very, very easily see people saying "You can get married now, what more do you want?" when there are countless issues still at hand. Homelessness, employment, health care, widespread discrimination and societal oppression, increased risks of suicide, prostitution, alcoholism, drug abuse. Homophobia and transphobia is widespread, and must be dealt with.


The point of gay marriage, aside from the obvious points of equality that I'm sure you are already aware, is that it makes us more easy to identify with. And therefore more likely for people to change negative views.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Zweite Alaje
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9551
Founded: Oct 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Zweite Alaje » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:02 pm

Essos wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:Gay marriage is great and doesn't do shit for LGBT people who really need help.

And I can very, very easily see people saying "You can get married now, what more do you want?" when there are countless issues still at hand. Homelessness, employment, health care, widespread discrimination and societal oppression, increased risks of suicide, prostitution, alcoholism, drug abuse. Homophobia and transphobia is widespread, and must be dealt with.


What's inherently wrong with prostitution?

Also, tangent, I dislike applying phobia to hate of gays. We don't call racism against blacks negrophobia, lets call it what it is. Hate, not fear.

Negrophobia?!?! :rofl:

Anyway, prostitution is a huge problem. It is often connected to increases in STDs and substance abuse.
Geist über Körper, durch Aktionen Ehrung
Likes: Corporatism, Market Socialism, Syndicalism, Progressivism, Pantheism, Gaia Hypothesis, Centrism, Dirigisme

Dislikes: Capitalism, Liberalism, Conservatism, Libertarianism, Abortion, Modern Feminism
I've been: Communist , Fascist
Economic Left/Right: -7.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.18

NIFP
Please don't call me Zweite, Al or Ally is fine. Add 2548 posts, founded Oct 06, 2011

User avatar
Christian Democrats
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10089
Founded: Jul 29, 2009
New York Times Democracy

Postby Christian Democrats » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:04 pm

I oppose same-sex marriage because men and women complement each other, and the law ought to reflect that. I oppose polygamy because an individual ought to devote his or her full attention to a single spouse and because our population is half male and half female. In short, marriage is a union between one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others.
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
GA#160: Forced Marriages Ban Act (79%)
GA#175: Organ and Blood Donations Act (68%)^
SC#082: Repeal "Liberate Catholic" (80%)
GA#200: Foreign Marriage Recognition (54%)
GA#213: Privacy Protection Act (70%)
GA#231: Marital Rape Justice Act (81%)^
GA#233: Ban Profits on Workers' Deaths (80%)*
GA#249: Stopping Suicide Seeds (70%)^
GA#253: Repeal "Freedom in Medical Research" (76%)
GA#285: Assisted Suicide Act (70%)^
GA#310: Disabled Voters Act (81%)
GA#373: Repeal "Convention on Execution" (54%)
GA#468: Prohibit Private Prisons (57%)^

* denotes coauthorship
^ repealed resolution
#360: Electile Dysfunction
#452: Foetal Furore
#560: Bicameral Backlash
#570: Clerical Errors

User avatar
Essos
Diplomat
 
Posts: 635
Founded: Apr 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Essos » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:04 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:
Essos wrote:
What's inherently wrong with prostitution?

Also, tangent, I dislike applying phobia to hate of gays. We don't call racism against blacks negrophobia, lets call it what it is. Hate, not fear.

Negrophobia?!?! :rofl:

Anyway, prostitution is a huge problem. It is often connected to increases in STDs and substance abuse.


Prostitution, selling sex for money, is not inherently a bad thing. Criminal prostitution, where sex workers are villified and treated like shit or subhumans, is bad.

Prostitution is linked to those things because it is so heavily stigmatized by society.

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:06 pm

Grenartia wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:Gay marriage is great and doesn't do shit for LGBT people who really need help.

And I can very, very easily see people saying "You can get married now, what more do you want?" when there are countless issues still at hand. Homelessness, employment, health care, widespread discrimination and societal oppression, increased risks of suicide, prostitution, alcoholism, drug abuse. Homophobia and transphobia is widespread, and must be dealt with.


The point of gay marriage, aside from the obvious points of equality that I'm sure you are already aware, is that it makes us more easy to identify with. And therefore more likely for people to change negative views.

Obviously I support gay marriage. I'm gay. I'd like to marry my partner some day.

I also think that, while it's important, it's also a distraction from many of the issues.

Recently. Maryland, which voted for marriage equality, killed off a bill that would have given trans* folk the same rights as gays.

http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2013/03/1 ... otections/

One of the Democrats who voted against the protections was Sen. Norman Stone, who in 1967 voted to maintain the state’s ban on interracial marriage and who opposed same-sex marriage in 2012. Another was Sen. James Brochin, who was actually convinced to vote for marriage equality because of how “appalling” opponents’ testimony was. Apparently when the Family Research Council’s Peter Sprigg testified that trans people are “suffering” from a “delusion” and require therapy instead of protections, it just wasn’t appalling enough.



Gay marriage is a distraction. The T is largely ignored in GBLT spaces. I can't tell how many times I've been in a queer space and I've been the token trans* person, or how many times queer activist groups have shafted trans* people in favour of cis white gay dudes (this is also why I dislike pride parades, and also the HRC). For example, in NY, activism pushed hard for gay marriage - ignoring the fact that the initial focus was on passing GENDA, aka the Gender Expression Non-Discrimination Act, which would have provided things like housing or job discrimination protection for transgender persons.

So yes. I think gay marriage is a fucking distraction.
Last edited by The Steel Magnolia on Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:06 pm

Lesbia wrote:
Regnum Dominae wrote:You do not have the right to force your religion on others.

Marriage is a union between any two people, regardless of gender or sexuality.

> Says one cannot "force" religion on another
> "Forces" opinion on another


There's a difference. Anti-SSM activists are inherently forcing their views down the throats of every same-sex couple who wishes to marry.

On the other hand, SSM shoves NOTHING down the throats of ANYBODY. If you have an objection to same-sex marriage, you're in luck, because NOBODY'S forcing you to get one. If you're a member of the clergy, and you have an objection to performing same-sex marriages, again, you're in luck, because NOBODY'S forcing you to perform them.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Essos
Diplomat
 
Posts: 635
Founded: Apr 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Essos » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:06 pm

Christian Democrats wrote:I oppose same-sex marriage because men and women complement each other, and the law ought to reflect that. I oppose polygamy because an individual ought to devote his or her full attention to a single spouse and because our population is half male and half female. In short, marriage is a union between one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others.


Why? And source your reasoning.

Why? And source your reasoning.

You are incorrect on this point. Mena and women are not 1:1 ratio. Please try again.

User avatar
Tlaceceyaya
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9932
Founded: Oct 17, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Tlaceceyaya » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:06 pm

Christian Democrats wrote:I oppose same-sex marriage because men and women complement each other, and the law ought to reflect that. I oppose polygamy because an individual ought to devote his or her full attention to a single spouse and because our population is half male and half female. In short, marriage is a union between one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others.

Some men complement men, and some women complement women.
Why oppose them getting hospital visitation rights for the people they love?
Economic Left/Right -9.75, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian -8.87
Also, Bonobos.
I am a market socialist, atheist, more to come maybe at some point
Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:06 pm

Christian Democrats wrote:I oppose same-sex marriage because men and women complement each other, and the law ought to reflect that. I oppose polygamy because an individual ought to devote his or her full attention to a single spouse and because our population is half male and half female. In short, marriage is a union between one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others.


Yes we know you hate freedom.

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:06 pm

The South beat you to it, and beat you to being wrong about it as well.

Separate-but-equal is anything but equal. Marriage is marriage, and I, nor does the Constitution, care about your religious beliefs with regard to it.

User avatar
Zweite Alaje
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9551
Founded: Oct 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Zweite Alaje » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:07 pm

Essos wrote:
Zweite Alaje wrote:Negrophobia?!?! :rofl:

Anyway, prostitution is a huge problem. It is often connected to increases in STDs and substance abuse.


Prostitution, selling sex for money, is not inherently a bad thing. Criminal prostitution, where sex workers are villified and treated like shit or subhumans, is bad.

Prostitution is linked to those things because it is so heavily stigmatized by society.

Eh, I don't see how prostitution a can be justified by a moral civilization. It is unclean.
Geist über Körper, durch Aktionen Ehrung
Likes: Corporatism, Market Socialism, Syndicalism, Progressivism, Pantheism, Gaia Hypothesis, Centrism, Dirigisme

Dislikes: Capitalism, Liberalism, Conservatism, Libertarianism, Abortion, Modern Feminism
I've been: Communist , Fascist
Economic Left/Right: -7.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.18

NIFP
Please don't call me Zweite, Al or Ally is fine. Add 2548 posts, founded Oct 06, 2011

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:08 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:
Essos wrote:
Prostitution, selling sex for money, is not inherently a bad thing. Criminal prostitution, where sex workers are villified and treated like shit or subhumans, is bad.

Prostitution is linked to those things because it is so heavily stigmatized by society.

Eh, I don't see how prostitution a can be justified by a moral civilization. It is unclean.


Morality is of course relative however.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Atrito, Benuty, Des-Bal, Dimetrodon Empire, Drop Your Pants, Dtn, Elejamie, Google [Bot], Greater Guantanamo, Nilokeras, Suomaajland, Tarsonis, The Jamesian Republic, UnVerkhoyanska, Valrifall, Vassenor

Advertisement

Remove ads