NATION

PASSWORD

The best alternative fuel

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What is the best alternative fuel for automobiles?

Hydrogen
37
31%
Biofuels
11
9%
Electricity
36
31%
Liquid Nitrogen
1
1%
Compressed Air
3
3%
Synthetic Fossil Fuels (Synthetic Petrol/Gasoline and synthetic Diesel)
13
11%
Other
17
14%
 
Total votes : 118

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:54 am

Gaveo wrote:Hydrogen.

This, when it becomes viable for everyday use.
password scrambled

User avatar
GrandKirche
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1488
Founded: Jan 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby GrandKirche » Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:56 am

Well, we could use poor people. I mean, there are a LOT of unemployed people using up resources and let's face it it'd get rid of everything ghastly.

Note: not my actual view. Give me nice nuclear any day.
Read "A Man For All Seasons". That explains most of what I believe in. Except the Catholic bits.

Outside of here I do lead a rather unusual and colourful life. As a Spinster.

I just want a nice man with a good accent and the manners of a Royal.

British, a really cliché G in LGBTQ gentleman a lot of the time.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:23 pm

Solar Shingles!
Image

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:23 pm

Genivaria wrote:Solar Shingles!
(Image)

That is pretty cool.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:28 pm

Divair wrote:
Genivaria wrote:Solar Shingles!
(Image)

That is pretty cool.

Apparently they take less time to install and are cheaper then traditional solar roof panels.
Not to mention that they far less ugly.
Last edited by Genivaria on Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:30 pm

Genivaria wrote:
Divair wrote:That is pretty cool.

Apparently they take less time to install and are cheaper then traditional solar roof panels.
Not to mention that they far less ugly.

I think traditional panels look pretty awesome, but I grew up with them all over the place :p (mandated by the government since the 50's)

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:31 pm

Electrcity with nuclear power.

though synthetic fossil fuels may prevail because they can use existing infrastructural.

Nuclear electric will require an expansion in grid capacity if it is to support cars and farm vehicles.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:32 pm

Divair wrote:
Genivaria wrote:Apparently they take less time to install and are cheaper then traditional solar roof panels.
Not to mention that they far less ugly.

I think traditional panels look pretty awesome, but I grew up with them all over the place :p (mandated by the government since the 50's)

Mandated? That's the first I've heard of it.
Back in Conroe there was a family that wanted to install solar panels on their roof to save on money, but the homeowners association complained and said it looked ugly and made them take it down.
That's what I heard from my uncle anyway.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:34 pm

Genivaria wrote:
Divair wrote:I think traditional panels look pretty awesome, but I grew up with them all over the place :p (mandated by the government since the 50's)

Mandated? That's the first I've heard of it.
Back in Conroe there was a family that wanted to install solar panels on their roof to save on money, but the homeowners association complained and said it looked ugly and made them take it down.
That's what I heard from my uncle anyway.

Even the new ones the home owners associations will block.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:34 pm

Genivaria wrote:
Divair wrote:I think traditional panels look pretty awesome, but I grew up with them all over the place :p (mandated by the government since the 50's)

Mandated? That's the first I've heard of it.
Back in Conroe there was a family that wanted to install solar panels on their roof to save on money, but the homeowners association complained and said it looked ugly and made them take it down.
That's what I heard from my uncle anyway.

Mandated indeed. Plan is to switch to 10% solar by 2020.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:35 pm

greed and death wrote:
Genivaria wrote:Mandated? That's the first I've heard of it.
Back in Conroe there was a family that wanted to install solar panels on their roof to save on money, but the homeowners association complained and said it looked ugly and made them take it down.
That's what I heard from my uncle anyway.

Even the new ones the home owners associations will block.

I fucking hate those people.

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65551
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:41 pm

I laik fluidized bed boilers.
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:43 pm

Orphan power. It's clean, renewable, and serves as a solution to two problems at once.
She/they

Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Phocidaea
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5316
Founded: Jul 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Phocidaea » Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:46 pm

For cars? Electricity.

Because you can produce electricity with nuclear, geothermal, and hydropower, all of which are efficient and, especially for the last two, practically inexhaustible.

The problem with hydrogen fuel is that even when the technology is developed it'll only solve the renewability problem- it'll still contribute significantly to global warming, unless all the vapor can be recaptured. Which is similar to recapturing all the CO2 and CO emissions from a fossil-fuel vehicle.
Last edited by Phocidaea on Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Call me Phoca.
Senator [Unknown] of the Liberal Democrats in NSG Senate.
Je suis Charlie: Because your feels don't justify murder.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:54 pm

Genivaria wrote:
greed and death wrote:Even the new ones the home owners associations will block.

I fucking hate those people.


Home owner's associations are why solar power is not picking up in the suburbs. Most of the panel installation is in urban areas where it is of limited use because of limited space to place them, and in rural areas ( where it is of great use).
Some states have passed laws to block the enforcement of such provisions.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:59 pm

greed and death wrote:
Genivaria wrote:I fucking hate those people.


Home owner's associations are why solar power is not picking up in the suburbs. Most of the panel installation is in urban areas where it is of limited use because of limited space to place them, and in rural areas ( where it is of great use).
Some states have passed laws to block the enforcement of such provisions.

Texas is apparently one of them.
http://www.dsireusa.org/incentives/ince ... Code=TX33R

Which makes my uncle's story weird.

User avatar
Screensaver
Diplomat
 
Posts: 529
Founded: Mar 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Screensaver » Sun Mar 10, 2013 2:25 pm

Phocidaea wrote:For cars? Electricity.

Because you can produce electricity with nuclear, geothermal, and hydropower, all of which are efficient and, especially for the last two, practically inexhaustible.

The problem with hydrogen fuel is that even when the technology is developed it'll only solve the renewability problem- it'll still contribute significantly to global warming, unless all the vapor can be recaptured. Which is similar to recapturing all the CO2 and CO emissions from a fossil-fuel vehicle.


Actually hydrogen cars emit no more water vapor in the atmosphere than a typical petrol or diesel powered car. Also it should be noted that while water vapor does trap more heat than carbon dioxide it only stays in the atmosphere for just a few days or weeks while carbon dioxide can stay for well over 100 years.

User avatar
Indira
Minister
 
Posts: 3339
Founded: Feb 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Indira » Sun Mar 10, 2013 2:46 pm

Biofuels, assuming we can get them from sources that don't effect our food supply

User avatar
Lordieth
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31603
Founded: Jun 18, 2010
New York Times Democracy

Postby Lordieth » Sun Mar 10, 2013 2:46 pm

In 600 BC it was discovered that rubbing a piece of amber with cat fur would cause it to attract small pieces of paper. This discovery led to the invention of the first apparatus for the mass production of static electricity, in which a number of cats are attached to the rim of a rotating wheel, aligned such that their fur comes into contact with a specially shaped block of amber.


I can't really find a credible source, and I doubt they used actual cats. More likely cat fur, or other animal fur. Not sure how renewable the energy would be. I haven't given the Cat Factory idea a great deal of thought.

Yet.
There was a signature here. It's gone now.

User avatar
Zottistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14894
Founded: Nov 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zottistan » Sun Mar 10, 2013 2:48 pm

Nuclear.
Ireland, BCL and LLM, Training Barrister, Cismale Bi Dude and Gym-Bro, Generally Boring Socdem Eurocuck

User avatar
Fintanland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1767
Founded: Aug 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Fintanland » Sun Mar 10, 2013 3:11 pm

Biofuels become inefficient when transported too far, but one good idea would be for larger farms to get their own small biofuel plant and run it with their own fuel crops, to run their agricultural machines.
Pro: Communists, Trotskyists, neo-Trotskyists, crypto-Trotskyists, union leaders, Communist union leaders, atheists, agnostics, long-haired weirdos, short-haired weirdos, football supporters, namby- pamby probation officers, foreign surgeons - headshrinkers, Wedgwood Benn, keg bitter, punk rock, glue- sniffers, Play For Today, squatters, Clive Jenkins, Roy Jenkins, Up Jenkins, up everybody's, Chinese restaurants

Anti: Thugs, bully-boys, psychopaths, sacked policemen, security guards, sacked security guards, racialists, Pakistani-bashers, queer-bashers, Chinese-bashers, anybody-bashers, Rear Admirals, Vice-Admirals, fascists, neo-fascists, crypto-fascists, loyalists, neo- loyalists, crypto-loyalists.

(With apologies to "The Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin")

User avatar
Screensaver
Diplomat
 
Posts: 529
Founded: Mar 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Screensaver » Sun Mar 10, 2013 3:40 pm

Indira wrote:Biofuels, assuming we can get them from sources that don't effect our food supply


I am curious. Why do you think that biofuels would be better than hydrogen, electricity, compressed air, liquid nitrogen, or synthetic petrol or diesel?

User avatar
Fintanland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1767
Founded: Aug 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Fintanland » Sun Mar 10, 2013 4:24 pm

Screensaver wrote:I am curious. Why do you think that biofuels would be better than hydrogen, electricity, compressed air, liquid nitrogen, or synthetic petrol or diesel?

My answer would be that plants use energy directly from the sun and the soil. That is a rather efficient way of doing things, and as soon as we can extract that energy from non-food crops, it is a direct way of putting the sun in your tank, in a manner of speaking.
Pro: Communists, Trotskyists, neo-Trotskyists, crypto-Trotskyists, union leaders, Communist union leaders, atheists, agnostics, long-haired weirdos, short-haired weirdos, football supporters, namby- pamby probation officers, foreign surgeons - headshrinkers, Wedgwood Benn, keg bitter, punk rock, glue- sniffers, Play For Today, squatters, Clive Jenkins, Roy Jenkins, Up Jenkins, up everybody's, Chinese restaurants

Anti: Thugs, bully-boys, psychopaths, sacked policemen, security guards, sacked security guards, racialists, Pakistani-bashers, queer-bashers, Chinese-bashers, anybody-bashers, Rear Admirals, Vice-Admirals, fascists, neo-fascists, crypto-fascists, loyalists, neo- loyalists, crypto-loyalists.

(With apologies to "The Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin")

User avatar
Northwest Slobovia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12548
Founded: Sep 16, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Northwest Slobovia » Sun Mar 10, 2013 4:45 pm

Screensaver wrote:
Indira wrote:Biofuels, assuming we can get them from sources that don't effect our food supply


I am curious. Why do you think that biofuels would be better than hydrogen, electricity, compressed air, liquid nitrogen, or synthetic petrol or diesel?

For starters, the ones in bold are just containers for moving energy from an existing power source to stick in a car. There's nothing wrong with that per se, but it's not adding adding any new source of energy to our supply. Because of that, there's the question of storage and transport efficiency: no process of transforming or moving energy is 100% efficient. Ya can't win, ya can't break even, and you can't get out of the game.

That leaves the synfuels. They can be made from coal or natural gas, in which case, they're just energy containers. Very useful ones, I might add, since a coal-burning car would suck mossy rocks. OTOH, both are targets for biofuels, especially diesel fuel.

So: biofuels. Their fundmental advantage is that they're another way to grab solar energy. They're not very efficient -- 2-4% overall energy conversion yields are pretty typical -- but they are in principle very cheap. I know of only two proposals for making them that don't compete with existing ag/forestry uses: algae and tequila. Well, alcohol from agave, but tequila sounds better. ;) Both sound promising from a technical standpoint, so the real question is cost.
Gollum died for your sins.
Power is an equal-opportunity corrupter.

User avatar
Blazedtown
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15177
Founded: Jun 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Blazedtown » Sun Mar 10, 2013 4:49 pm

Image
Go Vikings.
Sunnyvale, straight the fuck up.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Big Eyed Animation, Deblar, Kostane, Nanatsu no Tsuki, Pale Dawn, The Sinclarian Provinces, Turenia, Zetaopalatopia

Advertisement

Remove ads