North Korea renders armistice null and void,cuts S.K Hotline

by **The God-Realm** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:55 pm

Yankee Empire wrote:Whose ready to slaughter some NK?

Sup Rambo.

But tbh if they DID manage to get to the US I would support NK because I need food and who is ready to slaughter some rednecks.

by **Democratic Koyro** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:55 pm

The united imperial sector wrote:
Yankee Empire wrote:Whose ready to slaughter some NK?

Oh me if you give me a rifle and a few months of training ill fight the first year for free!

The US would suffer a damn sight more casulities than it did with Iraq. Its not the sort of conflict i would sign up to fight in.

by **Novraslavia** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:55 pm

The united imperial sector wrote:
Wisconsin9 wrote:Best of luck on your journey to what I'm sure will be a plethora of only the most reliable hardcore conservative and neo-Nazi websites.

Exactly do you have any you could suggest?

Wikipedia. I'd start with this article and branch off from there.

by **Arumdaum** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:55 pm

Yankee Empire wrote:Whose ready to slaughter some NK?

Who's ready to slaughter some Americans?
Who's ready to slaughter some French?
Who's ready to slaughter some Japanese?
Who's ready to slaughter some Afghans?
Who's ready to slaughter some Iraqis?

I don't get how calls for genocide are somehow okay, as long as it's on North Koreans.

by **Wisconsin9** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:55 pm

The united imperial sector wrote:
Wisconsin9 wrote:Best of luck on your journey to what I'm sure will be a plethora of only the most reliable hardcore conservative and neo-Nazi websites.

Exactly do you have any you could suggest?

I was being sarcastic and implying that you'd probably only end up at incredibly biased sites.

by **Warinemachine** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:56 pm

Johz wrote:
Regnum Dominae wrote:-snip-

The New York Times
March 20 2013
WHY WE SHOULD NEVER HAVE GONE TO WAR IN KOREA

The New York Times
March 20 2016
NEW PRESIDENT PROMISES TO BRING TROOPS HOME

The New York Times
20 March 2040
NEW PRESIDENT PROMISES TO END BOTH AFGHANISTAN AND KOREA. AS WELL AS SYRIA. AND ALL THE OTHERS. WHY IS THIS STILL HEADLINE NEWS?

Korea could be vietnam 2.5 exept this time we shouldn't stop short of total victory.

by **Nicer potlimitomaha** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:57 pm

Regnum Dominae wrote:The New York Times
March 12, 2013
NORTH KOREA NUKES PYONGYANG IN ATTEMPT TO DESTROY SEOUL

The New York Times
March 13, 2013
SOUTH KOREA PREPARES FOR INVASION OF NORTH KOREA

The New York Times
March 14, 2013
SOUTH KOREA INVADES NORTH

The New York Times
March 15, 2013
USA ASSISTS SOUTH KOREA IN INVASION OF NORTH

The New York Times
March 16, 2013
AMERICAN, SOUTH KOREAN FORCES REACH PYONGYANG

The New York Times
March 17, 2013
SOUTH KOREAN TROOPS CAPTURE KIM JONG UN

The New York Times
March 18, 2013
KIM JONG UN EXECUTED IN FRONT OF CHEERING NORTH KOREAN CROWD

The New York Times
March 19, 2013
SOUTH KOREA GAINS FULL CONTROL OF NORTH, BEGINS UNIFICATION PROCESS

by **Novraslavia** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:58 pm

Nicer potlimitomaha wrote:

Christ. Here we go.

by **Democratic Koyro** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:58 pm

Warinemachine wrote:
Johz wrote:The New York Times
March 20 2013
WHY WE SHOULD NEVER HAVE GONE TO WAR IN KOREA

The New York Times
March 20 2016
NEW PRESIDENT PROMISES TO BRING TROOPS HOME

The New York Times
20 March 2040
NEW PRESIDENT PROMISES TO END BOTH AFGHANISTAN AND KOREA. AS WELL AS SYRIA. AND ALL THE OTHERS. WHY IS THIS STILL HEADLINE NEWS?

Korea could be vietnam 2.5 exept this time we shouldn't stop short of total victory.

SO....mass unpopularity, utter defeat and reunification under the North?

by **The God-Realm** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:59 pm

Ahahaha "cheering" North Koreans.

by **The Corparation** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:59 pm

Wisconsin9 wrote:
The Corparation wrote:They actually have the launch system. They lack however the technology to build an accurate rentry vhecile for any warheads. And its unclear if they have one small enough to mount even if they did.

Actually, now that I think about it, any civilian target they could conceivably hit would have buildings reinforced against earthquakes, which would seriously limit damage to a city. So rather than an entire city going down, we lose maybe a dozen city blocks.

It would be much worse than that, assuming it detonated correctly. But the danger is nonexistent because the know they'll get glassed if they try it.

by **Gibberish America** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:59 pm

Regnum Dominae wrote:The New York Times
March 12, 2013
NORTH KOREA NUKES PYONGYANG IN ATTEMPT TO DESTROY SEOUL

The New York Times
March 13, 2013
SOUTH KOREA PREPARES FOR INVASION OF NORTH KOREA

The New York Times
March 14, 2013
SOUTH KOREA INVADES NORTH

The New York Times
March 15, 2013
USA ASSISTS SOUTH KOREA IN INVASION OF NORTH

The New York Times
March 16, 2013
AMERICAN, SOUTH KOREAN FORCES REACH PYONGYANG

The New York Times
March 17, 2013
SOUTH KOREAN TROOPS CAPTURE KIM JONG UN

The New York Times
March 18, 2013
KIM JONG UN EXECUTED IN FRONT OF CHEERING NORTH KOREAN CROWD

The New York Times
March 19, 2013
SOUTH KOREA GAINS FULL CONTROL OF NORTH, BEGINS UNIFICATION PROCESS

Ah, if only...

by **Democratic Koyro** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:00 pm

Nicer potlimitomaha wrote:
Regnum Dominae wrote:The New York Times
March 12, 2013
NORTH KOREA NUKES PYONGYANG IN ATTEMPT TO DESTROY SEOUL

The New York Times
March 13, 2013
SOUTH KOREA PREPARES FOR INVASION OF NORTH KOREA

The New York Times
March 14, 2013
SOUTH KOREA INVADES NORTH

The New York Times
March 15, 2013
USA ASSISTS SOUTH KOREA IN INVASION OF NORTH

The New York Times
March 16, 2013
AMERICAN, SOUTH KOREAN FORCES REACH PYONGYANG

The New York Times
March 17, 2013
SOUTH KOREAN TROOPS CAPTURE KIM JONG UN

The New York Times
March 18, 2013
KIM JONG UN EXECUTED IN FRONT OF CHEERING NORTH KOREAN CROWD

The New York Times
March 19, 2013
SOUTH KOREA GAINS FULL CONTROL OF NORTH, BEGINS UNIFICATION PROCESS

You're deluded if you think North Korea could be defeated in a single week.

by **The God-Realm** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:00 pm

Novraslavia wrote:
Nicer potlimitomaha wrote:

Christ. Here we go.

It's not really going to happen.

by **The united imperial sector** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:01 pm

Arumdaum wrote:
Yankee Empire wrote:Whose ready to slaughter some NK?

Who's ready to slaughter some Americans?
Who's ready to slaughter some French?
Who's ready to slaughter some Japanese?
Who's ready to slaughter some Afghans?
Who's ready to slaughter some Iraqis?

I don't get how calls for genocide are somehow okay, as long as it's on North Koreans.

You go right on ahead tuff guy bring it have fun fighting thru all 50 states national guard division as well as the hundreds of thousands of armed civilans oh and the U.S military so good luck same with all the othier countries.

by **The God-Realm** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:01 pm

The united imperial sector wrote:
Arumdaum wrote:Who's ready to slaughter some Americans?
Who's ready to slaughter some French?
Who's ready to slaughter some Japanese?
Who's ready to slaughter some Afghans?
Who's ready to slaughter some Iraqis?

I don't get how calls for genocide are somehow okay, as long as it's on North Koreans.

You go right on ahead tuff guy bring it have fun fighting thru all 50 states national guard division as well as the hundreds of thousands of armed civilans oh and the U.S military so good luck same with all the othier countries.

You need a sarcasm alarm.

by **Arumdaum** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:02 pm

The united imperial sector wrote:
Arumdaum wrote:Who's ready to slaughter some Americans?
Who's ready to slaughter some French?
Who's ready to slaughter some Japanese?
Who's ready to slaughter some Afghans?
Who's ready to slaughter some Iraqis?

I don't get how calls for genocide are somehow okay, as long as it's on North Koreans.

You go right on ahead tuff guy bring it have fun fighting thru all 50 states national guard division as well as the hundreds of thousands of armed civilans oh and the U.S military so good luck same with all the othier countries.

*sigh*

by **The united imperial sector** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:02 pm

Wisconsin9 wrote:
The united imperial sector wrote:Exactly do you have any you could suggest?

I was being sarcastic and implying that you'd probably only end up at incredibly biased sites.

I actualy clicked on your wiki link and i'm reading it now.

by **Democratic Koyro** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:02 pm

The united imperial sector wrote:
Arumdaum wrote:Who's ready to slaughter some Americans?
Who's ready to slaughter some French?
Who's ready to slaughter some Japanese?
Who's ready to slaughter some Afghans?
Who's ready to slaughter some Iraqis?

I don't get how calls for genocide are somehow okay, as long as it's on North Koreans.

You go right on ahead tuff guy bring it have fun fighting thru all 50 states national guard division as well as the hundreds of thousands of armed civilans oh and the U.S military so good luck same with all the othier countries.

How old are you?

by **Wisconsin9** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:02 pm

The Corparation wrote:
Wisconsin9 wrote:Actually, now that I think about it, any civilian target they could conceivably hit would have buildings reinforced against earthquakes, which would seriously limit damage to a city. So rather than an entire city going down, we lose maybe a dozen city blocks.

It would be much worse than that, assuming it detonated correctly. But the danger is nonexistent because the know they'll get glassed if they try it.

Well, considering that every single building in Hiroshima made of reinforced concrete survived—including one less than 200 meters away from the bomb's hypocenter—and that the only cities they might have reason to hit are on the Pacific plate, and therefore would include a vast multitude of reinforced buildings, plus the fact that the buildings in most of them are very dense which would limit damage from the flash, it probably wouldn't be as terrible as we're expecting.

by **The Corparation** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:02 pm

Warinemachine wrote:
Johz wrote:The New York Times
March 20 2013
WHY WE SHOULD NEVER HAVE GONE TO WAR IN KOREA

The New York Times
March 20 2016
NEW PRESIDENT PROMISES TO BRING TROOPS HOME

The New York Times
20 March 2040
NEW PRESIDENT PROMISES TO END BOTH AFGHANISTAN AND KOREA. AS WELL AS SYRIA. AND ALL THE OTHERS. WHY IS THIS STILL HEADLINE NEWS?

Korea could be vietnam 2.5 exept this time we shouldn't stop short of total victory.

It really depends on whether or not China jumps in on N. Korea's side again. Chances are with their relations they stand a good chance of sitting out unless S. Korean and Allied troops get to close to the border.

by **Wisconsin9** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:03 pm

The united imperial sector wrote:
Wisconsin9 wrote:I was being sarcastic and implying that you'd probably only end up at incredibly biased sites.

I actualy clicked on your wiki link and i'm reading it now.

I never posted a wiki link.

by **The united imperial sector** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:03 pm

Democratic Koyro wrote:
The united imperial sector wrote:You go right on ahead tuff guy bring it have fun fighting thru all 50 states national guard division as well as the hundreds of thousands of armed civilans oh and the U.S military so good luck same with all the othier countries.

How old are you?

I am 15 years old and how about you?

by **The united imperial sector** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:03 pm

Wisconsin9 wrote:
The united imperial sector wrote:I actualy clicked on your wiki link and i'm reading it now.

I never posted a wiki link.

Oh my bad that was someone else sorry. :oops:

by **The God-Realm** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:03 pm

The united imperial sector wrote:
Democratic Koyro wrote:
How old are you?

I am 15 years old an i luv murika and how about you?

Fixed

Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here	A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc.	Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia-
Making the Nightmare End ~~2020~~ 2024	WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety	This Cell is intentionally blank.

Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here	A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc.	Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia-
Making the Nightmare End ~~2020~~ 2024	WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety	This Cell is intentionally blank.

North Korea renders armistice null and void,cuts S.K Hotline

Who is online